IIS Reviews

We use IIS for hosting service, user authentication, and Active Directory integration.

The product could be more compatible with Linux and macOS, particularly when applying user configuration policies. We have to download and configure other player controllers for the same.

The product is stable. We do not encounter any issues from IIS after configuration.

We have 80-90 IIS users in our organization. We might increase the usage in the future.

The product is straightforward to configure. However, there could be a component to add a feature for third-party system integration.

I recommend IIS to others and rate it a ten out of ten. I cannot apply any policies from Windows server to Linux and Mac machines.

We are using IIS got Active Directory and DNS.

We are using six core hardware from Dell to run the solution.

The most valuable feature of IIS is the database it provides.

IIS could improve by Microsoft Windows improving the update services. We would like to be able to update all systems that are connected. The WSA service has to be in good order to accomplish this.

I have been using IIS for approximately nine years.

The solution is highly stable.

IIS is scalable.

We have approximately 75 servers using the solution. We have plans to increase our usage.

I have not used the support from the vendor for IIS.

The initial setup of IIS is simple and can be done within one hour.

We are using the solution virtually and we did the deployment. We have two or three people who deploy the solution.

There is an annual license to use this solution and the price could be better.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate IIS a nine out of ten.

It allowed us to set up and use a Windows Server we had in place already to host our internal web page.

It is a lightweight web host that is easy to configure for simple webpages.

Finding different settings can be difficult if you don't know where to look.

Stability seems good.

We have not needed to scale out with it, as we use it for very lightweight things.

I have not needed to contact technical support.

I have tried other tools (such as Apache), and found that IIS is more stable and easier on the memory for low resource systems.

Initial setup is straightforward for a basic setup (e.g. one host hosting HTTP traffic), but can get more complicated the more features you want to add (e.g. Windows Authentication, HTTPs, web farm, etc.).

It is licensed with your Windows installation which makes it relatively cheap if you already have a Windows Server sitting around.

We also evaluated Apache, but found that IIS was easier to set up for what we wanted.

Give it a shot. The features are included for free with Windows, so test it out. If you are unhappy, it is easy to disable and switch to a different solution.

We use the solution to build web-based applications and platforms.

The solution is easy to use.

The solution's scalability needs improvement.

It is reasonably stable.

The solution's scalability could be better.

The solution's initial setup process is straightforward.

If you're looking for a scalable solution, look at alternatives other than IIS. But it serves the purpose if you're looking for a small to medium solution. I rate it an eight.

IIS is primarily used for hosting and managing web applications.

The performance of IIS could be improved. Occasionally, we encounter performance issues with IIS where it becomes unresponsive and requires a solution restart.

I have been using IIS for six years.

I give IIS a seven out of ten for stability.

IIS is scalable.

The initial setup is straightforward.

The licensing cost is dependent on the usage.

I give IIS an eight out of ten.

We have around 15,000 people using IIS in the organization.

We require around three people for IIS maintenance.

I recommend IIS to others.

The solution's black box is not fast. 

I would rate the solution's stability a six out of ten. 

The product is scalable. 

The tool's setup is straightforward. 

The product's price is not high. 

I would rate the solution a five out of ten. 

The tool shows us the operating systems where our servers and applications are running. 

There is an issue with the network. The tool's price is also high. 

I am using the tool for one year. 

I would rate the tool's stability a ten out of ten. 

The solution is fully scalable. We have around 10-20 users for the solution. 

The solution's setup is straightforward. The deployment took around two to three weeks to complete.  

The tool's deployment can be done in-house. 

The tool's pricing is on a yearly basis. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

I am using IIS in our organization to manage the flow of the Active Directory.

The solution can be deployed on-premise and on the cloud.

The solution is highly reliable.

The solution is slow and could have better performance.

I used IIS within the last 12 months.

I rate the stability of IIS a six out of ten.

The solution is scalable.

The initial setup of IIS is easy.

I am able to deploy the solution myself.

There is a license needed for the solution.

I do not like the solution but I have no choice but to use it. I prefer open-source solutions, such as Linux.

I rate IIS a five out of ten.