Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Exabeam vs i-SIEM [EOL] comparison

Exabeam and Cybereason are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Additionally, 73% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cybereason users who would recommend it.
Exabeam
Read 19 Exabeam reviews
  • 2,375 Views
  • 1,274 Comparison Views
73% willing to recommend
i-SIEM [EOL]
Read 1 i-SIEM [EOL] review
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

    Exabeam and i-SIEM [EOL] are competing products in the cybersecurity market, both offering SIEM solutions. Exabeam seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while i-SIEM [EOL] shines in terms of its feature set and integration capabilities.

    Features: Exabeam offers advanced analytics, automated incident response, and enhanced threat detection. i-SIEM [EOL] provides extensive integration, custom threat modeling, and broad applicability.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Exabeam features streamlined deployment and a responsive support team. i-SIEM [EOL] offers a flexible deployment model and comprehensive onboarding support.

    Pricing and ROI: Exabeam has competitive setup costs and a significant return on investment. i-SIEM [EOL] requires a higher initial investment but offers proportional ROI with its enhanced security features.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: April 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    April 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Exabeam
    Average Rating
    7.8
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.7
    Number of Reviews
    19
    Ranking in other categories
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (15th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (3rd), Security Incident Response (5th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (7th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (7th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (9th)
    i-SIEM [EOL]
    Average Rating
    9.0
    Number of Reviews
    1
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Stephen-Armstrong - PeerSpot reviewer
    The SIEM provides a user-friendly UI experience
    When events come into the system, the dashboard categorizes them by the highest risk score, not when they appear on the system. When you've got multiple ongoing incidents you can only see the highest risk score at the top of the list rather than the most recent detection. Exabeam's reporting dashboard could have included a filtering option to filter by the most recent detection.
    Read full review
    DC
    The alert fatigue and false positive rates have just plummeted, which is really exciting.
    empow has a few areas of improvement as with any other technology, such as continuing to drive innovation in the dashboard. While we've been extremely impressed with the dashboard's ease of use, flexibility, ability to drill down deeply, and focus very intently on an area of interest, there will always be opportunities to be more innovative and open it up to a wider audience than just the operations group, for example. With reporting, there is always a desire to have custom reporting for every client of empow. Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology."
    "Exabeam includes machine learning features and out-of-the-box rules that we rely on."
    "The UI was very clean."
    "The Exabeam SIEM has a user friendly UI interface."
    "It is user-friendly and quite simple to use."
    "The way it can connect with AWS is very useful, and the integrations are pretty good."
    "The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features. The price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it."
    "Exabeam has improved our organization by speeding up the investigation process."
    More Exabeam pros
    "As a result of the automation, we are able to manage SIEM with a small security team. I'm in a unique position where we have been growing the security organization quite rapidly over the last three and a half years. But, as a direct result of the empow transition and legacy collection of tools towards the empow platform, we've been able to keep that head count flat. We've been able to redirect a lot of the security team's time away from the wash, rinse, repeat activities of responding to alarms where we have a high degree of confidence that they will be false positives, adjusting the rules accordingly. This can be a bit frustrating for the analyst when they have to spend hours a day dealing with these types of probable false positives. So, it has helped not only us keep our headcount flat relative to the resources necessary to provide the assurances that our executives expect of us for monitoring, but allows our analyst team to spend the majority of their time doing what they love. They are spending their time meaningfully with a higher degree of confidence and enjoying getting into the incident response type activity."
     

