IIS Reviews

Our primary use case for the solution is serving as a port for publishing URLs, especially for our share point team. Additionally, it helps scan and mitigates our vulnerabilities using the best protocols to secure our environment. In the world of cybersecurity, there are significant threats in the IT environment, so we have to mitigate all the HTTP URLs that you have in the environment HTTPS and to do so to secure these tunnels and to provide them with the certificate that you want. IIS also provides the option to secure or mitigate the vulnerabilities in your environment by using the safest protocol to avoid any vulnerabilities or scenarios. We deploy the solution on the premises.

The most valuable feature is controlling the ports you can use and denying the port you won't use in case anything goes wrong. This is one of the most outstanding features, especially for security.

The customer service and support team can be improved.

We have been using the solution for almost 40 years and currently have the latest version implemented.

The solution is very stable.

The solution is scalable and not exclusive to the system administrator. Some teams, such as the network, SharePoint, and dev ops teams, interfere with this solution. However, it is one of the major features of the IIS.

There is a lack of support from the customer service and support team, and they are very slow. I rate them a five out of ten.

Neutral

From my experience, I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten, and the setup took approximately an hour.

We implemented the solution in-house, and one person was required for deployment.

We have seen a return on investment, for all the teams, especially for the security and SharePoint team. Most of the work's done through the server, especially the SharePoint team, and they publish all the websites they are using internally for the company. It's related to the employee and released to the business as a newsletter for the company. So, it's very helpful.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

We are using IIS for a web and application server.

The solution has been reliable.

The price of the solution could be less to improve.

I have been using IIS for a long time.

The solution is stable.

IIS is a stable solution. However, we use load balancers when we want to scale.

The support from IIS is good compared to other vendors. However, the support is pooling over to the cloud reducing their support for on-premise.

I have used JBoss and open-source Tomcat. Depending on the use we will use a particular solution. For example, if we use .NET as a core, we will use IIS.

The implementation of IIS is straightforward. We do mostly MSI deployments but sometimes we do it manually.

If automation is used the deployment can be done quickly.

Depending on where we deploy the solution will determine if we use assistance. We use approximately two people for the deployment of the solution. However, The size of the service and the manner in which it is deployed or if it is automated will determine the number of people required for the deployment. Without utilizing such tools, as automation, additional personnel will be necessary. 

There is no license needed to use the solution.

The newer version of the solution works better.

We use two people for the maintenance of the solution.

I would recommend this solution. If the user is developing around .NET then this solution is needed.

I rate IIS an eight out of ten.

We use the platform for hosting Dynamics from our Microsoft Server.

The product is essential for hosting our ERP and managing our database, making it very important for the company.

The product's most valuable features are performance and security. 

The solution's pricing and stability need improvement. 

I have been using IIS for seven months. 

We have 57 IIS users in our organization. We use it regularly. I rate the platform's scalability a nine. 

Microsoft's support is responsive enough to our requirements.

The initial setup process is straightforward. The deployment of the Microsoft server was precise. We were able to install Windows efficiently.

We take help from a third-party vendor for product implementation. 

They offer a one-time payment model for the product license, and we pay annually for support.

I rate the pricing an eight out of ten. 

I would recommend the platform to others because of the integrated security features and the reliability of the server OS. 

Overall, I rate IIS a nine out of ten. 

I use the solution to maintain the web application by updating the port, DNS name, and date.

The solution's stability needs improvement.

I have been using the solution for two months.

The solution could be more stable. I rate its stability as a four.

It is a scalable solution. We have around 2,000 solution users.

The solution's initial setup was straightforward.

I deployed the solution with the help of online forums. It took two to three hours.

I rate the solution as a ten out of ten.

I use IIS for issuing security certificates. For example, when I was trying to deploy direct access, it require a certificate which is issued from services. The service I used comes from IIS.

IIS is for large enterprises who would want to secure and make information private.

The documentation of IIS could be better. They are not easily accessible. I had to use YouTube and other online resources to learn how to use the solution properly.

I have been using IIS for approximately a couple of months.

IIS is stable.

I am the only one using this solution in my company.

The solution is scalable for large-sized companies.

I have not used the support from IIS.

I previously used Microsoft Active Directory. I started using IIS to see how can I deploy a secure certificate from my organization. Deploying certificates often require payment for various services. However, if you have a Windows Server, you can deploy it on-premises without having to go online. However, if you opt to avoid going online, you'll need to have an alternative process in place.

I rate IIS a five out of ten. The time it takes for the deployment depends on your resources. If your resources are optimized, it will not take too long. You must have some knowledge of how to deploy it before you do it. However, typically the deployment takes 10 to 20 minutes.

I did the deployment of the solution myself. Assistance would be useful for large enterprises for the department.

I was using the trial version of IIS inside my virtual machines. 

ISS is included if you purchase a Windows Server license, then you can have the possibility to deploy different services. 

I would not recommend this solution because there are easier-to-use solutions on the market.

I rate IIS a five out of ten.

The solution is used to install and run applications on the server. It's similar to web servers. We host our internal applications on it.

We can have full control of the server from the configuration to the OS. The product is flexible. It provides much more flexibility than the cloud.

The security must be improved.

I have been using the solution since 2003.

The tool is very stable.

The scalability depends on the hardware. We have five users in our organization. We will eventually increase the usage.

It is very easy to deploy the tool. It took us 20 minutes to deploy it. The deployment process is very easy. We just need to prepare the installation and run it on the server.

The solution can be deployed in-house. We do not need any assistance.

ROI is good.

We have moved to the cloud. We must assess the vulnerabilities of the server. Then, we must perform the server hardening procedure of Windows. The impact of the product on our strategies depends on our use cases. The performance depends on the hardware. Generally, the tool performs well. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

My company is a reseller of cloud-based products, and we are using IIS for this.

It is an easy-to-use and secure program.

The solution can be made more compatible. IIS also has some stability issues and needs restarting.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The solution is mostly stable, but sometimes there are issues and needs a restart. I rate it eight out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. Around 50 users are using it presently in our organization.

The initial setup was easy, and it took one week to be deployed. For deployment, first, we are planning, second, we are implementing on-premise, and third we are publishing the cloud. For maintenance, we need managers, admins, and engineers.

The solution is simple, and you can find the deployments everywhere. I rate it nine out of ten.

It is used for the REST service.

The tool is very easy and efficient.

In the next release, the tool should be more easily integrated and configured with other provisions. The pricing should also be made cheaper since it's very expensive now.

I have been using it for twenty years.

The tool is stable. 

The solution is a scalable product. My company has 1000 users for the tool. I have plans to increase the number of users.

Previously, we used Apache, Orache and Webinar Technologies.

The initial setup was easy.

The product was deployed through an in-house team.

The yearly licensing cost is very high. The solution is very expensive.

IIS is a very efficient and stable solution.

I would rate it a ten out of ten.