Omada Identity Reviews

Our final goal is the entire process of identity management including provisioning, de-provisioning, roles-based access, review-based access, and things like that, but first, we needed to replace the old legacy system. That was successfully done last summer.

The main business case was realizing a unique joined identity process because we have students and we have employees. We have external contractor employees, and we have partners who work for our organization and need digital or physical access to our environment. Because of that, Avans wants to use a single identity and an identity for life. If a student who once studied at Avans becomes a teacher or an ICT employee five or ten years later, he or she should have the same identity back with the same UPN or email address, so we have to guarantee an account for life.

Because of the source systems, we know it is a student, which studies they do, and, for employees, we know which department they work for and if they are a teacher or non-teacher personnel and things like that. Based on all those attributes, we have business rules guiding them towards a set of rights. From the moment they agree on the standard basic rules, we get their accounts created. We allow them to have access to that particular account. After the account is created, group memberships are assigned. Through runbook script, Omada sets the right into our Azure Entra ID environment.

Every implementation has some hurdles. Not everything goes 100% smoothly. In our organization, we have a lot of processes and an enormous amount of students starting the study year on the first of September. During this period, we have a lot of students coming in. We have been able to clear any hurdles because everything is traceable within Omada, and we also got the help of the Customer Success engineer from Omada. We were able to pinpoint any problem that would have impacted not only one person but hundreds or thousands of students or employees. In a very short duration, we were able to solve all the problems. That gave me a good feeling. We were expecting problems, but when any problem occurred, they were flexible and very fast in providing answers and solutions.

We did an evaluation almost three years ago in which Omada won. Within Omada, a lot of things are possible, and we have used only a few features. We had a go-live in July, and we are now closing the last features that are a part of the delivery plan for the go-live. So far, the implementation that we have is a replacement of the business logic of our old system. We are aware that Omada Identity can do more, but first, we need 100% synchronization with systems like Azure Entra ID. We are not there yet, but we are aware that it is possible. We have a standard way of onboarding, so we also know what to do when someone leaves a branch to remove those rights. However, within our organization, we still have other groups that are given access manually within other systems. We first have to synchronize with those systems or align with those systems before we can use Omada Identity to take control of removing an employee's access as soon as that employee leaves our organization.

We use Omada Identity for role-based access, but it is still very basic. It is on our roadmap for this year to continue with role-based access and provide departments and teams with the ability to add people to their environment based on the workflows available in Omada for group membership. The group membership is done by roles, and based on what kind of role someone has, the person is provided with certain software licenses, certain applications, certain data structure rights, etc.

Omada Identity has helped to automate reviews of access requests and reroute them to the appropriate people.

Omada Identity has had a good impact on our IT Team's operations efficiency. More and more things are automated. Only a few steps require manual decision-making. Its effect is very positive on our daily activities, and it will improve more and more.

What I like most is that we can always find a solution, and we can also find the cause when something goes wrong. I like that the most because everything is in one way or another traceable. That is what I like most. I like its reliability. 

Omada keeps on releasing new features within their product. We also have our own functional features. The roadmap of Omada quite aligns with our roadmap. The features available in Omada Identity suit our business case.

In our organization, all the data is event-driven, which means that if an attribute is changed in the source system, it can be updated within a few seconds in all end-user systems. There is room for improvement in Omada regarding that. Omada is still batch-based for some processes, so sometimes it can take an hour or even four hours before the execution is run and the update is sent. We know that 100% real-time synchronization is not possible. There is always a delay because of system utilization and things like that, but we try to achieve near real-time. If someone is locked out for a reason, we want to find the reason, resolve the issue, and resume the access for that user to enable him or her to log in within a few minutes. With Omada Identity, sometimes, it takes a quarter, and sometimes, it takes more than an hour. It sometimes also takes more than a day before access is given back to their user. There is always a good explanation for that, but that does not bring us as real-time as we want it to be. In the future, Omada should move towards a real-time and event-driven system.

We have been using Omada Identity since July last year. We have been implementing it for two years upfront.

It is stable. I would rate it a nine out of ten for stability.

We have about 32,000 students, but that number fluctuates. Overall, we have about 4,800 identities for the staff. Some of the teachers work only one or two days, and some of the interns work only a few days.

It is very capable of scaling based on the needs of our organization. We have just started. We have to see how things go in the future, but I am very confident of that.

So far, we have Mads as our customer success manager. He is a very good engineer. He is almost a part of our team, so that works fantastic. We are now closing the go-live, and as we start using more and more roadmap features ahead, I hope that Mads will keep that connection with Omada for us. That was the biggest part of the success.

Positive

We had a Novell solution based on Novell directory services, and later on, that changed to the Micro Focus NetIQ solution. In addition, as our IBM tooling, we had a home-built database platform where we had some processes provisioned. They have already been migrated to Omada, and there are still some more to come.

