Discover the top alternatives and competitors to HPE MSA based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include IBM FlashSystem, NetApp FAS Series, and Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
IBM FlashSystem excels in high performance and virtualization, appealing to businesses seeking advanced capabilities. In comparison, HPE MSA attracts smaller setups with its affordability and simplicity. IBM addresses enterprise needs, while HPE offers cost-effective solutions for SMBs.
IBM FlashSystem setup costs are perceived as high, focusing on enterprise-level features, while HPE MSA offers lower setup costs designed for smaller businesses, highlighting a clear difference in initial investment.
IBM FlashSystem setup costs are perceived as high, focusing on enterprise-level features, while HPE MSA offers lower setup costs designed for smaller businesses, highlighting a clear difference in initial investment.
NetApp FAS Series appeals with advanced features like data deduplication and high availability, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, HPE MSA offers affordability and simplicity, making it suitable for entry-level storage needs while integrating dual controllers for stability.
NetApp FAS Series setup costs are generally higher due to advanced features, whereas HPE MSA offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Users may find the NetApp FAS Series costly relative to the affordability of the HPE MSA.
NetApp FAS Series setup costs are generally higher due to advanced features, whereas HPE MSA offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Users may find the NetApp FAS Series costly relative to the affordability of the HPE MSA.
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform offers robust features suited for large-scale applications with high performance and scalability. In comparison, HPE MSA is flexible and cost-effective, appealing to SMBs needing affordable storage solutions with autonomic tiering and snapshot replication.
The setup cost for Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is generally higher than HPE MSA, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two storage solutions.
The setup cost for Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is generally higher than HPE MSA, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two storage solutions.
Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance impresses with high-performance analytics, advanced data compression, and scalability, catering to enterprises seeking robust features. In comparison, HPE MSA attracts with affordability, easy installation, and effective data protection, ideal for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing straightforward deployment.
Dell EqualLogic PS series offers scalability and management ease with automated load balancing and application integration. In comparison, HPE MSA provides robust performance with SSD support and advanced data protection, making it ideal for enterprises prioritizing speed despite a higher initial cost.
Dell EqualLogic PS series offers a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while HPE MSA provides a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting clear cost differences between the two storage solutions.
Dell EqualLogic PS series offers a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while HPE MSA provides a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting clear cost differences between the two storage solutions.
