Top 10 Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Alternatives

4.5 out of 5

13 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Snyk, Black Duck SCA, and Mend.io. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive open-source risk identification, real-time vulnerability alerts, and seamless integration capabilities enabling developers to efficiently secure applications throughout the software development lifecycle.

Checkmarx Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Checkmarx, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Snyk

4.0 out of 5

Snyk

4.0 out of 5

Snyk excels in user-friendly integration and accurate vulnerability data, appealing to developers seeking streamlined solutions. In comparison, Checkmarx SCA offers robust security scanning and configurability, making it ideal for those prioritizing comprehensive open-source security management.

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. Snyk Report

Pricing

Snyk requires a lower initial setup cost, while Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis may involve a higher financial commitment but offers additional features.

View comparison

Pricing

Snyk requires a lower initial setup cost, while Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis may involve a higher financial commitment but offers additional features.

Black Duck SCA

3.8 out of 5

Black Duck SCA

3.8 out of 5

Black Duck SCA provides comprehensive vulnerability management, making it ideal for cost-effective open-source management. In comparison, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis excels with feature integration, offering dynamic scanning and strong customer service, appealing to those prioritizing advanced security insights and integration flexibility.

Download Black Duck SCA vs. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Report

Pricing

Black Duck SCA has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis offers a more flexible pricing arrangement, highlighting distinct approaches to initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Black Duck SCA has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis offers a more flexible pricing arrangement, highlighting distinct approaches to initial investment.

Mend.io

4.2 out of 5

Mend.io

4.2 out of 5

Mend.io is ideal for seamless integration in CI workflows, providing automated license management. In comparison, Checkmarx prioritizes early-stage security scanning, ensuring comprehensive vulnerability detection. Mend.io excels in open-source management tools, whereas Checkmarx focuses on thorough security scanning from development's start.

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. Mend.io Report

Pricing

Mend.io offers a more economical setup cost, while Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis presents a higher initial expense. This distinction highlights the cost-effectiveness of Mend.io compared to the premium price associated with Checkmarx.

View comparison

Pricing

JFrog Xray

3.9 out of 5

JFrog Xray

3.9 out of 5

JFrog Xray excels in integration and comprehensive package support for vulnerability detection. In comparison, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis offers advanced open-source vulnerability detection with machine learning. Checkmarx's enhanced analytics make it appealing for those valuing in-depth analysis despite higher costs.

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. JFrog Xray Report

Pricing

JFrog Xray reviews highlight higher initial setup costs, while Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis reports emphasize lower setup fees. These differences illustrate the distinct financial commitment required when adopting each software solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Sonatype Lifecycle

4.2 out of 5

Sonatype Lifecycle

4.2 out of 5

Sonatype Lifecycle excels in security enforcement and seamless DevOps integration. In comparison, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis focuses on design-phase security and remediation. Sonatype’s deployment flexibility contrasts with Checkmarx’s public cloud options, appealing to buyers seeking tailored security solutions through unique features.

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. Sonatype Lifecycle Report

Pricing

Sonatype Lifecycle's setup cost is higher, while Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis offers a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

Sonatype Lifecycle's setup cost is higher, while Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis offers a more budget-friendly option.

Semgrep

4.0 out of 5

Semgrep

4.0 out of 5

Semgrep excels in code analysis, offering real-time scanning and customization, making it ideal for developers seeking tailored solutions. It boasts a flexible rule set and easy deployment. However, it can benefit from enhanced documentation and performance optimization to better cater to expanding user needs.

View comparison

Polaris Platform

1 out of 5

Polaris Platform

1 out of 5

Polaris Software Integrity Platform offers robust security integrations that streamline vulnerability management. Its extensive language support aids developers in maintaining code quality. However, intuitive navigation could enhance user experience, ensuring seamless accessibility and feature discovery for users.

Pricing

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis features minimal setup costs, while Polaris Software Integrity Platform incurs moderate setup expenditures. Differences in setup costs can influence the financial approach to integrating these software solutions into an organization's security str...

View comparison

Pricing

FOSSA

4.3 out of 5

FOSSA

4.3 out of 5

FOSSA provides seamless integration and excellent interoperability with developer tools, excelling in legal policy features. In comparison, Checkmarx emphasizes comprehensive security scans, valued for its robust security insights, but faces criticism for its pricing model and update speed, highlighting unique strengths for tech buyers.

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. FOSSA Report

Pricing

FOSSA has a lower setup cost compared to Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation. Checkmarx requires a higher investment upfront, which may be more suitable for larger enterprises.

View comparison

Pricing

CAST Highlight

3.9 out of 5

CAST Highlight

3.9 out of 5

CAST Highlight excels with its easy dashboard integration with Azure DevOps and non-invasive analysis approach. In comparison, Checkmarx ensures comprehensive security, identifying vulnerabilities in open-source components. CAST Highlight's distinct codebase evaluation attracts tech buyers, while Checkmarx's detailed security focus appeals to security-conscious organizations.

Download CAST Highlight vs. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Report

Pricing

CAST Highlight offers lower setup costs, ideal for small to medium businesses, while Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis requires higher initial investment, appealing to enterprises needing detailed security features.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Application Security Tools

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)