Top 10 FOSSA Alternatives

Vendor: FOSSA

4.3 out of 5

15 reviews
92% willing to recommend

Top FOSSA Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to FOSSA based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Veracode, GitLab, and Snyk. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

FOSSA Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with FOSSA, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode excels in code analysis across numerous languages and integrates with developers' IDEs. In comparison, FOSSA offers strong policy management and tool compatibility. Veracode is ideal for enterprise-level security, while FOSSA efficiently manages open-source compliance and licenses.

Download FOSSA vs. Veracode Report

Pricing

Veracode's setup costs are regarded as moderate, while FOSSA is often seen as more budget-friendly. Veracode offers comprehensive features, whereas FOSSA is considered easier to implement.

View comparison

Pricing

Veracode's setup costs are regarded as moderate, while FOSSA is often seen as more budget-friendly. Veracode offers comprehensive features, whereas FOSSA is considered easier to implement.

GitLab

4.2 out of 5

GitLab

4.2 out of 5

GitLab offers a comprehensive CI/CD pipeline and collaboration features, excelling in containerized environments. In comparison, FOSSA provides effective open-source license compliance with strong interoperability. Tech buyers may choose GitLab for control in code management or FOSSA for precise compliance handling.

Download FOSSA vs. GitLab Report

Pricing

GitLab offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while FOSSA provides a more flexible approach, allowing for customization based on specific needs.

View comparison

Pricing

GitLab offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while FOSSA provides a more flexible approach, allowing for customization based on specific needs.

Snyk

4.1 out of 5

Snyk

4.1 out of 5

Snyk offers user-friendly integration and a comprehensive vulnerability database, appealing to developers. In comparison, FOSSA provides deep dependency scanning and a robust policy engine for license compliance. Snyk's cost may be higher, while FOSSA focuses on open-source management efficiency.

Download FOSSA vs. Snyk Report

Pricing

Snyk requires minimal initial setup costs, while FOSSA involves a higher initial expense, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Snyk requires minimal initial setup costs, while FOSSA involves a higher initial expense, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment.

Black Duck

3.8 out of 5

Black Duck

3.8 out of 5

Black Duck excels in integration capabilities across development tools, appealing to organizations seeking extensive connectivity. In comparison, FOSSA prioritizes automated, real-time vulnerability and license checks, offering fast deployment and cost efficiency, which may attract tech buyers prioritizing rapid responses and streamlined operations.

Download Black Duck vs. FOSSA Report

Pricing

Black Duck incurs a higher initial setup cost, while FOSSA offers a more budget-friendly setup option. These differences highlight variations in their pricing approach.

View comparison

Pricing

Black Duck incurs a higher initial setup cost, while FOSSA offers a more budget-friendly setup option. These differences highlight variations in their pricing approach.

Mend.io

4.2 out of 5

Mend.io

4.2 out of 5

Mend.io excels in vulnerability detection and license management, offering robust security and compliance features. In comparison, FOSSA integrates efficiently with developer workflows and supports deep dependency scanning. Tech buyers may prefer Mend.io for comprehensive governance or FOSSA for developer-centric integration.

Download FOSSA vs. Mend.io Report

Pricing

Mend.io offers competitive setup costs with straightforward integration, while FOSSA presents a higher initial cost with more complex deployment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Mend.io offers competitive setup costs with straightforward integration, while FOSSA presents a higher initial cost with more complex deployment requirements.

Sonatype Lifecycle

4.2 out of 5

Sonatype Lifecycle

4.2 out of 5

Sonatype Lifecycle offers proactive security and seamless DevOps integration, ideal for enterprises needing continuous monitoring with minimal false positives. In comparison, FOSSA excels in interoperability and legal compliance, with deep dependency scanning and compatibility with various CI environments, appealing to developer-focused teams.

Download FOSSA vs. Sonatype Lifecycle Report

Pricing

Sonatype Lifecycle typically involves a more substantial setup cost compared to FOSSA, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Sonatype Lifecycle typically involves a more substantial setup cost compared to FOSSA, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.

JFrog Xray

4.0 out of 5

JFrog Xray

4.0 out of 5

FOSSA excels in cost-effective open-source license management, making it ideal for compliance-focused developers. In comparison, JFrog Xray's deep package scanning and integration with JFrog Artifactory offer advanced security insights, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive development lifecycle security.

Download FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray Report

Pricing

FOSSA has a more involved setup cost, while JFrog Xray offers a more streamlined initial setup that may result in lower upfront fees. Their different approaches reflect in user feedback and influence the overall perceived value of each solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

4.6 out of 5

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

4.6 out of 5

FOSSA provides seamless integration and excellent interoperability with developer tools, excelling in legal policy features. In comparison, Checkmarx emphasizes comprehensive security scans, valued for its robust security insights, but faces criticism for its pricing model and update speed, highlighting unique strengths for tech buyers.

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. FOSSA Report

Pricing

FOSSA has a lower setup cost compared to Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation. Checkmarx requires a higher investment upfront, which may be more suitable for larger enterprises.

View comparison

Pricing

FlexNet Code Insight

2.0 out of 5

FlexNet Code Insight

2.0 out of 5

FlexNet Code Insight is a single integrated solution for open source license compliance and security. Find vulnerabilities and remediate associated risk, while you build your products and during their lifecycle. Manage open source license compliance. And add automation to your processes and implement a formal OSS strategy and policy that balances business benefits and risk management.

View comparison

Related categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Application Security Tools

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)