Avans University is quite ambitious. As per our goals that we wrote down a few years ago, by 2025, we want to be more flexible. We wanted to provide students with a more flexible way of doing their studies. Until now, students come to an institute and do a course, and in that course, the path is already defined. The future students would be in control of their own study much more than in the past. A student in the future can decide to have a part of its curriculum from Avans and another part from Amsterdam University or another university. When they have enough certificates within a branch, they get their degree. It is no longer required that everything is done within one institute, so a student can follow a particular course, and then follow another course in another city or institute. For us to be able to do that, we have to be more flexible. We have to have a system that can cope with a lot of changes coming in the near future. The solution we had was not capable of doing that, so we ended up doing a new tender and looking for a solution that was cloud-based and flexible enough for a constantly changing environment. Our organization will constantly change, and the IAM system must be flexible enough to cope with that.

Omada has not helped us consolidate disparate systems for access management. We replaced the old system, so that is a one-on-one replacement. Now that we have installed it, we can start using Omada for workflows and things that we have automated in other systems. In the future, we will have more processes provisioned through Omada. It will start helping us there.

For us, it is a SaaS solution. Omada was one of the top solutions in our tender because of the capability of doing all from the cloud. Its implementation took us about two years.

In terms of maintenance, we have to execute the updates ourselves. Omada tells us that there is a new release, and we can execute it ourselves. Within a time period, we can allow it to happen, which is nice. Within the system, we also have our configured workflows. We have to keep checking that everything is running properly. When there is an update done by Omada, we test it in staging before releasing it in production. We want to ensure that our most important flows are doing exactly what they are supposed to do. That is what I call maintenance.

Omada used a value-added reseller to do the implementation, and things went wrong there. They were not capable of doing SaaS implementations. They were capable of doing on-prem implementations. We were the first or second SaaS customers, and they were not capable of delivering the solution we requested in our tender, but we knew that Omada was capable of doing so. Omada then took over in March or April 2023, so the actual implementation started in March or April, and we went live in July 2023. At the end of February 2024, we are closing the activities from that go-live in July. For me, it was successful when we directly got it implemented from Omada. 

When Omada took over, there were no issues at all. They provided us with what we needed. The most important feature for us was the identity join check process for which we needed an improvement. It was quite a big improvement, but Omada fixed it with extra code, specially built for Avans.

I would rate Omada's implementation services an eight out of ten, and I would rate the third-party provider one out of ten for the effort.

It is not cheap. It is expensive, but compared to what we did almost three years ago, it is value for money. It is worth it.

I would recommend Omada Identity if you are an institute like Avans or an enterprise. If you are a small business, I would not recommend it.

We plan to use more features as we go on. We will use the governance features of Omada Identity as we go on. We have not prioritized the governance features of Omada. They are very important to us, but we have to first align and connect a lot more systems before we can fully profit from the governance possibilities. Similarly, we have not yet used Omada Identity Analytics. Our go-live implementation was a replacement of our old system. Since then, we have released some of the end-customer features, and now we are starting with extra features.

Within the educational IT environment, security is our top priority. It has always been a priority and in the future, we need to prioritize that more and more. Omada helps us, but our Security and Safety department itself has ICT security as the top program running right now where security must be in every part of our environment at every second and in every decision we make. Having Omada implemented during that program makes us aware that we are quite good, but there is always room for improvement. Omada can help us with that a lot.

Omada Identity has not yet saved us time. We have mostly replaced the functionalities that we had from our old system. In the near future, we will have more automatic provisioning. People will also be able to provision other colleagues and things like that. It will help us a lot in terms of time savings, but so far, the time savings are similar to what we have had in the last five years.

Overall, I would rate Omada Identity an eight out of ten.

We wanted a solution that could help us make HR the master of identities. We wanted a solution that could take that data and direct it into all our other directories and Active Directory.

We have Omada set up to remove an employee's access as soon as the employee leaves. When we started to do this, we saw that quite a few of our accounts were actually removed, meaning we had holes in our security. There were too many active accounts, compared to what should be active. That was one of the first things we saw.

Now, everybody is really aware that when a user leaves, the account should be disabled and accesses should be removed. People are getting more used to seeing that. It does something for the entire security culture, around identities, in our company.

The solution has also definitely helped us save time when provisioning access for identities. We don't have to go in and do a lot of the work that we did before. It may have saved us somewhere in the range of 10 to 30 percent of the time we spent on provisioning access.

In addition, before Omada, we used many systems and now we are using just this one system. Currently, we are mostly concerned about AD applications, but in the next year our plan is to incorporate all the systems, like our ERP. It will help us consolidate. The consolidation we have seen so far has helped reduce the time it takes to give people the access they need, but not that much, perhaps 10 percent. It's mostly AD groups at the moment. We will probably see a better number for that next year.

