TFS Reviews

The use case is as our repository for UPS Enterprise and the performance is pretty good.

It is a big improvement because before we were using PBCS.

Build definitions and releases within the product. They allow us to put our latest applications in the field.

Right now they are up to standard. All the features that we needed are included currently in TFS, including Git repository which allows our developers to perform their code-testing without impacting by uploading the latest code in TFS. It fits all of our needs.

100 percent stable.

It's completely scalable.

I give technical support a rating of A-plus.

The previous solution was PBCS which was obsolete for our team and that is why the company decided to invest in TFS.

When selecting a vendor what's most important, speaking from a money point of view, is that it be cost effective. It should have good support like Microsoft doing provides with TFS, and be easy to use as well.

Initial setup was straightforward.

The other vendor was HPE but we decided to go with Microsoft.

It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use.

TFS is very easy to integrate into your system. It's very easy to follow for any new developers. Also, I would say some 80 percent of developers out there use Visual Studio which is integrated with TFS.

It is mainly for the work item handling, which is the documentation for the development projects. We also use it for requirement handling and then following a project's progress with tasks or issues.

It doesn't improve the way our organization functions, but it supports the way we work. Instead of having separate Excel or other work item lists, we can just utilize the work items provided by TFS for record-keeping and monitoring the progress.

The work item feature is most valuable. It allows us to store all product requirements. We can also link the test cases to those requirements so that we know which feature has already been tested, and which one is waiting for testing. We can also couple the code reviews, unit tests, and automated tests into these requirements.

It is reliable. It has all the features and good performance. It also has reporting tools or analysis tools. 

Currently, we are looking for a solution with which we can incorporate third-party development sites or third-party project teams into the system. Because it is on-premise, it is a bit problematic because we need to have a VPN or something else in the system. A cloud-based solution would be better for us, and that's what we are looking for. Our biggest problem is the external connection, which, of course, is limited by our own IT. It would be good to have some kind of publishing service for this external connection. It might be there, and it might be that our IT is making it impossible for us.

Its template editor could be easier to use. Currently, customizing the project templates according to your needs requires some work.

I have been using this solution for 15 years. I have been using its latest version for a couple of years.

It is reliable.

I haven't actually used their support very much. I'm not really the one who is maintaining the system. 

You can find a lot of information by searching the web. There is also a community around it, and a lot of answers are available. Microsoft has its own support if needed.

I haven't been so much involved in building up the TFS server, but I think it is rather simple. The installation is simple. There are so-called project templates that you might need to adjust according to your needs. These require some work. If you can use the default templates, then no work is needed. We have managed to adjust everything for what we needed. There were no problems that we couldn't overcome. Its template editor could be easier to use.

It was done in-house. It is pretty easy to come up with an installer. There is nothing difficult there.

The Team Foundation Server is now called Azure DevOps. We are using an old product. I would advise others to consider whether they need an on-premises or a cloud solution. The on-premises solution requires external developers. They can also look at the cloud option and see which product offering is better for their needs.

It is a nice system to have. You get a managed system where you can manage your development tasks easily, and you don't need to keep your own bookkeeping for tasks and backup items. They are already there in TFS. You can just use the system monthly and produce reports out of the system. For me, it was nice to see that such a tool exists.

I would rate TFS a nine out of ten. I'm pretty happy with it.

TFS can support multiple code repositories (example: Git, TFS, CVS, etc.) via plugins, which is really a nice feature.

As I mentioned, it supports multiple code repositories. You can also build CI/CDs out of it. You can instruct TFS to build your .jar, .war, and .ear files and deploy them to to certain environments based on your configuration. So you don’t have explicitly maintain another code repository and CI/CD tools for your continuous integration/build purpose. This also automatically reduces DevOp burden and the number of people maintaining that DevOp work.

It needs huge improvement on its Agile functionality.

For more than a year, until I left the company.

No.

No.

We had our own support member (so I can't rate their support).

Yes, I used to use VersionOne, HP AGM, and JIRA to track and monitor Agile practice in my previous companies. At Lennox they had only one option, TFS.

I wasn’t involved in this process.

I wasn’t involved in discussions of pricing or licensing for TFS at Lennox.

As far as I‘m aware, the company decided to use TFS without evaluating other options.

