Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Logo

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis pros and cons

Vendor: Checkmarx
4.6 out of 5

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is easy to use and does not require technical support.
It includes functionality for incremental scans, which are efficient for continuous updates in large applications.
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis effectively identifies vulnerabilities in open-source components, elevating security for critical issues.
It integrates security from the beginning of the design process, ensuring all open-source applications are secure before production.
The integration process with existing systems is straightforward, enhancing its usability and reliability.

CONS

Pricing of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is high and could be improved.
There are concerns about whether Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis can effectively scan MuleSoft code.
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis can sometimes be slow, with scanning taking several hours.
Technical support quality for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis has decreased over time.
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis should improve dynamic analysis capabilities.
 

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Pros review quotes

Sujata Sujata Ghadage - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 14, 2024
It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.
SN
Jul 17, 2022
What's most valuable in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is that it provides security from the start. In the traditional approach, an enterprise or company validates the solution before launching to a production environment, but in the modern approach, security must be checked and provided from the beginning and from the design, and this is where Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis comes in. The solution helps you make sure that every open-source application that you use is secure, and that there's no vulnerability inside that open-source application.
Harsh Soni - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 1, 2023
The integration part is easy...It's a stable solution right now.
Learn what your peers think about Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
KN
Apr 25, 2022
What's most valuable in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is its ability to identify vulnerabilities in open-source components, especially if some critical issues exist.
GG
Feb 5, 2021
One of the strong points of this solution is that it allows you to incorporate it into a CICB pipeline. It has the ability to do incremental scans. If you scan a very large application, it might take two hours to do the initial scan. The subsequent scans, as people are making changes to the app, scan the Delta and are very fast. That's a really nice implementation. The way they have incorporated the functionality of the incremental scans is something to be aware of. It is quite good. It has been very solid. We haven't really had any issues, and it does what it advertises to do very nicely.
Cuneyt KALPAKOGLU Phd. - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 31, 2023
The product is stable and scalable.
MH
Jan 16, 2024
I appreciate the user-friendly interface. The GUI is excellent, providing detailed information on outdated versions, including version numbers and the flow of library calls. This allows me to plan and prioritize library changes based on potential vulnerabilities, even if the affected library is indirectly used in my project. The tool offers specific guidance on addressing these issues.
DS
Sep 1, 2023
The customer service and support were good.
GG
Apr 14, 2023
The most valuable feature of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is the comprehensive security scan.
Abner Silva - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 1, 2024
The tool's visual scan analysis shows me all the libraries' vulnerabilities and license types. It helps identify the most complex issues with licenses. It provides good visibility. SCA shows me all libraries that are vulnerable and the extent of their vulnerability.
 

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Cons review quotes

Sujata Sujata Ghadage - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 14, 2024
Some of the recommendations provided by the product are generic. Even if the recommendations provided by the product are of low level, the appropriate ones can help users deal with vulnerabilities.
SN
Jul 17, 2022
In terms of areas for improvement, what could be improved in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is pricing because customers always compare the pricing among secure DevOps solutions in the market. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis has a lot of competitors yet its features aren't much different. Pricing is the first thing customers consider, and from a partner perspective, if you can offer affordable pricing to your customers, it's more likely you'll have a winning deal. The performance of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis also needs improvement because sometimes, it's slow, and in particular, scanning could take several hours.
Harsh Soni - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 1, 2023
API security is an area with shortcomings that needs improvement.
Learn what your peers think about Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
KN
Apr 25, 2022
Instant updates for end users to identify vulnerabilities as soon as possible will make Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis better. The UI of the solution could also be improved.
GG
Feb 5, 2021
Its pricing can be improved. It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive. It is a good tool, and we're still figuring out how to fully leverage it. There are some questions regarding whether it can scan the MuleSoft code. We don't know if this is a gap in the tool or something else. This is one thing that we're just working through right now, and I am not ready to conclude that there is a weakness there. MuleSoft is kind of its own beast, and we're trying to see how we get it to work with Checkmarx.
Cuneyt KALPAKOGLU Phd. - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 31, 2023
The quality of technical support has decreased over time, and it is not as good as it used to be.
MH
Jan 16, 2024
Personally, I currently use it as a standalone tool without integrating it with other systems, and it meets my needs adequately. As a suggestion, I request on considering to add a "what if" feature to the application. Currently, when the tool identifies issues and suggests updates, if I want to explore different scenarios, I need to prepare another file, turn it into a ZIP, and run the analysis again. It would be more convenient if there was a "what if" option in the GUI. This feature could simulate a run, allowing me to quickly check the impact of changing one or more files or versions without the need for a full rerun.
DS
Sep 1, 2023
I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten.
GG
Apr 14, 2023
Parts of the implementation process could improve by making it more user-friendly.
Abner Silva - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 1, 2024
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis should improve dynamic analysis.