Omada Identity Reviews

It is to get more standardization for our organization on everything related to identity, provisioning, and managing access. 

I am not working a lot within the tool myself because it is not my role.

At the moment, because we just started our journey, its benefits are very limited. We are focused. We had an in-house IGA solution over the past 25 to 30 years, so our main focus was doing a technical migration first. We have some improvements to current processes, but we are not yet fully leveraging all the capabilities that Omada can give us. We are focused on our first technical migration.

Omada can help to deploy IGA within 12 weeks by focusing on fundamentals and best practices. That was the idea. That was also something I warned them about upfront. I told them it would be a real challenge within our organization. If they start from a blank page, the 12-week initiative that they have is achievable, but for an organization that already has certain processes and a tool in place, 12 weeks is not possible. We tried, but we could not meet that. We failed, but that is not a problem with the package. It is more of a problem as an organization. During the initial conversations at the start of the projects, we did say that we would give it a try and see where we end up. We would not focus too much on 12 weeks. They have been flexible to it as well. Just because they have listed it as a 12-week initiative, it does not mean that they are not flexible to go beyond those 12 weeks.

It is set up to remove an employee's access as soon as that employee leaves our organization, but we have limited scope today. It is currently only for a subset of applications. The goal is to have all major applications or data resources integrated, and then we would achieve that scenario.

Omada Identity has had a positive effect on our security posture. We are able to remove certain accesses in a centralized control way. We are able to remove certain roles or update some of the basic roles.

Our provisioning process is definitely faster today. With the previous solution, we needed to wait for overnight synchronization and scripting to run, whereas now, it is every six hours. It is definitely faster, but we are working to improve even the six-hour schedules.

The out-of-the-box connectors that Omada provides for the applications work. They need a little bit of effort in integration and setup, but they work.

It is modern. It is meeting our requirements. Its interface is okay. I know they are working on some modernization to make it more modern.

Support-wise, working with Omada has been good. We have very good direct interactions and fast responses.

Pricing-wise, it definitely meets our expectations. As compared to other vendors, we have better pricing.

Documentation can be improved. I have already filed a few suggestions to make documentation more clear and more representative of reality.

We have been using Omada Identity for about a year and a half. This duration includes some demos and trials. It has been about a year since we went live.

We experienced an issue that led to quite some commotion. We are still working on that one to see why it happened and how we can prevent it going forward. In general, I expect that it will be a stable solution, and we will not experience such things on a regular basis.

The issue was that there was a change or an update done that triggered something in the backend of the system, if I understood correctly, which then led to updates to a lot of identities that were not yet supposed to be under the management of the Omada solution.

I would rate it an eight out of ten for stability. That issue had nothing to do with the stability of the platform. It had more to do with the backend software updates.

Because it is a SaaS solution, I expect them to manage scalability. We do not want to manage it, and that is why we chose a SaaS solution. If they see that they need to add additional resources, it is up to Omada.

It is an enterprise solution, so only enterprises will benefit from it and use it. We just did a technical migration, and we will next focus on the provisioning of accounts. It has a very limited exposure to the end users, but that will increase in the coming months and years as we continue our journey. Currently, it has our service desk people, and then there are another 10 to 15 people with very limited insights into the tool. It has not yet been rolled out to the end-user community. We have between 5,000 to 6,000 people.

I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.

Because we are still in the rollout stage, we mainly work directly with our customer success manager. A few tickets have been opened during the initial setup and the first go-live, and they have always responded very quickly. We have got a direct line to Omada with our customer success manager. It is like having a direct support person.

We will be able to evaluate their customer support moving forward. We also use a service provider to assist us with the integration. They will be the main contact between Omada and us going forward.

With the service provider, there are some hiccups, but they are also starting and learning about us as an organization. They have their standard way of working and handling processes. Being an R&D organization, there are some challenges, but we try to address them. We also have Omada's support. If we see something not going as smoothly as expected with the service provider, they can put pressure on them, and we can get the results.

We were using an in-house solution. We switched mainly because that solution was running on an old supported platform. We did a security audit of it and found many vulnerabilities that were hard to fix. That solution could also not deal very well with the hybrid reality that we are in. We needed capabilities to manage on-premise provisions of identities, accounts, and accesses, as well as any cloud-based, SaaS, IaaS, and other kinds of services.

Omada Identity has not yet helped us consolidate disparate systems for access management. We only have a few key systems connected, which are already a part of the existing IGA solution and processes.

