Claroty Platform vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Claroty and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Claroty is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.2, while Tenable is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9. Claroty holds a 0.6% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Claroty users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Claroty Platform and Tenable Vulnerability Management compete in the cybersecurity space. Claroty has an edge in operational technology security, while Tenable leads in identifying and managing vulnerabilities.

Features: Claroty Platform provides comprehensive threat detection, asset monitoring, and advanced industrial control system protection. Tenable Vulnerability Management excels with its vulnerability assessment features, robust scanning, and detailed analytics.

Room for Improvement: Claroty Platform could enhance its user interface, scalability options, and integration with external security tools. Tenable Vulnerability Management can improve its processing speed for large data sets, enhance its reporting capabilities, and offer greater customization in analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Claroty Platform offers a streamlined deployment process tailored for industrial environments, supported by dedicated staff. Tenable Vulnerability Management provides a flexible deployment model with comprehensive customer service, delivering detailed guidance and support.

Pricing and ROI: Claroty Platform may have higher initial costs but promises significant ROI by securing critical industrial systems. Tenable Vulnerability Management offers competitive pricing, with benefits translating into substantial ROI through improved security posture.

To learn more, read our detailed Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 0.4%. The mindshare of Claroty Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 6.9%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at Novartis

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Deevanshi Priya

Cyber Security Security at PwC

Achieve certifications with progress tracking and potential for enhanced interactivity

I was using Claroty to complete training assigned by my company. The courses were self-paced and helped me get certified in two additional certifications. I plan to use it further as I have a task list for future courses. It was primarily for certification and study materials The feature I like…

Read full review

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Streamlines vulnerability management with excellent reporting and potential AI integration

Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting. It allows me to easily fetch and schedule reports. The software's discovery feature aids in strengthening our security posture. The single-sensor installation process on various operating systems is smooth, unlike Rapid7, which requires different versions for separate systems. Furthermore, Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Claroty assigns a score based on how well you are doing in the course. If you skip a video, your score decreases, making it essential to watch the content attentively."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the map, which shows everything that is connected and communicates with each other."

"The solution's asset management is really great compared to Dragos or Nozomi."

"The platform ensures security without imposing significant delays."

"I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally."

"I believe the two main aspects where Claroty stands out are their ability to provide a complete platform and their OT-specific focus."

"Claroty is very beneficial for learning and adds value to your resume."

More Claroty Platform pros

"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."

"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."

"The initial setup is mostly straightforward."

"The solution is very simple to use."

"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."

"Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"There should be AI security solutions implemented."

"Introducing an AI chatbot to assist you when you have doubts could be beneficial."

"If more AI features could be included with the Clarity solution, it would be feasible for everybody."

"Occasionally, I face a login problem despite entering the correct password."

"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."

"There is room for improvement in the user interface to make it more vibrant and interactive, similar to IT tools."

"There are a few protocols that Claroty doesn't currently support."

"The product could be improved in terms of user interface design."

More Claroty Platform cons

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."

"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."

"The solution must be promoted more in the market."

"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."

"The tool's reports are bad. They're not very customizable or flexible. During audits, we often have to exclude things that aren't relevant to our organization, but we can't do that easily with the reports. They come in HTML or PDF format, and we can't compare current results with previous ones in Excel because we never receive reports in Excel."

"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."

"The solution is a bit slow."

"They need to have more dependable and faster support."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The tool is quite expensive."

"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."

"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

"The solution is not too expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."

"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."

"A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

I find that the pricing for Zafran aligns well with the comprehensive features it offers. The asset and user-based li...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

While Zafran Security is already a powerful tool, there are areas where it could be further improved to provide even ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

Our primary use case for Zafran involves leveraging it to enhance our vulnerability risk scoring methodology. In toda...

See all answers

Which solution do you prefer: Nozomi Networks or Claroty Platform?

Nozomi Networks and Claroty Platform are both leading operational technology (OT) security solutions offering a wide ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Claroty Platform?

The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?

If more AI features could be included with the Clarity solution, it would be feasible for everybody. As AI is booming...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io. My current client doesn't have access to it. Howeve...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 54% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 22% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 15% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Nozomi Networks vs Claroty Platform

Compared 37% of the time

Dragos vs Claroty Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Claroty Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Armis vs Claroty Platform

Compared 9% of the time

OPSWAT MetaDefender OT Security vs Claroty Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Claroty Platform Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 23% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

March 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform

April 2025

Download Claroty Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

March 2025

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.io

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

The Claroty Platform is tailored for monitoring and securing industrial control systems. It offers deep visibility into OT networks, enabling effective anomaly detection and vulnerability assessments. Its user-friendly interface and robust reporting tools facilitate easy management and compliance, enhancing organizational efficiency and cybersecurity posture in industrial environments.

Claroty

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Rockwell Automation

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

April 2025

Free Report: Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.