At a high level, the areas of the solution that are most valuable are the 

• provisioning engine
• access request.

And, of course, all of the identity-handling capabilities are the most important to us. 

Other very good aspects include the

• interface, which is easy and intuitive
• review access handling.

There are some technical bits and pieces that we have looked at that could be better. For instance, when you do a recalculation of an identity, it's hard to understand what was incorrect before you started the recalculation, and which values are actually updated.

Right now, all you see are all the new fields that are provisioned, instead of seeing only the fields that are changed. This makes it hard to understand the situation before you started it, compared to after. This is one of the key features that I'm really missing.

Also, the onboarding of applications could be easier. There could be workflows to go through the entire process of onboarding a new system or application, instead of having to go to three places to do it. 

Those are the two key improvements needed.

Also, the connectors for the applications that we use are good, but not fantastic. This is constantly improving. Recently, they added a ServiceNow integration, so there are still new connectors coming. But there are a few systems that I would like to see on the list, systems that are not there today. We have two ERP systems: SAP and something called Infor M3, and the latter is not there. It's okay, though. Maybe some of the other companies we evaluated have even more connectors, but Omada was good enough for us.

We have been using Omada for two years.

We haven't had any incidents so far. It has been extremely stable.

It's at least scalable for what we need. We are now running a few systems on it with no problems so far. It has been scaled and that was fantastic. When we start to implement more and more systems, I hope it will continue to scale just as well as it has up until now.

For us, their technical support has been fantastic.

Also, Omada definitely provides us with a clear roadmap for additional features that will be deployed. I'm so lucky that I'm part of the board that looks at new features coming out. We are among a few customers that are invited to see the roadmap, for clarity. So I really do have a good overview of what's coming in the products.

It might sound strange, as we have been using it for a couple of years already, but we are not there yet when it comes to utilizing all of the new features. There are still so many basic features that we need to implement in our organization. For example, I have looked at the analytics and we have used them a little bit. But right now, it's not a key function area for us. Going forward, I definitely think we will use it more and more.

Another example is Omada's certification surveys to recertify roles or to determine if roles are relevant. We are starting to use that now but we have not done it at the scale that you might imagine. We are at the very beginning of that process. By the time another half a year has passed, we will have done quite a lot on that.

Positive

We used a self-developed solution that was based on a lot of scripts and different GUIs and interfaces. But it wasn't a product, it was just something that we put together.

The initial deployment was straightforward. The setting up of the solution was done by Omada and it only took a couple of days. Then they came with a good description of what we needed to do and we were complete within the first week. Everything was up and running. Then we started building the business logic. That took some more time, but the actual setting up of the entire environment and having everything connected took just a few days.

Omada helped us to deploy IGA within 12 weeks. The first phase took eight to 10 weeks. When we started, it was much more about an HR product than an IT project. It was to get the organization to understand that HR needs to be the master of identities. After that, we needed a solution to take that data and turn it into something productive, and that's where we saw the first benefits of Omada.

It is implemented as a global solution. We have Omada running in the cloud. Then we have a VPN collection set up to Omada. And we have different HR systems running in our company and all of them are synchronizing their data on a daily basis to Omada through connectors. And we control AD, Azure, et cetera by the data that we receive.

On our side, there were four or five people involved from different teams. And the team from the Omada side had three people plus a project manager.

From an administrative point of view, there are 10 to 15 people using Omada. Eventually, I hope all our users will go into and do something. For now, we have 500 to 1,000 users who are doing something in the solution. This will increase more and more over time, as more accesses are ordered by the employees.

In terms of maintenance, there are always new things that we do in the system, but Omada takes care of everything when it comes to patching and upgrading the environment. The only thing that we do is upgrade it when there's a new version out. We just have to go into an admin site and say, "Now we want to do the upgrade," and it's one click of a button and it's done.

We evaluated six or seven products, including One Identity Manager, SailPoint IdentityIQ, 365 Identity, and we also had a quick look at Microsoft Identity Manager, but that was not a full solution.

Among the reasons we chose Omada was that they had the identity process framework. When we started this, we were very immature in our identity journey, and having this identity process framework was a good way for us to get started. It was very clear what we needed to do.

Also, with Omada, you bought a license and you had everything. With a lot of the other products, you had to buy X, and then you had to buy Y if you wanted to implement a new feature. And there would be another cost if you wanted to implement another feature. Omada's model was very easy for us to understand: If you buy it, then you get the entire solution. That made it easy to see what the cost was going to be in the coming years.

