Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs Mend.io comparison

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Read 29 Mend.io reviews

5,953 Views
3,567 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Mend.io and Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis compete in the software security tools market, focusing on managing software vulnerabilities and open-source usage. Mend.io has an upper hand with its focus on Open Source dependency scanning and policy automation, while Checkmarx excels in early security checks and comprehensive scans.

Features: Mend.io provides inventory management, fix suggestions, and policy automation to manage vulnerabilities effectively. Its integration with continuous integration stacks and support for multiple languages adds to its value. Conversely, Checkmarx offers early integration of security checks, comprehensive scans for vulnerabilities and licenses, and ease of integration with developer tools, aiding developers in maintaining secure applications.

Room for Improvement: Mend.io could enhance its notification systems, expand language support, and improve UI responsiveness. Checkmarx needs to be more competitive in pricing, increase support effectiveness, and accelerate vulnerability update delivery. Both solutions could streamline their user interfaces and reporting tools for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mend.io is flexible with deployments across Public and Private Clouds, offering highly rated customer support through multiple channels, ensuring seamless integration into client workflows. Checkmarx, with availability on Public and On-premises Cloud, offers robust technical service but could improve its somewhat convoluted support process. Both rate highly in customer service, resolving inquiries efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: Mend.io might seem costly initially, but it offers comprehensive features and reduces manual processes, providing tangible ROI through compliance risk avoidance. Checkmarx delivers significant ROI with effective security enhancements, although its pricing structure is considered complex and comparatively high. Both products offer extensive capabilities, but pricing adjustments could enhance market competitiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. Mend.io Report (Updated: October 2024).

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. Mend.io

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

8th

Average Rating

9.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mend.io

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (17th), Static Code Analysis (4th), Software Supply Chain Security (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is 2.6%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mend.io is 8.7%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

Sujata Sujata Ghadage

Sr Manager consultant - Digital assurance Services at ADROSONIC

Mar 14, 2024

Offers great security in the area of vulnerability detection

I am more into the SAST side, which is related to Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis. Checkmarx recently introduced DAST and software composition analysis, but I am not aware much about it. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is a good tool with many rules, ensuring that the product offers vulnerability detection and provides good coverage. Though my company has not integrated Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis into SDLC, we do plan to do it in the future. The product helped our company deal with a major security breach when we had to deal with a lot of SQL-related issues stemming from some of the codes, which were written earlier not using a proper framework, owing to which there were many vulnerabilities in respect to LDAP, cross-site attacks and SQL injection. The product's most effective part for identifying vulnerabilities stems from the tool's SAST capabilities. The product's dashboard has improved our company's vulnerability management processes. The tool shows a proper dashboard and offers frequent remediation options and proper compliance status, which helps to know about the number of vulnerabilities and the dashboards. The accuracy of the product's vulnerability detection is 95 percent. At an organizational level, the product is hosted on the cloud. In my company, we use the product to scan reports. I don't see anything complex in the solution from the maintenance point of view. The product is deployed in a single location where multiple people use it. The product can be described as an access-based solution. For a particular project or depending on an assignment, access is given to certain people for a month or two. After the completion of a project or assignment, the product's access to a person is removed and given to another person who needs the solution for another project. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. It is one of the best tools in the market. The product provides good coverage and ensures that the users experience a return on investment from its use in their environment. The tool is also helpful in dealing with vulnerabilities and false positives. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Jeffrey Harker