We have the SaaS version. Its deployment was straightforward. It was pretty standard.

Its implementation took months of continuous workouts. It included setting it up in test, validating, going through some initial technical testing, and then setting it up in production. It took a couple of months.

It does not require any maintenance from our side. Because it is a SaaS solution, the maintenance is handled by Omada. We have to schedule the updates and see how they fit into our change management processes.

They communicate well about the roadmap. They have a six-week release cycle. For the last one, we did notice that the new features that were going to be implemented were not yet posted on their website on the day of the release, but a day later, everything was okay. They are overall good and as expected.

There were about ten people involved from our side. I am also including application owners. If we have to integrate with certain applications, they have to do something on their end as well.

With any security solution, it is very hard to calculate the return on investment.

It is not cheap. None of these solutions are cheap, but we have good pricing at least for now from a licensing perspective. Being an R&D organization, we have a mixture of employees and a lot of partners. We work with a lot of PhD students and universities, and there was flexibility at least to make a distinction between those two types of identities, which also had an impact on the pricing. So, its pricing is reasonable.

Do not get overwhelmed by the 12-day package that they offer. Be well prepared, not necessarily from a technical or solution perspective but also internally. Make sure you have the right people onboarded. It is not an Omada issue. It is more internal to the company. Make sure that things are in order and the right people are onboarded. Make sure you have a dedicated IAM team ready to support it before you start the journey, not during or after.

The goal of going to a platform like Omada, especially its cloud version, is to minimize customizations as much as possible and go with the standards already built into the platform. Along with Omada, we also use a third-party service provider. If we see something that does not fit our organization, we try to see if we need to change some internal processes to meet the defaults within the product, or we try to come up with other ways within the product. We want to stay away from any customizations as much as possible.

I would recommend Omada Identity. There is not a lot of choice out there.

For now, from what we have seen, I would rate Omada Identity an eight out of ten. There is always room for improvement.

We are using it for identity governance.

It provides the benefits that any IGA solution provides in a company. There is not anything new. If there was any other tool in our organization, that would have provided the same coverage.

Our Omada solution is set up to remove an employee's access as soon as that employee leaves our organization. It has made the security better. We know that once an identity is terminated, the access would be disabled so that the user cannot log in and do anything.

Omada Identity saves time. It is pretty fast. We can handle multiple access requests at the same time. It has a good filtering capability for the users to choose the resources that they need to select. It has definitely removed a lot of manual work that was being done by the help desk teams. That way, it has saved a lot of time. There are about 40% time savings.

Being a cloud solution, it is very easy to manage. An on-premises solution is not very efficient.

The support for the validity of the resources is valuable. The tool allows resource assignments within a validity period so that the managers do not have to remember to revoke the access once the work is done. That is one thing we like about Omada Identity. 

The assignment policies have been helpful for automating user life cycle management.

We have been having trouble with Omada compared to other tools in the market. They can improve its UI and make it more user-friendly. 

The architecture of the entire system should also be less complex. The way they process the data is complex. I am still trying to understand it.

They can add more types of services that we need from the compliance and audit perspective. Their out-of-the-box connectors are not enough. They can add more connectors for integrating with different products.

Omada does have a clear roadmap, but things are not delivered as promised.

My organization has been using it for 1 year.

Its stability is good. I would rate it a 9  out of 10 for stability.

We have not tried to scale it. We have more than 2,000 people in our organization. We have four people who work directly with Omada Identity. It works well for the number of users we have. I would rate it a 9 out of 10 for scalability.

Their support is good. It is not the best. They could do better in terms of response time and knowledge.

Neutral

We were using another solution, but I was not a part of the organization at the time. In my previous organization, I used SailPoint. SailPoint is much better, much easier, and more user-friendly.

It is deployed on a cloud, but I was not involved in its deployment. When I joined, Omada Identity was already there for 6 months.

We have three environments. One is for development, one is for testing, and one is for production. Omada is on the cloud, so it can be used everywhere.

It does not require any maintenance from our side.

I would recommend Omada Identity based on the requirements. If you are looking for a simpler solution, you can go for other products in the market, such as SailPoint.

They have not yet helped us to fully implement role-based access control, so we have not seen any outputs of that feature. We have not yet implemented Omada Analytics or Certification Surveys.

Omada did not help us consolidate disparate systems for access management. It also did not help to automate reviews of access requests and reroute them to the appropriate people.

