Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo

Top 10 Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Alternatives

Vendor: Quest Software
4.4 out of 5
462 followers
Post review

Top Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Intune, Fortinet FortiClient, and Microsoft Configuration Manager. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive endpoint management, automated software distribution, robust patch management, and extensive inventory capabilities, ensuring efficient IT asset management and superior operational efficiency for organizations.

Quest Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Quest Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in integration with Microsoft services, appealing to enterprises for its comprehensive cloud management. In comparison, Quest KACE SMA emphasizes robust asset management and deployment, attractive to organizations prioritizing detailed control over individual devices and comprehensive asset management capabilities.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Microsoft Intune often incurs lower setup costs with straightforward implementation while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance may involve higher initial expenses due to its more complex deployment process.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune often incurs lower setup costs with straightforward implementation while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance may involve higher initial expenses due to its more complex deployment process.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in remote management and integration with tools like Bomgar, aiding asset management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient provides robust security features, including VPN and firewall integration, making it a solid choice for comprehensive endpoint protection.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, highlighting a significant cost difference in initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, highlighting a significant cost difference in initial implementation.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager excels in automation and integration but struggles with resource demands and non-Microsoft products. In comparison, Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance is cost-effective for asset management but faces challenges in scalability and ease of software deployment.
Download Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager incurs a higher setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense, making Quest a more attractive choice for cost-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager incurs a higher setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense, making Quest a more attractive choice for cost-conscious organizations.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers agentless automation and strong community support for efficient datacenter management. In comparison, Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance delivers comprehensive endpoint management with robust security patching, appealing to large organizations seeking in-depth asset visibility and management capabilities.
Download Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security provides robust threat protection and seamless integration with Trend Micro's solutions. In comparison, Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in comprehensive asset management and automation. Each caters to distinct needs in endpoint security and IT infrastructure management, appealing to varied tech buyers.
Download Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) may involve higher initial configuration costs, highlighting distinct differences in setup ease and financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) may involve higher initial configuration costs, highlighting distinct differences in setup ease and financial commitment.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers extensive security features and seamless integration, making it suitable for organizations needing robust protection. In comparison, Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance enhances endpoint administration with efficient software deployment and asset management, appealing to those valuing integrated management processes.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business's setup cost is generally viewed as straightforward and affordable, while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often incurs higher initial expenses due to its extensive configuration options.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business's setup cost is generally viewed as straightforward and affordable, while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often incurs higher initial expenses due to its extensive configuration options.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Forescout Platform offers a robust NAC system and seamless integration with network devices, excelling in real-time device detection. In comparison, Quest KACE SMA focuses on IT asset management and patch management, providing a fully integrated help desk solution and efficient software deployment.
Download Forescout Platform vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Forescout Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Forescout Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in patching, customization, and scalability, making it ideal for large-scale environments. In comparison, Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers ease of deployment and a central console for compliance, appealing to organizations focused on comprehensive device management and asset tracking.
Download BigFix vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
BigFix has a moderate setup cost, while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a lower initial investment. The pricing differences highlight distinct budget considerations for organizations when evaluating system management software solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a moderate setup cost, while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a lower initial investment. The pricing differences highlight distinct budget considerations for organizations when evaluating system management software solutions.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
NinjaOne
4.0 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
NinjaOne
4.0 out of 5
Quest KACE excels with asset management, integrated services, and centralized control for large organizations. In comparison, NinjaOne offers efficient monitoring, script automation, and remote management, ideal for environments needing quick responses and flexibility. Each provides distinct advantages depending on specific IT needs.
Download NinjaOne vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) incurs a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more cost-effective initial deployment. The significant cost difference highlights a crucial consideration for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) incurs a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more cost-effective initial deployment. The significant cost difference highlights a crucial consideration for budget-conscious organizations.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
AWS Systems Manager
4.0 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance focuses on endpoint management and asset management for efficient remote operations. In comparison, AWS Systems Manager provides automation and resource orchestration within the AWS ecosystem. Quest KACE targets device-specific management while AWS Systems Manager integrates tightly with AWS services.
Download AWS Systems Manager vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance involves substantial setup costs, while AWS Systems Manager offers more budget-friendly initial implementation. Quest KACE delivers comprehensive management features, whereas AWS provides a scalable cloud-native solution with lower upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance involves substantial setup costs, while AWS Systems Manager offers more budget-friendly initial implementation. Quest KACE delivers comprehensive management features, whereas AWS provides a scalable cloud-native solution with lower upfront expenses.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.9 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.9 out of 5
Kaseya VSA offers strong automation and remote support, ideal for complex environments needing detailed reporting and flexible deployment options. In comparison, Quest KACE emphasizes security and integration through a single portal, appealing to larger organizations seeking comprehensive functionality and competitive pricing.
Download Kaseya VSA vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Kaseya VSA has an initial lower setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which may require a higher investment upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya VSA has an initial lower setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which may require a higher investment upfront.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
4.0 out of 5
Quest KACE offers comprehensive endpoint management capabilities, including asset and patch management. In comparison, WSUS provides centralized update management, excelling in Windows environments. KACE supports scalability and cloud deployment, while WSUS is cost-effective, integrated with Windows Server at no extra cost.
