Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs FOSSA comparison

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Read 15 FOSSA reviews

2,420 Views
1,585 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

FOSSA and Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis both compete in the realm of open-source software management. FOSSA appears to have the upper hand due to its seamless integration into build pipelines and high compatibility with developer ecosystems.

Features: FOSSA is known for its robust dependency scanning features during build-time, seamless integration into build pipelines, and high compatibility with various developer ecosystems. Checkmarx offers comprehensive security scans, early-stage vulnerability detection in open-source applications, and strong integration with developer tools.

Room for Improvement: FOSSA could enhance distribution acknowledgments, implement snippet matching, and improve security vulnerability scanning. Checkmarx needs to address the speed of updates, improve the user interface's efficiency, and offer more competitive pricing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FOSSA offers flexible deployment options across Public Cloud and On-premises environments with excellent support. Checkmarx supports various deployment options but has experienced some scaling and response time challenges, although the support has improved over time.

Pricing and ROI: FOSSA's pricing is competitive but mid-range, with costs often justified by the benefits provided. Checkmarx's pricing is higher with a complex licensing model. Both products are seen to generate substantial ROI, with FOSSA recognized for its operational benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. FOSSA Report (Updated: October 2024).

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. FOSSA

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

8th

Average Rating

9.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

FOSSA

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is 2.6%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FOSSA is 3.7%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

Sujata Sujata Ghadage

Sr Manager consultant - Digital assurance Services at ADROSONIC

Mar 14, 2024

Offers great security in the area of vulnerability detection

I am more into the SAST side, which is related to Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis. Checkmarx recently introduced DAST and software composition analysis, but I am not aware much about it. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is a good tool with many rules, ensuring that the product offers vulnerability detection and provides good coverage. Though my company has not integrated Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis into SDLC, we do plan to do it in the future. The product helped our company deal with a major security breach when we had to deal with a lot of SQL-related issues stemming from some of the codes, which were written earlier not using a proper framework, owing to which there were many vulnerabilities in respect to LDAP, cross-site attacks and SQL injection. The product's most effective part for identifying vulnerabilities stems from the tool's SAST capabilities. The product's dashboard has improved our company's vulnerability management processes. The tool shows a proper dashboard and offers frequent remediation options and proper compliance status, which helps to know about the number of vulnerabilities and the dashboards. The accuracy of the product's vulnerability detection is 95 percent. At an organizational level, the product is hosted on the cloud. In my company, we use the product to scan reports. I don't see anything complex in the solution from the maintenance point of view. The product is deployed in a single location where multiple people use it. The product can be described as an access-based solution. For a particular project or depending on an assignment, access is given to certain people for a month or two. After the completion of a project or assignment, the product's access to a person is removed and given to another person who needs the solution for another project. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. It is one of the best tools in the market. The product provides good coverage and ensures that the users experience a return on investment from its use in their environment. The tool is also helpful in dealing with vulnerabilities and false positives. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Hanumanth Ramsetty

Software Engineer at Tech Mahindra Limited

Oct 24, 2024

Proactively mitigate deployment vulnerabilities with seamless dependency tracking

In our current project, we are using FOSSA as part of our CI/CD pipeline. It is used to scan our projects to ensure that our dependencies are up to date and do not introduce vulnerabilities to our code Before using FOSSA, we could only identify issues after deployment in the Cloud Run. Now, with…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the strong points of this solution is that it allows you to incorporate it into a CICB pipeline. It has the ability to do incremental scans. If you scan a very large application, it might take two hours to do the initial scan. The subsequent scans, as people are making changes to the app, scan the Delta and are very fast. That's a really nice implementation. The way they have incorporated the functionality of the incremental scans is something to be aware of. It is quite good. It has been very solid. We haven't really had any issues, and it does what it advertises to do very nicely."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The integration part is easy...It's a stable solution right now."

"The tool's visual scan analysis shows me all the libraries' vulnerabilities and license types. It helps identify the most complex issues with licenses. It provides good visibility. SCA shows me all libraries that are vulnerable and the extent of their vulnerability."

