Tenable Vulnerability Management Reviews

I primarily implement the solution for clients. It's mostly used for security purposes. 

The product has many features and continues to develop its capabilities at a rapid pace. 

It's done a lot of acquisitions and has really built out its cloud functionality. They're doing a good job of building out their cloud security.

The initial setup is mostly straightforward. 

The solution is stable. 

It can scale as necessary.

I'd like to see them improve their support.

It would be great if there was more integration with other third-party products. They have a robust API, so it's possible to write a script in Python and extend or integrate with another solution, however, will be great if they had this integration automatically.

I've been dealing with the solution for three or four years. 

The solution is stable. I haven't had any issues. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We use AWS infrastructure and find it to be very reliable. 

The general scalability is pretty good. It's easy to add on. We haven't had an issue with expansion. 

At this point in time, I'm not sure if our clients intend to increase usage. 

They need a better approach to support. When I have hard questions that need answers to, I prefer to jump to L3 support instead of getting pushed to L1. It's not solving my problems fast enough.

I've deployed Tenable.sc and other Tenable products. I've also dealt with FireEye.

I've been implementing the solution for four years. Therefore, I do not find it to be a difficult process. In general, it is easy to deploy, however, it depends on the client. If they are cooperative, it is easier. 

We need at least one person for deployment and maintenance. 

I can't speak to the exact cost of the solution. 

There may be some features that we have to pay for that are extra. However, when someone wants to use Tenable.io only for vulnerability scanning and vulnerability management, there is no hidden cost.

We are partners with Tenable and therefore tend to lean towards their products more than others. 

We're partners. I mainly implement the solution. 

I work with a variety of different versions. I use the whole Tenable portfolio.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We use the Tenable Vulnerability Management solution for internal web applications, asset management, and remediation. It helps us transfer and leverage the remediation of websites, effectively addressing vulnerabilities.

We need to deploy this on internal assets. It resides within the internal infrastructure and communication.

It encompasses everything at some point. From development to deployment, it receives the necessary attention. 

The solution provides seamlessness, a perfect UI, and identity management for office operations. We are most vulnerable to users. Therefore, it is crucial to implement the right solution to ensure proper user access and resource management.

I have been using Tenable Vulnerability Management for 4 years.

200 users are using this solution.

We have used Qualys. It is tricky and expensive.

The initial setup is seamless and takes three days to complete. Two people are required for the deployment but one person can do as well.

This process is seamless because checks are scheduled at different intervals, typically every ten minutes. Once a log is generated, we attend to it immediately. Also, the maintenance is straightforward.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Our primary use case for this solution is to satisfy the requirement for vulnerability assessments regarding internal assets, CPI assets and web applications. We deploy the solution on private cloud.

The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable, and it has a diverse checklist when it comes to vulnerability databases. Hence, it has a comprehensive database for exploits and vulnerabilities, which is why we continue using it.

The response times from the customer service and support team could be improved. Additionally, the pricing could be better.

We have been using the solution for approximately four years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable, and we currently have 15 users utilizing it.

The response times of customer service and support can be faster. I rate them a six out of ten.

Neutral

We previously used different solutions but chose to switch because of the flexibility regarding cloud.

The initial setup is straightforward, and it took a couple of hours.

We implemented the solution in-house.

Licensing is approximately $6,000 annually.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good, but pricing, support and flexibility can be improved.

Our primary use case for the solution is managing organizations with assets. Our on-premises assets are in the private or public cloud so the customer doesn't need to have the server installed and deployed but can touch and go once the license has a provision. The user can use it right away. 

By making different resources available for sharing among users and groups, Tenable.io provides endless possibilities for creating customized workflows for vulnerability management programs, regardless of any of the numerous regulatory or compliance drivers that demand keeping your business secure.

With Tenable.io, we can schedule scans, push policies, view scan findings, and control multiple Nessus scanners from the cloud. This enables the deployment of Nessus scanners throughout networks to both public and private clouds as well as multiple physical locations

There is no burden to update or upgrade the solution manually, so it's always up to date. 

The price could be lower, and the grouping of platforms on the dashboard can be included in the next release of the product.