Overall, I would rate Omada Identity an 8 out of 10.

When we decided to implement Omada, our main goal was to establish it as our central identity management system. We wanted to be able to plan and automate our entire user and permission management process, including things like introducing business roles, access request workflows, and user lifecycle management. These are core functionalities for us.

Moreover, consolidating access management systems is important to us. We're optimistic about its potential.

The combination of features and the amazing support team are definitely valuable to use. The customer success and support teams have been crucial.

Omada provides a clear roadmap for additional features. We've already received some information about the product roadmap for 2024.

User lifecycle management is a key element of our new setup. Omada automatically removes employee access when they leave the company.

Moreover, Omada saves time when provisioning access for new identities. Automating user account provisioning across various systems should save us significant time and money.

Omada helps automate access request reviews and route them to the appropriate people. That's a common use case for their certification feature.

If I had to name one thing, it would be the user interface (UI). They're already working on improvements, but it could be a bit more user-friendly. It's on their roadmap though.

We just started using this solution because we just began implementation in August last year.

Everything works perfectly for us.

For our use case, we had no problem.

For the comprehensiveness of the model out-of-the-box connectors for the applications that we use, all the applications we wanted to integrate into our first wave. We had a few custom connectors for the out-of-the-box ones and for the ones we're missing, the REST connectors where we have flow.

And also, currently, Omada is developing a lot of new connectors, and the amount of connectors is currently growing, so this would be maybe also a good point.

With our customer success manager (CSM), we have a monthly meeting. So anytime we have some questions on each help, I can contact our CSM, and then he tries to help us, and until now, it's worked very, very well. Also, the technical support was very fast and already provided us with a solution.

Positive

We've got a bit of an old, self-coded solution based on MIM, and we're really looking to replace it. It's become a bit of a burden to manage.

The initial setup is definitely on the complex side. The topic, because of the different interfaces in many, many different systems. It is due to a complex environment. It's not due to Omada.

The deployment is done partly by our staff and partly by an external implementer. We have, some persons responsible for the application side of the system we want to connect to, but the core team has five to eight people.

We opted for an external implementation partner for internal reasons, not because of Omada's services. Although, a 12-week deployment is possible.

The pricing is okay.

First, definitely define your exact requirements. Then, maybe do a proof of concept. Try connecting the first application and gain some familiarity with Omada's expertise.

So far, we're very happy. No real negatives or drawbacks yet. So, for me, it is a ten out of ten.

We wanted a solution that could help us make HR the master of identities. We wanted a solution that could take that data and direct it into all our other directories and Active Directory.

We have Omada set up to remove an employee's access as soon as the employee leaves. When we started to do this, we saw that quite a few of our accounts were actually removed, meaning we had holes in our security. There were too many active accounts, compared to what should be active. That was one of the first things we saw.

Now, everybody is really aware that when a user leaves, the account should be disabled and accesses should be removed. People are getting more used to seeing that. It does something for the entire security culture, around identities, in our company.

The solution has also definitely helped us save time when provisioning access for identities. We don't have to go in and do a lot of the work that we did before. It may have saved us somewhere in the range of 10 to 30 percent of the time we spent on provisioning access.

In addition, before Omada, we used many systems and now we are using just this one system. Currently, we are mostly concerned about AD applications, but in the next year our plan is to incorporate all the systems, like our ERP. It will help us consolidate. The consolidation we have seen so far has helped reduce the time it takes to give people the access they need, but not that much, perhaps 10 percent. It's mostly AD groups at the moment. We will probably see a better number for that next year.

At a high level, the areas of the solution that are most valuable are the 

• provisioning engine
• access request.

And, of course, all of the identity-handling capabilities are the most important to us. 

Other very good aspects include the

• interface, which is easy and intuitive
• review access handling.

There are some technical bits and pieces that we have looked at that could be better. For instance, when you do a recalculation of an identity, it's hard to understand what was incorrect before you started the recalculation, and which values are actually updated.

Right now, all you see are all the new fields that are provisioned, instead of seeing only the fields that are changed. This makes it hard to understand the situation before you started it, compared to after. This is one of the key features that I'm really missing.

Also, the onboarding of applications could be easier. There could be workflows to go through the entire process of onboarding a new system or application, instead of having to go to three places to do it. 

Those are the two key improvements needed.