There are better tools for Agile and CI/CD in the market. TFS may be good for code repository purposes; however, it's not the best for Agile practice.

TFS needs to be stable.

I have been using the solution for six months. 

I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten. 

My company has more than 50 users. 

The tool's installation is straightforward. 

I have seen ROI with the tool's use. 

TFS is expensive, and the licensing costs are yearly. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. 

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

The interface is good with TFS.

I am looking for some pull request features, like Git.  I do not see a pull request option for branching and merging. I would also like a true command prompt like Git.

I have been using TFS for the past fourteen or fifteen years.

TFS is definitely stable.

TFS is scalable because it is managed by Microsoft internally. 

Technical support is good. We have optional support with Microsoft.

We previously used VSTS however TFS is a far better product.

The initial setup was very easy and straightforward.

The overall price of TFS is good.

I think most people are working with Git. We feel comfortable with TFS because we are already used to it. TFS is a good product and you can continue working with it.

I am overall happy with TFS and would rate it a nine on a scale of one to ten. 

While I don't recall the exact version we are using, I do know that we upgraded to the latest one.

We use the solution for project planning, code repository and for releases, everything really. 

Primarily, we have used it as a code repository, something we have been doing for many years. We have not made much use of the other features. 

The project management side should be addressed and the project and release planning should be somewhat extended. The solution cannot be used as a project management tool on its own. 

Although clear, the installation is of medium difficulty. It could be better and easier. 

I have been using TFS for more than five years.

The solution is very much stable. 

We have encountered no issues with the solution's scalability. 

I am not aware of ever having contacted technical support. 

TFS is the first solution of which we made use. 

While clear, the installation is of medium difficulty. It could be better and easier.

I do not know how long it took. 

Not too many people are needed for the deployment, perhaps four or five. They consist primarily of engineers and there is one manager. 

I am not in a position to comment on the licensing terms, as we are talking about an enterprise arrangement. I am not part of that.

Subsequent to TFS, we evaluated and tried making use of Jira and Azure DevOps. 

There are around 250 people making use of the solution in our organization.

At this point, I would not recommend the solution to others. 

I rate the solution as at least an eight out of ten.

We are using TFS for STLC

It improved SDLC & STLC 

The most valuable features of TFS are bug reporting and its high performance.

The overall reports in TFS could improve. Additionally, there should be an easier way to migrate from an older version to a newer one.

In a future release of TFS, they should be more integration and DevOps features added.

I have been using TFS for approximately 15 years.

I rate the stability of TFS a six out of ten.

The scalability of TFS is good.

We have approximately 50 people from our IT teams that are using the solution in my company.

I rate the scalability of TFS a six out of ten.

I have not used the support from TFS.

I previously used Jira. I did not switch solutions, the new company I work for selected TFS.

The initial setup of TFS took a couple of days to implement. The full process was simple.

There are different prices depending on the configurations. There is a free version available. There is no extra cost for the solution. However, the hardware could be something that needs to be considered.

The maintenance of the solution can be done by one or two people.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate TFS an eight out of ten.

We do a user story for a use case, which is like a snapshot of one pass through a use case. We tend to align them with the branches in Git. We have story branches created in Git and edited in TFS, which correspond to user stories based on a use case.

The solution's iteration board is good because you can track all your work with it. In TFS, you can do pull requests, trigger builds automatically, and gate them so that they're reviewed thoroughly before you release them. It is a good practice that makes things a lot easier.

If you've got 100 iterations and you create a new story and try to select which iterations, it doesn't default to the current iteration. You have to scroll right down to iteration 100 in the drop-down list. It would be good if it defaulted to the current iteration rather than having to go down a long drop-down list to select it when it's right at the end.

IBM ClearCase has something called a Version Tree, where you can see all the commits and updates to the configuration as a series of nodes in a tree diagram. You can also do mergers from the different branches using that. I'd like to see some kind of visualization tool for TFS that would make life much easier.

I have been using TFS for six to seven years.

I rate TFS ten out of ten for stability.

Hundreds of users in our organization use TFS.

I rate TFS a nine or ten out of ten for scalability.

The solution's initial setup is not too difficult. The people who set it up were experts who could quickly get it up and running. So, it looked like the setup was straightforward for them.

TFS is deployed on the cloud in our organization.

Overall, I rate TFS an eight out of ten.