Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claroty Platform vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Claroty Platform
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
14th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (11th), Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (1st)
Tenable Vulnerability Manag...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Claroty Platform is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 9.3%, down from 13.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Massimiliano La Camera - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 1, 2024
A good platform for increased business in network solutions but have high pricing
The main customers want visibility on their security devices. The first target is to implement the solution to give any panelist access to our and the customer's infrastructure Claroty is a good platform for increased business in network solutions. Pricing could be improved. I have been using…
Yogeswaran Neelagandan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 24, 2024
Offers risk prioritization , notification system but support should be bundled with the product cost
It's a fantastic product, but there are some things to consider. One is the price. Compared to on-prem solutions, the SaaS model can be expensive. Price is definitely a concern and needs improvement, especially for the Indian market. While it's a fantastic product, it should be more accessible to small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs). Currently, only larger enterprises seem to be able to afford and evaluate it thoroughly. So, pricing can be improved and be more affordable for the Indian market, specifically for SMBs. Another area of improvement is customer service and support. Tenable needs to include support in the pricing/license. Currently, they push clients to get support from partners or channel distributors, who often charge a lot. Even for a simple one-time setup, they may charge three to four lakhs, and then additional annual charges for ongoing support. We have the technical skills to handle basic tasks, but relying on Tenable itself often results in just receiving emails or being redirected back to channel partners. So, support should be bundled with the product cost.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is the map, which shows everything that is connected and communicates with each other."
"Claroty provides continuous threat protection and identifies pre-empty stuff and false positives."
"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."
"The main advantage of Claroty, when compared to its competitors, is integrated secure remote access."
"The solution offers comprehensive tools that greatly enhance your IT operations if implemented correctly."
"I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally."
"The solution's asset management is really great compared to Dragos or Nozomi."
"The tool's best feature was the UI and the simplicity it offers."
"The solution is very simple to use."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status."
"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"There is no burden of updating or upgrading this solution."
 

Cons

"The graphical user interface is quite poor."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I've reported four bugs and three feature requests so far. The main area of focus should be on how attacks are detected. The attack vector information needs to be more detailed. For example, it's not enough to state that an SMB v1 version open can lead to a WannaCry attack. A more detailed explanation should help clients understand the various ways an attack could occur."
"There are a few protocols that Claroty doesn't currently support."
"Claroty Platform could improve the pricing to get more acceptability in the market."
"For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn better."
"The product could be improved in terms of user interface design."
"We face issues in the alert investigation area because it does not properly give the alert communication patterns."
"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"It can have more integration."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."
"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."
"The tool is quite expensive."
"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."
"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."
"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."
"A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."
"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."
"The tool is reasonably priced."
"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Educational Organization
28%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which solution do you prefer: Nozomi Networks or Claroty Platform?
Nozomi Networks and Claroty Platform are both leading operational technology (OT) security solutions offering a wide range of features, including asset discovery, risk assessment, and threat detect...
What do you like most about Claroty Platform?
The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts.
What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?
For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn ...
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tenable.io
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation
Global Payments AU/NZ
Find out what your peers are saying about Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.