Black Duck and Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis compete in the realm of software composition analysis. Checkmarx appears to have the upper hand due to its superior integration capabilities, particularly appealing to development environments focused on CI/CD.
Features: Black Duck offers comprehensive open-source management, thorough vulnerability identification, and detailed reporting on open-source components. Checkmarx shines with robust CI/CD integration, developer-friendly features, and comprehensive security scans.
Room for Improvement: Black Duck's usability could benefit from a more streamlined deployment process, and its interface might be more intuitive. Improving incremental scanning speed and better license compliance tracking are needed. For Checkmarx, enhancing the precision of vulnerability identification, reducing false positives, and broadening language support would be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Black Duck requires extensive configuration, which can be complex but is supported by strong customer service. Checkmarx offers a straightforward deployment experience, emphasizing ease of use within existing development processes, backed by responsive customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Black Duck's pricing aligns with its extensive feature set, offering high ROI for managing open-source components. Checkmarx, though potentially higher in initial costs, provides significant ROI through improved workflow efficiency and enhanced productivity, making it cost-effective for organizations prioritizing integration.
There are some pain points with the response time and first-level support quality.
There are areas for improvement such as false positives and the scanning of containers.
The software composition analysis is most effective for security risk management.
Organizations use Black Duck for compliance, internal audits, license management, and security, scanning software to identify vulnerabilities, non-compliant code, and dependencies in open-source projects.
Black Duck integrates into CI/CD pipelines and DevSecOps processes, helping multiple industries detect and handle risks associated with open-source usage. Users leverage it for source and binary analysis to ensure security and compliance before software release. Automatic component analysis, effective vulnerability scanning, and a comprehensive knowledge base are some of its valuable features. Despite needing improvements in scanning speed, UI, and documentation, Black Duck remains crucial for ensuring open-source security and compliance.
What are Black Duck's most important features?
What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?
Black Duck is implemented by industries ranging from finance to healthcare, addressing security and compliance in open-source usage. Financial institutions employ it to manage license risks and ensure audit readiness. Healthcare organizations use it to comply with stringent data protection regulations, ensuring patient data security and privacy. Tech companies integrate Black Duck within CI/CD pipelines to maintain the security and compliance of software products before release. Its deployment varies, tailored to meet the specific risk management and compliance needs dictated by each sector's regulatory environment.
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis (SCA) helps organizations manage the risks associated with open source and third-party components in their software applications. While leveraging open source libraries and third-party dependencies is common practice, it can also introduce security vulnerabilities and license risks.
Checkmarx SCA offers a multifaceted approach to managing these risks by:
Automatically scanning project repositories, build configurations, and manifests to create a comprehensive inventory of all components, including version information and associated licenses.
Performing vulnerability assessments on each component, including identifying and prioritizing actual exploitable or reachable vulnerabilities.
Protecting organizations from software supply chain attacks involving malicious packages, such as the XZ Utils backdoor.
Identifying licenses associated and providing insights into license obligations, restrictions, and potential conflicts.
Integrating seamlessly into existing development workflows and CI/CD pipelines.
Providing actionable remediation guidance to help organizations address identified vulnerabilities and compliance issues effectively.
We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
