Visual Studio Test Professional and BrowserStack compete in the software testing tools category. Visual Studio Test Professional seems to have the upper hand in integration and developer-focused features, while BrowserStack excels in device coverage and cross-browser testing.
Features: Visual Studio Test Professional offers code testing, deep integration with Microsoft tools, and is easy to use for C# and .NET projects with tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper. BrowserStack provides extensive device coverage, essential cross-browser testing, and real-world scenario simulation for web and mobile applications.
Room for Improvement: Visual Studio could enhance its interface, better integrate with databases and web apps, and improve multi-system support. BrowserStack could advance its device connectivity, increase speed, improve integration with testing frameworks, and enhance GPS testing support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional is deployed on-premises, offering control over the environment, but users seek more intuitive documentation. BrowserStack, cloud-based, offers easy cross-device access with reliable support, although connectivity issues are reported and integration ease could improve.
Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional is considered pricey but offers excellent ROI due to enhanced productivity. The community version helps manage costs. BrowserStack's flexible pricing makes it cost-effective, with ROI depending on project size, offering more gains for larger projects.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.
The price is expensive.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.