Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo

Top 10 i-SIEM [EOL] Alternatives

Vendor: Cybereason
4.5 out of 5
Post review

Top i-SIEM [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to i-SIEM [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, and AWS Security Hub. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. i-SIEM [EOL] surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat detection, streamlined integration capabilities, and real-time analytics, empowering businesses with unparalleled cybersecurity insights and proactive incident management.

Cybereason Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cybereason, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers powerful analytics and comprehensive threat detection, appealing to those needing advanced security insights. In comparison, i-SIEM [EOL] provides seamless integration and user-friendliness, ideal for organizations prioritizing streamlined operations and cost-effective solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to i-SIEM [EOL], which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. The cost difference significantly impacts organizations with limited financial resources choosing between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to i-SIEM [EOL], which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. The cost difference significantly impacts organizations with limited financial resources choosing between these two solutions.
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar provides robust analytics and cost-effective solutions, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, i-SIEM [EOL] excels with advanced threat intelligence and a sophisticated feature set, appealing to those valuing long-term benefits despite higher initial costs and setup complexity.
IBM Security QRadar has a higher setup cost compared to i-SIEM, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment required for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar has a higher setup cost compared to i-SIEM, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment required for deployment.
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
i-SIEM [EOL] appeals to cost-sensitive buyers with strong alerting and support. In comparison, AWS Security Hub attracts those prioritizing integration and automation within AWS. i-SIEM [EOL] suits smaller enterprises, while AWS Security Hub offers scalability and richer ROI for larger infrastructures.
i-SIEM [EOL] has a lower setup cost, while AWS Security Hub requires a more substantial initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
i-SIEM [EOL] has a lower setup cost, while AWS Security Hub requires a more substantial initial investment.
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.6 out of 5
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.6 out of 5
AlienVault OSSIM offers cost-effective open-source integration with substantial threat intelligence, appealing to budget-conscious users. In comparison, i-SIEM [EOL] attracts buyers with advanced analytics and customizable reports, providing detailed insights. AlienVault OSSIM simplifies deployment, while i-SIEM [EOL] ensures strong customer support.
AlienVault OSSIM incurs lower setup costs compared to i-SIEM, which offers a more complex implementation requiring higher investment.
View comparison
Pricing
AlienVault OSSIM incurs lower setup costs compared to i-SIEM, which offers a more complex implementation requiring higher investment.
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam excels in threat detection and offers a competitive pricing structure, appealing to cost-sensitive tech buyers. In comparison, i-SIEM [EOL] provides comprehensive analytics and reporting, making it ideal for those requiring deep insights and willing to invest more initially.
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to i-SIEM, which has a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to i-SIEM, which has a more budget-friendly setup option.
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
DNIF HYPERCLOUD excels in affordability and vendor support with notable threat detection and scalability. In comparison, i-SIEM [EOL] appeals to those valuing extensive analytics and features, offering a higher upfront investment but delivering substantial long-term value with its diverse capabilities.
DNIF HYPERCLOUD offers a lower setup cost, while i-SIEM [EOL] involves a higher expense for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
DNIF HYPERCLOUD offers a lower setup cost, while i-SIEM [EOL] involves a higher expense for initial deployment.
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
IBM Watson for Cyber Security
4.0 out of 5
IBM Watson excels with seamless integration and analytics, appealing to those needing robust support and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, i-SIEM [EOL] offers advanced threat detection and scalability, suitable for enterprises seeking cutting-edge capabilities and long-term ROI despite higher initial costs.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security involves a high setup cost while i-SIEM [EOL] offers a more cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Watson for Cyber Security involves a high setup cost while i-SIEM [EOL] offers a more cost-effective implementation.

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Log Management
IT Operations Analytics