System Manager of Cloud Engineering at Common Spirit

May 12, 2022

Easy to use, great for finding vulnerabilities, and simple to set up

Finding vulnerabilities is pretty easy. Mend (formerly WhiteSource) does a great job of that and we had quite a few when we first put this in place. Governance up until that time had been manual and when we tried to do manual governance of a large codebase, our chances of success were pretty minimal. Mend (formerly WhiteSource) does a very good job of finding the open-source, checking the versions, and making sure they're secure. They notify us of critical high, medium, and low impacts, and if anything is wrong. We find the product very easy to use and we use it as a core part of our strategy for scanning product code moving toward release. We use Mend (formerly WhiteSource) Smart Fix. I’d say pretty much everything in Mend (formerly WhiteSource) is easy to use. We really don't have too much difficulty using the product at all. I've implemented other scanners and tools and had much more trouble with those products than we've ever had with Mend (formerly WhiteSource). That’s extremely important. It's hard to sell to some of these teams to put any level of overhead on top of their product development efforts and the fact that Mend (formerly WhiteSource) is as easy as it is to use is a critical aspect of adoption here. It scores very highly on that scale. Mend (formerly WhiteSource) Smart Fix helps our developers fix vulnerable transitive dependencies. It's all very helpful to our development community. First of all, we're able to find that there are issues. Second of all, we're able to figure out very quickly what needs to be done to remediate the issues. Mend (formerly WhiteSource) helped reduce our mean time to resolution since adopting it. A lot of it is process improvement and technical aspects that can tell us how to go about remediating the issues. We get that out of Mend (formerly WhiteSource). Making the developers aware that these issues are there and insisting they be corrected and making the effort to do that visibly is very valuable to us. Overall, Mend (formerly WhiteSource) helped dramatically reduce the number of open-source software vulnerabilities running in our production at any given point in time. I won't give metrics, however, it's fair to say that our state before and after Mend (formerly WhiteSource) is dramatically different and moved in a positive direction. Mend's ability to integrate our developer's existing workflows, including their IDE repository and CI is good. Azure DevOps is really important. That's what the pipelines are. That's a very important piece of the entire puzzle. If this was just an external scanner where periodically we'd go through and scan our repos and give them a report, we’d do that with pen testing products, for example, for security testing. The problem is, by the time they get those reports, they've already shipped the code to multiple environments and it's too late to stop the train. With these features being baked into the pipelines like this, they know immediately. As a result, we're able to quickly take action to remediate findings.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What's most valuable in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is its ability to identify vulnerabilities in open-source components, especially if some critical issues exist."

"The integration part is easy...It's a stable solution right now."

"I appreciate the user-friendly interface. The GUI is excellent, providing detailed information on outdated versions, including version numbers and the flow of library calls. This allows me to plan and prioritize library changes based on potential vulnerabilities, even if the affected library is indirectly used in my project. The tool offers specific guidance on addressing these issues."

"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is the comprehensive security scan."

"Checkmarx unifies all the features in its service."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"One of the strong points of this solution is that it allows you to incorporate it into a CICB pipeline. It has the ability to do incremental scans. If you scan a very large application, it might take two hours to do the initial scan. The subsequent scans, as people are making changes to the app, scan the Delta and are very fast. That's a really nice implementation. The way they have incorporated the functionality of the incremental scans is something to be aware of. It is quite good. It has been very solid. We haven't really had any issues, and it does what it advertises to do very nicely."

"The tool's visual scan analysis shows me all the libraries' vulnerabilities and license types. It helps identify the most complex issues with licenses. It provides good visibility. SCA shows me all libraries that are vulnerable and the extent of their vulnerability."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis pros

"The most valuable feature is the inventory, where it compiles a list of all of the third-party libraries that we have on our estate."

"Attribution and license due diligence reports help us with aggregating the necessary data that we, in turn, have to provide to satisfy the various licenses copyright and component usage disclosures in our software."

"WhiteSource is unique in the scanning of open-source licenses. Additionally, the vulnerabilities aspect of the solution is a benefit. We don't use WhiteSource in the whole organization, but we use it for some projects. There we receive a sense of the vulnerabilities of the open-source components, which improves our security work. The reports are automated which is useful."

"There are multiple different integrations there. We use Mend for CI/CD that goes through Azure as well. It works seamlessly. We never have any issues with it."

"We use a lot of open sources with a variety of containers, and the different open sources come with different licenses. Some come with dual licenses, some are risky and some are not. All our three use cases are equally important to us and we found WhiteSource handles them decently."

"The overall support that we receive is pretty good. "

"It gives us full visibility into what we're using, what needs to be updated, and what's vulnerable, which helps us make better decisions."

"The results and the dashboard they provide are good."

More Mend.io pros

Cons

"Its pricing can be improved. It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive. It is a good tool, and we're still figuring out how to fully leverage it. There are some questions regarding whether it can scan the MuleSoft code. We don't know if this is a gap in the tool or something else. This is one thing that we're just working through right now, and I am not ready to conclude that there is a weakness there. MuleSoft is kind of its own beast, and we're trying to see how we get it to work with Checkmarx."

