Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

We are using this solution for endpoint protection against intrusions, such as viruses.

One of the main features of this solution is the fast scanning capabilities.

I would like to see better-enhanced features, such as protection against ransomware and different types of malicious malware.

In an upcoming release, I would like to see DLP, encryption, and a VPN feature. There are a lot of other solutions coming out which claim they have all these features together.

I have been using this solution for two years.

I have found the solution to be stable.

We have over 3,000 users using the solution in my organization and the solution is scalable.

The technical support has been great. When we log a ticket we receive a solution shortly after.

We were previously using Symantec.

The setup was easy and not challenging.

The price of the solution is reasonable. It is less costly compared to competitors.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for endpoint security. It's just used to protect our equipment for the most part.

The security of the solution is very good. It helps us avoid viruses very effectively. We're quite concerned about this, and we take pains to ensure everything is protected.

The solution is very user-friendly and easy to use. 

The initial setup is very simple.

The solution is stable.

We haven't had any issues so far, and therefore don't have any complaints.

It would be preferable if the product were more proactive and more modern in its approach to security and protection.

We've been using this solution for about five years. It's been a while.

The solution is very reliable and scalable. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's not buggy or glitchy. We've been pleased with its level of stability.

We have about seven people using the solution. We're a very small company. We don't have much cause for large-scale expansion. What we are getting is what we need at this point.

We haven't actually used technical support just yet. We haven't had a need to as we haven't faced any issues with the technology. The solution itself is very reliable.

The solution is not complex to set up. It's very easy to implement. We didn't run into any problems with the process.

The deployment is fast. It only really takes about 15 minutes or so.

We deploy the solution annually.

We've been looking at similar solutions, such as CrowdStrike, as a next-generation antivirus or anti-malware.

We're dealers of Kaspersky. We're resellers. However, we're also customers. We mainly work with small companies.

I'm not sure of which version of the solution we're using currently. 

This solution is a good tool for small companies, at this point I can say that. For bigger companies, it may be better to look at cloud solutions, such as CrowdStrike, for instance.

Overall, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. It's easy to use and offers good protection.

We mostly use the product as an antivirus solution. With Kaspersky Security Network (KSN), we are protected against most new threats.

Beside being an antivirus solution, it is an endpoint solution. Therefore, it has many features, like deploying a package to many clients, an MDM solution, etc.

They can improve the zero-day exploit to be more effective.

For five years, we have not had any stability issues.

For five years, we have not had any scalability issues.

Support is actually quick. They try to find the solution fast and comfort you when a problem arises.

No, we did not use another solution before.

The setup was simple. After the setup, you also need to configure rules based on your company needs.

The licensing is based per agent. You can get discounts if you have more agents.

We evaluate NOD32, Symantec, and McAfee along with this product.

If they need more than an antivirus solution (like MDM and package deployment), they can still consider the product.

• Antivirus engine
• Center Management
• Security Center

It is very stable, and effective in combating spam, viruses, Trojans, etc.

Data loss prevention (DLP) in email security.

Nine years.

No issues.

No issues.

An eight out of 10 for technical support.

Yes, we used a different solution. We changed it because it went down in support and providing up-to-date information.

It is a mixture of both. You must know some information about installing a client server application in a WAN environment. You can use the guide as well to deploy the product.

Pricing is very competitive and licensing is very much ethical.

Trend Micro, McAfee, and Sophos.

Must have an up-to-date system and should have minimum a mid-size range server.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is used for security.

The most valuable features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are protection and encryption. Additionally, the interface is good and it can be integrated with Windows, Linux, and Mac.  

The solution could improve by having some integration with other vendors.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately two years.

I have found the support to be good.

The implementation is very simple.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a ten out of ten.

We use this solution to secure our endpoint devices.

With Kaspersky, we are licensed for 300 users. Eight technical engineers handle all maintenance-related issues. 

The reporting feature is good. Also, the device control is good. 

This solution used a lot of memory and GPU; it would be nice if this could be reduced. 

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for roughly five years.

The initial setup is easy. 

We installed this solution ourselves. 

Licensing is on a yearly basis. We have a three-year license.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give Kaspersky Endpoint Security a rating of eight.

I would absolutely recommend this solution to others.

For preventing virus spreads in our networks (servers and PCs). In my experience, Kaspersky products have comprehensive and quick zero-day response for global and local (Indonesia) threats, including spam, Trojans, worms, etc.

My environment consists of 30 servers and 200 PCs and laptops with no USB and CD/DVD media restriction. Eighty percent of all clients have internet connection without any restriction policy.

Decreases IT threats, incidents from outside the environment as well as internal. Reduces cost and time when handling incidents, including mitigation, restore backup, recovery, reducing/preventing file/data error caused by the threat.

Antivirus, including anti-spam, trojan, and worm detection and prevention. Kaspersky has a comprehensive virus definition update which is very helpful for threat prevention.

The need to re-engineer the source code to reduce CPU and memory usage. Other areas for improvement include a data-loss prevention solution, enhanced application control, enhanced device control, an endpoint security encryption solution, an advanced persistent threats (APT) solution, and an all-in-one solution with one pricing scheme for corporate and enterprise business needs.

I rate it at seven out of 10. It would be an eight if they could decrease memory and CPU usage.

The solution is primarily used in order to protect computers. It also helps you avoid issues online.

The solution has been very stable. The performance is good.

The product is quite scalable.

We use it at our enterprise, and it's been extremely beneficial.

We've found the product to be easy to use.

The solution could be more secure. It's an aspect the company needs to be mindful of.

I've been using the solution for around two years at this point.

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable. We don't deal with any types of crashing or freezing.

The solution can scale if you need it to. That's not a problem.

Right now, in our organization, about 25 people use it.

We've never used technical support before. We've never had to call them. Therefore, I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. 

For an antivirus product, I used to use McAfee. However, I had some information stolen from my computer and therefore I had to change products. It didn't protect me very well. 

I did not handle the installation process. There's another team that manages that aspect of the solution. Therefore, I can't comment directly on how easy or difficult it was to implement.

There is a systems manager that handles any maintenance that may be required.

We had a team that handled it internally.

You do have to pay for a license. We pay a yearly licensing fee. I can't speak to the exact cost, however. 

I'm a customer and an end-user. I do not have a business relationship with Kaspersky.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've mostly been quite please with its performance. 

I'd recommend it to other users and organizations.