The Kaspersky Endpoint Security is used for all the workstations in the company.
CIO at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Good cyber security features and stability
Pros and Cons
- "Kaspersky Endpoint Security protects against viruses and dangerous software, and it's also great because it has a component that is useful for the deployment of software versions to the end user's computer."
- "It is expensive, it could be cheaper, so I think the solution's pricing could be better."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
Kaspersky Endpoint Security protects us against viruses and dangerous software, and it's also great because it has a component that is useful for the deployment of software versions to the end user's computer.
What needs improvement?
In terms of improvement, we do not use the solution for the servers in most cases because the solution protects us against some software. Hence we have problems installing such software on the server; however, we do some fine-tuning to use this type of software.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Kaspersky Endpoint Security is stable.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
How are customer service and support?
We are satisfied with the support.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of this solution was straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing is yearly based.
It is expensive, it could be cheaper, so I think the solution's pricing could be better.
What other advice do I have?
Yes, I would definitely recommend Kaspersky Endpoint Security to other users.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Project Specialist at integra software
Is flexible and has good performance
Pros and Cons
- "It's flexible, and Kaspersky Endpoint Security's performance is good. Also, the pricing is fine."
- "The performance level could be better."
What is our primary use case?
It's our antivirus software, and we use it for disabling USBs.
What is most valuable?
It's flexible, and Kaspersky Endpoint Security's performance is good. Also, the pricing is fine.
What needs improvement?
The performance level could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been working with Kaspersky Endpoint Security for a couple of years.
What about the implementation team?
Sometimes, we implemented it ourselves, and at other times, we used technicians.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We have a yearly license, and the pricing is fine.
What other advice do I have?
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate this solution at ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Enables us to get feedback from our customers
Pros and Cons
- "I have found the security, device, web and application controls to be the most valuable features."
- "The application running speed consumes that of RAM, so performance speed is an issue."
What is our primary use case?
We use Kaspersky Endpoint Security to provide support to our customers. The new version and configuration settings are like production components.
How has it helped my organization?
There are many who would consider the performance in some of our systems to be slow, although this depends on the RAM and other features. The solution enables us to get feedback from our customers.
What is most valuable?
I have found the security, device, web, and application controls to be the most valuable features.
So too, the firewall has allowed me to do much troubleshooting.
What needs improvement?
The application running speed consumes that of RAM, so performance speed is an issue. The data, VST, and EST sizes can all be reduced.
Previously, some of the Windows Seven PCs took up more space and ran slowly all the time.
Some of the remote antivirus desktop sharing is not working in version 13, which is still in use.
When we upgrade to network agent version 13, the machine makes a duplicate copy of itself. It is created in another group. Under the same name, we will see two devices, one the original and the other the duplicate. Afterward, we move to the client's PC.
Occasionally troubleshooting is required because the solution does not work after being configured. As an example of this, the running time may be longer when it involves cloud-based SaaS remote installation. At other times, the process cannot be completed and I must remove the task, switch to manual mode or begin a new task.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable. It is good and I like it. Before going with it, I was not aware of its capabilities. It removes the element of worry.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
How are customer service and technical support?
While the technical support we can supply ranges from installation to troubleshooting, all other issues involved. bugs or updates made to versions would lead us to create a ticket with that of Kaspersky Endpoint Security.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not previously use a different solution.
How was the initial setup?
With us, the deployment took the minimum amount of time. But, with some of my clients, it took more than a day.
When it comes to the assistance I can lend the client, I suggest that he make a plan which would allow him to do the maximum amount of remote usage.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the deployment on our own.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
As my role is limited to that of support, I cannot conjecture as to the prices.
What other advice do I have?
The solution is both on-premises and cloud-based. Kate:
Our organization handles things on the partner side, supplying remote support throughout India. All its constituents are in IT positions.
There are many organizations making use of the solution.
When it comes to the implementation of the solution, we provide all the necessary support, from installation to troubleshooting.
I was not aware of Kaspersky Endpoint Solution and its features before entering this field but now am acquainted with its components and protection software. I learned a lot on the software side.
I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security as an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Network Engineer at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
Excellent at detecting viruses, very stable and easy to use
Pros and Cons
- "It's excellent at detecting viruses."
- "The initial setup is complex."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for securing our endpoints.
What is most valuable?
The solution always has the most up-to-date software.
The solution runs well.
It's excellent at detecting viruses.
The solution is very stable.
Our organization can easily scale the solution.
The solution is very compatible with Windows devices.
The solution is very basic and easy to use.
What needs improvement?
The solution seems incapable of stopping the proxy connection. The proxy server seems to be bypassing the antivirus. It's an aspect they need to improve.
The initial setup is complex.
While it's compatible with Windows, it may not work as well with other operating systems.
Reporting is not that good for Kaspersky. I want more detailed reporting, I want the details reported in the reporting section, and everything is in one report. That is not possible now on Kaspersky. The reporting consists of the computer name or the IP only. I want complete detailed reporting capabilities in the next update.
For how long have I used the solution?
We're only been working with the solution for about a year or so.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable. I haven't had issues with it and found it to be reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze. There aren't bugs or glitches.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is easily scalable. If a company needs to expand the solution, they can do so easily.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is okay, however, they need to have more expertise on the solution. Sometimes you will get a member of their support staff and they don't seem as knowledgeable as they should be.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We work mostly with Kaspersky, as well as Trend Micro and Bitdefender.
