Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText LoadRunner Professional Logo

OpenText LoadRunner Professional pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader
3,300 followers
Post review
 

OpenText LoadRunner Professional Pros review quotes

reviewer1246755 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 25, 2023
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
HelenSague - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
LoadRunner is a very sophisticated tool, and I can use many languages. For example, I can use Java. I can use C++. I can test the Internet of Things, FTP, mail, and Active Directory. It is very useful.
QAmgr9845 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 15, 2019
Very useful for finding out how the system responds to load, stress, and normal situations, as well as benchmarking with other industry competitors. It also improved our response time, memory delegation, and CPU delegation. In addition, we used LoadRunner to optimize our database and website.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText LoadRunner Professional. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
VC
Sep 19, 2017
The number of protocols that it supports, and especially, for example, when it talks about SAP GUI-based performance testing.
it_user1124241 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 15, 2020
The most useful aspect of the solution is that it provides agents in different geographic locations.
Kulveer Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
We don't find any features lacking. One of the most beneficial points we have from LoadRunner is we start sizing our infrastructure accordingly. So what we do is when we deploy a new workload, we do performance testing.
DP
Mar 10, 2019
LoadRunner is a very systematic tool for anyone to use. Even someone who is actually a first time user of LoadRunner can actually get a lot of benefit out of the tool.
Richard Dachowski - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 9, 2023
There are various languages that they allow those programs to be written in, whether you want to use Java or something else.
SamirPatle - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 18, 2024
When designing a workload model offers a good range of possibilities for creating goal-oriented scenarios, which helps us understand and meet SLAs.
reviewer1394802 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 2, 2020
It has good protocol coverage.
 

OpenText LoadRunner Professional Cons review quotes

reviewer1246755 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 25, 2023
On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high-quality technical support, I rate the support a one.
HelenSague - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
IBM WebSphere MQ testing can be a bit challenging. It can handle that, but I hope that they will build more and more capabilities. We do a huge amount of testing for messaging. Just like aviation, the railway industry is based on messaging. There is messaging to build trains and messaging to create some bills. There are many train movements. Everything involves messaging. I wish that it will be developed more for IBM WebSphere testing. Monitoring is okay, but for testing, I currently have to create Java users. I have to load a lot of libraries from IBM WebSphere and so on.
SP
Oct 20, 2023
I recently just got to see LoadRunner Developer, but it is still not fully developed to use.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText LoadRunner Professional. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
QAmgr9845 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 15, 2019
There is room for improvement of the pilot processing, the dump analysis, and forwarding results based on the dump analysis. We have a generator, root controller, different agents, and an analyzer, so all of these are very important when it comes to LoadRunner.
VC
Sep 19, 2017
You should be able to use LoadRunner as a single platform. You should be able to have browser based access. You should be able to run enterprise tests.
it_user1124241 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 15, 2020
The solution is very costly. The cost is very high, especially considering a lot of other resources are available now and they are less expensive. For a small organization, it is very difficult to sustain the costs involved in having the solution or the related fees
Kulveer Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
The only scenario we see a complexity is when we have single-page applications where JavaScript is talking to the server and coming back. That's the only scenario where we find some difficulties.
DP
Mar 10, 2019
If they can make LoadRunner more comprehensive, it would really help.
Richard Dachowski - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 9, 2023
There's a reporting part of the cloud that could be improved a little bit.
SamirPatle - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 18, 2024
LoadRunner experiences high resource utilization. Even though we have machines with higher configurations, I've observed this behavior. Heavy traffic recording results in the tool hanging. So heavy traffic recording makes the tool slow.