Top 10 Visual Studio Test Professional Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

52 reviews
96% willing to recommend

Top Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Visual Studio Test Professional based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Tricentis Tosca, OpenText Functional Testing, and BrowserStack. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Visual Studio Test Professional surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with Microsoft products, comprehensive test management tools, and a robust automation framework that enhances productivity and ensures high-quality software development.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca's model-based test automation and scriptless features make it accessible for non-technical users. In comparison, Visual Studio Test Professional excels in its integration with Microsoft tools, offering strong support for C# and .NET projects, enhancing developer productivity.

Download Tricentis Tosca vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Tricentis Tosca often incurs higher initial setup costs, while Visual Studio Test Professional tends to be more budget-friendly in this regard.

View comparison

Pricing

Tricentis Tosca often incurs higher initial setup costs, while Visual Studio Test Professional tends to be more budget-friendly in this regard.

OpenText Functional Testing

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Functional Testing

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Functional Testing offers advanced automation across multiple platforms, appealing to those seeking rich integration capabilities. In comparison, Visual Studio Test Professional excels with its seamless Microsoft technology integration, ideal for users focused on optimizing workflows within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Download OpenText Functional Testing vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing involves a moderate setup cost, while Visual Studio Test Professional offers a more cost-effective setup.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing involves a moderate setup cost, while Visual Studio Test Professional offers a more cost-effective setup.

BrowserStack

4.0 out of 5

BrowserStack

4.0 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional integrates management data, unit testing, and C# compatibility for software development. In comparison, BrowserStack supports diverse device testing with fast performance. Tech buyers may prefer Visual Studio for development features and BrowserStack for cross-device testing capabilities.

Download BrowserStack vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional requires an upfront setup cost, while BrowserStack offers a more straightforward setup process. The pricing structure difference highlights how these solutions cater to distinct user preferences regarding implementation and initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

SmartBear TestComplete

3.8 out of 5

SmartBear TestComplete

3.8 out of 5

SmartBear TestComplete offers advanced automation capabilities and dynamic find methods, making it ideal for comprehensive testing needs. In comparison, Visual Studio Test Professional provides strong IDE support and seamless Azure DevOps integration, catering to .NET environments with IntelliSense and robust debugging options.

Download SmartBear TestComplete vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

SmartBear TestComplete offers a straightforward setup compared to the more complex process of Visual Studio Test Professional, highlighting distinct differences in user experience for initial setup between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Application Quality Management

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Application Quality Management

4.0 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional integrates with Microsoft tools, offering flexibility and testing features like IntelliSense. In comparison, OpenText Application Quality Management provides end-to-end test management and customization. Buyers might choose Visual Studio for .NET support or OpenText for traceability and tool flexibility.

Download OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional setup costs are generally lower, appealing to budget-conscious teams, while OpenText Application Quality Management tends to have higher initial costs, suited for organizations prioritizing comprehensive quality management features over upfront expenditure.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

3.7 out of 5

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

3.7 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional offers seamless Microsoft tool integration and robust debugging, appealing to developers prioritizing .NET and C# environments. In comparison, OpenText Functional Testing emphasizes cross-platform flexibility and a developer-friendly approach, ideal for those needing diverse technology support and integration with various tools.

Download OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional offers a lower setup cost compared to OpenText Functional Testing for Developers, which requires a more significant investment. The pricing clearly distinguishes these products, highlighting diverse budgeting requirements for potential users.

View comparison

Pricing

ReadyAPI

3.9 out of 5

ReadyAPI

3.9 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional excels in source control and code testing for .NET, making it ideal for developers needing integration. In comparison, ReadyAPI provides ease in API testing, suitable for multi-type API environments and those seeking comprehensive load testing solutions.

Download ReadyAPI vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional generally has a lower setup cost, offering a budget-friendly entry, while ReadyAPI may require a higher initial investment, potentially reflecting its advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Tricentis qTest

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis qTest

4.1 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional is preferred for its integration with Microsoft tools and ease of deployment, making it suitable for users seeking prompt customer service and straightforward setup. In comparison, Tricentis qTest offers extensive test case management and superior integration with CI/CD tools, appealing to those valuing comprehensive features despite higher setup costs.

Download Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional has a lower setup cost compared to Tricentis qTest, which tends to be higher. The difference in setup costs may significantly impact the overall budget for each solution.

View comparison

Pricing

TestRail

4.0 out of 5

TestRail

4.0 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional excels in customer support and deployment, making it ideal for those within the Microsoft ecosystem. In comparison, TestRail offers robust test case management features suitable for diverse testing needs, despite its higher price and more complex initial setup.

Download TestRail vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional has a higher setup cost than TestRail, making TestRail a more affordable choice for initial implementation. In contrast, Visual Studio Test Professional offers extensive features that might justify its setup investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Telerik Test Studio

4.0 out of 5

Telerik Test Studio

4.0 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional integrates seamlessly with Microsoft's ecosystem, making it ideal for existing Microsoft users seeking enhanced collaboration. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers advanced automation capabilities and flexible deployment, appealing to those requiring comprehensive testing across varied environments despite its higher costs.

Download Telerik Test Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional offers a moderate setup cost, while Telerik Test Studio provides a higher setup cost, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional offers a moderate setup cost, while Telerik Test Studio provides a higher setup cost, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.

Related categories

Functional Testing Tools

Test Management Tools

Mobile App Testing Tools