IIS Reviews

I mainly use IIS to support web applications.

IIS's best features are its management console and stability.

IIS's memory management could be improved.

I've been using IIS for over ten years.

IIS is very stable.

IIS's scalability is good.

Microsoft's technical support is good.

Previously, I used Apache, but it wasn't stable enough.

The initial setup was very easy.

I would rate IIS nine out of ten.

The solution is used to install and run applications on the server. It's similar to web servers. We host our internal applications on it.

We can have full control of the server from the configuration to the OS. The product is flexible. It provides much more flexibility than the cloud.

The security must be improved.

I have been using the solution since 2003.

The tool is very stable.

The scalability depends on the hardware. We have five users in our organization. We will eventually increase the usage.

It is very easy to deploy the tool. It took us 20 minutes to deploy it. The deployment process is very easy. We just need to prepare the installation and run it on the server.

The solution can be deployed in-house. We do not need any assistance.

ROI is good.

We have moved to the cloud. We must assess the vulnerabilities of the server. Then, we must perform the server hardening procedure of Windows. The impact of the product on our strategies depends on our use cases. The performance depends on the hardware. Generally, the tool performs well. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the product for our web applications.

The product is easy to configure. It has a lot of good features.

The solution must improve the integration between its databases. It should also improve the definition of IP addresses and ports for connection.

I have been using the solution for more than ten years.

I rate the tool’s stability more than eight out of ten.

Compared to other web application services, IIS has better scalability. We have many different programs. A part of our customers use the solution.

The initial setup is a little complex. Even if we make a little mistake, the configuration still works well.

We need three networking personnel to maintain the product.

We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.

I look for network administration aspects in the product. A software person might have a different perspective. I did not configure the solution. My friends configured it. When my friends have a problem, I help them to solve it. IIS is related to software engineers and programmers. IIS is the best solution. Its services are better than other products. Overall, I rate the tool more than eight out of ten.

We are using the platform for automatic web services.

The platform is easy to manage.

The platform's stability could be better.

I have been using IIS for a few years. At present, we are the latest version.

I rate the platform's stability an eight out of ten. It could be improved.

We have 2,000 IIS users in our organization. It is a scalable platform.

The platform's technical support services are satisfactory.

The initial setup is simple. It does not take too long to set up.

The platform generates a good return on investment.

IIS's pricing is reasonable.

I recommend IIS to others and rate it a nine out of ten.

I use IIS to publish our website internally. It helps me to publish information about the teams and provides flexible communication.

IIS is easy to configure in terms of websites and other solutions.

I would like to see NLB features in IIS.

I have been using this solution for 20 years.

For stability, I would give a rating of nine out of ten.

I would rate the scalability at ten out of ten.

I would rate Microsoft's technical support at ten out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup is easy.

We have seen an ROI. We have been able to purchase the solution at a good price and implement it easily. It has been working fine for us.

The price is good.

I recommend IIS because it's simple, easy to configure and implement, and has good technical support. Overall, I would rate IIS at nine on a scale from one to ten.

The solution is an operating system for our servers. We have other applications running on it. 

I like the availability.

It's good and offers good usability.

The solution has been issue free.

It's stable and very reliable.

The solution scales well.

The setup is straightforward and quite simple. 

The cost is a bit too high.

There is a bit of complexity, and we'd like to make sure that in the future, it's streamlined and easier in general. 

I've used the solution for one year.

I'd rate the stability ten out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. 

We have ten to 20 users currently using it. It is scalable. We do have a plan to increase usage, although I'm not sure of the exact plan.

It's a bit expensive and therefore not extensively used. 

I've never contacted technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they would be. 

I did not previously use a different solution. This is the first tool of its kind that I have used. 

It is straightforward to set up. We managed to deploy it in two to three weeks. We were able to migrate all the platforms over without issue. The architecture must be clear, and if that's the case, you don't have any issues. 

We managed the setup ourselves in-house. We did not need any outside assistance from integrators or consultants while handling the implementation process. 

I have not witnessed any ROI while using the solution. 

The solution is expensive. We pay for the solution yearly. I'm not sure if there are also extra costs on top of the main licensing cost.

I am using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. New users wouldn't have an issue with the product. It's a good choice. 

I use the solution to maintain the web application by updating the port, DNS name, and date.

The solution's stability needs improvement.

I have been using the solution for two months.

The solution could be more stable. I rate its stability as a four.

It is a scalable solution. We have around 2,000 solution users.

The solution's initial setup was straightforward.

I deployed the solution with the help of online forums. It took two to three hours.

I rate the solution as a ten out of ten.

We are using .net website on this solution. It's great for our website hosting. All custom web pages and websites we develop are on it. 

For all of our custom pages, websites, and web applications, we use this. 

It's very handy to restart the back pages and restart the website engine. 

It's very easy to publish. 

The product has very good integration with firewalls. 

It allows port mapping and page mapping.

The product can allow for translation and certification binding.

It has multiple good, useful features.

The solution is easy to set up. 

Technical support is good.

It can scale well.

We'd like future versions to be more stable. 

It would be useful if they could incorporate some default security controls. These are missing right now. 

We've used the solution for 15 years. 

We would prefer if the solution improved the level of stability on offer. 

So far, the solution has been quite scalable. 

We are moving towards different apps and setups and by default, we'll need more IIS, so we are in the process of increasing usage. We'll need to increase the workload on our side.

The technical support has been quite helpful and responsive. It's pretty good.

The initial setup process is very straightforward and simple. It is not overly complex. 

We've used both on-premises and cloud deployments. 

We have witnessed an ROI.

The product is a default component on servers. We didn't have to pay any initial cost.

We are using the latest version of the solution. 

If you would like to host your websites internally, this is a good tool that gets the job done.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.