Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Product Manager at Axoft Ukraine
Real User
Secure, good user functionality, is easy to install, and is reliable
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of this solution is the protection and ease of use."
  • "Some of the technical internal functions, such as encryption protocols or something similar, could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

All of our hard drives are BitLocker-protected, and we use only protected USB sticks. We have no right to put unprotected USB sticks in our work notebooks, we must install password locks on the device and for notebook usage. I don't have any special knowledge or experience with such encryption, but I know that all of my hard drives are secure.

We use Microsoft BitLocker for security. If I lose my work computer or it is stolen, no one will be able to read the files on my hard drive.

I have a unique password.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of this solution is the protection and ease of use. 

All I have to do is enter my password and create passwords for my USB sticks.

I don't see where any improvements in this software are needed, because I'm not sure what else we can use. The functionality is straightforward.

What needs improvement?

Some of the technical internal functions, such as encryption protocols or something similar, could be improved. But it makes no difference in terms of functionality for us or users.

For how long have I used the solution?

I am not sure how long this solution was used before me, but I've been with the company for three years. 

I have been working with Microsoft BitLocker for almost three years.

I am not aware of the version we are using, I would have to consult with our system administrator.

I know we use some public clouds, but I'm not sure where the server for host encryption software is located.

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft BitLocker
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft BitLocker. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I am aware that the solution works and is configured by a centralized server. I don't have to do anything with it. It would be a concern for our system administrators.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's very scalable and doesn't have to be done manually because of the centralized tool for administration.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have some experience with complete data protection and endpoint encryption, but we are using standard features like Windows, and Bitdefender.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very simple. I would rate it a five out of five.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated, and use Microsoft BitLocker and McAfee Complete Data Protection, but our primary software tool is Microsoft BitLocker.

What other advice do I have?

Microsoft BitLocker is a good solution.

I would rate Microsoft BitLocker a ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user8433 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Expert at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Vendor
Using cloud services as glorified drive: BitLocker-To-Go (part III)

This post originally appeared on the Random Oracle blog at https://randomoracle.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/using-cloud-services-as-glorified-drive-bitlocker-to-go-part-iii/

The second post in this series described how to map storage at an arbitrary cloud storage provider as an ordinary local drive in Windows, using virtual hard disks. This post will look at how to encrypt that drive such that any information data backed up to the cloud remains private under the worst-case scenario: the service provider going rogue and deciding to rifle through user data. While there are many ways to encrypt storage locally, we are primarily interested in options supported out-of-the-box on common operating systems such as Windows. It turns out that there is a built-in feature with exactly the right properties for this job: BitLocker-To-Go disk encryption or BL2G for short.

BitLocker and BitLocker-To-Go

Some context is required to distinguish BL2G from its better known cousin, BitLocker for boot volumes. There is plenty in common as the shared branding suggests. Both variants are full-disk encryption schemes; they operate at the level of an entire drive. This is contrast with a much older Windows feature called Encrypting File System, which operates at the level of files and directories. With EFS it is possible to designate particular directories or even individual files for encryption. For BitLocker that choice is made at the granularity level of a complete drive. (Strictly speaking these are logical drives, rather than physical instances. A single physical drive may be formatted with multiple partitions, each appearing as independent logical volumes.)

Both vanilla BitLocker and BL2G use similar formats and cryptographic primitives such as AES block cipher. Where they differ is the way encryption keys are derived, a difference rooted in the usage scenarios. Ordinary BitLocker protects boot volumes and is often used in conjunction with a built-in TPM that is part of that machine. One interesting corollary is that BitLocker can not encrypt everything. At least part of the boot-loader and core filesystem code responsible for decrypting the rest of the drive must be accessible in the clear. This poses a problem, since an attacker could then replace these pieces with a malicious bootloader/OS combination to obtain the. To thwart such attacks, BitLocker requires a verified boot process, where disk encryption keys are derived as a function of the code executed during the boot sequence. If any of those pieces change– such as the OS bootloader– TPM will generate different keys and disk can not be encrypted. Implicit in this design is the assumption that decryption only needs to happen locally. There is no expectation that the same drive can be removed from that laptop, popped into a different one– which contains a different TPM– and successfully decrypted on that new host.

BitLocker-To-Go is specifically aimed at solving that mobility scenario. While internal drives are rarely migrated between machines, USB thumb-drives are frequently used as low-tech high-latency network to carry data around. Unfortunately their size and mobility also makes them frequent subjects of theft or accidental loss. This is where BL2G comes in, providing full-disk encryption on removable media. In many ways BL2G has a simpler design because there is no boot sequence to worry about. On the other hand the mobility requirement rules out using an on-board TPM as the source of encryption keys, since TPM is bound to a single machine by design.

