Acunetix and Tenable are key competitors in the vulnerability management category. While Acunetix excels in web application capabilities, Tenable holds an advantage for enterprise-level needs due to its integration and scalability.
Features: Acunetix offers a web-based interface, powerful scheduling capabilities, and an Interactive Application Security Testing module. It provides comprehensive reporting, is easy to set up, and maintains a low false positive rate. Tenable boasts extensive integration options with third-party tools, strong cloud management features, and supports both on-premises and cloud environments. Its large vulnerability database enhances network security coverage, but it lacks some depth in web application scanning.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance tool support redundancy, lower false positives, and improve mobile environment integration. Manual replication capabilities and user interface flexibility are additional areas for improvement. Tenable could simplify its dashboards, reduce setup complexity, and offer better pricing structures. Speed in support response and application testing enhancements are also necessary improvements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is known for its simple deployment across various platforms, receiving positive customer service feedback with 24/7 support. Tenable provides a wide array of cloud options, praised for responsive technical support and accommodating feature requests. Acunetix maintains a strong lead with its user-friendly setup and customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix's recent price increases necessitate a reassessment of its cost-effectiveness despite its high initial value. Tenable, although also costly, offers a pricing model tailored for large enterprises. Both tools deliver ROI through enhanced security posture and risk management, but a reevaluation of their pricing strategies is suggested for current market competitiveness.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly.
They can seamlessly scale the number of endpoints from 100 to 1,000,000 in a day.
I have faced no stability issues with Tenable.
The support program was helpful in addressing it.
They should also accelerate the process of implementing new features upon request.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
Tenable charges around $40 per device, while Rapid7 costs $10 to $15 per device.
I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention.
Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
