Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs Snyk comparison

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Read 43 Snyk reviews

9,185 Views
6,676 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Snyk and Checkmarx are competing in the security software category, focusing on vulnerability detection and security checks. Snyk appears to hold an advantage due to its ease of use and extensive integrations compared to Checkmarx, which excels in comprehensive scans and configurability.

Features: Snyk is favored for its easy integrations and self-service functionalities, offering accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives and support for multiple integration points like IDEs and CI/CD environments. Its simplicity and extensive integrations are significant strengths. Checkmarx is renowned for its thorough security scans and configurability, providing detailed security assessments and license compliance checks, excelling in maintaining security right from the design stage for open-source applications.

Room for Improvement: Snyk could enhance its offerings by adding security scanning types like SAST or DAST, expanding language support, and improving its licensing compliance features, especially for specific ownership scenarios. Better notification and reporting systems are also desired. Checkmarx might improve its pricing model, handle false positives better, and refine integration processes to be more user-friendly while expanding dynamic analysis capabilities and simplifying its licensing model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Snyk supports various public and private cloud deployment environments, with proactive and responsive customer service being appreciated for swift issue resolution. Checkmarx provides flexible deployment options for both on-premises and cloud environments, with customer feedback highlighting its effective technical support in resolving setup and usage issues.

Pricing and ROI: Snyk is generally seen as affordable with clear licensing terms, providing good ROI through reduced problem-solving time, although some perceive it as expensive. Checkmarx is considered expensive, with a complex licensing model. Users often weigh its thorough security features against its cost compared to cheaper market alternatives.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. Snyk Report (Updated: October 2024).

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. Snyk

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

8th

Average Rating

9.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Container Security (7th), Software Development Analytics (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is 2.6%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 18.0%, up from 17.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

Sujata Sujata Ghadage

Sr Manager consultant - Digital assurance Services at ADROSONIC

Mar 14, 2024

Offers great security in the area of vulnerability detection

I am more into the SAST side, which is related to Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis. Checkmarx recently introduced DAST and software composition analysis, but I am not aware much about it. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is a good tool with many rules, ensuring that the product offers vulnerability detection and provides good coverage. Though my company has not integrated Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis into SDLC, we do plan to do it in the future. The product helped our company deal with a major security breach when we had to deal with a lot of SQL-related issues stemming from some of the codes, which were written earlier not using a proper framework, owing to which there were many vulnerabilities in respect to LDAP, cross-site attacks and SQL injection. The product's most effective part for identifying vulnerabilities stems from the tool's SAST capabilities. The product's dashboard has improved our company's vulnerability management processes. The tool shows a proper dashboard and offers frequent remediation options and proper compliance status, which helps to know about the number of vulnerabilities and the dashboards. The accuracy of the product's vulnerability detection is 95 percent. At an organizational level, the product is hosted on the cloud. In my company, we use the product to scan reports. I don't see anything complex in the solution from the maintenance point of view. The product is deployed in a single location where multiple people use it. The product can be described as an access-based solution. For a particular project or depending on an assignment, access is given to certain people for a month or two. After the completion of a project or assignment, the product's access to a person is removed and given to another person who needs the solution for another project. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. It is one of the best tools in the market. The product provides good coverage and ensures that the users experience a return on investment from its use in their environment. The tool is also helpful in dealing with vulnerabilities and false positives. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Jayashree Acharyya

Director at PepsiCo

Mar 4, 2024

Used for image scanning and identifying vulnerabilities, but its integration with other services could be improved

The solution has improved or streamlined our process a lot for securing container images. We wanted to make sure we are deploying the secure Docker images. Snyk allowed us to check whether it is following our standard of docker images or not. We use Azure DevOps as our platform, and Snyk's integration with Azure DevOps was okay. However, Snyk's integration with JFrog Artifactory didn't go well. We use JFrog Artifactory to store the artifacts we download. We wanted to integrate Snyk with JFrog Artifactory to scan the binary artifacts we downloaded, but that broke our JFrog Artifactory for some reason. Instead of using it there, we are calling it directly from the pipeline. Snyk's automation features significantly reduced remediation times a couple of times. Sometimes, our developers scan the code from the environment and find some Java vulnerabilities. We fixed those vulnerabilities in the lower environment itself. The solution does not require any maintenance. The accuracy of Snyk's vulnerability detection is pretty good compared to other tools. I rate the solution's vulnerability detection feature an eight out of ten. I would recommend Snyk to other users because it is easy to implement and integrate with Azure DevOps and GitHub. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The integration part is easy...It's a stable solution right now."

"One of the strong points of this solution is that it allows you to incorporate it into a CICB pipeline. It has the ability to do incremental scans. If you scan a very large application, it might take two hours to do the initial scan. The subsequent scans, as people are making changes to the app, scan the Delta and are very fast. That's a really nice implementation. The way they have incorporated the functionality of the incremental scans is something to be aware of. It is quite good. It has been very solid. We haven't really had any issues, and it does what it advertises to do very nicely."

