Amazon S3 Glacier and Microsoft Azure Block Storage are both popular cloud storage solutions. Microsoft Azure Block Storage seems to be a superior product due to its features, and users feel it is worth the price.
Features: Amazon S3 Glacier is valued for its cost-effectiveness, data archiving capabilities, and long-term storage. Microsoft Azure Block Storage stands out for its high performance, integration with other Azure services, and greater flexibility and scalability.
Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 Glacier users desire faster retrieval times, better user interface, and improved integration with other platforms. Microsoft Azure Block Storage users point out the high cost, complex pricing structure, and occasional performance issues during spikes in usage.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 Glacier users find the deployment process straightforward but have mixed reviews on customer service. Microsoft Azure Block Storage users report a complex setup process but commendable technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 Glacier is favored for its competitive setup costs and positive ROI feedback. Microsoft Azure Block Storage, despite higher setup costs, delivers good ROI due to its performance benefits.
If AWS improves support and cost management, there would be fewer reasons for users to consider other cloud platforms.
There is room for improvement in providing more skilled and comprehensive solutions.
They provide documentation and resolve issues.
The response time for enterprise support needs improvement.
Amazon S3 Glacier auto-scales according to the data.
Amazon S3 Glacier is infinitely scalable, with no issues on our end.
Glacier has excellent scalability, with elasticity and security that meet industry standards.
The ability to scale is well-supported.
It is a significant advantage of the product.
We are on a premium plan, which should handle scalability automatically.
It is specifically designed for cold storage.
Amazon S3 Glacier is quite stable, nine out of ten.
I would rate the stability of Glacier for archival purposes at around eight out of ten.
It isn't as stable as sound storage systems in a premise environment.
Overall, the stability is very good.
None of the other storage vendors have all these features so easily manageable and fast to set up as Block Storage.
I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage.
Support could be more robust, with a focus on providing comprehensive solutions even for novel issues.
Another improvement is making Glacier available in all regions.
Its compatibility with various platforms could be enhanced to allow for a seamless operation across different cloud environments.
Some alternatives are cheaper and available for long trial periods before the payment.
Enabling SFTP on Microsoft Azure Block Storage didn’t allow us to get the IP address, as Azure doesn’t support it.
Compared to competitors like GCP, AWS can work on reducing hidden costs and overall pricing to retain startups and medium-sized businesses.
The storage cost is minimal, which is beneficial for archival purposes.
While it's generally cost-effective, the pricing model could be clearer.
For medium-sized companies, especially when discussing cost and scalability, it can be quite expensive.
The cost for Azure Data Factory, utilized for intensive data migration, was high but expected, as it's a one-time activity.
It is reasonable, however, it can be cheaper.
Glacier greatly helps in managing storage costs by moving historical data to a lower-cost storage option.
The most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier are its cost-effectiveness for data archiving and its durability.
Amazon S3 Glacier offers robust security features and practically infinite storage, where we can store all kinds of media swiftly.
The tool allows me to download to my device, control access, and manage data with ease.
The ability to increase and scale out is really easy, allowing us to manage a large amount of data with reduced dependency on scalability issues.
I can store data, use the storage account as a queue, and the pricing is also quite economical.
Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.
Massively scalable cloud storage for your applications
Store and help protect your data. Get durable, highly available data storage across the globe and pay only for what you use.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
