Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Intercept X Endpoint vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Intercept X Endpoint
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
7th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
103
Ranking in other categories
ZTNA (9th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (8th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (11th), Ransomware Protection (3rd)
Kaspersky Endpoint Security...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
8th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Intercept X Endpoint is 2.2%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is 3.8%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Khandokar Rabbi - PeerSpot reviewer
Used for endpoint security, ransomware protection, virus protection, and server security
Intercept X Endpoint is deployed on the cloud in our organization. Previously, we had two ransomware attacks when we were using Kaspersky as an endpoint security. We didn't face any ransomware attacks after using Intercept X Endpoint for endpoint security. Intercept X Endpoint has simplified our malware detection. Since we have already implemented the policies in the cloud, all the malware is automatically detected. The solution also detects and removes new malware that can also come from the cloud AI engine. Integrating Intercept X Endpoint with our current security infrastructure was very easy. In my opinion, Sophos is a better solution because we are using Sophos endpoint security and network security. These two things sync with each other and monitor the packets and network traffic. No other vendor has simultaneous devices to check everything. I would recommend the solution to other users. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Karim Mostafa - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases
I primarily use this solution for security.  I appreciate the good control it offers, which simplifies management. So, I feel confident using this solution. We need a more complete Mobile Device Management (MDM) system. I have been using Kaspersky for eight years. I use the latest version.  I…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Synchronization with the firewall is most valuable."
"It is quite scalable. You can always add more users. I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten."
"The solution is easy to install."
"It is very easy to set up and easy to use. It is also not resource-intensive."
"The EDR (Enhanced Data Detection and Response) and the DLP (Data Loss Prevention) components are valuable assets."
"Technical support from Sophos is rated as nine out of ten, which represents high quality."
"Machine learning is used to detect the threat and it does so by prioritizing the suspicious activities."
"Anti-virus captures malicious threats and an aggressive next generation firewall."
"One of the main features of this solution is the fast scanning capabilities."
"The product can scale if you need it to."
"The main feature of this solution is it is easy to use."
"I like how it protects the network and all the endpoints."
"The advice I would give someone implementing this solution is that the management of the solution is very easy. You don't need a lot of people to manage the solution."
"The most valuable feature is the management center."
"It has a very good firewall, which lets you isolate your devices depending on the groups."
"Some of the most valuable features are the security and the stability, which are great. There are some imperfections, but everything is fine. In general, I think it's one of the best solutions."
 

Cons

"The solution is expensive, and it could be made cheaper."
"The Data Loss Prevention module can be better. It should also have threat hunting capabilities."
"They need to focus on their SLA or technical support. They also need to focus on their UI. They should also improve their content filtering tool and update it so that correct categories are there. Sometimes, when I want to block an online gaming website, it is not shown under the correct category. It is shown under another category. They need to review their content filtering tool on a bi-weekly or monthly basis and update the sites and categories. This will be really helpful for them."
"We would like more application control in order to be able to schedule times and access."
"They should work on the logs and events. Sophos Intercept X needs to increase the interface test so that it can export to a live event."
"Through Sophos Central I would like to see the ability to zero in and produce a report about the challenges being faced by a particular machine and user, to know if a virus is appearing only on that specific machine or also on others."
"Technical support can be improved. There could be shared support, i.e. where someone in Egypt can respond."
"To be a perfect product, the price would have to be a bit better."
"Currently, it doesn't have a cloud option. This is something that they should look into going forward."
"The solution could use better reporting."
"The reporting portion of the solution is quite weak."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security could have more visibility and threat hunting. Right now, if it detects a file, it's quarantined, and then we can't find more details other than the path and the file name. We don't see what process it's warning off and how the virus got in. So, the reporting on the quarantined items, why were they quarantined, etc., could be improved."
"They're restricted to endpoint protection for now, I'd like to see some additional products."
"I rate the pricing five out of ten."
"The licensing fees could be reduced."
"Kaspersky could be improved by better malware protection. They have to take advantage of Malwarebytes and integrate the same engine inside Kaspersky. I use Malwarebytes as well because Kaspersky doesn't always detect malware."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution is a little high compared to competitors because they do not have a proper pricing structure."
"The solution is not expensive."
"You can pay monthly, but most of our customers choose annual subscriptions because they are less expensive."
"One can pay for the license annually, or at two and five year intervals."
"It's not bad, but compared to competitors, it's a little bit on the high side. The price could be more competitive."
"The pricing is average for software like this, but you can purchase additional services if you wish."
"It is a high-cost solution."
"The price of Sophos Intercept X is expensive. The license is paid on an annual basis. There are extra features that can be added depending on the endpoints. The solution is priced twice as much as the Comodo solution."
"The solution is available at a highly affordable price"
"The price of this solution is affordable and there is only a standard license required."
"The solution's pricing is acceptable."
"I don't remember exactly what the licenses cost, but it's not too expensive. It's affordable, especially when you are dealing with on-prem. However, I don't know about the new prices because we are in the process of buying support."
"The tool is too expensive compared to other products."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is not an expensive solution."
"It's an affordable security solution."
"The licensing is affordable. We bought a three-year license. There are no additional costs in addition to the standard license fees."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

CC
Jun 16, 2021
Jun 16, 2021
I recommend that you take a look at Tanium’s industry-leading EDR and TR platform for Full Visibility, Compliance, TR, and virtual management either on-premise or via TaaS. The Tanium agent is lightweight, doesn’t require any additional infrastructure, and due to its patented architecture allows managed devices to work together at the edge.
See 2 answers
EB
Jun 14, 2021
Hi @SathishKumar , @Husam Kabaha ​, @Andrey Rogov ​, and @Ahmed Mohamed Abdelmaged. Do you have any advice to share with @Constance Chinonzo ​?  Thank you!
PF
Jun 16, 2021
I recommend that you take a look at Tanium’s industry-leading EDR and TR platform for Full Visibility, Compliance, TR, and virtual management either on-premise or via TaaS. The Tanium agent is lightweight, doesn’t require any additional infrastructure, and due to its patented architecture allows managed devices to work together at the edge. 
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Educational Organization
61%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Crodwstrike Falcon compare with Sophos Intercept X?
I like that Crowdstrike Falcon allows me to easily correlate data between my firewalls. Its detection and machine learning are very valuable features. Crowdstrike Falcon also successfully prevents ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Intercept X?
The pricing is a little bit higher than that of other solutions.
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
I have some PCs with one gigabyte of RAM, and it's not easy to set up Kaspersky on these. Additionally, I want to improve how viruses are isolated and receive better notifications.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business?
The pricing of Kaspersky is good, and I rate it an eight out of ten. Our current licensing costs are one hundred dollars per user for three hundred users, which was established three years ago.
 

Also Known As

Sophos Intercept X
Kaspersky Work Space Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Flexible Systems
ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
Find out what your peers are saying about Intercept X Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.