"It can have better licensing models."

"I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten."

"In terms of areas for improvement, what could be improved in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is pricing because customers always compare the pricing among secure DevOps solutions in the market. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis has a lot of competitors yet its features aren't much different. Pricing is the first thing customers consider, and from a partner perspective, if you can offer affordable pricing to your customers, it's more likely you'll have a winning deal. The performance of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis also needs improvement because sometimes, it's slow, and in particular, scanning could take several hours."

"Personally, I currently use it as a standalone tool without integrating it with other systems, and it meets my needs adequately. As a suggestion, I request on considering to add a "what if" feature to the application. Currently, when the tool identifies issues and suggests updates, if I want to explore different scenarios, I need to prepare another file, turn it into a ZIP, and run the analysis again. It would be more convenient if there was a "what if" option in the GUI. This feature could simulate a run, allowing me to quickly check the impact of changing one or more files or versions without the need for a full rerun."

"Parts of the implementation process could improve by making it more user-friendly."

"Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis should improve dynamic analysis."

"The quality of technical support has decreased over time, and it is not as good as it used to be."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis cons

"The only thing that I don't find support for on Mend Prioritize is C++."

"It should support multiple SBOM formats to be able to integrate with old industry standards."

"Mend lets you create custom policies. They're not too complicated to set up, but it would be helpful if they had some preconfigured policies to match what we have in Azure DevOps. That would save us a lot of time. It's tedious to configure the policies manually, and I lack the capacity to do it right now. Other products have preconfigured packs and templates, and Mend doesn't."

"On the reporting side, they could make some improvements. They are making the reports better and better, but sometimes it takes a lot of time to generate a report for our entire organization."

"WhiteSource needs improvement in the scanning of the containers and images with distinguishing the layers."

"WhiteSource Prioritize should be expanded to cover more than Java and JavaScript."

"We specifically use this solution within our CICD pipelines in Azure DevOps, and we would like to have a gate so that if the score falls below a certain value then we can block the pipeline from running."

"At times, the latency of getting items out of the findings after they're remediated is higher than it should be."

More Mend.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license model is somewhat perplexing as it comprises multiple aspects that can be confusing for customers. The model is determined by the number of registered users and the number of projects being scanned, along with a third component that adds to the complexity."

"It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive."

"Pricing for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis needs to be competitive."

"We don't have a license. The usage is limited to one, two, three, five, or ten people. It is currently used for all projects, and there are plans to increase its usage."

"My customers need to pay for the licensing part, and they need to opt for an annual subscription."

"Mend is costly but not overly expensive. The license was quite expensive this year, but we managed to negotiate the price down to the same as last year. At the same time, it's a good value. We're getting what we're paying for and still not using all the features. We could probably get more out of the tool and make it more valuable. At the moment, we don't have the capacity to do that."

"The version that we are using, WhiteSource Bolt, is a free integration with Azure DevOps."

"The solution involves a yearly licensing fee."

"It is fairly priced."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Over the last two years, they have tried to add more and more features to their license packages, but the price is a little bit high, comparatively."

"We always negotiate for the best price possible, and as far as I know, Mend has done an excellent job with their pricing. Our management is happy with the pricing, which has led to renewals."

"Pricing and licensing are comparable to other tools. When we started, it was less than our existing solution. I can't go into specifics, but it isn't cheap."

More Mend.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

35%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Logistics Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

The tool's visual scan analysis shows me all the libraries' vulnerabilities and license types. It helps identify the most complex issues with licenses. It provides good visibility. SCA shows me all...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

We have a license. The usage is limited to one, two, three, five, or ten people. It is currently used for all projects, and there are plans to increase its usage.

What needs improvement with Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis should improve dynamic analysis.

How does WhiteSource compare with SonarQube?

Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...

How does WhiteSource compare with Black Duck?

We researched Black Duck but ultimately chose WhiteSource when looking for an application security tool. WhiteSource is a software solution that enables agile open source security and license compl...

What do you like most about Mend.io?

The best feature is that the Mend R&D team does their due diligence for all the vulnerabilities. In case they observe any important or critical vulnerabilities, such as the Log4j-related vulner...

