PTC Integrity Reviews

We use PTC Integrity for version control purposes.

The product has efficient and powerful features.

The product requires a learning curve. For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility. Our maintenance team finds it challenging to customize some functions. It could be user-friendly.

We have been using PTC Integrity for several years.

PTC Integrity has good stability.

We have 50 PTC Integrity users in our organization. It is a salable product.

We receive technical support from a third-party vendor.

Our maintenance team implements the product with the help of some consultants.

The product is expensive. They should improve the pricing.

I rate PTC Integrity an eight out of ten. It was a good solution five years back. However, at the moment, it does not have the latest technology. I advise others to evaluate new products as well.

Our primary use case is to develop tasks and controls. 

It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks. 

It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use. 

For example, if I need to attach pictures then relate items together, it doesn't work well. It doesn't look nice and it doesn't show you how it will look.

I have been using PTC Integrity for five years. 

It is stable.

It seems scalable but it's not really relevant to me. I only use it. 

I haven't contacted technical support. 

I would rate it a six out of ten. To make it a ten they should improve the interface. 

This solution is used for lifecycle management.

The tool is quite structured and has a good command set.

I would like to see better integration from the architectural side. It is difficult to use when it comes to linking models.

I have been working with PTC Integrity for the past five to seven years, and in the organization, it has been used for between ten and fifteen years.

It is a stable product.

We have approximately 1,000 people who are using it on a daily basis.

The technical support is very good.

We have our own dedicated support team for this solution.

In general, PTC Integrity is a good tool, although from a system perspective it is somewhat lacking.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We were evaluating PTC Integrity for the deployment for one of my clients. The major problem we faced regarding Integrity are the developments.

We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client. We missed out on the traceability part. For traceability, you need to develop a lot of scripts and you need a lot of background work.

The development environment is only on JavaScripts but other languages are not. For example, .NET platforms. It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer.

It is quite mature. 

I don't find it that scalable. Scalability is a concern for this particular tool.

The client that we have worked with for the department that we have deployed this particular solution has 120 to 140 members.

It's used on a regular basis. 

Technical support is excellent from PTC.

The initial setup was slightly complex. When we decided to have an isolated solution, PTC was not that user-friendly.

The complete deployment took around nine months to one year.

It requires four engineers for deployment and maintenance.

I head the complete ALM department at my organization. We have a team of ALM engineers across different tools, not only for PTC Integrity but also for IBM codeBeamer. 

Requirement management and software configuration management had better options. We found that they're more stable though they're not so scalable. During production time or during work time we don't have many production delivery issues.

My advice to someone considering this solution is to prepare yourself by having a good programming team that has good customization engineers. It requires a lot of programming skills.

I would rate it a seven out of ten. 

In the next release, I would like for there to not be so many scripts and programs to do workflow customization. It should be easily customizable.