Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs GitLab comparison

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Read 91 GitLab reviews

21,201 Views
2,332 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

GitLab and Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis are strong contenders in the DevOps and security scanning categories, respectively. GitLab has the upper hand in repository management and CI/CD capabilities, while Checkmarx excels in security scanning and comprehensive vulnerability assessments.

Features: GitLab is renowned for repository management, CI/CD pipelines, and integration flexibility, enabling effective software development. Its unified platform supports code reviews, deployments, and various DevOps activities. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is recognized for its security scanning, identifying open-source vulnerabilities, and providing comprehensive security assessments.

Room for Improvement: GitLab needs better integration with container platforms and third-party tools like AWS and Jira. Improved metrics, testing capabilities, and documentation are also needed. Checkmarx could improve by reducing false positives, offering better pricing, and enhancing configurability and dynamic analysis support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab offers versatile deployment options such as public, private, hybrid clouds, and on-premises, adaptable to organizational needs. Support varies with licensing, with community forums for free users. Checkmarx supports on-premises and public cloud deployments, with support dependent on licensing, highlighting system stability.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab's pricing includes free and paid tiers, with the open-source model appealing despite costly premium transitions. Users value its feature richness. Checkmarx has a complex, costly licensing model, yet its robust security benefits justify the expense for users needing strong security. Both provide significant ROI, appealing based on specific needs and budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. GitLab Report (Updated: June 2026).

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. GitLab

Download the complete report

Helped 902,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

10th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitLab

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th), Build Automation (2nd), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is 2.8%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 3.5%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitLab	3.5%
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis	2.8%
Other	93.7%

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

Tharindu Malwenna

Senior Application Security Engineer at a newspaper with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient library identification and upgrade suggestions improve application security

We have many third-party libraries in our organization. I used Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis to identify all the libraries we use and determine whether they are used or unused within the application Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis provides identification of libraries and…

Read full review

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Role-based workflows have transformed daily deployments and improve team collaboration

GitLab has role-based access control, so when a team member needs to make a code change, they cannot directly apply it to the environment but must put in a merge request. Once a senior reviews the code and approves it, then it is implemented across the environment, making it safer and allowing everyone to experience the process. The best features GitLab offers are version control and automation, which are the major things that stand out to me. When it comes to access, the login is very smooth, with just one login integrated with our Okta, allowing everyone to log in easily. Deployments become much easier, and that is how GitLab helps. The automation features make my work easier because we use a tool called AWX, which is connected to GitLab. Whenever we run a job on AWX, it directly checks the code and uses it. Since the code is not preserved locally but kept in the cloud, it is safe and nobody can tamper with it. When it comes to safety, that is a major thing. Automation features allow the code to be accessed from any tools we use, so the jobs we run are helping tremendously and doing their work perfectly. For pipeline tasks, we have created a significant amount of pipelines, which are all hosted in GitLab. Running the pipelines has become much easier, and they are doing a perfect job, helping tremendously in our day-to-day activities. GitLab has positively impacted my organization because previously we stored code locally on servers, leading to many risks. Since GitLab came into our environment, our integration and deployments became much easier, helping our work become much smoother. Improvements from GitLab have led to better team collaboration because when several people are working, they can all edit the code and submit it as a merge request, and once approved, it reflects directly to the main branch. Many can work at the same time. When it comes to deployments, deploying has become much faster since we started using GitLab, and even if errors occur, we can spot them easily and troubleshoot, which has helped tremendously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I appreciate the user-friendly interface. The GUI is excellent, providing detailed information on outdated versions, including version numbers and the flow of library calls. This allows me to plan and prioritize library changes based on potential vulnerabilities, even if the affected library is indirectly used in my project. The tool offers specific guidance on addressing these issues."

"What's most valuable in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is its ability to identify vulnerabilities in open-source components, especially if some critical issues exist."

"The product is stable and scalable."

"It is very easy and user friendly. It never requires any kind of technical support. You can do everything on your own."

"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is the comprehensive security scan."

"One of the strong points of this solution is that it allows you to incorporate it into a CICB pipeline. It has the ability to do incremental scans. If you scan a very large application, it might take two hours to do the initial scan. The subsequent scans, as people are making changes to the app, scan the Delta and are very fast. That's a really nice implementation. The way they have incorporated the functionality of the incremental scans is something to be aware of. It is quite good. It has been very solid. We haven't really had any issues, and it does what it advertises to do very nicely."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"We were able to reduce the number of vulnerable libraries by 50%, leading to significant operational improvement."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis pros

"I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently."

"It is user-friendly, easy to use, and easy to administer."

"The SaaS setup is impressive, and it has DAST solutioning."

"Overall, it's a great product and it does a good job."

"Git hosting has an integration with ACD which is why we liked this solution in the first place."

"This is a scalable solution. We had around 200 users working with it."

"I like that you can use GitLab as a double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management. It's a good product for working in these two areas, and the user interface makes it easy to understand."

"I would definitely recommend the solution to other organizations."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"Some of the recommendations provided by the product are generic. Even if the recommendations provided by the product are of low level, the appropriate ones can help users deal with vulnerabilities."

"The solution could improve by determining the success factor of an upgrade, which is currently lacking."