"I appreciate the user-friendly interface. The GUI is excellent, providing detailed information on outdated versions, including version numbers and the flow of library calls. This allows me to plan and prioritize library changes based on potential vulnerabilities, even if the affected library is indirectly used in my project. The tool offers specific guidance on addressing these issues."

"What's most valuable in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is its ability to identify vulnerabilities in open-source components, especially if some critical issues exist."

"Checkmarx unifies all the features in its service."

"The product is stable and scalable."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis pros

"The support team has just been amazing, and it helps us to have a great support team from FOSSA. They are there to triage and answer all our questions which come up by using their product."

"I found FOSSA's out-of-the-box policy engine to be accurate and that it was tuned appropriately to the settings that we were looking for. The policy engine is pretty straightforward... I find it to be very straightforward to make small modifications to, but it's very rare that we have to make modifications to it. It's easy to use. It's a four-category system that handles most cases pretty well."

"FOSSA provided us with contextualized, easily actionable intelligence that alerted us to compliance issues. I could tell FOSSA exactly what I cared about and they would tell me when something was out of policy. I don't want to hear from the compliance tool unless I have an issue that I need to deal with. That was what was great about FOSSA is that it was basically "Here's my policy and only send me an alert if there's something without a policy." I thought that it was really good at doing that."

"I am impressed with the tool’s seamless integration and quick results."

"The scalability is excellent."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to identify all of the components in a build, and then surface the licenses that are associated with it, allowing us to make a decision as to whether or not we allow a team to use the components. That eliminates the risk that comes with running consumer software that contains open source components."

"FOSSA suggests solutions for dependency mismatches."

"FOSSA is easy to use and set up, provides relatively accurate results, and doesn't require armies of people to get value from its use."

More FOSSA pros

Cons

"I have received complaints from my customers that the pricing could be improved."

"Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis should improve dynamic analysis."

"Its pricing can be improved. It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive. It is a good tool, and we're still figuring out how to fully leverage it. There are some questions regarding whether it can scan the MuleSoft code. We don't know if this is a gap in the tool or something else. This is one thing that we're just working through right now, and I am not ready to conclude that there is a weakness there. MuleSoft is kind of its own beast, and we're trying to see how we get it to work with Checkmarx."

"Parts of the implementation process could improve by making it more user-friendly."

"API security is an area with shortcomings that needs improvement."

"It can have better licensing models."

"I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten."

"In terms of areas for improvement, what could be improved in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is pricing because customers always compare the pricing among secure DevOps solutions in the market. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis has a lot of competitors yet its features aren't much different. Pricing is the first thing customers consider, and from a partner perspective, if you can offer affordable pricing to your customers, it's more likely you'll have a winning deal. The performance of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis also needs improvement because sometimes, it's slow, and in particular, scanning could take several hours."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis cons

"Security scanning is an area for improvement. At this point, our experience is that we're only scanning for license information in components, and we're not scanning for security vulnerability information. We don't have access to that data. We use other tools for that. It would be an improvement for us to use one tool instead of two, so that we just have to go through one process instead of two."

"For open-source management, FOSSA's out-of-the-box policy engine is easy to use, but the list of licenses is not as complete as we would like it to be. They should add more open-source licenses to the selection."

"If you have thousands of applications, organizing them all into teams or tags is challenging."

"While running a FOSSA scan, it takes time for the results to reflect in the FOSSA UI portal."

"On the dashboard, there should be an option to increase the column width so that we can see the complete name of the GitHub repository. Currently, on the dashboard, we see the list of projects, but to see the complete name, you have to hover your mouse over an item, which is annoying."

"I want the product to include binary scanning which is missing at the moment. Binary scanning includes code and component matching through dependency management. It also includes the actual scanning and reverse engineering of the boundaries and finding out what is inside."

"On the legal and policy sides, there is some room for improvement. I know that our legal team has raised complaints about having to approve the same dependency multiple times, as opposed to having them it across the entire organization."

"I would like the FOSSA API to be broader. I would like not to have to interact with the GUI at all, to do the work that I want to do. I would like them to do API-first development, rather than a focus on the GUI."

