Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

I like the security that this solution provides. It not only protects against the outside world, but it also protects against careless users. We do have users who make careless mistakes in the operation, but the system protects them from their attacks, and we can easily identify and follow up on the problem.

The performance could be better.

We would like to see improved performance and faster deployment in the next release.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for ten years.

It's a server-based application.

We are using the latest version. We update it daily.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is reliable, but it can be resource-intensive at times.

We have approximately 130 users in our organization.

We used technical support about once a year on average.

There are some issues with the configuration, but it is still very good, and the impact on general use operations is minimal.

The installation is a little complicated and can take a long time, and it requires a policy for our internal control.

The installation requires an experienced user.

We have two mechanical team members to maintain this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I would rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.

We use the solution in our company for security against intrusions. However, we cannot trace the source of the issue without the EDR which we are planning to implement soon. We are able to receive the report from the server and which SNMP traps are from what system but that is all.

We have zero-day detection of malware but it cannot detect other types of unknown intrusions.

In an upcoming release, they could improve by providing features, such as EDR and better tracing of intrusion.

I have been using this solution for approximately five years.

We have not had any stability issues and after each new version, the stability gets better.

The solution is scalable, we have 500 users using this solution.

I have not contacted technical support but we have vendor support that has been good.

We have used Trend Micro and Symantec previously. We switch to this solution most recently from Symantec because the resource consumption was too high and the reporting was not good.

The installation is straightforward.

We have an annual license and there is a fee per device used. The price is fair compared to the latest EDR solution.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a seven out of ten.

It's our antivirus software, and we use it for disabling USBs.

It's flexible, and Kaspersky Endpoint Security's performance is good. Also, the pricing is fine.

The performance level could be better.

I've been working with Kaspersky Endpoint Security for a couple of years.

Sometimes, we implemented it ourselves, and at other times, we used technicians.

We have a yearly license, and the pricing is fine.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate this solution at ten.

We are using this solution for endpoint protection.

The main feature of this solution is it is easy to use.

I would like to see integration to many different systems easier.

I have been using the solution for approximately one year.

The solution has been stable the past year we have been using it.

I have found the solution stable. We have 1,800 users using this solution in my organization.

We have not had any issue with the solution that we would need to contact the technical support.

There is a license required for this solution and we have 1,800 licenses. The cost is a bit high and we are looking for an alternative.

We are currently looking for an alternative solution and have evaluated Microsoft Defender.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a seven out of ten.

We are mounting the solution on a secured managed service center, where we are implementing it in order to have the EDR.

I find some of the most valuable features to be the anti-malware, encryption, and the EDR launching service.

I would like the solution to be able to allow to have end to end security services from the final user to the server.

I used CrowdStrike solution before and the price was very high. 

I find the solution to be inexpensive compared to other solution like Crowdstrike. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a six out of ten. 

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business as our antivirus for our systems.

It works fine.

The interface is friendly.

It's secure.

The licensing fees could be reduced.

I have been working with Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately three years.

We have no issues with the stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a scalable solution.

In our company, we have less than 100 users.

I have not contacted technical support.

Previously, I worked with the free version of AVG. We switched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business because we built an Endpoint connection, to a server, and there is a security center. Also, AVG was too heavy for the PC.

The initial setup is straightforward.

I was able to complete the installation myself. I am technical and familiar with setups, but normal users may need help, especially for the endpoint.

Licensing fees are expensive. 

Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

I would recommend this solution for others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business an eight out of ten.

I am a cyber security engineer and use this to protect my computer from viruses.

It has helped our company protect the confidential data of our customers.

I like that it is a known product used to protect computers from viruses.

I would like for Kaspersky to generate reports when it detects issues such as malware.

I have been using this solution for a few months.

It is a stable solution.

It is scalable.

I have not needed to reach out to support.

No, this is my first solution of this type.

The initial setup was very straightforward and took about thirty minutes, five out of five experience here.

I was able to complete the setup myself.

Not really, I only looked at the default antivirus that is installed in Windows.

I would recommend this to other people. I think it's a great solution to protect computers from viruses.

We primarily use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for antivirus access control and virus control. 

This solution is deployed on-prem. 

I think that all the features are valuable for our environment. 

It would be great if, as an additional feature, you could download updates without deploying updates to end users. 

I have been working with Kaspersky for three years. 

This solution is stable. 

We use this product extensively and there is no need for maintenance. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is scalable. 

There are approximately 7,000 users of this solution in my organization. We don't have plans to increase our usage yet. 

If I need assistance from technical support, I can use the texting system from the customer support website. 

Before using Kaspersky, I used Symantec, though I don't remember why I switched. 

The initial setup was straightforward. I deployed this solution by myself. 

We implemented this solution through an in-house team. 

Our company has seen a ROI. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a 10 out of 10. 

Kaspersky is straightforward. If you go to their website, you can install it easily.