Also, we had direct contact with Omada and we used their consulting department to help us onboard it. This was very good because we had people sitting close to the product group, in case there were questions. And they were building it correctly from the start, instead of having some local contractors coming in to help us. That was also something that was really good.

On the negative side, some of the other products might be more developed and have more features. But, Omada was very good for us to get started with.

I would definitely recommend Omada. It's a good product that absolutely does what you need. I would suggest reading through the identity process, the framework that they have created, to get an understanding of what you need to have in place before starting this project. For us, it was a long road to work with HR to get everything implemented. Having that understanding before you start is really key to a successful implementation.

We use Omada Identity for managing 99% of our employees and non-employee identities. We also use it for provisioning to Active Directory and across 12 different SAP systems and two other application integrations.

Omada provides us with a clear roadmap for getting additional features deployed. Our company, in particular, has been a key player in getting new features developed through the years. A lot of the features that are in their product today started as a custom enhancement implemented just for us, which they eventually rolled into the core product. We have been a customer for ten years, and their product has grown significantly in terms of feature set and so forth over the last ten years. A lot of that functionality started with us. Not all of it, of course.

We were able to realize its benefits immediately. Prior to Omada Identity, we did not have an identity access management platform in place. Everything was done manually. We did not even have a homegrown solution or anything. Identity management, account creation, and other similar things were done manually, so there were immediate benefits as one would expect. Of course, not everything was implemented all at once. We primarily started with Active Directory, so we started with primary identity management and so forth and then rolled in other things through the years, which was well before my time in the space.

Their identity analytics helped us make informed decisions, but we are running a much older version of their product. They have made a lot of progress over the last few years. We have not been able to take advantage of a lot of new functionality that has been implemented particularly around analytics.

Omada's solution is set up to remove an employee's access as soon as that employee leaves our organization. It has significantly impacted our security. Omada does its part very fast, and then we have to wait for replication across the main controllers and things like that, which could take up to an hour. We desire to do it immediately. We would like people to lose access immediately, and Omada does its part, but the rest of our infrastructure is not always immediate due to replication and so forth. That is huge from a security perspective because we have use cases all the time with regard to employees or non-employees leaving abruptly and in a manner where you need to cut off access immediately. Prior to Omada, it required a lot of phone calls and manual steps to make it happen and usually not at convenient times.

We have used Omada's certification surveys to recertify roles or to determine if roles are relevant. That is one of my primary roles. I am on the governance side, so I am well-versed in their recertification capabilities. We have a variety of different ones that we run at different intervals. Most of them are semiannual, but, of course, we deal with the same challenges as every other organization. That has nothing to do with the tool itself. It is with regards to people rubber-stamping access and so forth.

We use Omada for role-based access control in a very limited way. The capability is there. We would like to do more, but anybody who knows anything about role-based access control knows that the tool is the easiest part. The business processes are the hardest part. It is hard to get people to define their access model so that you can use a tool to implement that access model. We are very limited when it comes to role-based access control. It is mostly for high-level birthright type of access and so forth.

It has very much helped us save time when provisioning access for identities, but it is difficult for me to provide any metrics because we have been doing it for so long. We do not have people, either employees or as part of managed services, who are in roles to do this on a regular basis.

Omada Identity has helped us consolidate disparate systems for access management.

Omada Identity has also helped us to automate reviews of access requests and reroute them to the appropriate people. It is hard to compare how it affects our help-desk workload involving access requests because we have been doing it for so long, but it certainly avoids a significant number of calls to the help desk. If this was done manually, there would be calls to our help desk. It will either be done by the help desk or escalated to an applicable tier-two support team.

They have gotten better in terms of the comprehensiveness of the out-of-the-box connectors. They do not have as extensive a connector portfolio as SailPoint does, but they have enough to meet our needs. They have the basics, and we do not need a lot of connectors to various applications because we have an access model that is highly dependent on Active Directory groups for access management. Omada Identity Suite does very well in managing AD resources.

Technically, the product does everything one would expect from an identity and access management platform. The product offers robust handling of Active Directory resources. 

The ease of working with Omada itself is commendable. They have been a great partner of ours for ten years, and it is clear they fully understand the identity space.

The biggest issue, which is the reason why we are transitioning from their product to SailPoint, is the overall user experience. From a technical perspective, it is a very good product, but from an end-user experience perspective, it significantly lacks. Although they have made some improvements over the last few years, it is still not on par with many of their competitors, particularly SailPoint. We have gotten so much negative feedback through the years on users not being able to effectively use the system. It was not always intuitive, so our leadership wanted a change.

We have used the solution for about ten years.

We do not contact their technical support directly because we have a service agreement already in place with them with some dedicated and some non-dedicated resources. We work through them if they need to escalate anything to the development or the level 3 support team. We never have to do that directly.

