Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Azure Block Storage based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Amazon S3 Glacier, Azure NetApp Files, and Wasabi.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Microsoft Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Amazon S3 Glacier offers robust, cost-effective data archiving perfect for infrequent access. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Block Storage excels in feature richness and higher performance, making it ideal for comprehensive data management. Amazon S3 Glacier provides competitive pricing, while Microsoft Azure Block Storage demonstrates strong ROI for active data usage.
Microsoft Azure Block Storage is appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and strong support. In comparison, Azure NetApp Files provides advanced enterprise-grade features and superior integration, appealing to those handling complex, large-scale workloads, even though it comes at a higher cost.
Microsoft Azure Block Storage has a straightforward setup cost, while Azure NetApp Files may involve more setup fees. Azure Block Storage is generally more cost-effective in terms of initial setup compared to Azure NetApp Files.
Microsoft Azure Block Storage has a straightforward setup cost, while Azure NetApp Files may involve more setup fees. Azure Block Storage is generally more cost-effective in terms of initial setup compared to Azure NetApp Files.
Microsoft Azure Block Storage impresses with its integration with Microsoft services, advanced security, and scalability. In comparison, Wasabi appeals due to its competitive pricing, speed, and absence of fees for data egress and API requests. Azure's flexible deployment contrasts with Wasabi's simpler, cost-effective approach.
Google Cloud Storage Nearline is appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and fast data access. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Block Storage is preferred for its scalability and advanced features. Google Cloud is simple to deploy, whereas Azure provides better customer service and a higher ROI.
Google Cloud Storage Nearline has a minimal setup cost, making it affordable from the get-go, while Microsoft Azure Block Storage tends to have a higher setup cost, which might be a consideration for budget-conscious users.
Google Cloud Storage Nearline has a minimal setup cost, making it affordable from the get-go, while Microsoft Azure Block Storage tends to have a higher setup cost, which might be a consideration for budget-conscious users.
Microsoft Azure Block Storage offers seamless integration with Azure services and robust security features. In comparison, Zadara is praised for its flexibility, scalability, and features like on-premises deployment and customizable SLAs. Both have unique attributes that cater to different tech buyer needs.
Microsoft Azure Block Storage has an upfront setup cost, while Zadara offers a pay-as-you-go model. This difference in initial investment can significantly impact the budget considerations for businesses of varying sizes and requirements.
Microsoft Azure Block Storage has an upfront setup cost, while Zadara offers a pay-as-you-go model. This difference in initial investment can significantly impact the budget considerations for businesses of varying sizes and requirements.
Most databases and apps grow over time, and eventually require increased storage capacity. Adding physical storage or upgrading to a bigger server can be a costly and unscalable way to solve capacity issues.
