Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

We primarily use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for antivirus access control and virus control. 

This solution is deployed on-prem. 

I think that all the features are valuable for our environment. 

It would be great if, as an additional feature, you could download updates without deploying updates to end users. 

I have been working with Kaspersky for three years. 

This solution is stable. 

We use this product extensively and there is no need for maintenance. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is scalable. 

There are approximately 7,000 users of this solution in my organization. We don't have plans to increase our usage yet. 

If I need assistance from technical support, I can use the texting system from the customer support website. 

Before using Kaspersky, I used Symantec, though I don't remember why I switched. 

The initial setup was straightforward. I deployed this solution by myself. 

We implemented this solution through an in-house team. 

Our company has seen a ROI. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a 10 out of 10. 

Kaspersky is straightforward. If you go to their website, you can install it easily. 

We may be using version 13 or 14, although I can't say for certain. 

The solution provides protection for all our systems, file servers, endpoints and domain controllers.

We are dissatisfied with certain functions, such as those for application updates, which are not usable and don't work. 

The application updates and drive encryption are lacking. The former cannot be used or monitored. We would like to be able to use our domain controller for management purposes. 

The solution could also be more secure. 

We have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for three years.

The solution is stable. 

The solution is not easy to scale.  

I have not had occasion to make use of technical support. 

The initial setup was easy.

It was over within a day. 

A friend of mine handled the installation.

Our technical team for our deployment and maintenance needs consists of nine people, one manager, three administrators and the rest are employees. 

There are approximately 300 users in our organization making use of the solution. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security as an eight out of ten. 

We are using this solution for endpoint protection against intrusions, such as viruses.

One of the main features of this solution is the fast scanning capabilities.

I would like to see better-enhanced features, such as protection against ransomware and different types of malicious malware.

In an upcoming release, I would like to see DLP, encryption, and a VPN feature. There are a lot of other solutions coming out which claim they have all these features together.

I have been using this solution for two years.

I have found the solution to be stable.

We have over 3,000 users using the solution in my organization and the solution is scalable.

The technical support has been great. When we log a ticket we receive a solution shortly after.

We were previously using Symantec.

The setup was easy and not challenging.

The price of the solution is reasonable. It is less costly compared to competitors.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a seven out of ten.

Our primary use case is for monitoring. 

Before Kaspersky, I had to control each PC one by one but now it's just one update and it can detect a virus on all of the systems. 

The blocking feature is the most valuable feature. 

It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features. 

It's a little more expensive compared to other anti-virus competitors like Symantec. 

I would rate it an eight out of ten. Not a ten because it needs more computer resources. 

Over the years, I have learned that we always need to keep updating our OS — especially Windows. Any application that sits on Windows needs to be updated. This allows us to better detect and remove any infections. Sometimes, there are a few infections that we can't get rid of. In this case, we have to find another way to clean up the registry; otherwise, we have to reinstall everything again.

In terms of the interface, I prefer something that is simple without so much color. 

I have been using this solution for the last 10 years. 

This solution is stable. 

Reaching their support team can be difficult. I've dealt with Sophos before; they were quite responsive to our issues.

We are actually going to be switching to Sophos Endpoint Security.

I think the price of this solution is good. 

Make sure you are online in order to receive updates. The engine itself doesn't do much without updated data. With updates, you'll be at least 90% protected.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of eight.

We primarily use the solution for endpoint security and protection.

We haven't had any major issues with the solution overall. It's quite a reliable product so far.

The stability has been reliable so far.

The pricing has been quite good and very reasonable.

We found the installation to be very straightforward and the deployment process to be very fast.

We've found that sometimes the solution is not doing its job in detecting some malware. They need to make sure that they are advancing their technology to catch more malicious events. There needs to be more security in place specifically on the malware side of things.

I've used the solution for two years. It has been a while.

The solution is quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. the performance has been reliable so far. 

The scalability hasn't really been tested by our organization. We've never tried to expand it, and therefore I can't speak to how successful expanding it may be for other companies. 

We only have two users of the solution in our company.

At this time, we likely won't keep using the solution.

I've never opened any tickets with technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. I've never dealt with them directly.

The installation was not complex at all. It was very straightforward. A company shouldn't have any issues with the process.

The deployment was also quite quick. It only takes a few minutes, if I recall the process correctly. It's not long and drawn out. It's easy.

I handled the implementation myself. It's not difficult. I did not need the assistance of an integrator or consultant at all. 

At the time, when we purchased the solution, the company was giving us the best deal on the market. It's the reason why we ended up choosing it. I don't recall the licensing aspects or if we had to pay for it, and if so, how much.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. 

I haven't suffered from a malicious attack, and therefore I'm treating it quite high, as it is doing what we need it to do. The protection levels so far have been sufficient.

It's a good solution that companies should consider if other options are not available to them.

We mostly use the product as an antivirus solution. With Kaspersky Security Network (KSN), we are protected against most new threats.

Beside being an antivirus solution, it is an endpoint solution. Therefore, it has many features, like deploying a package to many clients, an MDM solution, etc.

They can improve the zero-day exploit to be more effective.

For five years, we have not had any stability issues.

For five years, we have not had any scalability issues.

Support is actually quick. They try to find the solution fast and comfort you when a problem arises.

No, we did not use another solution before.

The setup was simple. After the setup, you also need to configure rules based on your company needs.

The licensing is based per agent. You can get discounts if you have more agents.

We evaluate NOD32, Symantec, and McAfee along with this product.

If they need more than an antivirus solution (like MDM and package deployment), they can still consider the product.

• Antivirus engine
• Center Management
• Security Center

It is very stable, and effective in combating spam, viruses, Trojans, etc.

Data loss prevention (DLP) in email security.

Nine years.

No issues.

No issues.

An eight out of 10 for technical support.

Yes, we used a different solution. We changed it because it went down in support and providing up-to-date information.

It is a mixture of both. You must know some information about installing a client server application in a WAN environment. You can use the guide as well to deploy the product.

Pricing is very competitive and licensing is very much ethical.

Trend Micro, McAfee, and Sophos.

Must have an up-to-date system and should have minimum a mid-size range server.