IIS vs Windows Process Activation Services comparison

IIS and Windows Process Activation Services are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. IIS is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1, while Windows Process Activation Services is ranked #22. IIS holds a 12.7% mindshare in AIS, compared to Windows Process Activation Services’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of IIS users are willing to recommend the solution.

IIS

Read 55 IIS reviews

3,617 Views
2,755 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Windows Process Activation ...

Read 1 Windows Process Activation Services review

231 Views
174 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

IIS

Windows Process Activation ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IIS and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,095 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IIS

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (4th)

Windows Process Activation ...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

22nd

Average Rating

4.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of IIS is 12.7%, down from 14.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Process Activation Services is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

VikramSingh6

Operations Executive at Quess

A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps

I would rate the overall solution a six out of ten. We have around five to six developers and engineers for the solution’s deployment and maintenance. You can use the solution if your website is not too big or complicated. However, if it is big and complicated, then you need to use Apache or Red Hat. This tool can be used for internal purposes. But if you plan to host a public app, then I wouldn’t recommend the tool.

Read full review

reviewer1226547

Senior IT Systems Administrator at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support

The solution needs to allow for other company product licenses to be included if possible. The solution needs to include other Microsoft products, like Exchange, SharePoint, etc. Right now, it's only for Windows and Office. The solution needs to be made web-based. Right now, we have to install some tools and to use these tools we have to log into a specific server. If that server has an issue we cannot manage it. The solution needs to be able to be managed from any machine. Alerting capabilities should be improved. If a license expires or there is a breach, or something is non-compliant, the solution should send out alerts.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is simple."

"The solution integrates well with most Microsoft products."

"The product is easy to configure."

"When you are working with Microsoft solutions, you will see that the integration with the operating system, and implementing some security features, are easier in IIS than when using another solution."

"IIS is useful for the deployment of web applications...Its stability is good."

"This is definitely a stable solution."

"The solution is highly reliable."

"The product is stable."

More IIS pros

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the central console, that allows you to see all of the activated and deactivated computers."

Cons

"We've never had any issues with the solution, but it's still nice to have overall improvements on it. It could be easier and faster to use, for example."

"Scalability issues and security concerns need attention from Microsoft."

"The tool needs to improve its performance."

"The graphical user interface has room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."

"If Microsoft IIS could work well with AppOptics or things like PHP, Python, and other custom languages that run on the webserver, it would be ideal. I think there are cases where people need to use Apache instead of IIS when IIS doesn't work well with other web languages."

"In the next release, I would like to see better integration between the cloud environment and the on-premises environment."

"The security must be improved."

"This solution needs to be easier for cases where you want to have an IIS cluster."

More IIS cons

"The stability of the solution needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Windows Server IIS is expensive. They have a large user base, and they charge a little bit too much."

"There is no license required for the product as it is role-based. Whenever you go for a Windows platform server, the role has to be installed directly from the server manager. There is no additional cost that has to be paid for that. It is free to use."

"The solution provides multiple licensing options."

"The solution’s pricing is yearly. The pricing is affordable and not high."

"I give the price of the solution a five out of ten."

"I didn't need to get an additional license for the solution since it was included in my server."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"The cost for IIS is already included in Windows services. We don't have to pay anything extra."

More IIS pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - IIS or NGINX Plus?

IIS is a flexible, secure, and manageable web server to host anything on the web. IIS’s scalable and open architecture can handle the most demanding tasks. From media streaming to web applications,...

See all answers

What do you like most about IIS?

The product is flexible.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IIS?

They offer a one-time payment model for the product license, and we pay annually for support. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NGINX Plus vs IIS

Compared 32% of the time

Apache Web Server vs IIS

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle WebLogic Server vs IIS

Compared 15% of the time

Tomcat vs IIS

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Fusion Middleware vs IIS

Compared 2% of the time

More IIS Competitors

Microsoft .NET Framework vs Windows Process Activation Services

Compared 50% of the time

More Windows Process Activation Services Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IIS

December 2024

Download IIS product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

December 2024

Windows Process Activation Services report

Download Windows Process Activation Services product report

Also Known As

Windows Server IIS

No data available

Learn More

Microsoft

Overview

Internet Information Services (IIS) provides a secure, easy-to-manage, modular and extensible platform for reliably hosting websites, services and applications. With IIS, you get choice and control without giving up reliability or security.

Windows Process Activation Service generalizes the Internet Information Services (IIS) process model, removing the dependency on HTTP. All the features of IIS that were previously available only to HTTP applications are now available to applications hosting Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) services, by using non-HTTP protocols. IIS 7.0 also uses Windows Process Activation Service for message-based activation over HTTP.

Sample Customers

Erste Bank Group, NJVC, Samsung Electronics, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe, Urban Software Institute

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Harris Farm Markets, The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, John Keells Holdings, Green Prefab, 343 Industries, SM Prime, Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

December 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.