HPE MSA vs Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Oracle are both solutions in the Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #9. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 18.7% mindshare in MS, compared to Oracle’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

HPE MSA

Read 23 HPE MSA reviews

1,573 Views
1,284 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appl...

Read 2 Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance reviews

389 Views
311 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

HPE MSA

Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appl...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE MSA and Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE MSA vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE MSA vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE MSA

Ranking in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appl...

Ranking in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) category, the mindshare of HPE MSA is 18.7%, up from 17.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is 3.8%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

Featured Reviews

Pragnesh Sachania

Deputy Manager IT at La Gajjar

Scalable, easy to manage, and used for virtualization environments

We didn't face any issues with the technical functionality. However, we faced a lot of challenges with our custom configuration. The HPE support person who did the installation was very technical. He answered all the queries, and we resolved the entire setup. We set up the storage as per our requirements. We previously used a physical server instead of virtualization. With the help of an HPE engineer and partners, we prepared a strategy for migrating the entire physical servers to our virtualization infrastructure. It took two days to deploy the solution. Six people were involved in the solution's deployment, including two from HPE and four from our IT team.

Read full review

RobertMakale

IT Consultant at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

A stable unified storage system that enables quick access to data

The main thing Oracle can improve is the cost. It would be better if Oracle opened up the system to enable integration with other vendors. Whether it's the database, application server, or storage appliance, they should make it easy to integrate them. They need to open up more to ensure that it can work in any environment and IT ecosystem.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has notably provided scalability benefits."

"The most valuable features were the dual controllers and being able to expand it."

"The solution is very easy to use, it is not really complex for any user, such as non-technical individuals."

"The cost to performance for HPE StorageWorks MSA is good."

"The solution is scalable and easy to manage."

"The most valuable feature of HPE StorageWorks MSA is its flexibility."

"MSA performs exceptionally well, particularly in regions with frequent power outages."

"I like StorageWorks' snapshots for our backup system. We had a pool of SSD and traditional drives. StorageWorks has a feature that transfers the hot data to high-performing drives."

More HPE MSA pros

"I like its storage capacity, quick access to the data, speed, and overall storage management."

Cons

"It would be beneficial to have an add-on feature to improve analytics or insight capabilities inside the app."

"The platform’s monitoring capabilities could be enhanced."

"HPE should reintroduce customizable ports as they were in Gen 5, allowing customers to use both iSCSI or SC on a single controller."

"It should show more options for cloud backup support."

"Synchronized replication is very important for MSA; however, HPE StorageWorks MSA doesn't provide synchronized replication."

"This product is getting a little bit older, so new features like deduplication are not included."

"The solution's license should be integrated and not separate."

"The solution could improve by adding configuration tools."

More HPE MSA cons

"The main thing Oracle can improve is the cost. It would be better if Oracle opened up the system to enable integration with other vendors. Whether it's the database, application server, or storage appliance, they should make it easy to integrate them. They need to open up more to ensure that it can work in any environment and IT ecosystem."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When we bought this solution it was very reasonably priced and they were willing to deal."

"I would rate the pricing as nine out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The solution can be a bit expensive."

"HPE StorageWorks MSA's licensing is perpetual and not integrated."

"This solution involves a one-time CapEx payment, followed by warranty extensions."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

"This solution is quite expensive; they should lower the cost."

"The price of the solution is a little high and they should provide more competitive pricing. If you want to increases the storage size there are additional fees."

"The price could be better. We have many competing products now like Huawei and Dell EMC, and these are slightly cheaper."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE StorageWorks MSA?

The most valuable feature of HPE StorageWorks MSA is its flexibility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE StorageWorks MSA?

I am not satisfied with the licensing model and pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE StorageWorks MSA?

It needs more details on how to integrate with the cloud for backup scenarios. It should show more options for cloud backup support.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NetApp FAS Series vs HPE MSA

Compared 49% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs HPE MSA

Compared 30% of the time

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs HPE MSA

Compared 15% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs HPE MSA

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE MSA Competitors

NetApp FAS Series vs Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Compared 47% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Compared 30% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Compared 23% of the time

More Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE MSA

January 2025

Download HPE MSA product report

Buyer's Guide

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

January 2025

Download Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance product report

Also Known As

HP StorageWorks MSA

Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Learn More

Video not available

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Oracle

Overview

Whether you need best-in-class performance or are looking to get the most capacity for your investment, MSA has a fast, affordable solution for you. And every MSA comes with an intuitive setup and management interface anyone can master.

Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance integrates the cloud into its core architecture, making cloud storage available to all users and access protocols while eliminating on-premises cloud access licensing charges and the need for external gateways. Built using a powerful SMP design, multi-threaded OS, massive DRAM caches, and all flash storage, Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance powers the most demanding applications, from fast query responses and, rapid transaction processing to virtualization and cloud workloads. With these performance levels, you can easily achieve 4:1 consolidation of your current NAS filers and gain a higher return on your storage investment.

Sample Customers

Femsa CSC, TTX, Rabobank

Translational Genomics Research Institute, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, CyberSolutions Inc., Y-Telecom, First Alliance Bank Zambia Limited, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Mutlinet Pakistan, TDC A/S, Digi-Key Corporation, Thurgau Cantonal Bank

Buyer's Guide

HPE MSA vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

January 2025

Free Report: HPE MSA vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE MSA vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE MSA vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance report.

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.