Also, the connectors for the applications that we use are good, but not fantastic. This is constantly improving. Recently, they added a ServiceNow integration, so there are still new connectors coming. But there are a few systems that I would like to see on the list, systems that are not there today. We have two ERP systems: SAP and something called Infor M3, and the latter is not there. It's okay, though. Maybe some of the other companies we evaluated have even more connectors, but Omada was good enough for us.

We have been using Omada for two years.

We haven't had any incidents so far. It has been extremely stable.

It's at least scalable for what we need. We are now running a few systems on it with no problems so far. It has been scaled and that was fantastic. When we start to implement more and more systems, I hope it will continue to scale just as well as it has up until now.

For us, their technical support has been fantastic.

Also, Omada definitely provides us with a clear roadmap for additional features that will be deployed. I'm so lucky that I'm part of the board that looks at new features coming out. We are among a few customers that are invited to see the roadmap, for clarity. So I really do have a good overview of what's coming in the products.

It might sound strange, as we have been using it for a couple of years already, but we are not there yet when it comes to utilizing all of the new features. There are still so many basic features that we need to implement in our organization. For example, I have looked at the analytics and we have used them a little bit. But right now, it's not a key function area for us. Going forward, I definitely think we will use it more and more.

Another example is Omada's certification surveys to recertify roles or to determine if roles are relevant. We are starting to use that now but we have not done it at the scale that you might imagine. We are at the very beginning of that process. By the time another half a year has passed, we will have done quite a lot on that.

Positive

We used a self-developed solution that was based on a lot of scripts and different GUIs and interfaces. But it wasn't a product, it was just something that we put together.

The initial deployment was straightforward. The setting up of the solution was done by Omada and it only took a couple of days. Then they came with a good description of what we needed to do and we were complete within the first week. Everything was up and running. Then we started building the business logic. That took some more time, but the actual setting up of the entire environment and having everything connected took just a few days.

Omada helped us to deploy IGA within 12 weeks. The first phase took eight to 10 weeks. When we started, it was much more about an HR product than an IT project. It was to get the organization to understand that HR needs to be the master of identities. After that, we needed a solution to take that data and turn it into something productive, and that's where we saw the first benefits of Omada.

It is implemented as a global solution. We have Omada running in the cloud. Then we have a VPN collection set up to Omada. And we have different HR systems running in our company and all of them are synchronizing their data on a daily basis to Omada through connectors. And we control AD, Azure, et cetera by the data that we receive.

On our side, there were four or five people involved from different teams. And the team from the Omada side had three people plus a project manager.

From an administrative point of view, there are 10 to 15 people using Omada. Eventually, I hope all our users will go into and do something. For now, we have 500 to 1,000 users who are doing something in the solution. This will increase more and more over time, as more accesses are ordered by the employees.

In terms of maintenance, there are always new things that we do in the system, but Omada takes care of everything when it comes to patching and upgrading the environment. The only thing that we do is upgrade it when there's a new version out. We just have to go into an admin site and say, "Now we want to do the upgrade," and it's one click of a button and it's done.

We evaluated six or seven products, including One Identity Manager, SailPoint IdentityIQ, 365 Identity, and we also had a quick look at Microsoft Identity Manager, but that was not a full solution.

Among the reasons we chose Omada was that they had the identity process framework. When we started this, we were very immature in our identity journey, and having this identity process framework was a good way for us to get started. It was very clear what we needed to do.

Also, with Omada, you bought a license and you had everything. With a lot of the other products, you had to buy X, and then you had to buy Y if you wanted to implement a new feature. And there would be another cost if you wanted to implement another feature. Omada's model was very easy for us to understand: If you buy it, then you get the entire solution. That made it easy to see what the cost was going to be in the coming years.

Also, we had direct contact with Omada and we used their consulting department to help us onboard it. This was very good because we had people sitting close to the product group, in case there were questions. And they were building it correctly from the start, instead of having some local contractors coming in to help us. That was also something that was really good.

On the negative side, some of the other products might be more developed and have more features. But, Omada was very good for us to get started with.

I would definitely recommend Omada. It's a good product that absolutely does what you need. I would suggest reading through the identity process, the framework that they have created, to get an understanding of what you need to have in place before starting this project. For us, it was a long road to work with HR to get everything implemented. Having that understanding before you start is really key to a successful implementation.

We use Omada to track access to our system by employees, contractors, and external parties. It also helps with compliance requirements for access review. Omada is deployed on an on-prem server at the Bankdata office, and only our identity access team can use it. About 100 to 150 people have access to Omada, including our identity team and various managers. 

