Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

We are using this solution for endpoint protection.

The main feature of this solution is it is easy to use.

I would like to see integration to many different systems easier.

I have been using the solution for approximately one year.

The solution has been stable the past year we have been using it.

I have found the solution stable. We have 1,800 users using this solution in my organization.

We have not had any issue with the solution that we would need to contact the technical support.

There is a license required for this solution and we have 1,800 licenses. The cost is a bit high and we are looking for an alternative.

We are currently looking for an alternative solution and have evaluated Microsoft Defender.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a seven out of ten.

We are mounting the solution on a secured managed service center, where we are implementing it in order to have the EDR.

I find some of the most valuable features to be the anti-malware, encryption, and the EDR launching service.

I would like the solution to be able to allow to have end to end security services from the final user to the server.

I used CrowdStrike solution before and the price was very high. 

I find the solution to be inexpensive compared to other solution like Crowdstrike. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a six out of ten. 

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business as our antivirus for our systems.

It works fine.

The interface is friendly.

It's secure.

The licensing fees could be reduced.

I have been working with Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately three years.

We have no issues with the stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a scalable solution.

In our company, we have less than 100 users.

I have not contacted technical support.

Previously, I worked with the free version of AVG. We switched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business because we built an Endpoint connection, to a server, and there is a security center. Also, AVG was too heavy for the PC.

The initial setup is straightforward.

I was able to complete the installation myself. I am technical and familiar with setups, but normal users may need help, especially for the endpoint.

Licensing fees are expensive. 

Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

I would recommend this solution for others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business an eight out of ten.

I am a cyber security engineer and use this to protect my computer from viruses.

It has helped our company protect the confidential data of our customers.

I like that it is a known product used to protect computers from viruses.

I would like for Kaspersky to generate reports when it detects issues such as malware.

I have been using this solution for a few months.

It is a stable solution.

It is scalable.

I have not needed to reach out to support.

No, this is my first solution of this type.

The initial setup was very straightforward and took about thirty minutes, five out of five experience here.

I was able to complete the setup myself.

Not really, I only looked at the default antivirus that is installed in Windows.

I would recommend this to other people. I think it's a great solution to protect computers from viruses.

We primarily use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for antivirus access control and virus control. 

This solution is deployed on-prem. 

I think that all the features are valuable for our environment. 

It would be great if, as an additional feature, you could download updates without deploying updates to end users. 

I have been working with Kaspersky for three years. 

This solution is stable. 

We use this product extensively and there is no need for maintenance. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is scalable. 

There are approximately 7,000 users of this solution in my organization. We don't have plans to increase our usage yet. 

If I need assistance from technical support, I can use the texting system from the customer support website. 

Before using Kaspersky, I used Symantec, though I don't remember why I switched. 

The initial setup was straightforward. I deployed this solution by myself. 

We implemented this solution through an in-house team. 

Our company has seen a ROI. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a 10 out of 10. 

Kaspersky is straightforward. If you go to their website, you can install it easily. 

We may be using version 13 or 14, although I can't say for certain. 

The solution provides protection for all our systems, file servers, endpoints and domain controllers.

We are dissatisfied with certain functions, such as those for application updates, which are not usable and don't work. 

The application updates and drive encryption are lacking. The former cannot be used or monitored. We would like to be able to use our domain controller for management purposes. 

The solution could also be more secure. 

We have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for three years.

The solution is stable. 

The solution is not easy to scale.  

I have not had occasion to make use of technical support. 

The initial setup was easy.

It was over within a day. 

A friend of mine handled the installation.

Our technical team for our deployment and maintenance needs consists of nine people, one manager, three administrators and the rest are employees. 

There are approximately 300 users in our organization making use of the solution. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security as an eight out of ten. 

We used the solution to protect as against computer viruses.

We currently have had to move to another solution because we require faster response times and more advanced features other competitors offer.

The functions are very good and they have many different features that are available.

This solution needs to improve and get up to date with some of the new EDR technology anti-virus software available. There are many improvements needed, such as faster responses, faster notification, and immediate reports.

I have been using the product for 10 years.

It is a stable product.

If the company is big, more than 100 staff with different branches, this solution is good but for small companies, I think it's not very appropriate.

We have used support from Kaspersky China. They offer support through email and phone of which they provide a good service, fast response, and an overall professional resolution.

We now use Symantec End-user Endpoint Security software as our anti-virus protection solution. We opted to change software because of the current security risk our digital data faces, we needed a more robust solution.

The installation was not a problem.

We have had no troubles installing, maintaining, or deploying the product for our clients. For others, the deployment could take more time and might require professionals to do the job.

It would be a benefit for this solution to have better-advanced features, less maintenance required for operation, and faster response times.

Due to the current increased global security risks on digital data we have had to search for an alternative solution. 

I would have given the solution a ten out of ten a few years ago but they need to improve and provide more features as their competitors.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security an eight out of ten.

The signature update is done securely.

There are some issues that recently happened with this solution. The American government and other countries banned Kaspersky, since it is a Russian product, and customers lost their confidence in it.

There is too much deviation from Windows 7 to Windows 10.

Kaspersky could provide more training for the local support.

It is very stable. I have no complaints when it comes to stability. 

There have been some performance issues. They provide good security, but this slows down the performance of machines' servers. The software is not updating as frequently as we need.

Scalability is good, but if I want to update any patch or update for 2000 to 3000 machines, it can be difficult sometimes. If it is below 2000 machines, then it is fine.

In our organization, we have 3000 users utilizing the product.

The local support that they have here are great, especially for on-premise. If I call them, they can reach us very quickly. The issue is that they aren't always so knowledgeable. Kaspersky didn't provide enough training for them. 

The initial setup was straightforward, not so complex. 

Pricing and licensing is competitive. It's not so different from its competitors. 

At the moment, we don't have any alternatives that we are considering.

Think about the performance issues first. If I have a very good solution, but it slows down your server performance, then the productivity of your place will go down. The performance issues should be considered. Scalability should also be considered, then security issues. 

We are not happy with this solution and want it to change.