"Its pricing can be improved. It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive. It is a good tool, and we're still figuring out how to fully leverage it. There are some questions regarding whether it can scan the MuleSoft code. We don't know if this is a gap in the tool or something else. This is one thing that we're just working through right now, and I am not ready to conclude that there is a weakness there. MuleSoft is kind of its own beast, and we're trying to see how we get it to work with Checkmarx."

"I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten."

"Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis should improve dynamic analysis."

"Personally, I currently use it as a standalone tool without integrating it with other systems, and it meets my needs adequately. As a suggestion, I request on considering to add a "what if" feature to the application. Currently, when the tool identifies issues and suggests updates, if I want to explore different scenarios, I need to prepare another file, turn it into a ZIP, and run the analysis again. It would be more convenient if there was a "what if" option in the GUI. This feature could simulate a run, allowing me to quickly check the impact of changing one or more files or versions without the need for a full rerun."

"I have received complaints from my customers that the pricing could be improved."

"Parts of the implementation process could improve by making it more user-friendly."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis cons

"The integration could be slightly better."

"One of my colleagues got in touch with them, and his response was that their technical support was not that great. The details that they provided for the question were not that great."

"GitLab doesn't have AWS integration. It would be better to have integration with other container management environments beyond Kubernetes. It has very good integration with Kubernetes, but it doesn't have good integration with, for example, AWS, ETS, etc."

"GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker."

"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."

"The technology could be made simpler to use, it should not be overly complex."

"GitLab needs to improve the CI/CD functionality because it is not compatible with Jenkins and other tools, as it is not that efficient."

"We had to write GitLab configuration files, commands and conditions, in a YML format. I would like configuration of a YML file to be done via UI rather than a code file."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license model is somewhat perplexing as it comprises multiple aspects that can be confusing for customers. The model is determined by the number of registered users and the number of projects being scanned, along with a third component that adds to the complexity."

"Pricing for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis needs to be competitive."

"We don't have a license. The usage is limited to one, two, three, five, or ten people. It is currently used for all projects, and there are plans to increase its usage."

"It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive."

"My customers need to pay for the licensing part, and they need to opt for an annual subscription."

"There are different licensing options available, including a free limited-user license."

"I'm not aware of the licensing costs because those were covered by the customer."

"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."

"GitLab is a free solution to use."

"I'm not sure if they have some kind of discount. I've been negotiating with them on prices before, and I believe they weren't too happy to give discounts, but list prices are $19 per user, per month for Premium and $99 per user, per month for Ultimate. So, the difference between Premium and Ultimate is a bit bigger, and in most companies, you need to build some type of business case."

"GitLab's pricing is good compared to others on the market."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

Pricing is complex and high for small organizations but offers great benefits for larger organizations. It is notably different compared to competitors like GitHub Advanced Security.

What needs improvement with Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

The solution could improve by determining the success factor of an upgrade, which is currently lacking.

What is your primary use case for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The setup cost for GitLab is minimal since the team has its own minimal resource balancing. The costing falls into an intermediate stage and is impactful across all results within the team. It allo...

What needs improvement with GitLab?

There are many improvements that GitLab can implement, such as addressing the issue of caching. Currently, when I have multiple tasks to merge or attempt multiple merges, the CI/CD and overall GitL...

What is your primary use case for GitLab?

My main use case for GitLab is as a version control system that we are using. Currently, I am working on an end-to-end AI pipeline, and I have deployed my whole code using GitLab so that all things...

Black Duck SCA vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 12% of the time

JFrog Xray vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 11% of the time

CAST SBOM Manager vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 8% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 40% of the time

SonarQube vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

Jenkins vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis product report

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis report

Download GitLab product report

Also Known As

CxSCA

Fuzzit

Overview

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis offers robust features for identifying vulnerabilities in open source components. It integrates seamlessly into development processes, ensuring security from the start with its user-friendly interface and AI-enhanced suggestions. Ideal for .NET and Java applications.

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is an essential tool for developers looking to manage and secure open-source components. Known for its ease of integration and user-friendly design, it excels in providing comprehensive security by detecting vulnerabilities and offering actionable solutions. Developers gain from its configurability and visibility into library vulnerabilities. It further supports development with version upgrade suggestions and detailed insights, ensuring secure open-source component integration. Enhancing its effectiveness, AI-powered suggestions minimize false positives and improve scalability. While optimization of speed, performance, and pricing are anticipated, its strong integration capabilities within CI/CD pipelines make it a preferred choice for secure software development.

What are the key features of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and enhances usability for developers.
Incremental Scan Capability: Allows efficient continuous security assessments.
Vulnerability Detection: Provides detailed insights and solutions for identified issues.
AI-powered Suggestions: Minimizes false positives and enhances efficiency.
License Management: Assists in handling and managing license issues effectively.

What benefits can users expect from Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

Enhanced Security: Maintains robust protection against vulnerabilities in open source components.
Compliance Assurance: Ensures adherence to industry standards and regulations.
Visibility and Insight: Offers detailed insights into potential risks within libraries.
Scalability: Supports large-scale integration without compromising on performance.

In industries like banking and insurance, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis proves instrumental. Utilizing static code analysis, it assists these sectors by identifying security weaknesses in software. Its integration capability with CI/CD pipelines ensures that applications adhere to strict industry compliance and security standards.

Checkmarx

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

Sample Customers

AXA, Liveperson, Aaron's, Playtech, Morningstar

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. GitLab