I recommend developing your application to be ready for use with any web application firewall. Before full implementation, perform extensive testing to anticipate and resolve issues like false positives. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
I'm a customer. Overall, I would rate the solution seven out of ten. It's quite easy to work with, and if you have to work in a lab, with solutions like GitHub, it's quite useful. They just need to understand web development.
I rate Azure Web Application Firewall eight out of 10. It's a good option if you want a solution that's ready to go and easy for your team to learn. It's cloud-based, so you don't need to buy or maintain any hardware infrastructure. I can set up a defense in the cloud that supplements my on-premise infrastructure from Palo Alto, Fortinet, etc. You already have a platform as a service or services you can add on and configure.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Fortinet and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: November 2024.
Senior Specialist - Azure Cloud at HCL Technologies Ltd
Real User
Top 10
2022-11-16T10:50:35Z
Nov 16, 2022
We're Microsoft partners. I'd recommend the solution as it is easy to understand and easy to integrate. It's very stable and we trust it as a recognized Microsoft product. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
One should be cautious when comparing it with a third party that's more into AI and machine learning. It's important to study the solution and its governance. I rate the solution eight out of 10.
Lead Testing & Commissioning Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-12-24T07:35:25Z
Dec 24, 2020
In summary,l this is a good product, although I would recommend using FortiGate over this solution for a web application firewall. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
What is a web application firewall (WAF)? A web application firewall, or WAF, helps protect web applications by filtering and monitoring HTTP traffic between a web application and the internet.
I recommend developing your application to be ready for use with any web application firewall. Before full implementation, perform extensive testing to anticipate and resolve issues like false positives. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
We're Microsoft customers. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. I would recommend the product to others.
I'm a customer. Overall, I would rate the solution seven out of ten. It's quite easy to work with, and if you have to work in a lab, with solutions like GitHub, it's quite useful. They just need to understand web development.
I rate the overall product a seven and a half to eight out of ten.
I give Azure WAF a nine out of ten.
I rate Azure Web Application Firewall eight out of 10. It's a good option if you want a solution that's ready to go and easy for your team to learn. It's cloud-based, so you don't need to buy or maintain any hardware infrastructure. I can set up a defense in the cloud that supplements my on-premise infrastructure from Palo Alto, Fortinet, etc. You already have a platform as a service or services you can add on and configure.
We're Microsoft partners. I'd recommend the solution as it is easy to understand and easy to integrate. It's very stable and we trust it as a recognized Microsoft product. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
One should be cautious when comparing it with a third party that's more into AI and machine learning. It's important to study the solution and its governance. I rate the solution eight out of 10.
I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Azure Web Application Firewall an eight out of ten.
In summary,l this is a good product, although I would recommend using FortiGate over this solution for a web application firewall. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.