Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs GitLab comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Checkmarx SCA provides 24/7 customer support with knowledgeable service and comprehensive documentation, though some note past service decline.
Sentiment score
8.2
GitLab support receives mixed feedback; while some find it helpful, others rely on community forums or internal resources.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis requires price, UI, performance improvements, faster updates, stronger API security, and better support for enhancements.
Sentiment score
5.7
GitLab needs improved integrations, security, user-friendly interface, expanded capabilities, better CI/CD, project management, and simplified pricing and support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is praised for its scalability, effectively handling multiple projects with high user satisfaction and efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.5
GitLab is praised for efficient scalability across environments and team sizes, with flexible configurations and cloud integration capabilities.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is costly and complex but valued, prompting many enterprise users to expand its use.
Sentiment score
5.7
GitLab pricing offers flexible plans with free tiers and paid options for enhanced features, considered competitive but sometimes costly.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is stable and reliable, though occasional performance issues occur with geographical cloud usage impacting scan times.
Sentiment score
8.2
GitLab is praised for stability, with users experiencing rare minor issues, ensuring reliable performance and high user satisfaction.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
Checkmarx SCA integrates with CICD pipelines to ensure security by identifying vulnerabilities and license issues with detailed analysis and guidance.
Sentiment score
8.2
GitLab offers comprehensive CI/CD, seamless merging, robust management, automation, scalability, and extensive integration for DevOps support.
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx Software Composit...
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
8th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitLab
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (11th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (10th), Rapid Application Development Software (12th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is 2.6%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 4.8%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
 

Featured Reviews

Sujata Sujata Ghadage - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers great security in the area of vulnerability detection
I am more into the SAST side, which is related to Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis. Checkmarx recently introduced DAST and software composition analysis, but I am not aware much about it. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is a good tool with many rules, ensuring that the product offers vulnerability detection and provides good coverage. Though my company has not integrated Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis into SDLC, we do plan to do it in the future. The product helped our company deal with a major security breach when we had to deal with a lot of SQL-related issues stemming from some of the codes, which were written earlier not using a proper framework, owing to which there were many vulnerabilities in respect to LDAP, cross-site attacks and SQL injection. The product's most effective part for identifying vulnerabilities stems from the tool's SAST capabilities. The product's dashboard has improved our company's vulnerability management processes. The tool shows a proper dashboard and offers frequent remediation options and proper compliance status, which helps to know about the number of vulnerabilities and the dashboards. The accuracy of the product's vulnerability detection is 95 percent. At an organizational level, the product is hosted on the cloud. In my company, we use the product to scan reports. I don't see anything complex in the solution from the maintenance point of view. The product is deployed in a single location where multiple people use it. The product can be described as an access-based solution. For a particular project or depending on an assignment, access is given to certain people for a month or two. After the completion of a project or assignment, the product's access to a person is removed and given to another person who needs the solution for another project. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. It is one of the best tools in the market. The product provides good coverage and ensures that the users experience a return on investment from its use in their environment. The tool is also helpful in dealing with vulnerabilities and false positives. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.
Corné den Hollander - PeerSpot reviewer
Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage
It's more related to the supporting layer of features, such as issue management and issue tracking. We tend to always use, for example, Jira next to it. That doesn't mean that GitLab should build something similar to Jira because that will always have its place, but they could grow a bit in those kinds of supporting features. I see some, for example, covering ITSM on a DevOps team level, and that's one of the things that I and my current client would find really helpful. It's understandably not going to be their main focus and their core, and whenever you are with a company that needs a bit more advanced features on that specific topic, you're probably still going to integrate with another tool like Jira Service Management, for example. However, some basic features on things like that could be really helpful. In terms of additional features, nothing comes to mind. One of the potential pitfalls is to keep adding new features and functionalities. They can just improve some of the existing features to make it high-end, top-quality. I don't have any substantial experience with agile planning. I don't know the industries GitLab is in, and I don't know why they make decisions like this, but as a customer, I would rather see them invest in improving the basic agile planning functionalities rather than adding, for example, portfolio planning features. That's because if I'm going to do portfolio planning, I probably will also need a lot of business users. I'm not sure if I want them in GitLab, I'd rather have them in Jira collaborating with me on portfolio planning. That's way better fitted for that type of work.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
36%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Logistics Company
4%
Educational Organization
29%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?
The tool's visual scan analysis shows me all the libraries' vulnerabilities and license types. It helps identify the most complex issues with licenses. It provides good visibility. SCA shows me all...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?
We have a license. The usage is limited to one, two, three, five, or ten people. It is currently used for all projects, and there are plans to increase its usage.
What needs improvement with Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis should improve dynamic analysis.
What do you like most about GitLab?
I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
What needs improvement with GitLab?
The pricing has been substantially increased, which is a major concern. While GitLab has a lot of documentation, the complexity and volume can be overwhelming, especially for new learners. Structur...
 

Also Known As

CxSCA
Fuzzit
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AXA, Liveperson, Aaron's, Playtech, Morningstar
1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.