Neutral

We are in the process of migrating from Omada Identity Suite to SailPoint IdentityIQ due to the need for a better user experience.

We did an evaluation and looked at some of the other key players in the space but quickly settled on SailPoint.

From an implementation perspective, we had Omada resources who did the implementation. They do our support and all of our upgrade work. Omada does not have a lot of partners out there.

In terms of upgrades, the tool itself is not easy or hard. It is probably comparable to other identity solutions. For us, it is extremely difficult because of the detailed and thorough regression testing that we do for any upgrades, but that would be the case for any solution.

Early on, we did a lot of customization of the product that we had to go in and regression test everything, which made it extremely difficult. That is not Omada's fault. That is on us.

Being an on-prem solution, it does require maintenance. I would have loved to have gone to the Omada cloud product, but being an on-prem solution, there is regular support maintenance. We use Omada as a managed service provider for us, and they do a very good job with that.

They are positioned at a good price point. They are lower than some of their competitors.

I would rate Omada Identity an eight out of ten. The reason why I would not give it a nine or a ten has to do with the user experience.

When we decided to implement Omada, our main goal was to establish it as our central identity management system. We wanted to be able to plan and automate our entire user and permission management process, including things like introducing business roles, access request workflows, and user lifecycle management. These are core functionalities for us.

Moreover, consolidating access management systems is important to us. We're optimistic about its potential.

The combination of features and the amazing support team are definitely valuable to use. The customer success and support teams have been crucial.

Omada provides a clear roadmap for additional features. We've already received some information about the product roadmap for 2024.

User lifecycle management is a key element of our new setup. Omada automatically removes employee access when they leave the company.

Moreover, Omada saves time when provisioning access for new identities. Automating user account provisioning across various systems should save us significant time and money.

Omada helps automate access request reviews and route them to the appropriate people. That's a common use case for their certification feature.

If I had to name one thing, it would be the user interface (UI). They're already working on improvements, but it could be a bit more user-friendly. It's on their roadmap though.

We just started using this solution because we just began implementation in August last year.

Everything works perfectly for us.

For our use case, we had no problem.

For the comprehensiveness of the model out-of-the-box connectors for the applications that we use, all the applications we wanted to integrate into our first wave. We had a few custom connectors for the out-of-the-box ones and for the ones we're missing, the REST connectors where we have flow.

And also, currently, Omada is developing a lot of new connectors, and the amount of connectors is currently growing, so this would be maybe also a good point.

With our customer success manager (CSM), we have a monthly meeting. So anytime we have some questions on each help, I can contact our CSM, and then he tries to help us, and until now, it's worked very, very well. Also, the technical support was very fast and already provided us with a solution.

Positive

We've got a bit of an old, self-coded solution based on MIM, and we're really looking to replace it. It's become a bit of a burden to manage.

The initial setup is definitely on the complex side. The topic, because of the different interfaces in many, many different systems. It is due to a complex environment. It's not due to Omada.

The deployment is done partly by our staff and partly by an external implementer. We have, some persons responsible for the application side of the system we want to connect to, but the core team has five to eight people.

We opted for an external implementation partner for internal reasons, not because of Omada's services. Although, a 12-week deployment is possible.

The pricing is okay.

First, definitely define your exact requirements. Then, maybe do a proof of concept. Try connecting the first application and gain some familiarity with Omada's expertise.

So far, we're very happy. No real negatives or drawbacks yet. So, for me, it is a ten out of ten.

Omada Identity is our platform for managing the entire lifecycle of user identities, including creating and assigning roles based on changing needs (dynamic roles and birth rates), and we'll soon be implementing access review workflows.

Omada Identity prioritizes transparency in development by providing a clear roadmap. As a customer advisory board member, I gain access to this roadmap and can directly influence the product's future through feedback. This collaboration helps them prioritize features and bring them to production faster. I've even had direct discussions with their VP of product about our specific needs, ensuring they address functionalities that are currently immature or even missing entirely.

We saw the value in Omada Identity within the first four months.

Omada Identity deployed within 12 weeks.

Omada Identity's built-in data filtering eliminates the need for time-consuming manual data exports and filtering, allowing users to analyze information directly within the platform and make quicker, data-driven decisions.

Omada Identity has saved us time which could correlate to cost savings.

By automatically disabling access for former employees, Omada Identity strengthens our overall security posture.

Our organization is piloting Omada Identity's certification survey feature to streamline access reviews. This automated approach will ensure compliance and security by automatically collecting data from target systems, eliminating the need for administrators to manually extract, filter, assess, and compile information – a significant time saver.

We are deploying Omada's role-based access control across a large portion of our organization.

Omada has streamlined user provisioning for identity and access management, saving at least 15 minutes per user for the birthrate access method. It's also significantly reduced time spent on role-based access control, saving an additional hour or so per user.

