Acunetix vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Invicti and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Invicti is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.4, while Tenable is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2. Invicti holds a 1.2% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 31 Acunetix reviews

1,535 Views
1,216 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Read 40 Tenable Vulnerability Management reviews

9,851 Views
7,588 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Acunetix and Tenable are key competitors in the vulnerability management category. While Acunetix excels in web application capabilities, Tenable holds an advantage for enterprise-level needs due to its integration and scalability.

Features: Acunetix offers a web-based interface, powerful scheduling capabilities, and an Interactive Application Security Testing module. It provides comprehensive reporting, is easy to set up, and maintains a low false positive rate. Tenable boasts extensive integration options with third-party tools, strong cloud management features, and supports both on-premises and cloud environments. Its large vulnerability database enhances network security coverage, but it lacks some depth in web application scanning.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance tool support redundancy, lower false positives, and improve mobile environment integration. Manual replication capabilities and user interface flexibility are additional areas for improvement. Tenable could simplify its dashboards, reduce setup complexity, and offer better pricing structures. Speed in support response and application testing enhancements are also necessary improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is known for its simple deployment across various platforms, receiving positive customer service feedback with 24/7 support. Tenable provides a wide array of cloud options, praised for responsive technical support and accommodating feature requests. Acunetix maintains a strong lead with its user-friendly setup and customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix's recent price increases necessitate a reassessment of its cost-effectiveness despite its high initial value. Tenable, although also costly, offers a pricing model tailored for large enterprises. Both tools deliver ROI through enhanced security posture and risk management, but a reevaluation of their pricing strategies is suggested for current market competitiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (12th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (11th), DevSecOps (5th)

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 8.5%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami

Compliance Manager at Compunnel

Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…

Read full review

Yogeswaran Neelagandan

Key Account Manager at Uniware

Offers risk prioritization , notification system but support should be bundled with the product cost

It's a fantastic product, but there are some things to consider. One is the price. Compared to on-prem solutions, the SaaS model can be expensive. Price is definitely a concern and needs improvement, especially for the Indian market. While it's a fantastic product, it should be more accessible to small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs). Currently, only larger enterprises seem to be able to afford and evaluate it thoroughly. So, pricing can be improved and be more affordable for the Indian market, specifically for SMBs. Another area of improvement is customer service and support. Tenable needs to include support in the pricing/license. Currently, they push clients to get support from partners or channel distributors, who often charge a lot. Even for a simple one-time setup, they may charge three to four lakhs, and then additional annual charges for ongoing support. We have the technical skills to handle basic tasks, but relying on Tenable itself often results in just receiving emails or being redirected back to channel partners. So, support should be bundled with the product cost.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."

"Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick."

"One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that."

"We are able to create a report which shows the PCI DSS scoring and share it with the application teams. Then, they can correlate and see exactly what they need to fix, and why."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great."

More Acunetix pros

"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."

"It has greatly impacted us by providing asset visibility."

"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."

"The best feature of the solution is the amount of visibility it provides of the vulnerabilities."

"The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status."

"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."

"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."

"The interface is fine."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing."

"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."

"The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans."

"The pricing is a bit on the higher side."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"We have had issues during upgrades where their scans worked on some apps better with previous versions. Then, we had to work with their tech support, who were great, to get it fixed for the next version."

"It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched."

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

More Acunetix cons

"I would like the solution to cover the whole cycle of mitigation since it's an area where the solution currently lacks."

"The tool's reports are bad. They're not very customizable or flexible. During audits, we often have to exclude things that aren't relevant to our organization, but we can't do that easily with the reports. They come in HTML or PDF format, and we can't compare current results with previous ones in Excel because we never receive reports in Excel."

"They need to have more dependable and faster support."

"t needs additional reporting and intelligence features, as well as enhancements in AI-driven detection, which is still in its early stages."

"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."

"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."

"It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface."

"I don't recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for web scanning"

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is exceptionally high."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing cost of the product. It is neither a cheap nor an expensive product."

"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

31%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I use Acunetix for penetration testing purposes. This is the primary use case.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I rate the overall solution nine out of ten. I prefer Acunetix for its more precise and accurate results.

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

It needs additional reporting and intelligence features, as well as enhancements in AI-driven detection, which is still in its early stages.

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 16% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 12% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 27% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 22% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 8% of the time

Snyk vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

December 2024

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

November 2024

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

Tenable.io

Learn More

Invicti

Tenable

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

December 2024

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.