Encryption options

Instead BL2G gives users the option of a passphrase or smart cards. Ordinary BitLocker can also work with passphrases in the absence of a TPM but that leads to a situation where the burden is placed on users to pick “good” passwords. The difficulty of recovering the key is a function of user’s ability to pick random sequences of letters. This is exactly the weakness in SpiderOak client-side encryption described earlier. The same problem plagues OS X FileVault design, since Apple never quite figured out how to incorporate TPMs into their hardware. (Making matters worse FileVault uses the same secret for disk encryption as login to the OS. That means the secret will be typed often, for unlocking the screen for example, further discouraging choice of high-entropy ones.)

On Windows the smart card option is only available for BL2G. This is because the operating system is fully booted and running with all bells and whistles. By contrast ordinary BitLocker decryption takes place early on in the boot sequence, before smart card functionality has been initialized. Using this option requires a suitable “card” and/or reader combination but the options are quite diverse. Most common are plastic cards requiring insertion into a card reader, but contactless cards using NFC, USB tokens with embedded card or even an Android phone with embedded secure element can function as smart card as far as Windows is concerned. To confuse matters, starting in Windows 8 it is also possible to create a virtual smart card out of the TPM but doing that would break roaming.

One catch is that BL2G can not be applied to any old drive. For example SMB network shares can not be encrypted this way because such shares are not addressed as raw devices at the block level. Access to network drives is mediated by a remote server which presents a high-level abstraction of a file system, instead of a physical storage medium divided up into sectors. By contrast when a flash drive is attached, the OS takes direct control over its filesystem and manipulates the underlying media directly.

Enabling BitLocker-To-Go

Luckily VHD file mounted as local drive looks very much like that removable USB drive as far as the operating system is concerned. BL2G is enabled in exactly the same way: right-clicking on the mounted VHD image shows a context menu with the option to turn on BitLocker:

Manage_Bitlocker_menu
Enabling BitLocker-To-Go

As the shield icon suggests, the command requires administrator privileges. Selecting that and confirming the UAC prompt leads to a wizard walking the user through the steps of encrypting the drive and backing up the encryption key:

EnableBitlocker BackupRecoveryKey ReadyToEncrypt

When the smart card option is selected, the wizard will require that a card is already inserted in the reader and search for a certificate with suitable properties. After encryption is complete, the drive icon changes to show a gray open padlock superimposed. This signals that the volume is protected by BL2G and that it is currently unlocked to allow access to the data.

AfterEncryption

Once BL2G encryption is complete, all data written to the virtual disk– which is represented by a single VHD file as far as the cloud service goes– is protected. There is no user chosen passphrase that can be brute-forced. (There is a usually a PIN set on the card for additional security but this PIN is only known to the card; it is never part of the encrypted disk image or shared with the cloud.)

The next post in the series will look at the experience of accessing that data from another machine, and some important limitations of this approach which make it impractical for large volumes.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft BitLocker
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft BitLocker. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Loyiso Gura - PeerSpot reviewer
Microsoft SureStep Ambassador at 4Sight Dynamics Africa
Real User
Top 10
Helps with data production and pricing is fair
Pros and Cons
  • "While it helps mitigate unauthorized data access by enhancing file and system protection through encryption, the tool is really enhanced with the combination of other Microsoft Security and Compliance features like data labeling."
  • "Microsoft BitLocker needs to be an all-inclusive solution. For example, a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) cryptoprocessor is required to use Bitlocker with your computer which keeps Bitlocker from adoption beyond Windows."

What is our primary use case?

We use the product for data protection. 

What is most valuable?

The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to label data. 

While it helps mitigate unauthorized data access by enhancing file and system protection through encryption, the tool is really enhanced with the combination of other Microsoft Security and Compliance features like data labeling.

What needs improvement?

Microsoft BitLocker needs to be an all-inclusive solution. For example, a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) cryptoprocessor is required to use Bitlocker with your computer which keeps Bitlocker from adoption beyond Windows.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with the product for three years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have 400 users for Microsoft BitLocker. I rate the tool's scalability a nine out of ten. 

How was the initial setup?

I rate Microsoft BitLocker's deployment a seven out of ten. It is straightforward and is a matter of following guidance. You need three to four resources to handle the tool's deployment. Deployment takes around a week and a half to complete. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Microsoft BitLocker's pricing is fair; I rate it a four out of ten. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate the product a nine out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Distributor
PeerSpot user
Ibrahin Gamal - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Specialist at ITE Corp
Real User
A scalable solution useful for encryption and integration with other solutions
Pros and Cons
  • "The ease of administering and integrating the solution is great."
  • "The integration between Active Directory and BitLocker could be better."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for this solution is encryption. The solution is deployed on-premises.