Omada helped us automate reviews of access requests and reroute these access requests to the appropriate people.

Omada has significantly reduced our workload, particularly for tasks like managing birthrate access which was previously done manually. This applies to other areas where we have dynamic roles as well since anything directly integrated with Omada no longer requires manual intervention.

Contributing to the Omada connectivity community is valuable because it fosters a two-way exchange of information. We gain insights from other customers, their support staff, and engineers. This exchange not only allows us to help others and find solutions but also provides Omada with valuable customer data to prioritize improvements.

The most appealing aspect of Omada Identity is its self-service upgrade system. The cloud console allows us to control the update schedule, manage multiple environments by spinning up or cloning them, and configure most back-end settings without vendor intervention. This level of self-service is unmatched by many other identity governance solutions.

Omada Identity's user interface needs improvement, especially for new users. The key to a successful identity management system is ease of use for non-technical users. New hires or those unfamiliar with the system shouldn't struggle to request access. Ideally, the interface should be clear and straightforward, eliminating confusion about application types, entitlements, and permission levels. Users should be able to submit requests with confidence, knowing they have selected the correct options for full access. The burden shouldn't be on the user to understand the intricacies of the system behind the scenes. This is a common issue that Omada Identity, and similar solutions, should address.

Omada's pre-built connectors are generally effective, however a few require improvement. We've already informed Omada about these specific connectors.

I have been using Omada Identity for two years.

Omada Identity has been a significant improvement for us in terms of system stability. Unlike our previous solutions, which required extensive regression testing after upgrades and often resulted in bugs and performance issues, Omada Identity has not exhibited any lagging or crashing in our production environment, even though our lower environments have limitations due to weaker hardware. This has saved us a considerable amount of time and effort.

Our experience with Omada's scalability has been positive. We regularly communicate our data intake and future plans, including the number of systems we intend to connect, to ensure they can accommodate our growth.

While I appreciate that Omada's technical support surpasses my prior experiences, their response times can sometimes be slower than I'd like.

Positive

I have been deploying solutions for over 20 years and Omada Identity is one of the easier ones I have deployed.

We used two full-time and one part-time people for the deployment. 

Omada Professional Services assisted us with the implementation process.

Omada Identity is competitively priced and delivers good value for our money.

I would rate Omada Identity eight out of ten.

Omada Identity's cloud platform minimizes our maintenance burden; it handles most upkeep, leaving us with only essential tasks.

It's crucial to understand your business rules and data sources upfront. Not all identity management systems can handle complex rules or multiple sources of truth. Before implementing a solution like Omada Identity, ensure it aligns with your requirements to avoid compatibility issues and wasted effort.

We use Omada Identity for identity management and access management for requesting mailboxes or user-based policies.

Omada provides us with a clear roadmap for getting additional features deployed. AI integration is expected shortly, which could offer valuable capabilities like machine learning. The possibility of creating new security group functionalities is also being explored, allowing for the automated assignment of specific access permissions to designated individuals.

Omada's Identity Analytics helps us make informed decisions faster than we could without them. Creating new security measures or setting new rules is both easier and faster.

When someone leaves the company, Omada automatically disables their account. This process is entirely automated.

Omada's role-based access control helps our security posture by enabling us to assign certain rights to people based on their roles.

Omada helps automate reviews for access requests and reroute them to the appropriate people in charge.

Omada Identity is easy to use. The interface is good and customizable.

Since implementing Omada Identity our IT team's operational efficiency has improved. 

The most valuable aspects of Omada Identity for me are the automation capabilities. These include user-based policies, user-based access controls, and automated group creation. Overall, it simplifies the management of both users and policies.

Omada Identity has a steep learning curve. Due to the abundance of features, I have still been relying on Omada University for assistance even after six months of use.

I have been using Omada Identity for almost six months.

Omada Identity is stable. Any bugs we have encountered are part of the implementation issues.

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.

Omada Identity is a cloud-based solution so it is scalable.

The technical support is the best.

Positive

Before I joined the organization they were using another solution that was old and needed to be upgraded.

I would rate Omada Identity eight out of ten.

We have several users of Omada in our organization. This includes both administrators and regular users. We currently have a small group of four administrators managing the system for approximately 20-30 users. However, we anticipate needing to grant access to Omada to a much larger group of students in the future. These students would have varying levels of access based on their needs. They would likely request access through a system like Home Holter, which would manage start and end dates for their permissions. This could potentially involve access for up to 30,000 students, teachers, and colleagues.

Monthly maintenance is required for Omada Identity.

I recommend Omada Identity to others. The solution is widespread and there are many options to choose from.

We leverage Omada Identity to manage user identities for governance applications. We integrate our applications with the Identity Governance and Administration system and conduct periodic access reviews.

