Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Tenable Lumin based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include RSA Archer, OneTrust GRC, and Amazon Inspector.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Tenable Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Tenable, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
RSA Archer excels with comprehensive risk management tools and flexible integrations. In comparison, Tenable Lumin offers advanced analytics and clear risk insights. RSA Archer's significant long-term ROI and customization appeal, whereas Tenable Lumin attracts with cost-effectiveness and innovative features leveraging real-time data.
RSA Archer's setup cost is considered higher initially, whereas Tenable Lumin offers a more budget-friendly setup. This cost difference highlights the varying upfront investment required between the two solutions.
RSA Archer's setup cost is considered higher initially, whereas Tenable Lumin offers a more budget-friendly setup. This cost difference highlights the varying upfront investment required between the two solutions.
OneTrust GRC offers robust compliance management features and seamless integration, appealing to those focused on policy management. In comparison, Tenable Lumin provides advanced risk visualization and prioritization tools, ideal for security-focused organizations needing risk analytics for an enhanced security posture.
Amazon Inspector is favored for its competitive pricing and seamless AWS integration, providing a cost-effective security assessment solution. In comparison, Tenable Lumin offers advanced risk management and adaptability across IT environments, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive features and diverse deployment needs.
Amazon Inspector has straightforward setup costs, while Tenable Lumin requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing differences in budget considerations for organizations.
Amazon Inspector has straightforward setup costs, while Tenable Lumin requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing differences in budget considerations for organizations.
Bitsight provides risk analytics with intuitive dashboards and prioritizes third-party risk monitoring. In comparison, Tenable Lumin integrates vulnerability management with deep business insights, offering a comprehensive feature set with in-depth asset visibility, which appeals to those seeking extensive configurability and data-rich insights.
Bitsight generally has a lower setup cost, while Tenable Lumin offers a more comprehensive initial investment that may appeal to organizations seeking in-depth features from the start.
Bitsight generally has a lower setup cost, while Tenable Lumin offers a more comprehensive initial investment that may appeal to organizations seeking in-depth features from the start.
Black Kite offers valuable features for risk assessment with efficient analytics and comprehensive reporting capabilities. Its customization options are beneficial, though some users suggest improvements in integration processes. Black Kite is favored for its detailed insights, but feedback on streamlining updates exists.
