Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user2589 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Administrator at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
MS IIS- A good web server

What is most valuable?

1. It is Microsoft product that is easy to use and to host local and public websites. 2. Unfamiliar users can work on this product. No license required because it is integrated with the OS. 3. IIS has the ability to limit the bandwidth of your web pages. 4. If the application crashes then the server and other applications continue to run and the failed application restarts the next time with the request.

What needs improvement?

1. It is not compatible with other platforms due to limitations. 2. Users can not change the source code as per the requirements because source code is not editable. 3. Compatibility issue with other applications.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user245406 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user245406MIS Analyst at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor

I'd like to add that it was mostly the licensing that kept me from using IIS. Microsoft licensing is not very clear; I ended up talking to an MS agent. They told me that if you are running IIS, you don't need an additional license for each person to connect and view a web page, but you will need a CAL for each person using AD authentication. If you choose to not use AD authentication, such as a database username and password, then you will need an external authentication license. Most sites will have some sort of permissions and security, even if it's just logging into an admin panel of some sort (all CMS')

I asked exactly how a CAL works, and I was told that it was a piece of paper to tell MS that you are in compliance if they decide to audit you. Each license is around $40.

Apache doesn't require you to purchase a license. Microsoft does and if you don't think so, you haven't read enough or talked to the right person (even MS agents have been known to provide inaccurate licensing information).

I hope someone finds this useful. I spent about 2 hours of my time getting solid answers. A few online MS resources, MS agents, and other forums have been in agreement with what I said above.

See all 2 comments
reviewer1192332 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Pre-Sales Manager at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Straightforward to set up, easy to use, and the stability has been improving over time
Pros and Cons
  • "What I like the most is that it is easy to use."
  • "In the next release, I would like to see better integration between the cloud environment and the on-premises environment."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case of this solution is for infrastructure, Active Directory, infrastructure functionality, such as DHCP, and also, it's the main operating system for virtual machines.

What is most valuable?

What I like the most is that it is easy to use.

What needs improvement?

The price could be reduced.

In the next release, I would like to see better integration between the cloud environment and the on-premises environment.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with this solution for twenty years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is better than it was in the past. It is better today than it was five years ago.

How are customer service and technical support?

I am no longer involved in the technical areas anymore. Instead, I am a part of the trade sales team. In this role, I have contacted Microsoft for the commercial parts but not for support.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward.

It is deployed in all environments, on-premises and on the cloud.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of the cloud system is a bit high.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
IIS
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about IIS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Solutions Architect at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
​It needs a more compact configuration, but the clustering feature is valuable.

What is most valuable?

  • Clustering
  • Application isolation

What needs improvement?

It needs a more compact configuration.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for one year.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It depends on the load of the server, but we have not had an issue.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

I've not used customer service.

Technical Support:

I've not used technical support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We switched because of the nature of the application and technology.

How was the initial setup?

I always design my systems simple and keep them simple as possible.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it with in-house team. We like to keep the knowledge in-house.

What was our ROI?

It was crucial and it definitely paid off.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Keep the systems simple. Try to work with open-source solutions and pay for technical support and subscription to support the projects.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes, I always and regularly evaluate. In case of Java we evaluated all applications servers which support JEE full profile.

What other advice do I have?

I was using Apache Tomcat, JBoss AS (RedHat), WebMethods (Software AG) and IIS (Microsoft). All of them have they specialities, but depending on the goals and purpose it’s quiet easy to make a choice. Products based on Microsoft .NET do not give companies lot of options; either with Server Operating System shipped IIS, or the developer version called IIS Express. Applications written in Java, n opposite, can be accommodated on several fully profiled or non-fully-profiled application or web servers.

Only have one application per server if possible. Do not over complicate it, and keep the variance in the configuration simple as possible.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1255719 - PeerSpot reviewer
Techincal CIO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Easy to set up, good scalability, and excellent online communities to help with troubleshooting
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is easy to use and connects with Microsoft."
  • "The documentation is not very detailed. They need to improve it and add to it. They should ensure there are lots of visuals to help users better understand the solution."

What is most valuable?

The solution is easy to use and connects with Microsoft. 

The solution is very robust.

What needs improvement?

The documentation is not very detailed. They need to improve it and add to it. They should ensure there are lots of visuals to help users better understand the solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for five years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In the previous version, scalability was a bit difficult, but with the latest version, a lot of improvements have been made. It's getting better.

How are customer service and technical support?

We don't use technical support. We do find there is a lot of community support online if we need it.

How was the initial setup?

The solution is easy to setup. It's very easy to comprehend.

What about the implementation team?

We implement the solution ourselves on behalf of clients.

What other advice do I have?

We use the current version of the solution and the on-premises deployment model. We're partners with Microsoft. We generally work with enterprise-level organizations.

I'd recommend the solution, but only to those organizations already using Microsoft.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Vendor
IIS is a reliable Web Server

Valuable Features:

IIS in windows 2003 onwards has become more secure by allowing the users to choose only the required components / features to install thereby reducing the surface area. High performance and stability by isolating worker processes, application pools. Essential for products like Exchange and SharePoint. Comes with Windows OS, no separate licenses.

Room for Improvement:

Can be difficult to set up for new users and complex to troubleshoot.

Other Advice:

IIS is a reliable and secure product, works very well along side other components such as SQL and dotnet.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user3870 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user3870Senior Manager of Engineering with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor

I agree with you about the worker processes and setting up separate application pools!

I love the ability to recycle an application pool without effecting any other pools/sites!

reviewer1268013 - PeerSpot reviewer
Field Engineer & Lead Implementation SLA
Real User
Scalable and easy to set up but cold improve its technical support
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is very stable. The solution is very simple and easy to use."
  • "The level of technical support the solution offers could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for the internet and opening applications. We use it, for example, to access Outlook on the web. We use it for a variety of Microsoft applications.

What is most valuable?

The solution is very stable. The solution is very simple and easy to use.

What needs improvement?

The level of technical support the solution offers could be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for one to two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable, but they could improve on it a bit.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's easy to scale the solution. We have about 200 users using it currently.

How are customer service and technical support?

We've been in contact with technical support. They're okay, but they could be better in terms of the level of support they offer.

How was the initial setup?

The solution was easy to set up. It only takes about one hour to deploy it.

What about the implementation team?

We handled the deployment ourselves.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing of the product could be improved.

What other advice do I have?

We use the on-premises deployment model.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Oliver Baharanyi - PeerSpot reviewer
ICT Superintendent at a mining and metals company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Stable, easy to use, and a quick deployment
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is very easy to use and offers a quick deployment."
  • "We've never had any issues with the solution, but it's still nice to have overall improvements on it. It could be easier and faster to use, for example."

What is most valuable?

The solution is very easy to use and offers a quick deployment.

What needs improvement?

We've never had any issues with the solution, but it's still nice to have overall improvements on it. It could be easier and faster to use, for example.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for a few years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have around 80 users on the solution currently.

How are customer service and technical support?

We've never had any issue that required us to reach out to support. We've been satisfied with the solution overall.

How was the initial setup?

Overall, the deployment was very fast. It didn't take long to set up.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution could offer better pricing.

What other advice do I have?

We use the on-premises deployment model.

I'd recommend the product. I'd rate it eight out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user