We previously did most of these tasks manually, but now we're more automated. Omada gives us a clearer view of user access and permissions. The solution's identity analytics help us make informed decisions faster by providing a bird's eye view. It has sped up the process of onboarding new operators, consultants, and employees. We can get them up to speed much faster because we automated a significant part of it. 

Omada has given us the tools we need to see which permissions users have and automate the review process. We no longer need to manually compile data and send out the Excel files for review. While it doesn't save us money, it helps us scale up our processes. Omada saves us about eight hours a month on provisioning user access. 

The ability to automatically cancel an employee's access when they separate has optimized our security. We don't need to wait for someone to do it manually. Omada's role certification surveys enable our managers to see what access their employees have, helping us to stay compliant and secure. We're currently doing a proof of concept for role-based access control, but we've simplified the access review process in that area. 

Omada enabled us to consolidate some of our access management systems. However, it hasn't reduced the amount of time it takes to provide users with access. That was by choice. We decided not to roll out self-service because there are some limitations. At the same time, Omada offers better visibility and faster access. We expect more efficient, user-friendly solutions soon. 

Omada's most valuable aspect is its usability.

The account management integration isn't bad, but it isn't plug-and-play like Microsoft Azure. You need some deep development knowledge to set up the connectors. Omada has out-of-the-box connectors, but it's still a little complicated. I want to connect to the system with something like a "next, next, finish" installer.  

Omada provides a clear feature roadmap, but they could be more transparent and flexible in the schedule. Omada's SmartMap can show us the way to go. However, we haven't implemented that system yet. 

I have used Omada Identity for around six years.

Omada is highly stable. 

Omada isn't scalable in an on-prem deployment because it requires a complete installation on a new server. That's our setup, and it can be quite difficult. When deployed with cloud services, Omada is quite scalable. 

I rate our support a seven out of ten. We do not get support directly from Omada. Instead, we use a partner. They're highly skilled and knowledgeable, but they need more people. 

Neutral

We previously used Microsoft. 

Deploying Omada is highly complex. We work in finance. It requires a high level of control because of regulatory compliance. When it was installed, we ran an executable and had to follow up with it. 

However, it wasn't plug-and-play because we needed more control over storage. We couldn't simply provide domain admin and database owner access to a sales account. It took us almost two years before we could deploy Omada in a production environment. The deployment team consisted of about 10 to 15 people, including our infrastructure partner. 

Omada requires some ongoing maintenance. We have to do data input differences in our connected systems. It's nothing unexpected. 

We haven't calculated an ROI yet, but we started with a mostly manual process. Since implementing Omada, we have had to add as many resources to the team. We're still keeping a close eye on what Omada does, and how it works. Still, we expect to see a return by improving our IGA team's effectiveness and making access more efficient at the end-user level.

I think Omada is fairly priced compared to other solutions.  

I rate Omada Identity an eight out of ten. It takes a lot of time, but it's worth it. It's not something that you can implement in 12 weeks and forget about. Omada requires a lot of ongoing attention. 

Omada is used for identity access management. I previously worked as a database specialist but switched jobs when I switched companies. I joined this company because I connected personally with the company culture. As part of my new role, I received training on Omada Identity Cloud, which was being taught to new hires. During my first six months with the company, I worked from the Omada office, explicitly focusing on Kubernetes to gain a technical understanding of the system.

Developing new solutions and processes within the system can be very challenging for our customers, and it often requires highly qualified professionals to assist with the process. This is why companies typically hire consultants when they need to change their systems. I started as a consultant and am now a full-time employee. As such, I can leverage my expertise to provide valuable guidance and support to our clients needing assistance with their systems.

We have just under 3,000 users spread out across multiple locations in Denmark. Departments across the county can access the system from the cloud. 

Omada streamlines onboarding by automatically granting employees access to various IT systems. We can remove an employee's access immediately after they leave the company. It improves our security because people who have left can no longer access sensitive information, such as our finances and tax data.
We have also had cases where people continued receiving a salary after they quit. Previously, someone needed to remove the employee's access manually. Now, it is done automatically.  

It also helps us with internal and external audits. The auditors ask us why users can access particular systems, and we can produce reports for them. It saves us time because we don't need to spend hours looking through various systems to determine who has been given access. Omada documents who has requested or approved access. You can see when access stopped and why. 

