Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Forcepoint Email Security [EOL] Logo

Forcepoint Email Security [EOL] pros and cons

Vendor: Forcepoint
3.9 out of 5
246 followers
Post review
 

Forcepoint Email Security [EOL] Pros review quotes

VK
Aug 17, 2021
It is good at data leakage prevention (DLP). You can create the data exfiltration profile while sending the emails, which is one of the key advantages of the solution.
ZR
May 4, 2020
The Forcepoint Email Security roadmap easily integrates with the data loss prevention (DLP) suite of Forcepoint. Therefore, the customer doesn't have to buy another solution for DLP.
SS
Aug 30, 2019
All of the filtering features are very nice.
Learn what your peers think about Forcepoint Email Security [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IM
Jan 29, 2020
The filtering of the solution is very good. You can do URL filtering and, while you need a custom URL to filter under other solutions like Symantec, here the solution covers most categories and the database.
JS
Jun 23, 2019
The feature I find most valuable is the web, email and DLP integration.
JD
Mar 30, 2021
The email and the web filter aspects of the solution are the most valuable features.
Kunjal Haria - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 13, 2022
Forcepoint Email Security is a good solution, and I don't have any issues with it. I found anti-spam and anti-spyware the most valuable features of Forcepoint Email Security.
WK
Feb 23, 2022
It's easier to deploy than other options.
SM
May 12, 2022
Unlike other competitors, it doesn't cause any performance issues.
EO
Jan 17, 2022
I like how versatile the options are. For example, we can set it where we are able to access and browse Facebook but we are denied the ability to post photos. There is also that ability integrate with Office 365 - SharePoint app.
 

Forcepoint Email Security [EOL] Cons review quotes

VK
Aug 17, 2021
Forcepoint is the best for DLP, but it is not better than other solutions in terms of phishing emails or threat protections on the email. It has less visibility over there. They might need to enhance these components because other solutions, such as Cisco Email Security and IronPort, have more advanced features. Forcepoint should focus more on threats and spam. They have a small database for spam. They must increase their solution's capability from this perspective.
ZR
May 4, 2020
It would be better if it were simpler to deploy on one or two machines instead of three or four machines.
SS
Aug 30, 2019
The reporting functionality needs to be improved, as it is not customizable.
Learn what your peers think about Forcepoint Email Security [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IM
Jan 29, 2020
We've fixed a couple of issues on the solution so far. It doesn't work perfectly all the time.
JS
Jun 23, 2019
I would like to see some improvement like cloud application and integration capabilities and the classification part is missing from the DLP.
JD
Mar 30, 2021
Technical support is lacking. It could be a lot better.
Kunjal Haria - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 13, 2022
An area for improvement in Forcepoint Email Security is technical support. The agents need to be more knowledgeable. The support also needs to be faster.
WK
Feb 23, 2022
The pricing could always be just a little bit better.
SM
May 12, 2022
Customer support could be better.
EO
Jan 17, 2022
I would like for deployment to be simplified.