Omada helped us deploy IGA within 12 weeks by focusing on fundamentals and best practices.

Omada's identity analytics helps us make faster decisions.

Omada is set up to remove employee access as soon as an employee leaves the organization. This improves our security posture.

Omada can streamline identity access provisioning by up to 5 percent. This efficiency is achieved by focusing automation on frequently used access rights, primarily those assigned to D groups.

Omada helps us consolidate some of our access management systems. However, we don't rely solely on Omada for all our access management needs. We also use Jira for other access management functions.

Omada Identity helped us save around 20 percent of our time.

The out-of-the-box connectors from Omada are easy to use.

I appreciate all the support we receive from Omada. Through Omada, we get to learn about all of our contacts and who to reach out to for assistance. The consultation sessions are also helpful.

The reporting and importing have room for improvement. Currently, it takes half a day to complete and since we are looking to implement more applications the time will only increase.

Omada comes with custom functionalities but the access rights review requires a lot of manual work and could be improved.

I have been using Omada Identity for 1 year.

I would rate the stability of Omada Identity 9 out of 10.

I would rate the scalability of Omada Identity 9 out of 10.

Sometimes the support team doesn't provide clear instructions on how to solve our problems. This might be because we have a lot of self-created content, making it difficult for Omada to offer one-size-fits-all support. Additionally, explaining complex issues with multiple solutions can be time-consuming. Perhaps this reflects a gap in understanding between how we, as customers, use the tool and how Omada anticipates us using it.

Positive

We previously used an IBM solution before switching to Omada Identity.

Consolidating our processes with Omada Identity has shown a return on investment.

Omada Identity offers a reasonable price point, but it will increase as we transition to the cloud.

I would rate Omada Identity 8 out of 10.

When there's a concern about something, such as reporting, the process usually follows a clear path. We typically hold meetings with Omada to discuss any reporting issues we encounter. After providing them with relevant information, the information is then released and formatted accordingly. However, this process likely applies to other types of information as well, such as details about upcoming features. This information is probably sent via email or can be found within the Omada staging area. In our specific case, though, our lead engineer handles the verification of that information.

We are currently in the process of training and implementing the certification surveys to recertify roles and determine if they are still relevant for employees.

Omada Identity is deployed across our organization of 16,000 people and managed by a team of 11 people in IT.

Omada Identity requires regular maintenance. Sometimes, we encounter issues with its functionalities, and troubleshooting is necessary to identify and resolve the problems. One specific process within Omada involves automatically sending new employee login credentials to their managers via email. Unfortunately, this process has been experiencing occasional failures. 

I recommend having a technical introduction or demo on how to use the features of Omada before implementing the solution.

The main purpose is to get services up and running for user management in the whole company and automate workflows. 

We have a pretty big team. We develop a lot of custom solutions. We mainly use it as a toolbox to get a baseline of the IAM platform. We are doing a lot of customization for data. Customization is the key. 

We are in an industry where we have a lot of regulations. Most of the regulatory IGA features that we use are mainly for auditing purposes. We do not use the whole suite for that. 

The data model and how the data model can be utilized to automate things have been beneficial for automating user life cycle management.

Omada Identity improves our compliance and audit readiness a lot because of the reporting capabilities that are there. Because we have a lot of data from the whole organization, we can support the review and auditing processes as well as possible. The historical information gathering that Omada supports is very helpful in such audits.

Omada provides us with a clear roadmap for getting additional features deployed. They have gotten much better in terms of planning the future. They are very transparent about which features are covered and which are not. They let us know at least a year in advance what is coming up.

It has been a very good joint venture. We started with Omada when the company was very small, and they had just started their business in Europe. We worked together a lot in the beginning and improved each other. We developed things that they now have in the standard Omada, and we developed them initially in our company. It was very nice working with them together. A couple of colleagues are still there after ten years. Omada is now a big enterprise. It is getting bigger and bigger. We are no longer the most important customer. Standardization is key for them now, but I am not 100% convinced that standardization always helps with the problem.

We are multidimensional when it comes to role-based access. We have a couple of enterprise role models running for different areas of our company. We have a very good model. Omada gives us capabilities for role management. It helps us to control which access is given to whom.

With Omada's reporting tools, we could make decisions related to onboarding. It was very helpful. We did a lot of analysis to see how many people we have given access to for certain applications, and then we used the data to push certain initiatives. The data that we got out of Omada helped us, but for the analytics, we used different software.

Omada's identity analytics have affected the manual overhead involved with our identity management. We always try to reduce the overhead on the business side of the company, and that is why we focus on automation. Our goal is to not have any manual inputs or access management in five to ten years. We are getting everything automated with AI tools and things like that.

