Amazon S3 Glacier and Microsoft Azure Block Storage are both popular cloud storage solutions. Microsoft Azure Block Storage seems to be a superior product due to its features, and users feel it is worth the price.
Features: Amazon S3 Glacier is valued for its cost-effectiveness, data archiving capabilities, and long-term storage. Microsoft Azure Block Storage stands out for its high performance, integration with other Azure services, and greater flexibility and scalability.
Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 Glacier users desire faster retrieval times, better user interface, and improved integration with other platforms. Microsoft Azure Block Storage users point out the high cost, complex pricing structure, and occasional performance issues during spikes in usage.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 Glacier users find the deployment process straightforward but have mixed reviews on customer service. Microsoft Azure Block Storage users report a complex setup process but commendable technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 Glacier is favored for its competitive setup costs and positive ROI feedback. Microsoft Azure Block Storage, despite higher setup costs, delivers good ROI due to its performance benefits.
If AWS improves support and cost management, there would be fewer reasons for users to consider other cloud platforms.
There is room for improvement in providing more skilled and comprehensive solutions.
They provide documentation and resolve issues.
The response time for enterprise support needs improvement.
Amazon S3 Glacier auto-scales according to the data.
Glacier has excellent scalability, with elasticity and security that meet industry standards.
Amazon S3 Glacier is infinitely scalable, with no issues on our end.
It is a significant advantage of the product.
The ability to scale is well-supported.
Block Storage allows for extensive scaling, and I can scale it to as much as I want.
It is specifically designed for cold storage.
Amazon S3 Glacier is quite stable, nine out of ten.
I would rate the stability of Glacier for archival purposes at around eight out of ten.
The stability of block storage could be rated as nine out of ten.
Overall, the stability is very good.
It isn't as stable as sound storage systems in a premise environment.
Another improvement is making Glacier available in all regions.
Support could be more robust, with a focus on providing comprehensive solutions even for novel issues.
I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage.
Its compatibility with various platforms could be enhanced to allow for a seamless operation across different cloud environments.
Some alternatives are cheaper and available for long trial periods before the payment.
Considerations on security regulations and hardware vendor information might be useful.
Compared to competitors like GCP, AWS can work on reducing hidden costs and overall pricing to retain startups and medium-sized businesses.
The storage cost is minimal, which is beneficial for archival purposes.
While it's generally cost-effective, the pricing model could be clearer.
For medium-sized companies, especially when discussing cost and scalability, it can be quite expensive.
It is pay-as-you-go, related to the size and usage of the storage.
It is reasonable, however, it can be cheaper.
Glacier greatly helps in managing storage costs by moving historical data to a lower-cost storage option.
These features facilitate log management and data dumping since the service is versatile enough to handle large volumes of data and provide necessary security.
The most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier are its cost-effectiveness for data archiving and its durability.
The tool allows me to download to my device, control access, and manage data with ease.
I can store data, use the storage account as a queue, and the pricing is also quite economical.
The ability to increase and scale out is really easy, allowing us to manage a large amount of data with reduced dependency on scalability issues.
Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.
Massively scalable cloud storage for your applications
Store and help protect your data. Get durable, highly available data storage across the globe and pay only for what you use.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
