Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText LoadRunner Professional pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

4.2 out of 5

80 reviews
94% willing to recommend

3,303 followers

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText LoadRunner Professional supports diverse protocols, enabling robust performance testing with scalability up to 20,000 users. Its scripting and execution capabilities provide automation benefits and insightful analytics. However, integration issues with SiteScope and TruClient's usability challenges hinder performance. High pricing and licensing fees deter non-enterprise buyers, while slow technical support and resource-heavy demands during tests affect stability. Despite these drawbacks, it improves system efficiency and load times.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText LoadRunner Professional provides extensive protocol support, including SAP GUI-based performance testing, which greatly enhances multithreading capabilities across diverse technologies.

The stability and scalability of OpenText LoadRunner Professional are highly rated, with seamless integration into various testing pipelines and a wide range of applications.

The reporting and scripting features in OpenText LoadRunner Professional allow quick creation and execution of performance test cases, improving application performance insights.

OpenText LoadRunner Professional's comprehensive protocol coverage is a key benefit for users, making it possible to support and test all industry-standard protocols efficiently.

OpenText LoadRunner Professional aids in performance testing with features like workload distribution, monitoring, and automation to optimize system response and resource allocation.

CONS

OpenText LoadRunner Professional is expensive and the pricing model could be more competitive.

There are issues with integration, particularly with SiteScope, and it lacks more extensive open-source platform integration.

High resource utilization causes the tool to be slow, especially with heavy traffic recording.

The support for Microsoft Dynamics and IBM WebSphere testing could be improved.

Improvements are needed in the TruClient protocol and mobile testing features for better usability.

OpenText LoadRunner Professional Pros review quotes

reviewer1246755

Performance Architect at ValueLabs

May 25, 2023

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Senior Performance Testing Specialist at Canadian Pacific Railway

Oct 20, 2023

LoadRunner is a very sophisticated tool, and I can use many languages. For example, I can use Java. I can use C++. I can test the Internet of Things, FTP, mail, and Active Directory. It is very useful.

Read full review

QA Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 15, 2019

Very useful for finding out how the system responds to load, stress, and normal situations, as well as benchmarking with other industry competitors. It also improved our response time, memory delegation, and CPU delegation. In addition, we used LoadRunner to optimize our database and website.

Read full review

OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Free Report: OpenText LoadRunner Professional Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText LoadRunner Professional. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.

831,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

VC

Lead Solution Architect at a consumer goods company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 19, 2017

The number of protocols that it supports, and especially, for example, when it talks about SAP GUI-based performance testing.

Read full review

Head - Testing Centre of Excellence at NIIT Technologies Limited

Jun 15, 2020

The most useful aspect of the solution is that it provides agents in different geographic locations.

Read full review

Senior Technical Manager at Amtrak

Oct 20, 2023

We don't find any features lacking. One of the most beneficial points we have from LoadRunner is we start sizing our infrastructure accordingly. So what we do is when we deploy a new workload, we do performance testing.

Read full review

DP

Technical Leader at Valtech

Mar 10, 2019

LoadRunner is a very systematic tool for anyone to use. Even someone who is actually a first time user of LoadRunner can actually get a lot of benefit out of the tool.

Read full review

Richard Dachowski

Senior Quality & Test Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Mar 9, 2023

There are various languages that they allow those programs to be written in, whether you want to use Java or something else.

Read full review

Senior Performance Analyst at EPAM Systems

Apr 18, 2024

When designing a workload model offers a good range of possibilities for creating goal-oriented scenarios, which helps us understand and meet SLAs.

Read full review

reviewer1394802

Performance Engineer with 10,001+ employees

Aug 2, 2020

It has good protocol coverage.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 53)

OpenText LoadRunner Professional Cons review quotes

reviewer1246755

Performance Architect at ValueLabs

May 25, 2023

On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high-quality technical support, I rate the support a one.

Read full review

Senior Performance Testing Specialist at Canadian Pacific Railway

Oct 20, 2023

IBM WebSphere MQ testing can be a bit challenging. It can handle that, but I hope that they will build more and more capabilities. We do a huge amount of testing for messaging. Just like aviation, the railway industry is based on messaging. There is messaging to build trains and messaging to create some bills. There are many train movements. Everything involves messaging. I wish that it will be developed more for IBM WebSphere testing. Monitoring is okay, but for testing, I currently have to create Java users. I have to load a lot of libraries from IBM WebSphere and so on.

Read full review

SP

Lead Performance Engineer at AT&T

Oct 20, 2023

I recently just got to see LoadRunner Developer, but it is still not fully developed to use.

Read full review

OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Free Report: OpenText LoadRunner Professional Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText LoadRunner Professional. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.

831,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

QA Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 15, 2019

There is room for improvement of the pilot processing, the dump analysis, and forwarding results based on the dump analysis. We have a generator, root controller, different agents, and an analyzer, so all of these are very important when it comes to LoadRunner.

Read full review

VC

Lead Solution Architect at a consumer goods company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 19, 2017

You should be able to use LoadRunner as a single platform. You should be able to have browser based access. You should be able to run enterprise tests.

Read full review

Head - Testing Centre of Excellence at NIIT Technologies Limited

Jun 15, 2020

The solution is very costly. The cost is very high, especially considering a lot of other resources are available now and they are less expensive. For a small organization, it is very difficult to sustain the costs involved in having the solution or the related fees

Read full review

Senior Technical Manager at Amtrak

Oct 20, 2023

The only scenario we see a complexity is when we have single-page applications where JavaScript is talking to the server and coming back. That's the only scenario where we find some difficulties.

Read full review

DP

Technical Leader at Valtech

Mar 10, 2019

If they can make LoadRunner more comprehensive, it would really help.

Read full review

Richard Dachowski

Senior Quality & Test Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Mar 9, 2023

There's a reporting part of the cloud that could be improved a little bit.

Read full review

Senior Performance Analyst at EPAM Systems

Apr 18, 2024

LoadRunner experiences high resource utilization. Even though we have machines with higher configurations, I've observed this behavior. Heavy traffic recording results in the tool hanging. So heavy traffic recording makes the tool slow.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 54)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Perfecto vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

BlazeMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

ReadyAPI vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Eggplant Performance vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

SmartBear LoadNinja vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Ixia IxLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Automai AppLoader vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Perfecto vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

BlazeMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

ReadyAPI vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Eggplant Performance vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

SmartBear LoadNinja vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Ixia IxLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Automai AppLoader vs OpenText LoadRunner Professional

See all alternatives

Related questions

16

Performance/Load Testing Tools: What are the options?

52

OATS (Oracle Application Testing Suite) vs. HP Loadrunner?

3

What is your greatest success or failure using a testing tool? Please share with the community

21

HP LoadRunner versus Oracle Application Testing Suite?

17

When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

15

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

8

Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?

54

What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?

50

What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?

4

When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?