IIS Reviews

IIS is primarily used for hosting and managing web applications.

The performance of IIS could be improved. Occasionally, we encounter performance issues with IIS where it becomes unresponsive and requires a solution restart.

I have been using IIS for six years.

I give IIS a seven out of ten for stability.

IIS is scalable.

The initial setup is straightforward.

The licensing cost is dependent on the usage.

I give IIS an eight out of ten.

We have around 15,000 people using IIS in the organization.

We require around three people for IIS maintenance.

I recommend IIS to others.

The tool shows us the operating systems where our servers and applications are running. 

There is an issue with the network. The tool's price is also high. 

I am using the tool for one year. 

I would rate the tool's stability a ten out of ten. 

The solution is fully scalable. We have around 10-20 users for the solution. 

The solution's setup is straightforward. The deployment took around two to three weeks to complete.  

The tool's deployment can be done in-house. 

The tool's pricing is on a yearly basis. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

I use the solution to research and help our clients with dashboards and reports.

The most valuable feature of the solution is its capability to create different kinds of reports and charts. It has an intuitive user interface and provides a lot of options for building reports. The solution is also very user-friendly.

The initial setup could be made easier.

I have been using the solution for six months.

Our clients feel that other BI tools are more stable than IIS. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

The solution is scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

The initial setup is a bit complex. Our clients manage their own setups.

The deployment can be done in-house. A team of three or four people is required to deploy and maintain the solution.

We have seen a 50% return on investment on the product.

We have to pay a license fee to use the solution. The solution provides multiple licensing options.

I would recommend the solution to others. I rate the product an eight and a half or nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for the database and application system. We provide information systems for public and private companies.

The solution is easy to use, easy to maintain and isn't too technical. 

The solution's security needs improvement.

The solution should improve the cluster environment and load balancing.

Occasionally we have a problem with stability.

The scalability isn't so good. We have about 2,000 internal users, but externally we may have as many as one million users. Our service is public service. We do plan to increase usage.

We have a contract with technical support and they have helped us with issues in the past. We've been satisfied so far.

The solution is easy to set up. It took maybe an hour or two to deploy.

We use the private cloud deployment model.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. I'd recommend the solution.

We primarily use the solution for our IT help desk interface.

All the features of Microsoft IIS are valuable.

The graphical user interface has room for improvement and can be more user-friendly.

The price of the solution has room for improvement.

I have been using the solution for over ten years.

The solution is very stable.

I give the scalability an eight out of ten.

We have around 150 end users.

The initial setup is complex because we are not familiar with the steps required to deploy. Over time, once we become familiar with the process the setup becomes easier.

I give the price of the solution a five out of ten.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

I recommend Microsoft IIS to others.

• Clustering
• Application isolation

It needs a more compact configuration.

I've used it for one year.

No issues encountered.

It depends on the load of the server, but we have not had an issue.

No issues encountered.

I've not used customer service.

I've not used technical support.

We switched because of the nature of the application and technology.

I always design my systems simple and keep them simple as possible.

We implemented it with in-house team. We like to keep the knowledge in-house.

It was crucial and it definitely paid off.

Keep the systems simple. Try to work with open-source solutions and pay for technical support and subscription to support the projects.

Yes, I always and regularly evaluate. In case of Java we evaluated all applications servers which support JEE full profile.

I was using Apache Tomcat, JBoss AS (RedHat), WebMethods (Software AG) and IIS (Microsoft). All of them have they specialities, but depending on the goals and purpose it’s quiet easy to make a choice. Products based on Microsoft .NET do not give companies lot of options; either with Server Operating System shipped IIS, or the developer version called IIS Express. Applications written in Java, n opposite, can be accommodated on several fully profiled or non-fully-profiled application or web servers.

Only have one application per server if possible. Do not over complicate it, and keep the variance in the configuration simple as possible.

• Easy to set-up
• Good to maintain

This made the security set-up easier and authentication simplified.

• Logging
• Monitoring

I've used Microsoft NPS for four years.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered but always gor for two machines as one isn't enough and isn't fault redundant.

Haven't needed it yet.

Haven't needed it yet.

Yes, we used RSA Radius. It was very hard to maintain and outdated.

Straightforward, it's a feature of Windows Server and a basic knowledge of the radius principles are enough.

In-house implementation.

Pretty good. Authentication for network appliances, load balancing products and wireless devices became easy to do.

It came with the Microsoft contract.

No, we were unhappy with RSA Radius so we went for the 'free' solution.

It has many features, make sure they satisfy your needs.

We primarily use the solution for the internet and opening applications. We use it, for example, to access Outlook on the web. We use it for a variety of Microsoft applications.

The solution is very stable. The solution is very simple and easy to use.

The level of technical support the solution offers could be improved.

I've been using the solution for one to two years.

The solution is stable, but they could improve on it a bit.

It's easy to scale the solution. We have about 200 users using it currently.

We've been in contact with technical support. They're okay, but they could be better in terms of the level of support they offer.

The solution was easy to set up. It only takes about one hour to deploy it.

We handled the deployment ourselves.

The pricing of the product could be improved.

We use the on-premises deployment model.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.