IIS Reviews

The solution is used to install and run applications on the server. It's similar to web servers. We host our internal applications on it.

We can have full control of the server from the configuration to the OS. The product is flexible. It provides much more flexibility than the cloud.

The security must be improved.

I have been using the solution since 2003.

The tool is very stable.

The scalability depends on the hardware. We have five users in our organization. We will eventually increase the usage.

It is very easy to deploy the tool. It took us 20 minutes to deploy it. The deployment process is very easy. We just need to prepare the installation and run it on the server.

The solution can be deployed in-house. We do not need any assistance.

ROI is good.

We have moved to the cloud. We must assess the vulnerabilities of the server. Then, we must perform the server hardening procedure of Windows. The impact of the product on our strategies depends on our use cases. The performance depends on the hardware. Generally, the tool performs well. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

My company is a reseller of cloud-based products, and we are using IIS for this.

It is an easy-to-use and secure program.

The solution can be made more compatible. IIS also has some stability issues and needs restarting.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The solution is mostly stable, but sometimes there are issues and needs a restart. I rate it eight out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. Around 50 users are using it presently in our organization.

The initial setup was easy, and it took one week to be deployed. For deployment, first, we are planning, second, we are implementing on-premise, and third we are publishing the cloud. For maintenance, we need managers, admins, and engineers.

The solution is simple, and you can find the deployments everywhere. I rate it nine out of ten.

It is used for the REST service.

The tool is very easy and efficient.

In the next release, the tool should be more easily integrated and configured with other provisions. The pricing should also be made cheaper since it's very expensive now.

I have been using it for twenty years.

The tool is stable. 

The solution is a scalable product. My company has 1000 users for the tool. I have plans to increase the number of users.

Previously, we used Apache, Orache and Webinar Technologies.

The initial setup was easy.

The product was deployed through an in-house team.

The yearly licensing cost is very high. The solution is very expensive.

IIS is a very efficient and stable solution.

I would rate it a ten out of ten.

I use IIS for issuing security certificates. For example, when I was trying to deploy direct access, it require a certificate which is issued from services. The service I used comes from IIS.

IIS is for large enterprises who would want to secure and make information private.

The documentation of IIS could be better. They are not easily accessible. I had to use YouTube and other online resources to learn how to use the solution properly.

I have been using IIS for approximately a couple of months.

IIS is stable.

I am the only one using this solution in my company.

The solution is scalable for large-sized companies.

I have not used the support from IIS.

I previously used Microsoft Active Directory. I started using IIS to see how can I deploy a secure certificate from my organization. Deploying certificates often require payment for various services. However, if you have a Windows Server, you can deploy it on-premises without having to go online. However, if you opt to avoid going online, you'll need to have an alternative process in place.

I rate IIS a five out of ten. The time it takes for the deployment depends on your resources. If your resources are optimized, it will not take too long. You must have some knowledge of how to deploy it before you do it. However, typically the deployment takes 10 to 20 minutes.

I did the deployment of the solution myself. Assistance would be useful for large enterprises for the department.

I was using the trial version of IIS inside my virtual machines. 

ISS is included if you purchase a Windows Server license, then you can have the possibility to deploy different services. 

I would not recommend this solution because there are easier-to-use solutions on the market.

I rate IIS a five out of ten.

We are using IIS for many purposes, such as creating the application pools, and websites, and defining the HTTP rules.

IIS could improve the error logging. There are times we are not able to see the errors. More details would be helpful. Additionally, the configuring of the IIS should be allowed through coding instead of the classic view.

I have been using IIS for approximately eight years.

IIS is a stable solution for .NET applications.

The scalability of IIS is good. We can expand the solution if we choose.

We have approximately 30 to 40 people using the solution in my organization.

I was required to use the support from IIS a while ago when we were migrating from IIS 6.0 to IIS 7.0.

I rate the support from IIS a five out of five.

Positive

The initial setup of IIS is easy. The process takes only five minutes.

We chose IIS because most of the applications we use are .NET and are Microsoft technologies that we are using for developing the application, IIS is the most valuable solution for this use case.

For first-time users of IIS, they should have some basic knowledge of what an application pool is, websites, and homepage redirections are.

I rate IIS a nine out of ten.

We use the product for our web applications.

The product is easy to configure. It has a lot of good features.

The solution must improve the integration between its databases. It should also improve the definition of IP addresses and ports for connection.

I have been using the solution for more than ten years.

I rate the tool’s stability more than eight out of ten.

Compared to other web application services, IIS has better scalability. We have many different programs. A part of our customers use the solution.

The initial setup is a little complex. Even if we make a little mistake, the configuration still works well.

We need three networking personnel to maintain the product.

We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.

I look for network administration aspects in the product. A software person might have a different perspective. I did not configure the solution. My friends configured it. When my friends have a problem, I help them to solve it. IIS is related to software engineers and programmers. IIS is the best solution. Its services are better than other products. Overall, I rate the tool more than eight out of ten.

I use IIS to publish our website internally. It helps me to publish information about the teams and provides flexible communication.

IIS is easy to configure in terms of websites and other solutions.

I would like to see NLB features in IIS.

I have been using this solution for 20 years.

For stability, I would give a rating of nine out of ten.

I would rate the scalability at ten out of ten.

I would rate Microsoft's technical support at ten out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup is easy.

We have seen an ROI. We have been able to purchase the solution at a good price and implement it easily. It has been working fine for us.

The price is good.

I recommend IIS because it's simple, easy to configure and implement, and has good technical support. Overall, I would rate IIS at nine on a scale from one to ten.

The solution is an operating system for our servers. We have other applications running on it. 

I like the availability.

It's good and offers good usability.

The solution has been issue free.

It's stable and very reliable.

The solution scales well.

The setup is straightforward and quite simple. 

The cost is a bit too high.

There is a bit of complexity, and we'd like to make sure that in the future, it's streamlined and easier in general. 

I've used the solution for one year.

I'd rate the stability ten out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. 

We have ten to 20 users currently using it. It is scalable. We do have a plan to increase usage, although I'm not sure of the exact plan.

It's a bit expensive and therefore not extensively used. 

I've never contacted technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they would be. 

I did not previously use a different solution. This is the first tool of its kind that I have used. 

It is straightforward to set up. We managed to deploy it in two to three weeks. We were able to migrate all the platforms over without issue. The architecture must be clear, and if that's the case, you don't have any issues. 

We managed the setup ourselves in-house. We did not need any outside assistance from integrators or consultants while handling the implementation process. 

I have not witnessed any ROI while using the solution. 

The solution is expensive. We pay for the solution yearly. I'm not sure if there are also extra costs on top of the main licensing cost.

I am using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. New users wouldn't have an issue with the product. It's a good choice.