How was the initial setup?
I wouldn't say that the solution has a straightforward implementation. It's a bit complex. It needs access to the Kaspersky server on-premises. It isn't an easy process.
You only need one day to deploy the server.
You only need one or two people to manage the deployment.
What about the implementation team?
I handled the implementation myself.
What other advice do I have?
We're a Kaspersky partner.
We have clients of different sizes and the solution works well for all of them. It's perfect for any sized company.
It's a very good product. Everything is in a very professional environment. It's largely easy to set up. However, we've noticed that the RAM utilization is very high when Kaspersky is running on a computer. This might distract users that don't have too much memory on their machines.
On a scale of one to ten, I'd rate it at eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Senior Manager at RQ Net MSC Sdn Bhd
Good dashboards, easy to manage, and responsive support, but DLP features need to be added
Pros and Cons
- "Using dashboards, it is very easy to manage."
- "I would like to see the inclusion of support for device management and device control."
What is our primary use case?
We have about 300 nodes that are being controlled by five or six servers. Kaspersky is providing antivirus protection at the endpoints.
What is most valuable?
Using dashboards, it is very easy to manage.
What needs improvement?
Kaspersky is lacking in features for DLP and protection against ransomware.
I would like to see the inclusion of support for device management and device control.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Kaspersky for the past 14 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have not experienced any bugs or glitches in the software.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have not had issues with scalability.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have been in contact with technical support and they are responsive.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment is not difficult and we have experienced no major issues. It takes a couple of hours to deploy. One person is sufficient for deployment and maintenance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
For 300 nodes, we pay about 15,000 Malaysian Ringgit ($3,500 USD).
What other advice do I have?
This is a good solution and I recommend it, although if they could provide more features like deep security, DLP, and device management, then it would be much better.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Manager Business Productivity, IT with 5,001-10,000 employees
The central management policies of this product are valuable to us
Pros and Cons
- "We swtiched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements."
- "I think it would be good for them to consider and cloud integration capabilities."
What is our primary use case?
My primary use case of this solution is to use a large enterprise endpoint protection for our computers and servers.
What is most valuable?
I value the modular capability to house the network, device, web and email protection. Additionally, the central management policies are valuable.
What needs improvement?
We have experienced problems with downloads and integration in the past. I think it would be good for them to consider cloud integration capabilities.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of this product on a scale of one to five, is a four.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability as a four out of five stars.
How are customer service and technical support?
We use a local partner who helps us with tech support. We are happy with the services they have provided.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We switched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was difficult, because we did not know the product.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
When choosing a product, we review product functionality, financial concerns and effective deployment. We looked at McAfee and others.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Support at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Quite secure and easy to install
Pros and Cons
- "One of the most valuable features is that it's quite secure. I'm satisfied with this solution."
- "As far as improvements, maybe the licensing could be cheaper, but I think this solution is pretty okay."
What is our primary use case?
My primary use case of this solution is for protection from malware and viruses.
This solution is deployed on-prem. We are using the latest version.
What is most valuable?
One of the most valuable features is that it's quite secure. I'm satisfied with this solution.
What needs improvement?
As far as improvements, maybe the licensing could be cheaper, but I think this solution is pretty okay.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for about 12 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability and performance are good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This solution is scalable. There are about 300 people in my organization using Kaspersky.
How are customer service and support?
I haven't contacted Kaspersky's technical support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
How was the initial setup?
The installation is easy and straightforward. It took roughly 10 minutes, and I did it myself. For deployment, you need one admin.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented this solution through an in-house team.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay for licensing yearly.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Kaspersky a 10 out of 10, and I would recommend this solution to others.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Innovation and strategy Development-OCP Solutions at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees
Plenty of features, stable, but performance could improve
Pros and Cons
- "There is plenty of features that make the solution work very well."
- "When I do a malware scan on my computer it takes a long while. This process could improve in the future. Additionally, the security could improve."
What is our primary use case?
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is used for network protection. It does monitoring and can detect intrusions and viruses. Additionally, we use it for log management.
What is most valuable?
There is plenty of features that make the solution work very well.
What needs improvement?
When I do a malware scan on my computer it takes a long while. This process could improve in the future. Additionally, the security could improve.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have approximately 24,000 users are using this solution.
How are customer service and support?
We have not needed to contact the support because we have not had any issues.
What about the implementation team?
We have a department that handles all the implementation and maintenance of the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is an annual license required.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Product Categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Endpoint Compliance Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)Popular Comparisons
CrowdStrike Falcon
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
Cisco Secure Endpoint
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
Fortinet FortiClient
Symantec Endpoint Security
Trellix Endpoint Security
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Intercept X Endpoint
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which endpoint solution is more effective in terms of protection and remote administration: Sophos Intercept X or Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
- Which EPP solution to choose for a university: Seqrite Endpoint Security vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
- What is the biggest difference between EPP and EDR products?
- Can Cylance be used with Symantec or Kaspersky endpoint solutions without conflict?
- When evaluating Endpoint Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What's the best way to trial endpoint protection solutions?
- What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
- Which Endpoint Protection Solution offers Zero Trust (ZTN) as a feature?
- What to choose: an endpoint antivirus, an EDR solution or both?
- Which ransomware is the biggest threat in 2020?