What is most valuable?

The ease of administering and integrating the solution is great.

What needs improvement?

The product could be improved by simplifying the implementation process and the integration between Active Directory and BitLocker could be better.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this solution for two years and are currently using the latest version.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. Currently, we have approximately 800 users using this solution, and six people are required for maintenance.

How are customer service and support?

We don't have experience with customer service and support.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy and takes approximately one to two days. A day for implementation and a second day for compliance.

What about the implementation team?

The solution was implemented in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We use the System Center Configuration Manager, which is free. So we don't need a license for BitLocker.

What other advice do I have?

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by simplifying the implementation process. I recommend it to people who may not be able to afford high license costs.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
PeerSpot user
reviewer1952547 - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
Data protection and encryption solution that offers excellent customer support and performance stability
Pros and Cons
  • "Being able to encrypt an entire hard disk has been most valuable."
  • "The solution could be improved if it was more user friendly."

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution to protect our data in the event that it is stolen or a laptop goes missing. We make use of the encryption scheme.

What is most valuable?

Being able to encrypt an entire hard disk has been most valuable.

What needs improvement?

The solution could be improved if it was more user friendly. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this solution for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable solution. 

How are customer service and support?

The customer service for this solution is excellent. I would rate it a five out of five. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is not difficult. You can set it up using policy levels. The pilot testing took less than one week.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to others. The best feature is that we can secure organization data using folder encryption. 

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Info Sec Consultant at Size 41 Digital
Real User
Top 5
Bitlocker - defence in depth

Understanding your responsibilities for disaster recovery at a departmental level can be difficult; IT departments are holistic entities. We deal with systems, people, security, servers and infrastructure... but we also need to think about things at a granular level so we can ready ourselves for when a terrible system failure occurs - it always will.

My problem was that we needed to ensure we had a very basic form of disaster recovery for our staff who were planning an event that gave us the biggest turnover of our year. Okay, so, our staff needed to take business critical information out of the office on something they could access individually. Yes, we could have used cloud storage but the staff needed full portability and access with or without the internet. Not to make a mountain out of a mole hill - USB keys.

I know. USB keys. Oddly they seem very fond of train seats and restaurant chairs because we keep hearing about them being found everywhere with private information on them.I think we're all agreed that - in the wrong hands - USB keys can be a bit of a nightmare. Of course, in the right hands they can be a nifty thing but the password must be strong enough,. It also shouldn't be able to be changed by staff.

Here we have a solution to the problem of securing drives in easy reach - Bitlocker. I literally can't think of an easier product to use. Click. Choose a couple of options or leave them as the default. Save. Done. I’m not underplaying this, it really is simple.

The aim of the game is to provide security against thefts that are spur of the moment, or people finding items that are lost; no-one wants to be the government department that loses a USB key full of people's NI numbers. We need to show due diligence in securing the storage devices that will be leaving the office.

How does it all work? 

Bitlocker uses TPM (Trusted Platform Module) but can be used without it via a small change from the sys admin of your org (probably you)

And it really is quite simple: 


It comes with a recovery key that the IT dept can keep a hold of in case the password is forgotten.To reiterate, it's included in some Windows software so free. When working for charities this is a great bonus especially if they insist on USB drives even though we all know they are a real risk to info getting out into the open. 

So, Bitlocker is designed to secure your drives (even removable ones) in an easy fashion. Does it do that? Yes, very much so. Is it easy to use? I’m not sure they could have made it easier.

 Is it secure? Secure enough from situational thieves and unskilled (in hacking) malicious current/ex-staff.

Did I find any bad points? To be honest, no. Job done. Bitlocker for securing drives, especially USB drives that leave the office. If you need something stronger then the drive probably shouldn't be leaving the office in the first place.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Darren Chaker - PeerSpot reviewer
Darren ChakerOperator at Halliburton
Top 20Real User

By Darren Chaker : I would extend full drive encryption for not only USB, but also external drives too. Simply imagine whatever data you have is lost or subject to a competitors possession, and the residual harm that would ensue. Information security must be part of the work environment, and being proactive is the only way to accomplish this.