"The tool's visual scan analysis shows me all the libraries' vulnerabilities and license types. It helps identify the most complex issues with licenses. It provides good visibility. SCA shows me all libraries that are vulnerable and the extent of their vulnerability."

"It is very easy and user friendly. It never requires any kind of technical support. You can do everything on your own."

"The product is stable and scalable."

"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is the comprehensive security scan."

"Checkmarx unifies all the features in its service."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis pros

"It's very easy for developers to use. Onboarding was an easy process for all of the developers within the company. After a quick, half-an-hour to an hour session, they were fully using it on their own. It's very straightforward. Usability is definitely a 10 out of 10."

"Snyk categorizes the level of vulnerability into high, medium, and low, which helps organizations prioritize which issues to tackle first."

"We're loving some of the Kubernetes integration as well. That's really quite cool. It's still in the early days of our use of it, but it looks really exciting. In the Kubernetes world, it's very good at reporting on the areas around the configuration of your platform, rather than the things that you've pulled in. There's some good advice there that allows you to prioritize whether something is important or just worrying. That's very helpful."

"The solution's Open Source feature gives us notifications and suggestions regarding how to address vulnerabilities."

"Static code analysis is one of the best features of the solution."

"I find SCA to be valuable. It can read your libraries, your license and bring the best way to resolve your problem in the best scenario."

"The CLI feature is quite useful because it gives us a lot of flexibility in what we want to do. If you use the UI, all the information is there and you can see what Snyk is showing you, but there is nothing else that you can change. However, when you use the CLI, then you can use commands and can get the output or response back from Snyk. You can also take advantage of that output in a different way. For the same reason, we have been using the CLI for the hard gate in the pipeline: Obtain a particular CDSS score for vulnerability. Based on that information, we can then decide if we want to block or allow the build. We have more flexibility if we use the CLI."

"The most valuable features include enriched information around the vulnerabilities for better triaging, in terms of the vulnerability layer origin and vulnerability tree."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"Instant updates for end users to identify vulnerabilities as soon as possible will make Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis better. The UI of the solution could also be improved."

"API security is an area with shortcomings that needs improvement."

"Some of the recommendations provided by the product are generic. Even if the recommendations provided by the product are of low level, the appropriate ones can help users deal with vulnerabilities."

"The quality of technical support has decreased over time, and it is not as good as it used to be."

"In terms of areas for improvement, what could be improved in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is pricing because customers always compare the pricing among secure DevOps solutions in the market. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis has a lot of competitors yet its features aren't much different. Pricing is the first thing customers consider, and from a partner perspective, if you can offer affordable pricing to your customers, it's more likely you'll have a winning deal. The performance of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis also needs improvement because sometimes, it's slow, and in particular, scanning could take several hours."

"It can have better licensing models."

"Its pricing can be improved. It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive. It is a good tool, and we're still figuring out how to fully leverage it. There are some questions regarding whether it can scan the MuleSoft code. We don't know if this is a gap in the tool or something else. This is one thing that we're just working through right now, and I am not ready to conclude that there is a weakness there. MuleSoft is kind of its own beast, and we're trying to see how we get it to work with Checkmarx."

"Parts of the implementation process could improve by making it more user-friendly."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis cons

"We were using Microsoft Docker images. It was reporting some vulnerabilities, but we were not able to figure out the fix for them. It was reporting some vulnerabilities in the Docker images given by Microsoft, which were out of our control. That was the only limitation. Otherwise, it was good."

"One area where Snyk could improve is in providing developers with the line where the error occurs."

"We have seen cases where tools didn't find or recognize certain dependencies. These are known issues, to some extent, due to the complexity in the language or stack that you using. There are some certain circumstances where the tool isn't actually finding what it's supposed to be finding, then it could be misleading."

"It lists projects. So, if you have a number of microservices in an enterprise, then you could have pages of findings. Developers will then spend zero time going through the pages of reports to figure out, "Is there something I need to fix?" While it may make sense to list all the projects and issues in these very long lists for completeness, Snyk could do a better job of bubbling up and grouping items, e.g., a higher level dashboard that draws attention to things that are new, the highest priority things, or things trending in the wrong direction. That would make it a lot easier. They don't quite have that yet in container security."

"Could include other types of security scanning and statistical analysis"

"Generating reports and visibility through reports are definitely things they can do better."

"I would like to give further ability to grouping code repositories, in such a way that you could group them by the teams that own them, then produce alerting to those teams. The way that we are seeing it right now, the alerting only goes to a couple of places. I wish we could configure the code to go to different places."

"Snyk's API and UI features could work better in terms of speed."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis needs to be competitive."

"The license model is somewhat perplexing as it comprises multiple aspects that can be confusing for customers. The model is determined by the number of registered users and the number of projects being scanned, along with a third component that adds to the complexity."

"It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive."

"My customers need to pay for the licensing part, and they need to opt for an annual subscription."

"We don't have a license. The usage is limited to one, two, three, five, or ten people. It is currently used for all projects, and there are plans to increase its usage."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The product's price is okay."

"I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market."

"You can get a good deal with Snyk for pricing. It's a little expensive, but it is worth it."