More FOSSA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We don't have a license. The usage is limited to one, two, three, five, or ten people. It is currently used for all projects, and there are plans to increase its usage."

"My customers need to pay for the licensing part, and they need to opt for an annual subscription."

"It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive."

"The license model is somewhat perplexing as it comprises multiple aspects that can be confusing for customers. The model is determined by the number of registered users and the number of projects being scanned, along with a third component that adds to the complexity."

"Pricing for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis needs to be competitive."

"The solution's pricing is good and reasonable because you can literally use a lot of it for free."

"The solution's cost is a five out of ten."

"Its price is reasonable as compared to the market. It is competitively priced in comparison to other similar solutions on the market. It is also quite affordable in terms of the value that it delivers as compared to its alternative of hiring a team."

"FOSSA is a fairly priced product. It is not either cheaper or expensive. The pricing lies somewhere in the middle. The solution is worth the money that we are spending to use it."

"FOSSA is not cheap, but their offering is top-notch. It is very much a "you get what you pay for" scenario. Regardless of the price, I highly recommend FOSSA."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

35%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Logistics Company

Manufacturing Company

28%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

The tool's visual scan analysis shows me all the libraries' vulnerabilities and license types. It helps identify the most complex issues with licenses. It provides good visibility. SCA shows me all...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

We have a license. The usage is limited to one, two, three, five, or ten people. It is currently used for all projects, and there are plans to increase its usage.

What needs improvement with Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis should improve dynamic analysis.

What do you like most about FOSSA?

I am impressed with the tool’s seamless integration and quick results.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FOSSA?

The solution's pricing is good and reasonable because you can literally use a lot of it for free. You have to pay for the features you need, which I think is fair. If you want to get value for free...

What needs improvement with FOSSA?

If you have thousands of applications, organizing them all into teams or tags is challenging. There is a point where you start using FOSSA at a very large scale, and the user interface needs to adj...

Black Duck vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Comparisons

Compared 34% of the time

JFrog Xray vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 23% of the time

Semgrep vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 7% of the time

Mend.io vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Competitors

Black Duck vs FOSSA

Compared 45% of the time

Snyk vs FOSSA

Compared 17% of the time

Mend.io vs FOSSA

Compared 12% of the time

JFrog Xray vs FOSSA

Compared 7% of the time

Veracode vs FOSSA

Compared 3% of the time

More FOSSA Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

November 2024

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis report

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis product report

Download FOSSA product report

November 2024

Also Known As

CxSCA

No data available

Learn More

Checkmarx

Video not available

Overview

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis (SCA) helps organizations manage the risks associated with open source and third-party components in their software applications. While leveraging open source libraries and third-party dependencies is common practice, it can also introduce security vulnerabilities and license risks.

Checkmarx SCA offers a multifaceted approach to managing these risks by:

Automatically scanning project repositories, build configurations, and manifests to create a comprehensive inventory of all components, including version information and associated licenses.
Performing vulnerability assessments on each component, including identifying and prioritizing actual exploitable or reachable vulnerabilities.
Protecting organizations from software supply chain attacks involving malicious packages, such as the XZ Utils backdoor.
Identifying licenses associated and providing insights into license obligations, restrictions, and potential conflicts.
Integrating seamlessly into existing development workflows and CI/CD pipelines.
Providing actionable remediation guidance to help organizations address identified vulnerabilities and compliance issues effectively.

Up to 90% of any piece of software is from open source, creating countless dependencies and areas of risk to manage. FOSSA is the most reliable automated policy engine for legal teams to maintain license compliance, security to fix vulnerabilities, and engineering to improve code quality across the entire software supply chain. As the only developer-native open source management platform, FOSSA fully integrates with your existing CI/CD pipeline to provide complete visibility and context earlier in the software development lifecycle. For the first time, teams can collaboratively shift left and audit, analyze, control, and remediate license issues and vulnerabilities right in their existing workflows.

Sample Customers

AXA, Liveperson, Aaron's, Playtech, Morningstar

AppDyanmic, Uber, Twitter, Zendesk, Confluent