Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is used for security.
Analista de Suporte Pleno at N1 Software e Servicos de Informatica
Beneficial encryption, good protection, and straightforward installation
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are protection and encryption. Additionally, the interface is good and it can be integrated with Windows, Linux, and Mac."
- "The solution could improve by having some integration with other vendors."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are protection and encryption. Additionally, the interface is good and it can be integrated with Windows, Linux, and Mac.
What needs improvement?
The solution could improve by having some integration with other vendors.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately two years.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
February 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d09a/3d09ae4d87808101515aff47a788c8a5df4338de" alt="PeerSpot Buyer's Guide"
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
How are customer service and support?
I have found the support to be good.
How was the initial setup?
The implementation is very simple.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90183/9018307dff0f8424d9744886ad50d7f0f7915caf" alt="PeerSpot user"
Network and Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Scalable, easy to use, and stable
Pros and Cons
- "The product is quite scalable."
- "The solution could be more secure. It's an aspect the company needs to be mindful of."
What is our primary use case?
The solution is primarily used in order to protect computers. It also helps you avoid issues online.
What is most valuable?
The solution has been very stable. The performance is good.
The product is quite scalable.
We use it at our enterprise, and it's been extremely beneficial.
We've found the product to be easy to use.
What needs improvement?
The solution could be more secure. It's an aspect the company needs to be mindful of.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for around two years at this point.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable. We don't deal with any types of crashing or freezing.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution can scale if you need it to. That's not a problem.
Right now, in our organization, about 25 people use it.
How are customer service and technical support?
We've never used technical support before. We've never had to call them. Therefore, I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
For an antivirus product, I used to use McAfee. However, I had some information stolen from my computer and therefore I had to change products. It didn't protect me very well.
How was the initial setup?
I did not handle the installation process. There's another team that manages that aspect of the solution. Therefore, I can't comment directly on how easy or difficult it was to implement.
There is a systems manager that handles any maintenance that may be required.
What about the implementation team?
We had a team that handled it internally.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
You do have to pay for a license. We pay a yearly licensing fee. I can't speak to the exact cost, however.
What other advice do I have?
I'm a customer and an end-user. I do not have a business relationship with Kaspersky.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've mostly been quite please with its performance.
I'd recommend it to other users and organizations.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
February 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d09a/3d09ae4d87808101515aff47a788c8a5df4338de" alt="PeerSpot Buyer's Guide"
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
A stable and affordable endpoint security solution
Pros and Cons
- "I like that Kaspersky isn't heavy."
- "It should be more secure and detect new malware as it's released."
What is our primary use case?
I use Kaspersky like an end-user, I just want security, but I don't use all the features. I only use it for protection, like when someone puts a pen drive inside my PC and to block some websites and content.
What is most valuable?
I like that Kaspersky isn't heavy.
What needs improvement?
Like most of the virus scanning products, it can be better. It should be more secure and detect new malware as it's released.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for more than two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Kaspersky Endpoint Security is a stable product.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy. It takes about an hour to install and deploy this solution.
What about the implementation team?
I installed it by myself.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's an affordable security solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this product to potential users.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Kaspersky Endpoint Security an eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Supervisor
Helps minimize breach of data and stabilize our network
What is our primary use case?
To protect my endpoint computer.
How has it helped my organization?
It helps minimize breach of data and stabilize our network.
What is most valuable?
Device protection.
What needs improvement?
Web Control and vulnerability need work.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Service Delivery Engineer - Network Security Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Provides good visibility of the endpoint; cloud management was somewhat difficult
Pros and Cons
- "It provides good security."
- "There were issues with the cloud management."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case was for endpoint security.
What is most valuable?
As much as the solution is an endpoint product, it provided good security. When you logged in, you could actually see all the things that were happening on your endpoint and that was a benefit.
What needs improvement?
I had issues with the cloud management of this solution.
For how long have I used the solution?
I used this solution for about a year and recently switched to a different solution.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution was stable but it crashed the application sometimes. As much as it's an endpoint security, I think it should be intelligent enough to know which applications are secure and which are not.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were using this solution but we recently switched to Sophos.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is quite straightforward. It took a few minutes, but the solution is complex to manage because as much as it was cloud-based, the machines in our environment meant that when you wanted to uninstall or remove an appliance from the portal, it was a bit hectic. The portal would say it's been removed but your machine didn't agree with that. We had about 50 users of the product and one engineer dealing with maintenance.
