Kaspersky is a good product. It helps clients with adequate protection using the latest technologies, such as AI, Azure, and zero-day attack protection.
Director at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
Helps clients with adequate protection using the latest technologies but have lesser integrations
Pros and Cons
- "It integrates well across different operating systems, including mobile devices like Android and Mac. It effectively manages firewalls, particularly with Fortinet, enhancing overall security posture."
- "The solution could provide more integration."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
The number of incidents has been completely reduced. We haven't reported any incidents since we deployed the product. Additionally, on the dashboard, you can easily see all the attempts that have been detected. On the reporting side, it operates smoothly and effectively, ensuring security.
What is most valuable?
Kaspersky has EDR capabilities and extended EDR features, which help in mitigating legacy issues. Additionally, the robust management tools enable effective vulnerability patching and application deployment.
It integrates well across different operating systems, including mobile devices like Android and Mac. It effectively manages firewalls, particularly with Fortinet, enhancing overall security posture.
What needs improvement?
The solution could provide more integration.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business since 2019.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We're looking for a comprehensive solution that integrates multiple services, such as malware protection and firewall capabilities, similar to what the Sophos platform offers. Our technicians have indicated that Sophos provides superior integration and functionality compared to Kaspersky.
What other advice do I have?
The management console is user-friendly. We haven't encountered any problems with it. Our technicians can easily navigate the dashboard and perform any necessary tasks.
Administrators can easily monitor detections and remediations, saving considerable time on the administrator's side. Additionally, when threats are detected, the program promptly reports to the administrator, allowing for immediate action or manual intervention to mitigate potential risks.
Kaspersky does not exclusively focus on network security solutions. Instead, it primarily concentrates on securing endpoints. Adding additional components could enhance its effectiveness in protecting your environment.
Kaspersky primarily focuses on endpoint protection and includes features like application controls, unlike solutions such as Sophos, which integrate seamlessly with EDR and extend to network security. Kaspersky's offering remains focused on endpoint security without the same level of integration into broader network security frameworks.
The solution includes various components that can be tailored to meet specific needs. It provides comprehensive endpoint security, including email security, as a separate module. You can purchase and configure the necessary components without buying unnecessary add-ons like sandboxing separately.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
Cybersecurity Product Consultant at a wholesaler/distributor with 11-50 employees
Unified endpoint security has simplified sales conversations and has supported clients’ defenses
Pros and Cons
- "I think all the features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are beneficial because it offers unified endpoint management with security features."
What is our primary use case?
I have good experience in the sales part of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, not the technical side. I am not a technical person who installed Kaspersky or worked with it technically, but I sell Kaspersky solutions here in Jordan.
I have been dealing with Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for more than 15 years.
What is most valuable?
I think all the features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are beneficial because it offers unified endpoint management with security features. This is the differentiator between it and other solutions. The unified endpoint management and the capabilities that are added to the antivirus and anti-malware are what differentiate this solution from others.
I usually recommend Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for all organizations, both small and enterprise.
What needs improvement?
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business does not have encryption tools. It uses the Windows BitLocker tool, which is management only for that.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been dealing with Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for more than 15 years.
What other advice do I have?
I would assess the effectiveness of Kaspersky advanced threat defense measures as very powerful.
I do not have the technical capabilities to check the features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business in detail, but I do not have any concerns regarding the product.
I think Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is affordable and competitive compared to other vendors.
I would rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business overall as a 10 out of 10.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
Last updated: Jan 22, 2026
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.
It security engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Provides good threat detection and reporting capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "The solution's most helpful features for threat detection are machine learning analytics and behavior analytics."
- "Some threats were able to bypass the solution's detection."
What is our primary use case?
I used the solution for signature-based detection, machine learning, threat detection, behavior-based detection, and for the endpoint.
What is most valuable?
The solution's most helpful features for threat detection are machine learning analytics and behavior analytics. The solution's reporting capabilities are good. I can generate and schedule custom reports from it. It's helpful and gives us a high, medium, and low-risk-based approach.
What needs improvement?
Some threats were able to bypass the solution's detection.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I haven’t faced any stability issues with this solution.
How are customer service and support?
The solution’s technical support is okay.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have worked with other tools, but I like Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business because it gives full endpoint control, including detection, vulnerability management, and file integrity.
What was our ROI?
The solution fulfilled our needs for the endpoints, including enhanced security and detection for the endpoints.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is not an expensive solution.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Technology Specialist at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
An easy-to-deploy tool with good application control
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the application control is very good."
- "The GUI mode in the product is an area with certain shortcomings since it looks old with the graphics provided by Kaspersky."
What is our primary use case?
In my company, we use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, just like how we use Sophos Central and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the application control is very good.
What needs improvement?
The GUI mode in the product is an area with certain shortcomings since it looks old with the graphics provided by Kaspersky. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement in the product.
Once you look at the console from the on-premises version, you can see that the GUI mode is very old, meaning you feel like you are dealing with something vintage in nature. The tool's GUI mode is not updated to a new one. Kaspersky should change settings or parameters and make it easy enough for users to create policies since, presently, some difficulties are encountered when creating the policies. The tool needs to change some components in the console to make the product easy to access and configure the policies.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
There are no bugs in the product. It is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I know about a company that has around 600 users of the solution where I did the configuration.
How was the initial setup?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
The solution is deployed on the cloud and on-premises model.
Once my company gets the license, we access the URL, after which we use the URL for configuration, license activation, creating agents, and creating the necessary policies, after which we take care of the setup phase for handing over the product to the customer.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The tool is expensive.
What other advice do I have?
To those who plan to use the solution, I would say that we need a dedicated server to deploy the tool in several places.
I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Head of IT Department at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Stable product with a wide range of security features
Pros and Cons
- "It is an effective solution. It provides a wide range of security and defense features."
- "Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business’s interface could be easier to understand when displaying the activities during configuration processes."
What is our primary use case?
We use the software to secure and defend the network from malicious attacks for endpoints.
What is most valuable?
It is an effective solution. It provides a wide range of security and defense features.
What needs improvement?
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business’s interface could be easier to understand when displaying the activities during configuration processes.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for eight or nine years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have 50 Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business users in our organization. It is challenging to scale while working with a large number of users.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support team takes time to respond to the queries. However, their documentation on the website is helpful.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
We encounter issues while deploying the product if it is not installed properly and requires one executive to work on the process. However, it is easy to maintain.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We purchase the software’s yearly license. It includes support and maintenance updates. The pricing is a bit more expensive than other products.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated a few similar products. We decided to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business as it is more stable, has different defense models, and helps in efficient network supervision.
What other advice do I have?
The product uses a lot of resources for hardware. It is necessary to install and configure the product correctly. I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
IT Support Specialist at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees
User-friendly with a good firewall and good reliability
Pros and Cons
- "It's easy to use."
- "The deployment could be better."
What is our primary use case?
We're using it on the endpoint on the user's computer and the servers. We have licenses for workstations and servers. And it's the endpoint security that is the antivirus and the IDS integrated. We also use it to manage some restrictions and web browsing for some users. We allow them to browse some websites and also we restrict some devices and ports.
What is most valuable?
The firewall is the most valuable feature for us.
The solution is user-friendly.
It's stable and reliable.
What needs improvement?
The deployment could be better. Recently when I try to deploy it I received a large number of failures. It is very slow as well.
As an IT analyst, it's easy to use. However, some users don't want to use it as it is more complicated, and due to the firewall, they cannot connect to some websites or other networks. That said, it's still a very good product.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable. It's easy to use. It's reliable and there are no bugs or glitches.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution doesn't really scale per se.
We have two IT specialists and are using it directly. The other users are only end users and there are about 600 of them.
How are customer service and support?
I haven't used support much. I only opened one ticket with them. However, I found the solution myself. Nobody even gave me training and I was able to figure it out.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are leaving Kaspersky next year. We will work with Microsoft instead. We'll be using Defender.
How was the initial setup?
We had trouble deploying the solution as we ended up getting many failures, which was not helpful.
Most of the time, it's from the script I wrote myself, and I used to deploy it before in the previous version. We're using Security Center 13 in the version and it was working fine, and we're still using the same application. At the same time, also with version 13 it's very slow and has a large number of failures. Right now, I'm using another tool to deploy the software to the computer to get around issues.
I am able to manage the solution myself. I manage the server.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost of the solution is approximately $31,000 for three years. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee.
What other advice do I have?
We are a customer and end-user.
I use it both on-premises and in the cloud.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. We've been mostly happy with the product overall.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Network and Security Specialist at a government with 51-200 employees
It's reliable and secure, but the monitoring and notifications could be more detailed
Pros and Cons
- "The performance is good. It doesn't use a lot of resources, which is crucial for us."
- "Kaspersky and most other security products have a lot of modules. They recently added several new ones. You find yourself buying and deploying so many things. There are some modules that everyone uses, like, for example, the orchestration module. Instead of selling them separately, it would be better to have bundles or an all-in-one license."
What is our primary use case?
We install Kaspersky to protect our endpoints for clients and servers. In the past, Kaspersky had different solutions for the clients and servers. We use the solution for protection from viruses, malware, etc., on the client's side.
I'm not sure if we'll increase usage of Kaspersky or try another solution. We are having discussions now with Trend Micro because we have new business requirements, and we want to see all the different capabilities that are there.
When we started with Kaspersky, it was an antivirus system, but now they've added endpoint protection, so it has more capabilities. Trend Micro has the same product and engine for clients and servers. We are using another product from Trend Micro that will integrate these products, which is better than having different solutions. For now, we're still using Kaspersky, but in the future, I think we'll move to Trend Micro.
What is most valuable?
With Kaspersky in place, we haven't faced any problems with viruses, ransomware, or anything like that.
What needs improvement?
If something critical happens, Kaspersky will alert the admin or SOC team about it. I think Kaspersky's reporting, monitoring, and notifications should be more detailed.
In my case, different admins are responsible because we have various departments. There is one admin per department. We don't need to receive all the notifications. We can receive only the critical alerts, but the other admins need to get all of them. That's one area where Kaspersky needs improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using Kaspersky for five or six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The performance is good. It doesn't use a lot of resources, which is crucial for us. However, the performance wasn't optimal out of the box. It needed some tuning on it to be sure that it is the best configuration. Kaspersky is reliable. I can't recall any time we had crashes or downtime.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Kaspersky is highly scalable. Right now, we have more than 500 users in various departments, including regular employees and managers.
How are customer service and support?
Kaspersky support is fast and good.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up Kaspersky isn't complex at all. It's straightforward. You install the server, and then you can install the agent remotely. It didn't take very long either. For post-installation maintenance, we have different sites, and each site has an engineer responsible for handling Kaspersky. The product doesn't necessarily require this many engineers. It's only because we have different locations. Right now, we have five or six engineers across the various sites.
What about the implementation team?
We used a Kaspersky partner for implementation. They were very good.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I don't remember exactly what the licenses cost, but it's not too expensive. It's affordable,
especially when you are dealing with on-prem. However, I don't know about the new prices because we are in the process of buying support. We've owned the license for a long time, and we are now bringing in the support, so we are not paying much for this.
Kaspersky and most other security products have a lot of modules. They recently added several new ones. You find yourself buying and deploying so many things. There are some modules that everyone uses, like, for example, the orchestration module. Instead of selling them separately, it would be better to have bundles or an all-in-one license. That would save the customers from having to do lots of implementations. As far as I know, they do not have a bundled license.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security seven out of 10. I think Kaspersky is one of the best products for small and medium-sized businesses. It doesn't need that much experience for implementation and support. I would suggest that new users be patient when they're tuning in the first implementation. They might find that the system uses a lot of resources and the machines become slow. But after spending some time tuning, the product will work fine.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
System Administrator at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
An easy-to-install product that is available at a very low price
Pros and Cons
- "The product's initial setup phase was easy."
- "The GUI of the product is too basic, making it an area where improvements are required."
What is our primary use case?
I use the solution in my company for endpoints and for anti-malware purposes. I use the solution for the endpoints in our infrastructure, so it allows me to block USBs or any other incoming connections from unknown sources.
What is most valuable?
The tool is easy to use for me, especially if it is the on-premises version. The product is easy to install. The best thing about the solution stems from the fact that it is available at a very low price with a lot of features that can be modified to meet the users' requirements. The policies of the product are easy to use.
What needs improvement?
The product is hard to use on a cloud server. From an improvement perspective, the use of the product on a cloud server should be made better. The GUI of the product is too basic, making it an area where improvements are required.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for five to six years. I don't remember the version of the solution. My company has a partnership with Kaspersky.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The major problem I have with the product stems from the fact that it needs more RAM space. My company has to make more RAM space.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Around 2,000 people in my company use the product.
How are customer service and support?
I am very happy with the solution's technical support team.
How was the initial setup?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
Users must install MySQL first, after which they can install Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, after which they can use a package installer from another client that automatically connects the tool on the server, making it an easy process.
The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.
The solution can be deployed in an hour or two.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product is available at a low price.
What other advice do I have?
The integration of the tool with our company's existing IT infrastructure is good and helpful.
In my company, we have choices. If I want to use a cloud-based tool for endpoint security, we use Sophos. If I want an on-premises endpoint security product, I prefer Kaspersky.
If you want cheap endpoint security, especially on an on-premises server, I highly recommend Kaspersky since it is easy to use, install, and available at a low price.
I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2026
Product Categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Endpoint Compliance Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Extended Detection and Response (XDR)Popular Comparisons
CrowdStrike Falcon
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Fortinet FortiEDR
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
IBM Security QRadar
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
Microsoft Defender XDR
Elastic Security
Fortinet FortiClient
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Trend Vision One
Symantec Endpoint Security
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which endpoint solution is more effective in terms of protection and remote administration: Sophos Intercept X or Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
- Which EPP solution to choose for a university: Seqrite Endpoint Security vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
- What is the biggest difference between EPP and EDR products?
- Can Cylance be used with Symantec or Kaspersky endpoint solutions without conflict?
- When evaluating Endpoint Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What's the best way to trial endpoint protection solutions?
- What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
- Which Endpoint Protection Solution offers Zero Trust (ZTN) as a feature?
- What to choose: an endpoint antivirus, an EDR solution or both?
- Which ransomware is the biggest threat in 2020?




















