Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText UFT One vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

OpenText and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 10.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Microsoft’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
OpenText UFT One
Read 95 OpenText UFT One reviews
  • 7,005 Views
  • 4,400 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Read 52 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews
  • 461 Views
  • 381 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText UFT One and Visual Studio Test Professional compete in automated testing. Visual Studio Test Professional has the upper hand for its integration with Microsoft tools, accessible pricing, and diverse functionality.

Features: OpenText UFT One offers browser support, allows Excel data import, and recognizes HTML5 objects for broad environment operation without pre-compilation. Visual Studio Test Professional provides integration with .NET projects, a rich IDE, and features like IntelliSense and ReSharper.

Room for Improvement: UFT One could improve in stability, browser compatibility, and memory use, as well as enhance language support and cost structure. Visual Studio Test Professional could improve integration with modern tools, reduce memory consumption, and enhance code compatibility across updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer deployment flexibility on-premises and in the cloud. UFT One is known for responsive support, though feedback varies. Visual Studio Test Professional benefits from strong Microsoft ecosystem integration but has occasional slower support responses.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One is expensive but effective for large enterprises, offering ROI through automation capabilities. Visual Studio Test Professional is perceived as priced high by some but offers a community edition that provides a cost-effective entry point.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: February 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
February 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
OpenText UFT One enhances efficiency and productivity with automation, AI capabilities, and supports achieving up to 300% ROI.
Sentiment score
7.3
Visual Studio Test Professional boosts productivity and ROI, enhancing development speed and quality, while varying ROI across companies.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
OpenText UFT One's customer service is generally efficient but inconsistent, with varied experiences in support quality and response time.
Sentiment score
7.1
Visual Studio Test Professional's support is well-rated for responsiveness, knowledgeable staff, and helpful resources, despite navigation challenges.
After creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewerCharlesChang - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText UFT One is scalable, integrating with Jenkins, but success depends on licensing, automation quality, and deployment strategy.
Sentiment score
7.5
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly scalable, effectively supporting various team sizes and projects despite cost and infrastructure considerations.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
OpenText UFT One generally exhibits stability, though some users report performance issues, often resolved through updates. Satisfaction remains high.
Sentiment score
7.9
Visual Studio Test Professional is generally stable, with updates enhancing reliability, though occasional performance issues are reported.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText UFT One requires improvements in stability, compatibility, speed, memory use, object recognition, and integration with open-source tools.
Visual Studio Test Professional needs improved performance, integration, usability, compatibility, and support for automation and web application testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
CharlesChang - PeerSpot reviewerALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewerVaibhav Kaneria - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

OpenText UFT One licensing is costly, leading organizations to mix different license types and evaluate ROI against open-source alternatives.
Visual Studio Test Professional is costly but offers competitive value, priced at $52 monthly per user, with multi-user discounts.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
The price is expensive.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewerCharlesChang - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

OpenText UFT One provides versatile automation with cross-platform compatibility, easy use, robust testing, and integration with key technologies.
Visual Studio Test Professional excels in code testing, user interface, integration, debugging, and scalability for efficient software development.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewerCharlesChang - PeerSpot reviewerALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
95
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 10.0%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 0.6%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson - PeerSpot reviewer
With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results
With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.
Read full review
ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides extensive extensions and plugins for seamless AI product development
Our primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional is as a development tool. We develop software primarily in Python, specifically for applications related to artificial intelligence. We use frameworks like PyTorch for training models and developing applications using these models. This tool…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?
My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?
UFT still requires some coding. If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again. Additionally, customer support could be improved as they take days to ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?
The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?
The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface. Currently, I need to search online to find out how to use certain functions. This feature would save time by providing direct assi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 32% of the time
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One Logo
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 11% of the time
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 9% of the time
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One Logo
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 9% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 6% of the time
More OpenText UFT One Competitors
Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 26% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 16% of the time
TFS vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
TFS vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 12% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 12% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 11% of the time
More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One
March 2025
OpenText UFT One reportDownload OpenText UFT One product report
Buyer's Guide
Visual Studio Test Professional
March 2025
Visual Studio Test Professional reportDownload Visual Studio Test Professional product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro
No data available
 

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText
Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
February 2025
Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText UFT One vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.