    Cons

    "The solution's reporting and dashboarding could be improved."
    "Exabeam needs to improve its adaptive nature towards rules and its capability to understand the entire client environment faster."
    "The only problem is that the UI is not very impressive."
    "Adding to the number of certifications that they have, for example, ISO 27001, would be helpful."
    "The organzation is rigid and not flexible in the way they operate"
    "Exabeam should be a bit faster, especially in loading and vulnerability scanning."
    "We had a large volume right from the beginning and they weren't quite prepared for that. That's something that they should think about when it comes to customers that have a large volume to start off with."
    "Exabeam needs to improve its documentation and provide more customization for dashboards and case management."
    More Exabeam cons
    "Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "Exabeam is not a cheap solution."
    "The solution is expensive."
    "They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."
    "There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."
    "Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."
    "The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."
    "I don't have to put up with any longer with these hypercomplex licensing agreements. Every time I want to add some additional reporting as a compliance centric or regulatory specific, e.g., GDPR, PCI, or Sarbanes-Oxley, many providers would have an additional license for this, which felt a bit ridiculous to me. With the simplified licensing architecture, there were no hidden "gotchas" down the road with empow. Something I have experienced with other providers that I've worked with in the past."
    "With a higher degree of fidelity in the alarms, we were able to avoid adding additional resources to our teams. We take into account the cost of security resources in the market and the significantly higher fidelity from the alarms that are being generated. This drove down our costs with our MSSP. It drove down my cost for human capital internally. It drove down our need to have multiple resources supporting the underlying infrastructure and health and maintenance of empow as a platform from several resources down to one. Therefore, human capital costs were significantly reduced. Our operating expenses were significantly reduced. Our capital costs were significantly reduced while tripling our capacity and our run rate reduced. It was almost a "too good to be true" situation. Fortunately, for us, it worked out very nicely."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    15%
    Financial Services Firm
    13%
    Manufacturing Company
    9%
    Government
    6%
    Computer Software Company
    16%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    12%
    Financial Services Firm
    10%
    Legal Firm
    9%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
    It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
    See all answers
    What do you like most about Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
    The solution's initial setup process is easy.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
    I do not have much information about the pricing. However, I am aware that Exabeam is cheaper than Palo Alto based on discussions in meetings.
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam Logo
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam
    Compared 13% of the time
    Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam Logo
    Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam
    Compared 8% of the time
    Microsoft Sentinel vs Exabeam Logo
    Microsoft Sentinel vs Exabeam
    Compared 8% of the time
    Cortex XSIAM vs Exabeam Logo
    Cortex XSIAM vs Exabeam
    Compared 6% of the time
    LogRhythm SIEM vs Exabeam Logo
    LogRhythm SIEM vs Exabeam
    Compared 6% of the time
    More Exabeam Competitors
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 100% of the time
    More i-SIEM [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Exabeam
    April 2025
    Exabeam reportDownload Exabeam product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    April 2025
    i-SIEM [EOL] reportDownload i-SIEM [EOL] product report
     

    Overview

    Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

    -Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
    -Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
    -Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
    -Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
    -Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
    -Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

    Exabeam

    i-SIEM [EOL] delivers comprehensive monitoring and threat detection capabilities suitable for today's security challenges. It integrates with existing systems, enabling efficient threat analysis and response for knowledgeable users.

    i-SIEM [EOL] offers advanced security analytics and seamless integration with security infrastructure, making it a favored choice among technology professionals. Its intuitive design caters to efficient threat management. Users appreciate its capability to process large data volumes for timely threat detection and remediation. The platform ensures effective incident response through automated processes, assisting professionals in maintaining robust security postures.

    What are the key features of i-SIEM [EOL]?
    • Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes real-time analytics for identifying potential security threats.
    • Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with diverse security tools for a cohesive security strategy.
    • Automated Incident Response: Facilitates swift responses to security incidents to mitigate risks.
    What benefits and ROI can i-SIEM [EOL] offer?
    • Reduced Security Risks: Proactively identifies and addresses vulnerabilities before exploitation.
    • Operational Efficiency: Automation reduces manual workload and minimizes error.
    • Cost-Effectiveness: Streamlines processes to lower overall security management costs.

    i-SIEM [EOL] is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where security and compliance are critical. Its flexibility in handling specific industry requirements makes it suitable for enhancing security postures and operational efficiency.

    Cybereason
     

    Sample Customers

    Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
    University of Oklahoma, Donnelley
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    April 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Microsoft and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: April 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.