Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText UFT Developer are competing tools in application testing. Visual Studio Test Professional has the upper hand due to its pricing options and broad integration with Microsoft tools, while OpenText UFT Developer excels with robust features favored by larger enterprises.
Features: Visual Studio Test Professional integrates well with Microsoft tools like C# and .NET, offers testing features including code testing, and makes use of IntelliSense. OpenText UFT Developer supports Java and C#, aligns with various testing frameworks, and is flexible across different technologies.
Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional needs better integration with monitoring tools, stability enhancements, and improved Git handling. OpenText UFT Developer could enhance browser compatibility, improve performance speed, and reduce the scripting knowledge barrier.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer on-premises and cloud deployment. Visual Studio Test Professional provides comprehensive deployment options, while OpenText UFT Developer lacks extensive hybrid cloud support. Both have highly rated customer support, although Visual Studio Test Professional could improve its documented guidance.
Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional is more affordable, ranging from a free community edition to paid versions, providing efficiency-boosting features for notable ROI. OpenText UFT Developer is costlier with per-user licensing but delivers value primarily for large enterprises with its substantial feature set.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.
The price is expensive.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