We have been using the solution for approximately four years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable because if you want to extend the license, you can do it over a call every quarter. Additionally, the scaling does not require infrastructure requirements or additional infrastructure because all are hosted in the Tenable.io Vulnerability Management cloud. 

The initial setup is straightforward. However, once the account is provisioned for a user, Its just the data collector to set up Scanner/Agents, and it takes approximately two hours to set everything up.

It costs approximately $2,300 yearly.

We chose this solution because it has a great reporting feature and provides the most CVE coverage and VPR. Additionally, the solution has been in the industry for a long time and performs well.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good, but the price could be lower, and the grouping of platforms on the dashboard can be included in the product's next release. I advise new users to know the infrastructure system and networking. Additionally, there are videos and documentation that will assist them in getting set up to use the product right away.

Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is used to scan our infrastructure.

The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options.

The stability has room for improvement.

I have been using Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for one year.

The stability is moderate.

The solution is scalable.

The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint.

I give Tenable.io Vulnerability Management a five out of ten.

The maintenance requires a subject matter expert.

I recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management. 

We primarily use the solution for on-premises monitoring. We use it to monitor the servers in our organization.

For most of the updates, Windows updates, et cetera, the service will let us know when we shouldn't apply an update due to the fact that there's some missing code, for example. It gives us great insights into security risks.

The vulnerability scanning has been great as it's helped us to define some issues around the updates of some things, and some items surrounding services we need to take care of.

The initial setup is very straightforward.

The solution has been very stable and quite scalable.

The dashboard and the main panel could be better. It's lacking right now. Sometimes it's hard to find what you need in the menus. There needs to be better dashboard navigation.

There needs to be more curation of core knowledge.

The documentation was hard to find. It's not all in one place. It's kind-of all over. You have to work to seek it out.

I can't recall any features that are lacking. I can't think of any additions we'd like to see in the next release.

I've been using the solution for six months at this point. This has occurred within the last year. It hasn't been that long.

The stability is very good. I haven't had any issues with it. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

The scalability of the solution is very good. If a company needs to expand it out, it can do so with relative ease.

We have a few network engineers that work with the solution directly.

I can't speak to any plans in terms of increasing usage. it's not something that we've discussed.

I've never directly dealt with technical support. I can't speak to how knowledgeable or responsive they are. 

I've read a lot of documentation and whitepapers on the product. However, they were not concentrated in one place. I had issues teaching down details about the product.

We did previously use a different solution, however, we've found Tenable to be much better.

The initial setup is quite straightforward. It's not complex. It was very easy to create an account

The deployment itself only took one day. It was quite fast.

We have four people on staff that are knowledgeable enough to handle deployment and maintenance.

We handled everything ourselves. it was all online and very simple. We didn't need the assistance of a consultant or reseller. 

I don't handle the licensing aspects of the solution. I'm not aware of the costs involved.

We potentially looked at Qualys and Rapid7 before ultimately choosing Tenable.

I cannot control the main difference.

We're a partner.

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using.

I'd recommend the solution to other companies.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten overall. We're mostly very happy with its capabilities.

Our primary use case for this solution is to perform in-depth vulnerability scans on the cloud.

The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance.

An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons.

I have been using this solution for about two years.

The solution is very stable.

The customer service/technical support for the solution is very good.

The initial setup of the solution is not complicated and can easily be configured. Additionally, the solution comes with templates for assessing and auditing.

The solution is not too expensive.

It is useful for scanning the whole environment to check for any vulnerabilities. We can then start deploying or closing these vulnerabilities by applying the Windows or other product patches. In the end, we have an environment with no vulnerabilities, and we increase our security posture and security levels. 

It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities. It can discover much quickly as compared to other vendors.

Its management console and portal make it easy to use and effective. 

It can have more integration.

I have been using this solution for three months.

It is very stable.

It is scalable.

I haven't installed it on a customer's site. I just installed it in my lab in order to get familiar with the product, and that's it. It was just for testing.

It was a straightforward installation. Because it was done in my lab environment, it didn't take that much time. It took around three to four hours.

I did it myself.

I would recommend this solution at this time, but after installing it for more customers, my answer might change in the future.

I would rate this solution a seven out of 10.