See all 2 comments
it_user8433 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Expert at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Vendor
IronKey verses BitLocker-To-Go with smart cards (part 1)

This post originally appeared on the Random Oracle blog at https://randomoracle.wordpress.com/2013/03/02/ironkey-verses-bitlocker-to-go-with-smart-cards-part-1/

IronKey is one of the better known examples of “secure flash drive,” a category of products targeted at enterprises and security-conscious users for portable storage with hardware encryption. From a certain perspective, this entire category owes its existence to a failure of smart card adoption in the same target market. All of the functionality of dedicated hardware encryption products can be implemented with equal or better security, at much lower cost and greater flexibility using general purpose smart cards and off-the-shelf software.

Case in point: BitLocker-To-Go (“B2LG” for short) available in Windows 7 and later versions, provides full disk encryption for any old USB drive, with keys managed externally. B2LG is closely related to the original Bitlocker feature introduced in Vista, which protected boot volumes with the help of a trusted platform module. The latter is a more difficult proposition, as booting a modern OS involves several stages, each depending on executing code from the encrypted disk. Maintaining integrity of this code loaded during boot is as much of a concern as confidentiality, because altering the operating system can be an avenue of bypass against disk encryption. By contrast B2LG is concerned strictly with reading data after the OS has been already booted into a steady state.

Screenshot of the context menu on a removable drive
Context menu on a removable drive, showing the option to enable BitLocker

BL2G can be configured to use either passwords or smart card for encryption:

Choosing between passphrase and smart card
Choosing between passphrase and smart card, when enabling BitLocker.

The first configuration is susceptible to the usual offline guessing attacks, much like Android disk encryption, because keys are derived from a low-entropy secret chosen by the user. In the second configuration, the bulk-data encryption key is randomly and sealed using a public-key associated with the smart card. Unsealing that to recover the original key can only be done by asking the card to perform a private key operation, which is what smart cards are designed to implement with high security.

PIN dialog during private key operation
PIN dialog during private key operation to unlock a volume protected by BitLocker To Go.

Comparing a USB drive with built-in encryption with B2LG coupled to smart cards card, these solutions achieve similar but not identical, security profiles:

  • In both cases, bulk data encryption key is not derived from user-entered PIN or pass-phrase. A key based on “12345678″ is not any more likely than one based on “c8#J2*}ep
  • In both cases there is a limit to online guessing attacks by trying different PIN/password choices. For dedicated drives, the retry count is typically fixed by the manufacturer. For BL2G, it depends on the application installed on the card, translating into more flexibility.
  • BitLocker defaults to AES with 128-bit keys, along with a home-brew diffuser to emulate a wide-block cipher operating on sectors. Dedicated flash drives typically boast slightly more modern cryptography, with 256-bit AES in standardized XTS mode. (Not that any practical attacks exist against 128-bit keys or the custom diffuser. But one can imagine that manufacturers are caught in a marketing arms race: as soon as one declares support for the wider key length and starts throwing around “256″ as magic number, everyone else is required to follow suit for the sake of parity.)
  • For those comforted by external validation, there are many smart cards with FIPS 140 level 3 certification (as well as Common Criteria EAL 5+) in much the same way that many of the drives boast FIPS compliance. Again BL2G provides for greater choice here: instead of being stuck with the specific brand of tamper-resistant hardware the drive manufacturer decided to use, an enterprise or end-user can go with their own trusted card/token model.
  • BL2G has better resilience against physical theft: an attacker would have to capture the drive and the card, before they get to worrying about user PIN. If only the drive itself is lost, any data residing there can be rendered useless by destroying the cryptographic keys on the smart card. By contrast a lost IronKey is a permanent liability, just in case the attackers discover the password in the future.
  • Neither approach is resilient against local malware. If the drives are unlocked while attached to a compromised machine, all stored data is at risk. Some smart cards can support external PIN entry, in which case local malware can not observe the PIN by watching keystrokes. But this is little consolation, as malware can request the card to perform any operation while connected. Similarly while the IronKey PIN must be collected on PC and subject to interception, there are other models such as Aegis Secure Key with their own integrated PIN pad.
  • BitLocker has one convenience feature that may result in weaker configuration.  There is an option to automatically unlock drives, implemented by caching the key after successful decryption. Once cached, the smart card is no longer required to access the same drive in the future, because the key is already known. If the user makes an unwise decision to use this feature on a laptop which is stolen (or equivalently, remotely compromised) the persisted key can be used to decrypt the drive. Meanwhile the proprietary software accompanying IronKey does not provide an option to cache passwords. (That said, nothing stops a determined user from saving it to a local file.)

