Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers are key competitors in the software testing tools industry. OpenText Functional Testing tends to have the upper hand due to its feature-rich offerings, particularly in complex testing environments.
Features: Visual Studio Test Professional offers TFS integration, comprehensive test case management, and built-in code analysis. Its support for C#, .NET projects, and integration with tools like GitHub and Azure DevOps is also valuable. OpenText Functional Testing excels in compatibility across diverse development environments, supports Java and C#, and integrates with multiple IDEs. It includes a strong automation framework and supports various application types.
Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional could enhance extension stability, unit testing tools, and simplify its complexity. Users also wish for improved resource management and Linux compatibility. OpenText Functional Testing users desire better object recognition, stability, and price reduction, alongside improved integration with more development tools and expanded browser capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud deployment, offering flexibility. Technical support is generally satisfactory, albeit reliant on community resources. OpenText Functional Testing primarily functions in on-premises and cloud environments. Its technical support is adequate, though higher responsiveness and better documentation are desired.
Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional offers flexible licensing options, considered high-priced, but justifiable by its features, enhancing developer efficiency and reducing development time. OpenText Functional Testing, despite higher license costs, is valued for its comprehensive functionality. Its pricing models cater to various needs, and the ROI is favorable for those prioritizing feature depth.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
The price is expensive.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
We have a retrospective in our auto projects that we are using frequently to get lessons learned, what went well, and what is going wrong.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Visual Studio Test Professional | 1.2% |
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 3.1% |
| Other | 95.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
