We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."
"Testing across devices and browsers without maintaining that inventory is invaluable."
"The main core concept behind this product is, it takes the overhead of maintaining all of your devices or particular computers. It continuously adds the latest devices that are coming into the market."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides parallel and cross-browser testing. It enables us to run tests on multiple browsers or devices simultaneously."
"The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult."
"I like that it offers full device capability."
"The integration is very good."
"It's helpful for me to test on different devices."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"There is some stability issue in the product, making it in areas where improvements are required."
"We are struggling to do local testing."
"We had some execution issues."
"If you are inactive for 30 minutes, the solution will close."
"BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally."
"We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues."
"One of the biggest issues with BrowserStack is that if you don't have your network set up by the book, it's hard to get it to work with local desk machines."
"Adding better integration with frameworks, particularly testing frameworks like Robot, would be of more value to customers and make their jobs easier."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"The documentation is limited."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
BrowserStack is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". BrowserStack is most compared with LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca and CrossBrowserTesting, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca. See our BrowserStack vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.