Top 10 Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Alternatives

4.4 out of 5

39 reviews
95% willing to recommend

463 followers

Top Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Configuration Manager, and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive IT asset management, efficient patching, powerful software deployment capabilities, and advanced security features, ensuring streamlined operations and enhanced productivity for IT teams.

Quest Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Quest Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Intune

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Intune

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Intune excels in integration with Microsoft services, appealing to enterprises for its comprehensive cloud management. In comparison, Quest KACE SMA emphasizes robust asset management and deployment, attractive to organizations prioritizing detailed control over individual devices and comprehensive asset management capabilities.

Download Microsoft Intune vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report

Pricing

Microsoft Intune often incurs lower setup costs with straightforward implementation while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance may involve higher initial expenses due to its more complex deployment process.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Configuration Manager excels in automation and integration but struggles with resource demands and non-Microsoft products. In comparison, Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance is cost-effective for asset management but faces challenges in scalability and ease of software deployment.

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report

Pricing

Microsoft Configuration Manager incurs a higher setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense, making Quest a more attractive choice for cost-conscious organizations.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

4.3 out of 5

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

4.3 out of 5

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers agentless automation and strong community support for efficient datacenter management. In comparison, Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance delivers comprehensive endpoint management with robust security patching, appealing to large organizations seeking in-depth asset visibility and management capabilities.

Download Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report

Pricing

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

BigFix excels in patching, customization, and scalability, making it ideal for large-scale environments. In comparison, Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers ease of deployment and a central console for compliance, appealing to organizations focused on comprehensive device management and asset tracking.

Download BigFix vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report

Pricing

BigFix has a moderate setup cost, while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a lower initial investment. The pricing differences highlight distinct budget considerations for organizations when evaluating system management software solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

AWS Systems Manager

4.0 out of 5

AWS Systems Manager

4.0 out of 5

Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance focuses on endpoint management and asset management for efficient remote operations. In comparison, AWS Systems Manager provides automation and resource orchestration within the AWS ecosystem. Quest KACE targets device-specific management while AWS Systems Manager integrates tightly with AWS services.

Download AWS Systems Manager vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report

Pricing

Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance involves substantial setup costs, while AWS Systems Manager offers more budget-friendly initial implementation. Quest KACE delivers comprehensive management features, whereas AWS provides a scalable cloud-native solution with lower upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Puppet Enterprise

4.1 out of 5

Puppet Enterprise

4.1 out of 5

Puppet Enterprise attracts tech buyers with its robust scalability and automation for infrastructure management. In comparison, Quest KACE SMA offers broader features like patch management and asset tracking, appealing to those seeking comprehensive tools, despite its higher cost.

Download Puppet Enterprise vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report

Pricing

Puppet Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), making it a more significant initial investment, while Quest KACE stands out for its more budget-friendly setup.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management

4.0 out of 5

OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management

4.0 out of 5

OpenText ZENworks is appealing for its competitive pricing, personalized support, and policy-driven automation. In comparison, Quest KACE SMA offers robust features like comprehensive endpoint management and automated deployment, ideal for buyers seeking a long-term management solution with efficient implementation and responsive customer service.

Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report

Pricing

OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management typically requires higher initial setup costs, while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management typically requires higher initial setup costs, while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

Related categories

Configuration Management

Patch Management

Endpoint Compliance