Ranorex Studio Reviews

Test Suite layout and the logs. It is easy to navigate through logs and find the bugs. Ranorex improved our ui automation by providing handy features such as WaitForExists, Exists, Enabled, Visible

We have a flex application and it is difficult to use Java/Selenium, Ranorex helped to automate these flex application and improved our test coverage to deliver a bug free application.

Their logs are not compatible with the continuous integration we use internally. We have to parse the log file to extract the details. And we can view those logs/test results only in the Ranorex add on enabled browser which is IE, we tried in Firefox we keep getting this version of Firefox version is not supported. Ranorex should at-least say which version of Firefox it will support.

I've used it for one year.

It's good - 8/10.

It's straightforward.

The most useful features to me are the ability to write test scripts in C#, and also record/playback any and all test steps. Ranorex Spy is also a very useful tool.

Ranorex has significantly cut down the time it takes me to run through multiple, repetitive test steps.

They should have support for other OS’s, aside from only supporting Windows. It would also be great if they supported JavaScript as a usable language to write code modules in.

I’ve been using Ranorex for about five to six months.

Ranorex’s customer service is outstanding.

When something is out, I immediately email their tech support and will usually hear back from them within an hour. The forums are also very helpful.

Setting up Ranorex and jumping into your first test suite is extremely easy, even for non-programmers The record/playback feature makes it easy for anyone to automate a test case..

The best advice I can give is geared towards implementation. If you’re capable of writing your own test scripts, then I wouldn’t suggest using the Record/Playback feature at all, aside from maybe looking at the generated code module for help on starting a new test case. There are a lot more constraints that come with using the record/playback method, and you cannot easily implement conditional statements or parameters, like you would be able to in the code modules.

The mobile testing feature is the most valuable feature for me.

I have been able to run specific tests on different platforms and browsers.

The compatibility with different browsers needs to be improved.

I've used it for three to six months.

There were issues with objects identification.

9/10.

9/10.

I tried to use different products Selenium, TestComplete, amongst others, but this was very familiar, fast, adaptable and flexible.

It was simple. Everything was inline, but some features needed support – like creating virtual platforms for testing. Connecting to a real IOS was impossible without a dev account.

• Ranorex Spy
• Ranorex Repository
• Ranorex Recorder
• Mobile libraries
• User Guide
• Support Team

Need few upgrades to automate desktop applications

• Snapshots for WPF applications taking too long than expected.

I've used it for three years.

A few times with Android and iOS devices, but Ranorex support resolved quickly.

A few times without proper scripting skills the build will be always unstable.

A few times with Android and iOS devices, but Ranorex support resolved quickly.

Ranorex support team is really supportive and resolve issues as soon as possible.

Easy installations no hiccoughs.

The ROI is being able to automate the web, mobile, and desktop applications.

We're really satisfied with the pricing as well and buying licenses is easy. If you have a large automation team try floating license and runtime license which is cheaper than premium license.

We tried using HP QTP and Selenium, but opted for Ranorex because of its reasonable price and the ease of use of the automation tool.

Go through the user guide and update your library files for your mobile automation process.

It allows us to replay user actions for desktop applications.

Unfortunately, we were not able to drive this project to completion due to incompatibility between our offerings and product functionality, as well as internal politics.

Running the tool in a distributed environment was a challenge since Ranorex requires an active user session.

I've been using it for one year.

No issues with deployment.

As stated above, we had compatibility issues.

Excellent – very quick and detailed responses.

Excellent – very quick and detailed responses.

Ranorex was able to read some of our custom components, while other tools failed to do that. Also, it was within our budget.

Very easy – desktop application installation. It's almost one click, and only takes five minutes.

We did it in-house.

Pricing is fair.

Check if all your components are recognized by Ranorex prior to buying.

Live tracking along with capturing the RX path of objects, and cross browser testing is the most valuable feature of this product. Also, its seamless integration with any test management tool is the best feature.

In total, the test execution times of the test automation projects were significantly improved. In conjunction with a new test case design, ease of use, the functionality of the software and C# as the standard programming language, new test cases can be implemented more effectively than with the older software.

The results up to now indicate that much less time is needed for execution with Ranorex robust tests compared to the previously used automation tool

Object recognition of Outlook add-ins instead of raw text recognition could be better. Ranorex should also provide features for Windows Mobile automation.

I have been using this tool for the last two years, and I love the way that they have frequent updates that provide new features and support for the latest technology.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

8/10.

Ranorex has provided on-line training for my company, particularly for test automation, so 8/10.

I've seen and used many different test automation solutions like HpP QTP. Not only is Ranorex's solution one of the most powerful and easy to use, it has one of the lowest cost entry points resulting in a quicker ROI.

Also, their end user support and communication has been second to none. C# language support is an added advantage of that.

It was very straightforward, just click on the EXE file and it will do the rest automatically.

The initial set-up was quiet simple, and there was no need for any external help.

We found that the tool could also be used in reproducing defects and automating user cases, which were very hard to do manually.

Ranorex doesn't provide automation for Windows Mobile, and lacks some of the basic functions like table comparison etc. Although one can achieve this through C# or VB.net, it would be better if it provides the UI comparison. However, Ranorex uses power of C# to built a highly competitive Automation tool.

You should go for it and it will not let you down.

Cross browser testing and the ability to perform mobile test automation. Due to this, you do not need to buy two different solutions for mobile and web channels separately.

Our core banking application is developed as a plugin of Chrome. Most of the automation tools do not work properly on Chrome, but Ranorex provides this with less maintenance costs. Also, the automation platform is useful for us.

I encountered a problem during div element recognition. This point could be enhanced.

I've used it for three years.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

9/10

9/10

I had experience on QTP and RFT. They do not support the latest version of browsers or mobile environments. Their costs are high, accordingly.

It was simple.

We implemented it in-house.

It is simple and stable solution.