Download Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance offers a straightforward setup but may incur higher initial costs, whereas Microsoft Windows Server Update Services provides a lower setup cost option but might require more manual configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance offers a straightforward setup but may incur higher initial costs, whereas Microsoft Windows Server Update Services provides a lower setup cost option but might require more manual configuration.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
Quest KACE excels in asset and security patch management, offering integration with tools like Bomgar and Dell EMC for endpoint management. In comparison, Atera's cross-platform capabilities and remote access features suit monitoring and automation needs, integrating with TeamViewer and Splashtop for remote management.
Download Atera vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to Atera, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment. Atera offers a cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to Atera, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment. Atera offers a cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Quest KACE SMA is ideal for those prioritizing customer service with its robust support options and diverse feature set. In comparison, Automox is suitable for tech buyers seeking advanced automation and cloud-native architecture to enhance efficiency and scalability while reducing infrastructure costs.
Download Automox vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more complex and potentially costly setup process, while Automox presents a simplified and more cost-effective approach, highlighting the differences in setup costs and implementation complexity between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more complex and potentially costly setup process, while Automox presents a simplified and more cost-effective approach, highlighting the differences in setup costs and implementation complexity between the two.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
4.2 out of 5
Quest KACE SMA excels in package deployment and centralized endpoint management, catering to diverse environments. In comparison, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus focuses on automated patch management and pricing efficiency, appealing to cost-conscious organizations with integration and monitoring needs.
Download ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) typically involves a higher setup cost, while ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a more economical setup. This pricing difference highlights distinct budget considerations for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) typically involves a higher setup cost, while ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a more economical setup. This pricing difference highlights distinct budget considerations for deployment.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security excels in advanced threat protection and offers competitive pricing and responsive support, appealing to security-focused buyers. In comparison, Quest KACE leads in systems management with versatile asset management and software distribution, appealing to buyers seeking comprehensive management and efficiency.
Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a higher setup cost, while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a higher setup cost, while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Puppet Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Puppet Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Puppet Enterprise attracts tech buyers with its robust scalability and automation for infrastructure management. In comparison, Quest KACE SMA offers broader features like patch management and asset tracking, appealing to those seeking comprehensive tools, despite its higher cost.
Download Puppet Enterprise vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Puppet Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), making it a more significant initial investment, while Quest KACE stands out for its more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Puppet Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), making it a more significant initial investment, while Quest KACE stands out for its more budget-friendly setup.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
4.0 out of 5
Quest KACE SMA offers diverse integration options, ideal for geographically dispersed environments seeking operational efficiency. In comparison, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is better suited for Microsoft-centric environments, focusing on patching capabilities and offering a more affordable option for SCCM integration.
Download Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a straightforward setup with a transparent cost structure, while Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune provides a flexible setup, emphasizing adaptability to different environments, highlighting cost-related differences in setup approaches.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a straightforward setup with a transparent cost structure, while Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune provides a flexible setup, emphasizing adaptability to different environments, highlighting cost-related differences in setup approaches.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BMC Client Management
4.3 out of 5
Quest KACE enhances IT productivity with mass deployment and automation, providing versatile deployment options. In comparison, BMC Client Management excels in stable multi-OS management and competitive pricing, with specific strengths in patching while requiring improvements in integration and remote access capabilities.
Download BMC Client Management vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a lower setup cost compared to BMC Client Management, which is higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a lower setup cost compared to BMC Client Management, which is higher.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
Quest KACE excels in integration and automation, offering efficient endpoint management, while GFI LanGuard focuses on security with superior vulnerability assessment. In comparison, Quest KACE supports broader deployments, and GFI LanGuard provides a security-centric approach for vulnerability and patch management.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a setup cost that is generally higher, reflecting its robust functionalities, while GFI LanGuard offers a more budget-friendly setup cost with fewer advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a setup cost that is generally higher, reflecting its robust functionalities, while GFI LanGuard offers a more budget-friendly setup cost with fewer advanced features.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management
4.0 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks is appealing for its competitive pricing, personalized support, and policy-driven automation. In comparison, Quest KACE SMA offers robust features like comprehensive endpoint management and automated deployment, ideal for buyers seeking a long-term management solution with efficient implementation and responsive customer service.
Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management typically requires higher initial setup costs, while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management typically requires higher initial setup costs, while Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
SolarWinds Patch Manager
1 out of 5
Quest KACE SMA supports various operating systems with affordable endpoint management. In comparison, SolarWinds Patch Manager simplifies patch management with Windows integration, despite longer deployment. Quest KACE SMA is cost-effective, while SolarWinds Patch Manager offers high ROI through streamlined operations.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has higher setup costs, offering comprehensive management solutions. In contrast, SolarWinds Patch Manager features more affordable setup while focusing on efficient patch management and software updates.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has higher setup costs, offering comprehensive management solutions. In contrast, SolarWinds Patch Manager features more affordable setup while focusing on efficient patch management and software updates.
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac
4.5 out of 5
Quest KACE SMA appeals with competitive pricing and comprehensive management tools, focusing on asset management and automated software distribution. In comparison, Ivanti Patch offers strong security features and platform compatibility, catering to those prioritizing advanced vulnerability management and seamless automation across platforms.
Download Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance incurs a higher setup cost compared to Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac, highlighting a potential cost consideration for budget-conscious organizations assessing these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance incurs a higher setup cost compared to Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac, highlighting a potential cost consideration for budget-conscious organizations assessing these solutions.

Related categories

Configuration Management
Endpoint Compliance
Patch Management