The life cycle of identities is definitely covered 100% within our company, and it is mostly automated. We take away access when a person is leaving. This is definitely very good with Omada Identity.

Omada Identity has definitely improved our security from internal and external aspects. We have automated a lot of identity life cycle processes and situations. The automation enables an HR person to make a decision, and then everything onwards is secured by automation.

We have used Omada's certification surveys, but not as much as they are used, for example, within the banking industry. There they have regulations that it needs to be done in a certain amount of time. We use the re-certification feature for cleaning up things. For every application, we have somebody who is managing the roles, and we also have different departments to take care of the roles. They have also the responsibility to have it cleaned up and match what we need on the business side. That is an effort of the company. It is not something that Omada can take care of.

We have 1,500 stores worldwide, and giving access to every employee and region is fully automated. Taking it away is also fully automated, and we have a big turnover per year in our retail environment. About 40% of the staff is changing. It saves a huge amount of time. Overall, there are about 40% time savings.

Omada has helped to automate reviews of access requests and reroute them to the appropriate people. We also have a lot of customization. We are active in over 50 countries, and the approval mechanisms that we have differ from the standard. The capabilities and the toolbox that Omada gives us make it possible for us to control the access very well. The person who needs to be involved in the approval of something is always within the chain. It is working well.

Implementing Omada brought a lot of change. People had to adapt to requesting things themselves. It improved our operational efficiency a lot because people know they can help themselves. It brought a lot of changes, especially for the IT department.

The out-of-the-box connectors they provide are a good starting point, but there are always some customer-specific things that need to be added, which is totally fine. The standard connectors that they provide are always a good starting point.

Its best feature is definitely the process design. It is quite easy and straightforward to design a process. Customization capabilities in terms of adding code to the processes are very good.

The UI design needs improvement. One or two years ago, Omada changed its user interface to simplify, but the simplification has not really kicked in. UI design is something that can be improved.

We do not use the reporting capabilities of Omada. They can improve it and provide very cool automated reporting for us to use.

AI capabilities are another area of improvement, but I know that is already on the roadmap. They want to enrich AI mechanisms into role management and help requesters get to the role they need. That is definitely a thing to improve.

I have been using Omada Identity for ten years.

We have not seen any bugs or issues because we always went with the updates that were quite solid. We never went with the newest versions because we did not want to get any bugs and glitches, so we are quite happy. The service is running very smoothly, and we do not have situations where Omada does things that we cannot understand and support. It is transparent. I would rate it a nine out of ten for stability.

Scalability has improved a lot over the past years. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.

Overall, we have 50,000 users, and there are a couple of thousands of users who use Omada and the processes of self-service. There are 1,000 to 2,000 users out of 50,000 identities in total.

We had special contact within Omada, so their support was always very good throughout the years. When Omada got bigger, they tried to standardize the support processes more and more. We were not that happy at certain points, but they have been working on it every year. They improved over the past year. They now listen.

We always do a lot of analysis before we open a ticket with Omada. We are not happy with the standard support answers because we would have already checked most things. I would rate their support a six out of ten.

Neutral

We did not use a similar solution before Omada. We only had Active Directory, and manual user management within applications. Omada has already been with the company for 15 years. I came here 10 years ago. It was the first IAM solution we used.

We have deployed it on-premises, and we are in full control of the infrastructure and the servers. We are still on-premises, but we are looking at the cloud solution. I am comparing a lot of things and assessing how we can work with customization in the cloud environment. A lot of decisions need to be taken if we want to go the cloud route in the future.

Its initial setup is quite complex. The most complex thing was getting the software from version 6, which was the initial version we used, to version 12. From version 7 to 12, there were a lot of structural and data models changed within Omada. They needed to be adapted to our environment, so the updates took a lot of effort, but it has gotten much better over the past three years because they did not do any big structural changes.

It took a few months to plan and implement it, but the deployment just took a weekend because of the prior planning we did.

In terms of maintenance, it does not require that much maintenance. The maintenance is mostly at the data level. You have to clean up the data in the database once in a while. Overall, the maintenance is quite low.

One or two external people and three to four internal employees were involved in its implementation.

We have seen an ROI time-wise. It lowers the effort with automation, so it saves time and money. There is at least a 50% reduction in the effort for a classic request scenario.

It is fairly priced for an on-premise environment, but for the cloud environment, I am not that happy with the pricing.

If somebody asks me about a good IAM solution, I would definitely recommend Omada Identity. If you have a very diverse environment, Omada's good features and capabilities would be useful to meet your company's needs. That is where Omada is very strong. If you are just a marketing company and you just want an IAM solution, you can go with Salesforce. If you have a complex environment where you need adoption to your business processes, I would definitely recommend Omada Identity.

Overall, I would rate Omada Identity an eight out of ten.