The second part of this post will look at other dimensions, such as performance, cost effectiveness and scaling, where BitLocker & smart card combination enjoys a decisive advantage over dedicated hardware.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user8433 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Expert at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Vendor
IronKey verses BitLocker-To-Go with smart cards (part 2)

This post originally appeared on the Random Oracle blog at http://randomoracle.wordpress.com/2013/03/05/ironkey-verses-bitlocker-to-go-with-smart-cards-part-2/

The first post in this series described how the BitLocker-To-Go feature built into Windows can be used in conjunction with smart cards to encrypt removable drives, and offer an alternative to dedicated hardware such as IronKey devices with comparable security. In this second and final part, we continue the comparison focusing on scaling, cost effectiveness and ease of deployment.

From a cost perspective, BL2G wins hands down:

  • BL2G works for any external drive, as well as logical volumes and non-bootable partitions of internal drives. There is no need to acquire new hardware. Existing plain USB drives can be leveraged, avoiding new capital spending.
  • Even when buying new drives,  there is a huge premium for models with built-in encryption.  Data point from March 2013: 16GB model of IronKey Basic S250 retails for around $300. By comparison a plain USB thumb drive at that capacity costs less than $20, or one-fifteenth the price. Not to mention those vanilla drives boast USB 3.0 support, unlike the IronKey stuck with slower USB v2. The price discrepancy only gets worse with increasing capacity– a phenomenon that can only be explained by wide profit margins, considering that the addition of secure element to vanilla drive is fixed overhead.
    • For BL2G there is the additional expense of card and reader. Basic contact-only readers can be had for less than $20. (On the splurge side, even fanciest dual-interface readers with contact and NFC  retail top out around $130.) The cost of the card itself is noise; plastic cards cost around $10 in volume. Alternatively one can opt for USB tokens such as GoldKey that function as combined card-in-reader.
    • It is also worth pointing out that card and reader are not unique to a drive: the same combination can protect any number of drives. Not to mention, enable other useful scenarios including machine logon,  secure email and remote authentication. In short the one-time investment in issuing cards and readers is far more economical than buying dedicated drives.
  • Speaking of space, BL2G scales better to large capacities because it operates on commodity hardware. IronKey comes in different sizes but the largest ones in thumb-drive form factor max out at 64GB currently. Meanwhile plain 256GB drives have reached market, and are starting their inevitable drop in price. Because BL2G effectively implements the ”bring-your-own-drive” approach, it is not constrained by any particular manufacturer’s offerings.

From an administration perspective, the MSFT focus on enterprise scenarios leads to a more manageable solution:

  • The IronKey requires yet one more password to remember and does not fit into any existing enterprise authentication infrastructure. (For users with drives, consider the challenge of updating the password on all of them.) By contrast the same smart card used for logon to Active Directory can be used for BL2G encryption if provisioned with a suitable certificate. The user experience is one versatile credential, good for multiple scenarios.
  • Basic IronKey models can not recover from a forgotten PIN, unless the user activated an online account. Not even if the user is willing to lose all data and start from a clean slate with blank drive. (This conveniently translates into more sales for the manufacturer, so there is not exactly a lot of economic incentive to solve the “problem.”)  BL2G volumes have no such constraint. They can be wiped clean and reformatted as plain drives if desired.
  • BL2G can be integrated with Active Directory in managed environments. Group policy can be configured to back up encryption keys to AD, to allow for data recovery by IT administrators in case the primary (smart card) and secondary (printed key) unlock mechanisms both fail.

On the downside, there are deployment challenges to using smart cards:

  • BitLocker remains a Windows-only solution, while IronKey and its brethren have decent cross-platform support. In principle there is no reason why software could not be written to mount such volumes on OS X and Linux. (It is not clear Wine emulation will help. While there is a reader application available downlevel for XP,  recognizing BL2G volumes is part of core system functionality. There is no stand-alone executable to run in emulation mode to get same effect.)
  • BL2G requires smart card and card reader, or equivalent combined form factor as USB token. While plug-and-play support and developments in the Windows smart card stack for recognizing common cards has made this simpler, it is one more piece of hardware to consider for deployment.
  • Cards need to be provisioned with a suitable certificate. BitLocker can use self-signed certificates obviating the need for CA, but that assumes the card can support user-driven provisioning. This is true for GIDS for example, but not PIV which requires administrative privilege for card management and more suitable for enterprise setting.

Finally it is worth pointing out some options that try to integrate removable storage with a smart card reader. For example the @Maxx Prime combines a SIM-sized smart card reader with a slot that can accommodate microSD drives. Typically that SIM slot would be permanently occupied by a small form-factor card with support for certificates and public-key cryptography. Then interchangeable microSD cards can go in the microSD side to provide access to encrypted data, with the entire rig connected to a USB port.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft BitLocker Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft BitLocker Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.