Top 10 IBM Application Performance Management Alternatives

Vendor: IBM

3.2 out of 5

7 reviews
62% willing to recommend

606 followers

Top IBM Application Performance Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM Application Performance Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Datadog, and Azure Monitor. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Dynatrace

4.4 out of 5

Dynatrace

4.4 out of 5

Dynatrace excels in user satisfaction related to speed and accuracy, while IBM offers a more extensive set of features, making it a preferred choice despite higher costs. In comparison, Dynatrace’s AI-driven anomaly detection stands out, but IBM’s customization and integration capabilities are more robust.

Download Dynatrace vs. IBM Application Performance Management Report

Pricing

Dynatrace offers a straightforward setup costing less time and resources, whereas IBM Application Performance Management can be more complex and demanding during the initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Dynatrace offers a straightforward setup costing less time and resources, whereas IBM Application Performance Management can be more complex and demanding during the initial setup.

Datadog

4.3 out of 5

Datadog

4.3 out of 5

Datadog is recognized for its ease of use and quick integrations. In comparison, IBM Application Performance Management offers detailed insights and complex performance analytics. Datadog's straightforward deployment, efficient support, and competitive pricing make it appealing, whereas IBM's powerful features and substantial ROI cater to detailed performance needs.

Download Datadog vs. IBM Application Performance Management Report

Pricing

Datadog has higher initial setup costs, while IBM Application Performance Management is known for being more cost-effective in terms of initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Datadog has higher initial setup costs, while IBM Application Performance Management is known for being more cost-effective in terms of initial setup.

Azure Monitor

3.9 out of 5

Azure Monitor

3.9 out of 5

IBM Application Performance Management offers robust transaction tracking and diagnostic capabilities. In comparison, Azure Monitor excels in extensive integration options and real-time analytics. IBM's higher setup costs may yield substantial ROI, while Azure's scalable pricing model and quicker deployment make it cost-effective for many users.

Download Azure Monitor vs. IBM Application Performance Management Report

Pricing

IBM Application Performance Management has a higher setup cost than Azure Monitor, which offers more affordable initial pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Application Performance Management has a higher setup cost than Azure Monitor, which offers more affordable initial pricing.

AppDynamics

4.1 out of 5

AppDynamics

4.1 out of 5

AppDynamics excels with intuitive features, seamless deployment, and competitive pricing. In comparison, IBM APM offers robust monitoring and extensive reporting. Tech buyers might choose AppDynamics for real-time analytics and ease of use. IBM APM could be selected for its depth in monitoring and extensive functionalities.

Download AppDynamics vs. IBM Application Performance Management Report

Pricing

AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Application Performance Management, which reviewers find more affordable and easier to implement.

View comparison

Pricing

AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Application Performance Management, which reviewers find more affordable and easier to implement.

AWS X-Ray

3.9 out of 5

AWS X-Ray

3.9 out of 5

IBM Application Performance Management (APM) excels in ease of use and integration capabilities, making it favorable for those needing real-time analytics and customer support. In comparison, AWS X-Ray offers extensive tracing and language support, appealing to buyers needing deep insights into distributed applications.

Download AWS X-Ray vs. IBM Application Performance Management Report

Pricing

IBM Application Performance Management has a higher setup cost, whereas AWS X-Ray offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Key differences in setup expenses may influence the initial investment required for these performance monitoring tools.

View comparison

Pricing

Instana Dynamic APM

3.8 out of 5

Instana Dynamic APM

3.8 out of 5

IBM Application Performance Management excels in pricing, scalability, and integration capabilities, making it cost-effective with transparent pricing and robust customer support. In comparison, Instana Dynamic APM stands out with real-time data collection, automated root cause analysis, and seamless deployment, delivering ROI despite its higher cost.

Download IBM Application Performance Management vs. Instana Dynamic APM Report

Pricing

IBM Application Performance Management offers a high initial setup cost compared to Instana Dynamic APM, which provides a more affordable and straightforward setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Application Performance Management offers a high initial setup cost compared to Instana Dynamic APM, which provides a more affordable and straightforward setup process.

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

4.5 out of 5

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

4.5 out of 5

IBM Application Performance Management excels in detailed monitoring and analytics, making it ideal for tech buyers focused on performance metrics. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance stands out for its seamless deployment and effective customer support, appealing to those prioritizing connectivity assurance and troubleshooting.

Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. IBM Application Performance Management Report

Pricing

IBM Application Performance Management has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Application Performance Management has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance.

OpenText SiteScope

3.8 out of 5

OpenText SiteScope

3.8 out of 5

OpenText SiteScope is favored for its comprehensive monitoring, ease of use, and competitive pricing. In comparison, IBM Application Performance Management provides innovative analytics, extensive integration options, and advanced tracking features. OpenText prioritizes simplicity and straightforward deployment, while IBM’s detailed analytics justify its higher price.

Download IBM Application Performance Management vs. OpenText SiteScope Report

Pricing

OpenText SiteScope has an affordable setup cost focused on budget-conscious users, whereas IBM Application Performance Management integrates a higher initial investment for more advanced capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

4.0 out of 5

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

4.0 out of 5

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management excels in real-time analytics and comprehensive monitoring, making it ideal for users needing detailed insights. In comparison, IBM Application Performance Management offers predictive insights and scalability, ensuring advanced analytics and long-term growth potential for tech buyers.

Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. IBM Application Performance Management Report

Pricing

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a lower setup cost, while IBM Application Performance Management is more expensive to implement.

View comparison

Pricing

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a lower setup cost, while IBM Application Performance Management is more expensive to implement.

BMC Compuware Strobe

4.0 out of 5

BMC Compuware Strobe

4.0 out of 5

Compuware Strobe is the industry-leading mainframe application performance management and analysis solution for mainframe applications. With Strobe, IT departments can pinpoint application inefficiencies that cause excessive CPU consumption, elongated elapsed times and reduce hardware and software costs while increasing customer satisfaction.

View comparison

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Log Management

Mobile APM