Top 10 Visual Studio Test Professional Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

51 reviews
96% willing to recommend

1,455 followers

Top Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Visual Studio Test Professional based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, and BrowserStack. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Visual Studio Test Professional surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with development environments, robust test planning, and comprehensive project tracking tools, empowering teams to efficiently manage test cases and deliver high-quality software consistently.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca's model-based test automation and scriptless features make it accessible for non-technical users. In comparison, Visual Studio Test Professional excels in its integration with Microsoft tools, offering strong support for C# and .NET projects, enhancing developer productivity.

Download Tricentis Tosca vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Tricentis Tosca often incurs higher initial setup costs, while Visual Studio Test Professional tends to be more budget-friendly in this regard.

View comparison

Pricing

Tricentis Tosca often incurs higher initial setup costs, while Visual Studio Test Professional tends to be more budget-friendly in this regard.

OpenText UFT One

4.0 out of 5

OpenText UFT One

4.0 out of 5

OpenText UFT One offers extensive compatibility and robust automation for diverse platforms, appealing to tech environments with varied needs. In comparison, Visual Studio Test Professional benefits those deeply integrated with Microsoft, providing user-friendly development and testing capabilities within its ecosystem.

Download OpenText UFT One vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

OpenText UFT One involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Visual Studio Test Professional, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, distinguishing them in terms of investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText UFT One involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Visual Studio Test Professional, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, distinguishing them in terms of investment requirements.

BrowserStack

4.0 out of 5

BrowserStack

4.0 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional integrates management data, unit testing, and C# compatibility for software development. In comparison, BrowserStack supports diverse device testing with fast performance. Tech buyers may prefer Visual Studio for development features and BrowserStack for cross-device testing capabilities.

Download BrowserStack vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional requires an upfront setup cost, while BrowserStack offers a more straightforward setup process. The pricing structure difference highlights how these solutions cater to distinct user preferences regarding implementation and initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

SmartBear TestComplete

3.8 out of 5

SmartBear TestComplete

3.8 out of 5

SmartBear TestComplete offers advanced automation capabilities and dynamic find methods, making it ideal for comprehensive testing needs. In comparison, Visual Studio Test Professional provides strong IDE support and seamless Azure DevOps integration, catering to .NET environments with IntelliSense and robust debugging options.

Download SmartBear TestComplete vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

SmartBear TestComplete offers a straightforward setup compared to the more complex process of Visual Studio Test Professional, highlighting distinct differences in user experience for initial setup between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Selenium HQ

4.0 out of 5

Selenium HQ

4.0 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional offers extensive TFS and MTM integration, enhancing workflow efficiency with robust IDE features. In comparison, Selenium HQ, an open-source tool, supports versatile cross-platform testing but requires technical expertise to maximize its potential and flexibility, influencing cost-effectiveness and setup.

Download Selenium HQ vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional has an initial setup cost, while Selenium HQ offers more flexibility with a lower setup investment. This distinction highlights how Selenium HQ might be a preferable option for those seeking cost-effective testing solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Ranorex Studio

4.0 out of 5

Ranorex Studio

4.0 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional excels in integration with Microsoft tools and supports multiple languages. In comparison, Ranorex Studio offers robust test automation for UI and mobile applications. Tech buyers choose Visual Studio for its ecosystem, while Ranorex appeals with its extensive automation capabilities.

Download Ranorex Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional requires a moderate setup cost, while Ranorex Studio involves a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in budget considerations for potential users.

View comparison

Pricing

ReadyAPI

3.9 out of 5

ReadyAPI

3.9 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional excels in source control and code testing for .NET, making it ideal for developers needing integration. In comparison, ReadyAPI provides ease in API testing, suitable for multi-type API environments and those seeking comprehensive load testing solutions.

Download ReadyAPI vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional generally has a lower setup cost, offering a budget-friendly entry, while ReadyAPI may require a higher initial investment, potentially reflecting its advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText UFT Developer

3.7 out of 5

OpenText UFT Developer

3.7 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional integrates well with Microsoft tools, supporting .NET and C# for ease of use. In comparison, OpenText UFT Developer offers flexibility, allowing testing across various environments with Java and C#. Both cater to differing testing needs and programming preferences.

Download OpenText UFT Developer vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional incurs lower setup costs, making it a budget-friendly choice, while OpenText UFT Developer might involve higher initial expenditures, reflecting its extensive feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

Telerik Test Studio

4.0 out of 5

Telerik Test Studio

4.0 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional integrates seamlessly with Microsoft's ecosystem, making it ideal for existing Microsoft users seeking enhanced collaboration. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers advanced automation capabilities and flexible deployment, appealing to those requiring comprehensive testing across varied environments despite its higher costs.

Download Telerik Test Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional offers a moderate setup cost, while Telerik Test Studio provides a higher setup cost, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Visual Studio Test Professional offers a moderate setup cost, while Telerik Test Studio provides a higher setup cost, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.

Related categories

Functional Testing Tools

Test Management Tools

Mobile App Testing Tools