"Snyk is an expensive solution."

"Despite Snyk's coverage, scalability, reliability, and stability, it is available at a very competitive price."

"The license model is based on the number of contributing developers. Snyk is expensive, for a startup company will most likely use the community edition, while larger companies will buy the licensed version. The price of Snyk is more than other SLA tools."

"Presently, my company uses an open-source version of the solution. The solution's pricing can be considered quite reasonable owing to the features they offer."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

35%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Logistics Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

The tool's visual scan analysis shows me all the libraries' vulnerabilities and license types. It helps identify the most complex issues with licenses. It provides good visibility. SCA shows me all...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

We have a license. The usage is limited to one, two, three, five, or ten people. It is currently used for all projects, and there are plans to increase its usage.

What needs improvement with Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis should improve dynamic analysis.

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

What needs improvement with Snyk?

I'm not responsible for the tool. As far as I know, there are no major concerns or features that we lack. We had some issues integrating into our pipeline, however, they were resolved.

Black Duck vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Comparisons

Compared 34% of the time

JFrog Xray vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 23% of the time

Semgrep vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 7% of the time

FOSSA vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Competitors

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 13% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 12% of the time

Black Duck vs Snyk

Compared 11% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 6% of the time

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Snyk

Compared 6% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

November 2024

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis report

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis product report

Download Snyk product report

October 2024

Also Known As

CxSCA

No data available

Learn More

Checkmarx

Overview

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis (SCA) helps organizations manage the risks associated with open source and third-party components in their software applications. While leveraging open source libraries and third-party dependencies is common practice, it can also introduce security vulnerabilities and license risks.

Checkmarx SCA offers a multifaceted approach to managing these risks by:

Automatically scanning project repositories, build configurations, and manifests to create a comprehensive inventory of all components, including version information and associated licenses.
Performing vulnerability assessments on each component, including identifying and prioritizing actual exploitable or reachable vulnerabilities.
Protecting organizations from software supply chain attacks involving malicious packages, such as the XZ Utils backdoor.
Identifying licenses associated and providing insights into license obligations, restrictions, and potential conflicts.
Integrating seamlessly into existing development workflows and CI/CD pipelines.
Providing actionable remediation guidance to help organizations address identified vulnerabilities and compliance issues effectively.

Snyk is a user-friendly security solution that enables users to safely develop and use open source code. Users can create automatic scans that allow them to keep a close eye on their code and prevent bad actors from exploiting vulnerabilities. This enables users to find and remove vulnerabilities soon after they appear.

Benefits of Snyk

Some of the benefits of using Snyk include:

Conserves resources: Snyk easily integrates with other security solutions and uses their security features to ensure that the work that users are doing is completely secure. These integrations allow them to protect themselves without pulling resources from their continued integration or continued delivery workflows. Resources can be conserved for areas of the greatest need.

Highly flexible: Snyk enables users to customize the system’s security automation features to meet their needs. Users can guarantee that the automation performs the functions that are most essential for their current project. Additionally, users are able to maintain platform governance consistency across their system.

Keeps users ahead of emerging threats. Snyk employs a database of threats that help it detect and keep track of potential issues. This database is constantly being updated to reflect the changes that take place in the realm of cybersecurity. It also uses machine learning. Users are prepared to deal with new issues as they arise.

Automatically scans projects for threats. Snyk’s command-line interface enables users to schedule the solution to run automatic scans of their projects. Time and manpower can be conserved for the areas of greatest need without sacrificing security.

Reviews from Real Users

Snyk is a security platform for developers that stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to integrate with other security solutions and important insights that it can enable users to discover. Snyk enables users to combine its already existing security features with those of other solutions to create far more robust and flexible layers of security than what it can supply on its own. It gives users the ability to dig into the security issues that they may experience. Users are given a clear view of the root causes of these problems. This equips them to address the problem and prevent similar issues in the future.

Cameron G., a security software engineer at a tech company, writes, “The most valuable features are their GitLab and JIRA integrations.The GitLab integration lets us pull projects in pretty easily, so that it's pretty minimal for developers to get it set up. Using the JIRA integration, it's also pretty easy to get the information that is generated, as a result of that GitLab integration, back to our teams in a non-intrusive way and in a workflow that we are already using. Snyk is something of a bridge that we use; we get our projects into it and then get the information out of it. Those two integrations are crucial for us to be able to do that pretty simply.”

Sean M., the chief information security officer of a technology vendor, writes, "From the software composition analysis perspective, it first makes sure that we understand what is happening from a third-party perspective for the particular product that we use. This is very difficult when you are building software and incorporating dependencies from other libraries, because those dependencies have dependencies and that chain of dependencies can go pretty deep. There could be a vulnerability in something that is seven layers deep, and it would be very difficult to understand that is even affecting us. Therefore, Snyk provides fantastic visibility to know, "Yes, we have a problem. Here is where it ultimately comes from." It may not be with what we're incorporating, but something much deeper than that."

Sample Customers

AXA, Liveperson, Aaron's, Playtech, Morningstar

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief