Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

To protect my endpoint computer.

It helps minimize breach of data and stabilize our network.

Device protection.

Web Control and vulnerability need work.

Since introduced years ago, it has been used to prevent various types of malware infections. It has also introduced additional features for firewalling to better control applications regarding network activities.

Initially, it did greatly improve the security. However, as many of us know, signature-based malware prevention is not very useful anymore. Aside from not stopping all threats, it is not very good for the performance of the system, and especially with older devices, it has a noticeable impact. But in regard to other legacy solutions, I do believe Kaspersky is one of the better ones.

Especially the firewalling, I found useful, as you can control the applications and services on a granular level to tell them where they have access to or not. 

The policies are easy to make and controlled by the Kaspersky Administrative Security Center, which comes at no additional costs.

Malware protection for Kaspersky should be revolutionized, where they no longer work with signatures, but with more advanced ways of detecting malware, such as Cylance or Traps from Palo Alto.

Our clients use it for protecting their endpoints.

Our clients are using the advanced options, and they're quite comfortable with this solution because they didn't have any problems. 

It was easy to integrate it with Active Directory. It is fast and easy to use. It has all the required features.

Currently, it doesn't have a cloud option. This is something that they should look into going forward.

I have been using this solution for two months.

It is stable. We didn't have any problems.

We have been implementing it in small companies, and it has been working fine.

I haven't spoken to technical support because our implementation went well.

Our clients were using other antivirus solutions, and they moved to this solution. We will be doing POCs for some clients who already have a similar solution. It is not easy to move to a new solution.

It was a simple process. The installation and the updates afterward went smoothly. The initial setup was quite fast. It took 15 to 20 minutes, which also included updates. 

We provide maintenance services to our clients and check whether the updates are happening.

Its price is on par with other products. It might even be slightly cheaper. There are no additional costs.

I would rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security an eight out of ten.

I use Kaspersky like an end-user, I just want security, but I don't use all the features. I only use it for protection, like when someone puts a pen drive inside my PC and to block some websites and content.

I like that Kaspersky isn't heavy. 

Like most of the virus scanning products, it can be better. It should be more secure and detect new malware as it's released.

I've been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for more than two years.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is a stable product.

The initial setup is easy. It takes about an hour to install and deploy this solution.

I installed it by myself. 

It's an affordable security solution.

I would recommend this product to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Kaspersky Endpoint Security an eight.

It's on-premise. There are three Kaspersky appliances — EPP, EDR, and the sandbox — that all work together. If someone wants to secure their internal endpoints, they can use the EBB and the EDR tools. You can use these to investigate traffic on the endpoint. The sandboxing feature is used to check the files. 

I'd like Kaspersky to be more stable and secure.

We've been providing Kaspersky for many years. Before I joined this company, my company worked for several years with various endpoint protection solutions by Kaspersky, Trend Micro, Carbon Black, and others.

Yeah, yeah. Stable and scalable.

Kaspersky support has cooperated with us. They were very helpful.

Setting up Kaspersky is easy, but it requires two or three core members from our team, including admins and managers if necessary. And that is because of the administration that I mentioned. And we set up an SQL Server to manage Kaspersky. With help from the customer team, it takes only six to seven days to get it working. 

Kaspersky requires a license. I don't remember how much it costs exactly, but it's charged per appliance. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security eight out of 10. I recommend it.

Kaspersky has performed nicely, we haven't had any issues with the end user. Our primary use case is for the detection features. 

It helps to improve our security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure. The remote tasks are great. 

• Deployment 
• Reports
• Detection

I would like to see an enhanced web platform. 

The reports and email notifications have room for improvement. 

Stability is very good. We haven't had any problems. 

I haven't had to use their technical support yet. 

We have only used Kaspersky. The criteria that was important to us when considering a solution was that it would be easy to use and that it would have easy upgrades. 

The initial setup was easy. 

I would rate it a nine out of ten. The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface. 

The primary use case was for endpoint security. 

As much as the solution is an endpoint product, it provided good security. When you logged in, you could actually see all the things that were happening on your endpoint and that was a benefit. 

 I had issues with the cloud management of this solution. 

I used this solution for about a year and recently switched to a different solution. 

The solution was stable but it crashed the application sometimes. As much as it's an endpoint security, I think it should be intelligent enough to know which applications are secure and which are not. 

We were using this solution but we recently switched to Sophos. 

The initial setup is quite straightforward. It took a few minutes, but the solution is complex to manage because as much as it was cloud-based, the machines in our environment meant that when you wanted to uninstall or remove an appliance from the portal, it was a bit hectic. The portal would say it's been removed but your machine didn't agree with that. We had about 50 users of the product and one engineer dealing with maintenance. 

I think the solution is suitable for a mid-size organization but not for enterprise size companies that need endpoint security.

I rate Kaspersky a seven out of 10. 

We use this solution for the antivirus to secure our PCs and server rooms.

As far as it functions, it works fine. 

From a technical standpoint, they are good and it's functional, but improvements are needed.

It's very heavy and it affects the computer's performance. 

We need better performance. A lightweight solution without affecting the performance of the computer would be better.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for 14 years.

I don't have any issues with the stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security.

This is a scalable solution. We have approximately 200 users in our organization.

We have plans to increase our usage.

Technical support is okay. I don't have any issues with them.

I was not involved in the installation but seems to be straightforward.

We have three people to manage this solution for our organization. The team is made up of two engineers and one manager.

Licensing fees are paid annually.

I would recommend this solution but the performance needs to be improved.

I would rate this solution a four out of ten.