Omada's surveys have simplified the process of assigning roles. We know that if we send 200 questions to one manager, he will accept everything. I don't have time to review 200 permissions. Based on the questions sent to one manager, we try to minimize that by grouping them as roles. You only have to approve six roles instead of 200 granular permissions. Omada has helped us to do that. 

We have to do this a few times every year. If we add a new role or access within a role, it must be approved by the access owner. We have fixed rules that every access has to be reviewed at least once a year. Some are done every three months. We prefer role-based access control, but you also need to do some at the granular level. However, we want to wrap everything into roles if we can. It makes things easier for the managers to understand. 

Omada worked well when I started at this company, but now we are provisioning identities even more efficiently. At other companies where I've worked, getting the proper access might take up to two weeks. Here, everything works on the first day. 

Omada's user interface is elegant and easy to work with. I like Omada's ability to automatically generate accounts for new hires and allow them access to all required systems by established policies. Around 80 percent of workers can start working immediately on their first day without requesting further access. 

No two-week waiting period is required to obtain the proper accounts and memberships in various AD groups. Many clients are unaware of our behind-the-scenes work because the system functions effortlessly, making us an indispensable partner.

Omada provides a clear roadmap for additional features. We use it to plan for the future and align it with our internal roadmap. We integrate many systems with Omada and need to plan for integrating new ones. They introduced advanced reporting and analytics in the latest version, but we're behind and haven't implemented that yet.

When making a process, you should be able to use some coding to do some advanced calculations. The calculations you can currently do are too basic. I would also like some additional script features. 

I have been using Omada Identity Cloud for approximately five years.

Omada is stable. It's always running, but I think we share resources with other customers. One resource pool is in Azure. It's slow at times but never crashed. 

I believe Omada is scalable. The product has had built-in connectors for integrating with our solutions for many years. The new ones may lack some features that you might require. It depends on the age of the implementation. We've had situations where we couldn't use the out-of-the-box connector because it was too simple, so we built our own. 

I rate Omada's support a nine out of ten. They respond in under an hour if we have a serious issue. 

Positive

Omada's solution is in the cloud, but it integrates with an on-prem agent. It was deployed when I joined the company, but I was told that a new Omada project can take one or two years. 

The integration is potentially complex because you might need to connect it with hundreds of other systems. However, you can quickly migrate data from your HR system and connect it to your Active Directory. The standard installation is straightforward but grows in complexity with each new system you integrate.

After deployment, the only maintenance is regular system updates. You can schedule those with your sales team. I prefer the cloud version because the on-prem solution requires you to do everything yourself. You have detailed knowledge of databases, operating systems, and communication between the various servers. 

We messed up the data a few weeks ago, but restoring a backup snapshot from the previous hour was easy. We rolled back the database by an hour and were up and running in under 30 minutes. It's easy and convenient for us.

I rate Omada Identity Cloud an eight out of ten. In most cases, whenever I have an issue with Omada or a feature I would like to see, I check the roadmap and realize it's already in the pipeline. Omada is constantly improving, so I give it an eight. 

They listen to their customers. You can submit a suggestion to their ideas portal, and other customers can vote it up. They prioritize new features based on the users' votes. 

I advise new Omada users to understand your data before implementing the solution. When you put people on the project, it should be people who know the HR data and the internal architecture.

We use Omada Identity Cloud to onboard and offboard user accounts and manage permissions. We are using the cloud version.

We are able to onboard new user accounts much faster by automating the process and standardizing our operations globally. Previously, there were many individual processes and manual admin interactions. We also see a lot of cost savings and benefits because of automation and standardization. 

It decreases the work for admins while boosting user productivity. I would estimate that we've reduced admin work by about 30 percent. Omada's identity analytics also help us make informed decisions more efficiently and reduce the cost of our IGA program a little. We can also automate the disabling of user accounts when employees leave to prevent unauthorized access.

Process automation is the most valuable feature.

Omada could communicate better with us about the product roadmap. We haven't gotten any updates about it. The user interface is often a bit difficult to understand. It isn't optimized for small screens, so it doesn't display all of the information clearly, so users need to scroll a lot. 

The configuration could also be simpler for our admins. For example, it could have some configuration assistance or preset out-of-the-box functionality because it's complicated to enable new features. 

I have been using Identity Cloud since January 2022.

Omada is somewhere in the middle in terms of stability. Generally, all the services are running well, but we've had a few serious issues that had a significant impact on our company. I would rate them six out of 10 for stability.