What other advice do I have?
I think the solution is suitable for a mid-size organization but not for enterprise size companies that need endpoint security.
I rate Kaspersky a seven out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Help Desk at Elsewedy Electric Algerie
Improves security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure
Pros and Cons
- "It helps to improve our security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure. The remote tasks are great."
- "The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface."
What is our primary use case?
Kaspersky has performed nicely, we haven't had any issues with the end user. Our primary use case is for the detection features.
How has it helped my organization?
It helps to improve our security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure. The remote tasks are great.
What is most valuable?
- Deployment
- Reports
- Detection
What needs improvement?
I would like to see an enhanced web platform.
The reports and email notifications have room for improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability is very good. We haven't had any problems.
How are customer service and technical support?
I haven't had to use their technical support yet.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have only used Kaspersky. The criteria that was important to us when considering a solution was that it would be easy to use and that it would have easy upgrades.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was easy.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate it a nine out of ten. The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
SAP Director at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The performance could be better, but the functionality is good
Pros and Cons
- "As far as it functions, it works fine."
- "It's very heavy and it affects the computer's performance."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution for the antivirus to secure our PCs and server rooms.
What is most valuable?
As far as it functions, it works fine.
From a technical standpoint, they are good and it's functional, but improvements are needed.
What needs improvement?
It's very heavy and it affects the computer's performance.
We need better performance. A lightweight solution without affecting the performance of the computer would be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for 14 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I don't have any issues with the stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable solution. We have approximately 200 users in our organization.
We have plans to increase our usage.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is okay. I don't have any issues with them.
How was the initial setup?
I was not involved in the installation but seems to be straightforward.
We have three people to manage this solution for our organization. The team is made up of two engineers and one manager.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Licensing fees are paid annually.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution but the performance needs to be improved.
I would rate this solution a four out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Cyber Security Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
It's easy to set up and manage
Pros and Cons
- "Setting up Kaspersky is easy, but it requires two or three core members from our team, including admins and managers if necessary. And that is because of the administration that I mentioned."
- "I'd like Kaspersky to be more stable and secure."
What is our primary use case?
It's on-premise. There are three Kaspersky appliances — EPP, EDR, and the sandbox — that all work together. If someone wants to secure their internal endpoints, they can use the EBB and the EDR tools. You can use these to investigate traffic on the endpoint. The sandboxing feature is used to check the files.
What needs improvement?
I'd like Kaspersky to be more stable and secure.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been providing Kaspersky for many years. Before I joined this company, my company worked for several years with various endpoint protection solutions by Kaspersky, Trend Micro, Carbon Black, and others.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Yeah, yeah. Stable and scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Kaspersky support has cooperated with us. They were very helpful.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up Kaspersky is easy, but it requires two or three core members from our team, including admins and managers if necessary. And that is because of the administration that I mentioned. And we set up an SQL Server to manage Kaspersky. With help from the customer team, it takes only six to seven days to get it working.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Kaspersky requires a license. I don't remember how much it costs exactly, but it's charged per appliance.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security eight out of 10. I recommend it.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90183/9018307dff0f8424d9744886ad50d7f0f7915caf" alt="PeerSpot user"
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: February 2025
Product Categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Endpoint Compliance Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)Popular Comparisons
CrowdStrike Falcon
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
Cisco Secure Endpoint
Fortinet FortiClient
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
Symantec Endpoint Security
Intercept X Endpoint
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Trellix Endpoint Security
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which endpoint solution is more effective in terms of protection and remote administration: Sophos Intercept X or Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
- Which EPP solution to choose for a university: Seqrite Endpoint Security vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
- What is the biggest difference between EPP and EDR products?
- Can Cylance be used with Symantec or Kaspersky endpoint solutions without conflict?
- When evaluating Endpoint Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What's the best way to trial endpoint protection solutions?
- What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
- Which Endpoint Protection Solution offers Zero Trust (ZTN) as a feature?
- What to choose: an endpoint antivirus, an EDR solution or both?
- Which ransomware is the biggest threat in 2020?