Ranorex Studio Reviews

• Ranorex Spy
• Ranorex Repository
• Ranorex Recorder
• Mobile libraries
• User Guide
• Support Team

Need few upgrades to automate desktop applications

• Snapshots for WPF applications taking too long than expected.

I've used it for three years.

A few times with Android and iOS devices, but Ranorex support resolved quickly.

A few times without proper scripting skills the build will be always unstable.

A few times with Android and iOS devices, but Ranorex support resolved quickly.

Ranorex support team is really supportive and resolve issues as soon as possible.

Easy installations no hiccoughs.

The ROI is being able to automate the web, mobile, and desktop applications.

We're really satisfied with the pricing as well and buying licenses is easy. If you have a large automation team try floating license and runtime license which is cheaper than premium license.

We tried using HP QTP and Selenium, but opted for Ranorex because of its reasonable price and the ease of use of the automation tool.

Go through the user guide and update your library files for your mobile automation process.

It allows us to replay user actions for desktop applications.

Unfortunately, we were not able to drive this project to completion due to incompatibility between our offerings and product functionality, as well as internal politics.

Running the tool in a distributed environment was a challenge since Ranorex requires an active user session.

I've been using it for one year.

No issues with deployment.

As stated above, we had compatibility issues.

Excellent – very quick and detailed responses.

Excellent – very quick and detailed responses.

Ranorex was able to read some of our custom components, while other tools failed to do that. Also, it was within our budget.

Very easy – desktop application installation. It's almost one click, and only takes five minutes.

We did it in-house.

Pricing is fair.

Check if all your components are recognized by Ranorex prior to buying.

Spy for X-path and data binding help us to loop or iterate some functions for any module an N-number of times.

It's improved our company in a numbers of ways, but most importantly it helps us save time and the report preparation is nice and easy.

I've used it for two years and three months.

With the new version of Chrome, some objects are identified differently, so we need to identify those and fix the x-path of the object.

It's very good as I have interacted a lot with a number of people (especially Bassem and Bernhard) when faced with the object identification, and they were able to help me.

8/10

We switched because the older solution did not support Chrome.

It was simple.

We can invest depending on the requirements of the business. Run-time licenses can be used if you don't need to develop scripts, floating-type license, or node-lock license.

A non-technical person can record a test and execute the same. But, a technical person is required to write code module and test data.

As per my knowledge, we don't have a (Free) robust tool for functional and GUI testing in desktop application testing field. This is way better than QTP and Silktest when compared to in following aspects:

User friendly UI

Cost of Tool

Continuous Integration

Instant release of updated add-on as per latest technologies and browsers.

Full fledged trial product for exact 30 days.

Need support for other operating systems like Mac and Linux, and not just Windows.

• It offers many features of recognizing UI widgets, making test automation easy. 
• The spy feature is useful in updating the control address of modified UI widgets.

It's reduced the manual effort in verifying the user interface of the product under test.

There were some issues when the UI widget being tested was not developed in .NET, and the test resulted in some unknown actions when played back.

I used it for a period of two months.

Stability was an issue.

I did not get to interact with the customer service.

No previous solution was used.

It was straightforward.

We used an in-house team.

I believe ROI is pretty high, although I am not involved with the management of the product.

No other options were evaluated.

My advice is to spend some time reading the user guide and interacting with teammates who have already used the tool so that things become straightforward when you use it. It is a good tool to perform user interface testing over a .NET product.

It allows users to insert code.

Using the "User Defined" functions has helped me a lot in testing my applications in different ways.

SQL Connector has a lot of improvements to make, and they need to implement user-defined queries. 

Also, the invoke function doesn't work as it should to select the items down in the scroll tab.

We've used it for one year.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

I've never had a chance to interact with the service provider.

I would rate it average -- neither straightforward nor complex.

Overall, it's a good product.

The product is a bit expensive, especially the licenses which should be cheaper.

We also looked at Coded UI.