Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

We primarily use Kaspersky as our antivirus solution. It covers endpoint protection and endpoint compliance, as well.

This product is easy to use.

It slows down the system sometimes, and it has the occasional false positive where it deems something a virus when it isn't. That said, it's not bad.

We have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for the past 12 months.

I have not seen any bugs or glitches in the time that I have used it.

When I need help, I contact them. Technical support has always been helpful and we have had no issues with them at all.

We are a solution provider, and most of our clients use Symantec as their antivirus solution.

The initial setup is straightforward.

Our in-house team deployed it and didn't require any help.

Kaspersky is priced well. I would say that the prices are relatively cheap.

This is a product that we like, and use it as-is. We wouldn't want to change anything on it.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I am a cyber security engineer and use this to protect my computer from viruses.

It has helped our company protect the confidential data of our customers.

I like that it is a known product used to protect computers from viruses.

I would like for Kaspersky to generate reports when it detects issues such as malware.

I have been using this solution for a few months.

It is a stable solution.

It is scalable.

I have not needed to reach out to support.

No, this is my first solution of this type.

The initial setup was very straightforward and took about thirty minutes, five out of five experience here.

I was able to complete the setup myself.

Not really, I only looked at the default antivirus that is installed in Windows.

I would recommend this to other people. I think it's a great solution to protect computers from viruses.

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for protecting our information.

The solution is secure.

There are times when Microsoft Windows's antivirus called Defender interferes with the functionality of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. There should be better integration with Windows.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately six years.

We are having some stability issues but we have been using the solution for a long time and we have not had any issues until now. Once this issue is fixed we expect it to work well in the future.

We have approximately 90 people using the solution in my organization.

We have had some issues with the solution and we have contacted support and they have resolved them.

The installation takes half an hour to complete.

I did the implementation of the solution and we have five engineers that handle the maintenance.

There is an annual license required to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a six out of ten.

We use this solution to secure our endpoint devices.

With Kaspersky, we are licensed for 300 users. Eight technical engineers handle all maintenance-related issues. 

The reporting feature is good. Also, the device control is good. 

This solution used a lot of memory and GPU; it would be nice if this could be reduced. 

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for roughly five years.

The initial setup is easy. 

We installed this solution ourselves. 

Licensing is on a yearly basis. We have a three-year license.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give Kaspersky Endpoint Security a rating of eight.

I would absolutely recommend this solution to others.

It has improved my organization because the admin tools are easy to use.

The admin tools are the most valuable feature because they are easy to use.

It allows for a solid form of risk management as well as a measure of remote device management. It is very hands off, which I appreciate. 

Utilizing the CPU usages during the scan process needs to be improved.

The customer service is solid. I have never had a problem getting through to someone. They have always been able to help me with any problems or questions.

• Custom package deployments 
• The user interface is easy to maintain once it is setup.
• The Client is very low-resource. Some of the systems that I have deployed it on are older, and it does not eat up a lot of system resources.

It is a cost-effective endpoint security service.

For preventing virus spreads in our networks (servers and PCs). In my experience, Kaspersky products have comprehensive and quick zero-day response for global and local (Indonesia) threats, including spam, Trojans, worms, etc.

My environment consists of 30 servers and 200 PCs and laptops with no USB and CD/DVD media restriction. Eighty percent of all clients have internet connection without any restriction policy.

Decreases IT threats, incidents from outside the environment as well as internal. Reduces cost and time when handling incidents, including mitigation, restore backup, recovery, reducing/preventing file/data error caused by the threat.

Antivirus, including anti-spam, trojan, and worm detection and prevention. Kaspersky has a comprehensive virus definition update which is very helpful for threat prevention.

The need to re-engineer the source code to reduce CPU and memory usage. Other areas for improvement include a data-loss prevention solution, enhanced application control, enhanced device control, an endpoint security encryption solution, an advanced persistent threats (APT) solution, and an all-in-one solution with one pricing scheme for corporate and enterprise business needs.

I rate it at seven out of 10. It would be an eight if they could decrease memory and CPU usage.

Endpoint antivirus and malware protection for mobile users and their laptop computers. We have experimented with mobile devices, but have not needed to establish corporate protections on mobiles until recently.

Kaspersky has proven to offer very good protection to all our PC users. We also have it installed on our Mac clients and it is performing well.

Kaspersky Enterprise solution's combined protections have helped to block a lot of malware which would have caused a lot of interruptions in our operations.

The solution is very draining on the computers at certain moments in its operation, excluding the scanning periods that make the computer unusable until finished. It is a balance between economic protection and client machine performance to our users. Most of the time, it is an excellent solution.

Since introduced years ago, it has been used to prevent various types of malware infections. It has also introduced additional features for firewalling to better control applications regarding network activities.

Initially, it did greatly improve the security. However, as many of us know, signature-based malware prevention is not very useful anymore. Aside from not stopping all threats, it is not very good for the performance of the system, and especially with older devices, it has a noticeable impact. But in regard to other legacy solutions, I do believe Kaspersky is one of the better ones.

Especially the firewalling, I found useful, as you can control the applications and services on a granular level to tell them where they have access to or not. 

The policies are easy to make and controlled by the Kaspersky Administrative Security Center, which comes at no additional costs.

Malware protection for Kaspersky should be revolutionized, where they no longer work with signatures, but with more advanced ways of detecting malware, such as Cylance or Traps from Palo Alto.