I rate Omada eight out of 10 for scalability. There are many connectors to services, so it's good to have them. At the same time, configuring these connectors requires more effort than expected.

We rate Omada support 7 out of 10

Neutral

The initial setup is highly complex. Full deployment took around a year. Including preparation, planning, design, and implementation, it was about a year and three months.

We were supported by the Omada project team.

We haven't seen much cost savings yet, so the return on investment could be better. We still have many issues with the IdM system and high consulting costs to maintain and administer this tool.

We did a market study and also checked out some competitors, including Sailpoint and Saviynt. 

We rate Omada Identity Cloud six out of 10. Overall, it's a good solution, but you need to be aware of the effort it takes to implement and maintain the system. We recommend carefully estimating and considering the cost of the implementation and maintenance, to allocate enough resources.
You need to carefully plan and test before going live.

Companies I work with use Omada Identity for compliance and governance purposes. They use the solution to have control over all of their business processes in terms of access control.

For me, the best feature of Omada Identity is its web interface because it's really easy for users to understand.

Omada Identity has two main issues that need to be solved or improved the most. One is its setup or installation process because it's complex and cumbersome. I'm talking about the process for on-premises deployment because I've never tried the cloud version of Omada Identity. Setting up the cloud version should be much easier.

The second area for improvement in Omada Identity is that it's piggybacking on Microsoft's complex way of having all kinds of add-ons, extensions, or setups, whether small or large, such as the new SQL Server, and it's cumbersome to make sure that everything works. Omada Identity is a complex solution and could still be improved.

What I'm expecting in the next version of the solution is a makeover of its user interface. It's supposed to be available in the new version of Omada Identity.

As for additional features, what I'd like to see in the future from the solution is a visual designer of all processes, for example, a visual designer of all the task mappings. I've seen it in Novell Identity Manager before, and it was way easier to understand.

I've been using Omada Identity since 2018.

Omada Identity is a stable solution.

My company had no problems with the scalability of Omada Identity. I've experienced it in a large-scale setting, and the solution works.

My team contacts Omada Identity technical support whenever there's an error or a hiccup. There's a ticketing system you can use for raising issues. On a scale of one to five, where one is bad and five is excellent, my rating for Omada Identity support overall is a four.

The company I first worked with in 2018 looked into the Gartner reports and saw that Omada Identity was good in both of the required categories, plus the solution was under a Danish company and my client was Danish which was a plus, so the company went with Omada Identity.

Omada Identity has a complex setup. How long the deployment takes would depend on how you planned the installation. My best experience was when everything ran smoothly after I had been very thorough and I've taken care of requirements. If you do the planning upfront, the process of installing Omada Identity is rather quick, and you don't get errors, and deployment would take a week or so.

You need to make sure that everything works. Often, when I install the solution, there's more than one system such as the production environment, the test environment, the development environment, the education environment, etc., so planning the setup of Omada Identity takes a long time, but that's okay, and in larger organizations, you're often not alone when installing the solution.

Planning the installation of Omada Identity is mandatory because then you need to have the SQL team working on the databases, the network team handling the firewalls, the web team taking care of the information server, etc., so a lot of people are often involved in larger organizations.

My client deals directly with the Omada Identity team in terms of licensing. I never look at pricing, so I'm not aware of how much the solution costs, but it's worth the money. Often, when you begin to use Omada Identity and it takes a while to set up, it'll be irreversible, and you'd depend on and focus more on the functionality of the solution, rather than its price tag.

I'm a consultant, and the company I'm serving right now uses Omada Identity version 12. I do have hands-on experience with the solution, from version 11 to version 14.

The two companies I serve that use Omada Identity deployed it on-premises.

My client has more than 6,500 hundred users of Omada Identity.

My advice to anyone interested in using Omada Identity is to first contact a consultant who can help you decide on how you'll use the solution. Will you deploy it on the cloud or on-premises? Which systems will be onboarded? What's your workflow and how will you map tasks? How will you define events? You'll have a lot of decisions to make and if you're not knowledgeable about Omada Identity, it'll be hard for you to make the right decisions. You need to know about the product before you can gain the full advantage from it.

If I would rate my overall experience with Omada Identity, I'd give it an eight out of ten. I'm not giving it a ten because it's too complex as a solution, though it does what it intends to do.

I'm a partner of Omada Identity.