Visual Studio Test Professional Reviews

We use this solution to develop code.

The price could be improved.

I have been using this solution for two years.

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

The initial setup is easy. It's easy to configure.

The deployment can be done in-house.

We pay for the license. The licensing model is per year. So, yearly-based license.

I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where ten is the most expensive and one is the cheapest.

Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. I would definitely recommend using the solution.

I use the solution for web-based application development.

The solution has good stability.

The solution's UI could be better.

I have used the solution for a month or two.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution.

The solution's initial setup process is easy.

I implemented the solution myself.

I rate the solution a six out of ten.

It helps us to create happy and safe solutions.

It is a free solution, the documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems.

It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it. The interface could also be more simple.

We have been using this solution for four years. It is deployed on-premises and on Azure cloud.

It is a stable solution.

It is very scalable. The backend developer and full-start developer use this solution, and it doesn't require maintenance.

Few people are needed for deployment, and it is easy because it is Microsoft technology. It takes about one hour to deploy.

I rate this solution a nine out of ten. I would recommend this solution to others, but it requires a lot of learning to use it.

We primarily use the solution as a build environment.

The solution offers good memory analysis.

The solution has a lot of features on offer. We have not even utilized 100% features we used to use. From Visual Studio 6.0 onwards, the newer versions have a lot of features- including a built-in code analyzer - and all of that which would be very useful for us.

The solution can integrate with other solutions. In the past, we used to have BoundsChecker integrated with the solution for memory leak detection. 

The initial setup was pretty easy.

The stability has always been very good.

While I haven't used the feature, my understanding is that there are code-sharing capabilities among the developers in order to allow them to effectively review the code.

In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line. It gives me memory analysis, however, it's not taking me to the code lines. That's what I was searching for in Micro Focus. If I could find a product that works exactly like BoundsChecker or better, then I would switch to that.

I've used the solution for a very long time. I've used it since version 1.5. It's been many years.

We've never questioned the stability. It's always been quite good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

We've never contacted technical support. There was never any need to do so. Therefore, I can't speak to how knowledgeable or responsive they are. 

Many years back not now, very early 2006 or 2007 or around there, we were using a product called BoundsChecker and that time we were using it very extensively and it was a very, very useful tool. We had it integrated with Visual Studio 6.0. Now, we are using Visual Studio 2017 and 2019. However, unfortunately, we haven't found any tool that gives us the same kind of output as BoundsChecker used to. When I searched its history I found that it has been bought by Micro Focus and it has changed names a lot of times. I've been looking for a product giving the same output as BoundsChecker.

The initial setup was not complex or difficult. It was easy and pretty straightforward.

We aren't bothered by the pricing of the solution at all due to the fact that it provides us with a lot of great tools. The pricing is high, however, it's a single tool that allows you to do a lot of development without having to buy multiple other tools to do the same tasks.

We're into software development. We are developing products, enterprise-level products, for clients. Microsoft is a business partner.

I'm into product management. My developers are the ones that are directly working with Visual Studio. I myself I'm not overly technical. Therefore, my insight is slightly limited. 

We are using versions from both 2017 and 2019. It might be Visual Studio version 6.0. 

We are not using a lot of it due to the fact that ours is a legacy code written back in the 1990s. It's a system library. We simply use it to build and compile and that's it.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. I haven't completely explored the whole solution, however, I've been very pleased with its overall capabilities. 

As a software developer working on the Microsoft platform, I find Visual Studio Test Professional to be a valuable tool for ensuring the quality and reliability of my applications.

Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work. It easily works with Visual Studio, helping me find and fix bugs fast. It does both manual and automated testing, making sure my app works well.

In terms of improvement, I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options.

.

Visual Studio Test Pro is quite stable.

It is fairly scalable.

The support is good, but it could be a bit faster.

The initial setup is fairly simple. 

It is a bit pricey.

Overall, I would rate Visual Studio Test Pro as an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for coding.

I would like to see more integration in the solution.

The solution is stable. I would rate it a ten out of ten.

The product’s technical support is fast.

The solution was easy to setup. It will take less than an hour to setup.

I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area.

We do a lot of test-driven development and acceptance test-driven development, so we write all our test cases for our .net development through Visual Studio Test Professional. 

Visual Studio Test Professional has allowed us to increase the quality of one of our web portal products drastically. We went two years with only one regression in our software because of the automated testing we built with Visual Studio Test. 

Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development.

I've been using Visual Studio Test Professional for as long as I can remember.

I'd rate Visual Studio Test Professional's stability eight out of ten.

I would rate Visual Studio Test Professional's scalability nine out of ten.

The initial setup was pretty straightforward.

We've seen an ROI because the IDE is much richer than others we've used.

Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey - I would rate its pricing six out of ten.

I would recommend anybody thinking of implementing Visual Studio Test Professional to go for it. I'd give Visual Studio Test Professional a rating of eight out of ten.

It's great for the development of .NET.

The solution should be cheaper. But unfortunately, Microsoft products are usually expensive.

We've been using this solution for several years and have used Visual Studio 10, 12 and 13. We use it both as a cloud solution and on-premises.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. It is secure because most of our applications are in .NET.

The deployment was not complicated, and our developers completed the deployment. Only those two developers use the solution, and we don't plan to increase usage at this time.

Visual Studio Test Professional has an annual license.

I rate this solution a ten out of ten. I recommend Visual Studio Test Professional, primarily if you work with .NET. If we are developing something in .NET or C++, we use Visual Studio. But if we are developing something in Java, we have to use Java.