IIS Reviews

We use the product for our web applications.

The product is easy to configure. It has a lot of good features.

The solution must improve the integration between its databases. It should also improve the definition of IP addresses and ports for connection.

I have been using the solution for more than ten years.

I rate the tool’s stability more than eight out of ten.

Compared to other web application services, IIS has better scalability. We have many different programs. A part of our customers use the solution.

The initial setup is a little complex. Even if we make a little mistake, the configuration still works well.

We need three networking personnel to maintain the product.

We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.

I look for network administration aspects in the product. A software person might have a different perspective. I did not configure the solution. My friends configured it. When my friends have a problem, I help them to solve it. IIS is related to software engineers and programmers. IIS is the best solution. Its services are better than other products. Overall, I rate the tool more than eight out of ten.

We are using the platform for automatic web services.

The platform is easy to manage.

The platform's stability could be better.

I have been using IIS for a few years. At present, we are the latest version.

I rate the platform's stability an eight out of ten. It could be improved.

We have 2,000 IIS users in our organization. It is a scalable platform.

The platform's technical support services are satisfactory.

The initial setup is simple. It does not take too long to set up.

The platform generates a good return on investment.

IIS's pricing is reasonable.

I recommend IIS to others and rate it a nine out of ten.

My company is a reseller of cloud-based products, and we are using IIS for this.

It is an easy-to-use and secure program.

The solution can be made more compatible. IIS also has some stability issues and needs restarting.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The solution is mostly stable, but sometimes there are issues and needs a restart. I rate it eight out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. Around 50 users are using it presently in our organization.

The initial setup was easy, and it took one week to be deployed. For deployment, first, we are planning, second, we are implementing on-premise, and third we are publishing the cloud. For maintenance, we need managers, admins, and engineers.

The solution is simple, and you can find the deployments everywhere. I rate it nine out of ten.

I use IIS to publish our website internally. It helps me to publish information about the teams and provides flexible communication.

IIS is easy to configure in terms of websites and other solutions.

I would like to see NLB features in IIS.

I have been using this solution for 20 years.

For stability, I would give a rating of nine out of ten.

I would rate the scalability at ten out of ten.

I would rate Microsoft's technical support at ten out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup is easy.

We have seen an ROI. We have been able to purchase the solution at a good price and implement it easily. It has been working fine for us.

The price is good.

I recommend IIS because it's simple, easy to configure and implement, and has good technical support. Overall, I would rate IIS at nine on a scale from one to ten.

The solution is an operating system for our servers. We have other applications running on it. 

I like the availability.

It's good and offers good usability.

The solution has been issue free.

It's stable and very reliable.

The solution scales well.

The setup is straightforward and quite simple. 

The cost is a bit too high.

There is a bit of complexity, and we'd like to make sure that in the future, it's streamlined and easier in general. 

I've used the solution for one year.

I'd rate the stability ten out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. 

We have ten to 20 users currently using it. It is scalable. We do have a plan to increase usage, although I'm not sure of the exact plan.

It's a bit expensive and therefore not extensively used. 

I've never contacted technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they would be. 

I did not previously use a different solution. This is the first tool of its kind that I have used. 

It is straightforward to set up. We managed to deploy it in two to three weeks. We were able to migrate all the platforms over without issue. The architecture must be clear, and if that's the case, you don't have any issues. 

We managed the setup ourselves in-house. We did not need any outside assistance from integrators or consultants while handling the implementation process. 

I have not witnessed any ROI while using the solution. 

The solution is expensive. We pay for the solution yearly. I'm not sure if there are also extra costs on top of the main licensing cost.

I am using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. New users wouldn't have an issue with the product. It's a good choice. 

It is used for the REST service.

The tool is very easy and efficient.

In the next release, the tool should be more easily integrated and configured with other provisions. The pricing should also be made cheaper since it's very expensive now.

I have been using it for twenty years.

The tool is stable. 

The solution is a scalable product. My company has 1000 users for the tool. I have plans to increase the number of users.

Previously, we used Apache, Orache and Webinar Technologies.

The initial setup was easy.

The product was deployed through an in-house team.

The yearly licensing cost is very high. The solution is very expensive.

IIS is a very efficient and stable solution.

I would rate it a ten out of ten.

We are using .net website on this solution. It's great for our website hosting. All custom web pages and websites we develop are on it. 

For all of our custom pages, websites, and web applications, we use this. 

It's very handy to restart the back pages and restart the website engine. 

It's very easy to publish. 

The product has very good integration with firewalls. 

It allows port mapping and page mapping.

The product can allow for translation and certification binding.

It has multiple good, useful features.

The solution is easy to set up. 

Technical support is good.

It can scale well.

We'd like future versions to be more stable. 

It would be useful if they could incorporate some default security controls. These are missing right now. 

We've used the solution for 15 years. 

We would prefer if the solution improved the level of stability on offer. 

So far, the solution has been quite scalable. 

We are moving towards different apps and setups and by default, we'll need more IIS, so we are in the process of increasing usage. We'll need to increase the workload on our side.

The technical support has been quite helpful and responsive. It's pretty good.

The initial setup process is very straightforward and simple. It is not overly complex. 

We've used both on-premises and cloud deployments. 

We have witnessed an ROI.

The product is a default component on servers. We didn't have to pay any initial cost.

We are using the latest version of the solution. 

If you would like to host your websites internally, this is a good tool that gets the job done.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

We are using IIS for a web and application server.

The solution has been reliable.

The price of the solution could be less to improve.

I have been using IIS for a long time.

The solution is stable.

IIS is a stable solution. However, we use load balancers when we want to scale.

The support from IIS is good compared to other vendors. However, the support is pooling over to the cloud reducing their support for on-premise.

I have used JBoss and open-source Tomcat. Depending on the use we will use a particular solution. For example, if we use .NET as a core, we will use IIS.

The implementation of IIS is straightforward. We do mostly MSI deployments but sometimes we do it manually.

If automation is used the deployment can be done quickly.

Depending on where we deploy the solution will determine if we use assistance. We use approximately two people for the deployment of the solution. However, The size of the service and the manner in which it is deployed or if it is automated will determine the number of people required for the deployment. Without utilizing such tools, as automation, additional personnel will be necessary. 

There is no license needed to use the solution.

The newer version of the solution works better.

We use two people for the maintenance of the solution.

I would recommend this solution. If the user is developing around .NET then this solution is needed.

I rate IIS an eight out of ten.