Black Duck vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Comparisons

Compared 34% of the time

JFrog Xray vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 23% of the time

Semgrep vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 7% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Mend.io

Compared 26% of the time

Black Duck vs Mend.io

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs Mend.io

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs Mend.io

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Mend.io

Compared 6% of the time

More Mend.io Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

November 2024

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis report

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis product report

Download Mend.io product report

October 2024

Also Known As

CxSCA

WhiteSource, Mend SCA, Mend.io Supply Chain Defender, Mend SAST

Learn More

Checkmarx

Overview

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis (SCA) helps organizations manage the risks associated with open source and third-party components in their software applications. While leveraging open source libraries and third-party dependencies is common practice, it can also introduce security vulnerabilities and license risks.

Checkmarx SCA offers a multifaceted approach to managing these risks by:

Automatically scanning project repositories, build configurations, and manifests to create a comprehensive inventory of all components, including version information and associated licenses.
Performing vulnerability assessments on each component, including identifying and prioritizing actual exploitable or reachable vulnerabilities.
Protecting organizations from software supply chain attacks involving malicious packages, such as the XZ Utils backdoor.
Identifying licenses associated and providing insights into license obligations, restrictions, and potential conflicts.
Integrating seamlessly into existing development workflows and CI/CD pipelines.
Providing actionable remediation guidance to help organizations address identified vulnerabilities and compliance issues effectively.

Mend.io is a software composition analysis tool that secures what developers create. The solution provides an automated reduction of the software attack surface, reduces developer burdens, and accelerates app delivery. Mend.io provides open-source analysis with its in-house and other multiple sources of software vulnerabilities. In addition, the solution offers license and policy violation alerts, has great pipeline integration, and, since it is a SaaS (software as a service), it doesn’t require you to physically maintain servers or data centers for any implementation. Not only does Mend.io reduce enterprise application security risk, it also helps developers meet deadlines faster.

Mend.io Features

Mend.io has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Vulnerability analysis
Automated remediation
Seamless integration
Business prioritization
Limitless scalability
Intuitive interface
Language support
Integration
Continuous monitoring
Remediation suggestions
Customization

Mend.io Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Mend.io. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Easy to use: The Mend.io platform is very user-friendly and easy to set up.

Third-party libraries: The solution eases the process of keeping track of all the used third-party dependencies within a product. It not only scans for the pure occurrence (also transitively) but also takes care of licenses and vulnerabilities.

Static code analysis: With Mend.io’s static code analysis, you can quickly identify security weaknesses in custom code across desktop, web, and mobile applications.

Broad support: Mend.io provides 27 different programming languages and various programming frameworks.

Easy integration: Mend.io makes integration very easy with existing DevOps environments and CI/CD pipelines so developers don’t need to manually configure or trigger the scan.

Ultra-fast scanning engine: The solution’s scanning engine generates results up to ten times faster than legacy SAST solutions.

Unified developer experience: Mend.io has a unified developer experience inside the code repository that shows side-by-side security alerts and remediation suggestions for custom code and open-source code.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Mend.io solution.

Jeffrey H., System Manager of Cloud Engineering at Common Spirit, says, “Finding vulnerabilities is pretty easy. Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) does a great job of that and we had quite a few when we first put this in place. Mend.io does a very good job of finding the open-source, checking the versions, and making sure they're secure. They notify us of critical high, medium, and low impacts, and if anything is wrong. We find the product very easy to use and we use it as a core part of our strategy for scanning product code moving toward release.”

PeerSpot reviewer Ben D., Head of Software Engineering at a legal firm, mentions, “The way WhiteSource scans the code is great. It’s easy to identify and remediate open source vulnerabilities using this solution. WhiteSource helped reduce our mean time to resolution since we adopted the product. In terms of integration, it's pretty easy.”

An IT Service Manager at a wholesaler/distributor comments, “Mend.io provides threat detection and an excellent UI in a highly stable solution, with outstanding technical support.”

Another reviewer, Kevin D., Intramural OfficialIntramural at Northeastern University, states, "The vulnerability analysis is the best aspect of the solution."

Sample Customers

AXA, Liveperson, Aaron's, Playtech, Morningstar

Microsoft, Autodesk, NCR, Target, IBM, vodafone, Siemens, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates